![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,318
|
Branding a new domain name - should I use 'porn' in light of new law?
I am starting a site and I want to brand the domain name for the long haul - and in light of this new law about misleading domain names etc - should incorporate the word 'porn' 'adult' 'xxx' 'sex' into the domain name to play it safe?
It obviously much easier to have an easier name to remember if it's smaller and without these terms. Your thoughts...
__________________
Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 2,578
|
As long as it's got something to do with the adult industry then it's okay, doesn't necessarily mean you need to have porn or sex in the domain name, or something sexual for that matter. Erotic is still fine, just make sure it's not mortgagequotes.com or some shit.
__________________
WickedFire.com - Stay here. We don't need more of you. Not unless you have money, then, fine... |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,318
|
any other opinions on this?
__________________
Learn SEO - make $$ residually - icq me 333485092 |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 316
|
![]() Why take a chance ? No one knows how this domain crap is going to play out. Play it safe- If the site is good, surfers will bookmark it anyway. Unless you have a great type-in name.
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Push Porn Like Weight.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Inside .NET
Posts: 10,652
|
wait a minute...a law against misleading domain names? who gets to decide what exactley constitutes being mislead? and if this is a US thing, how will they persue out of country offenders?
__________________
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Principality of Sealand
Posts: 2,033
|
Quote:
2. The name of the Corporation's initial agent for service of process in the State of California, United States of America is C T Corporation System. You're pretty much fucked if the FBI says it's a no no, no matter what offshore registrar you use.
__________________
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,245
|
this-is-a-pornsite.com
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,513
|
Quote:
I don't think they'd go after anyone unless the domain name showed an obvious attempt to deceive. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,245
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Far far away - as possible
Posts: 14,956
|
This is yet another US law... It does not concern anyone operating outside the US ... long live freedom :-)
But yea.. whitehouse.com is contentious when kids expect to see some pics of the "US leader" grinning stupidly. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,235
|
LOL LOL
Yeah, Bill Clinton and the infamous Stained dress, that is a fine representation of your leaders at work. I think I would rather have kids go to the real whitehouse.com, at least I would know what they are seeing. |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 287
|
Quote:
Relief is coming to you on 2003:05:15 just hold on! |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |