You can not have it much better than that - their beloved huff post makes them look like fools 
Them looking like fools is nothing new and daily occurrence, but HUFFtingtongpost making them look like fools is whole new story
So to put the story short:
Thinking GFY members raised the question about whether Assad chemically attacked that irrelevant village against his own interest (when Trump was not having much issue with Assad and so on).
GFY libsters and leftards mocked this question and as usually took everything that was said on MSM at face value. Thinking members were accused of being pro Putin etc etc.
And now, behold, libby beloved huffpost itself makes said morons look like fools by publishing the same view we, thinking GFY members, were raising:
Wag The Dog -- How Al Qaeda Played Donald Trump And The American Media | The Huffington Post
Gfy ad hominem libby crowd so owned by own libby huff post
Could not get better than that
Ps: if this article was written by something else, ad hominem crowd would attack the source. But it is written by their own saint huff post, they lose that "valid" argument
Them looking like fools is nothing new and daily occurrence, but HUFFtingtongpost making them look like fools is whole new story
So to put the story short:
Thinking GFY members raised the question about whether Assad chemically attacked that irrelevant village against his own interest (when Trump was not having much issue with Assad and so on).
GFY libsters and leftards mocked this question and as usually took everything that was said on MSM at face value. Thinking members were accused of being pro Putin etc etc.
And now, behold, libby beloved huffpost itself makes said morons look like fools by publishing the same view we, thinking GFY members, were raising:
The counter-narrative offered by the Russians and Syrians, however, has been minimized, mocked and ignored by both the American media and the Trump administration. So, too, has the very illogic of the premise being put forward to answer the question of why President Assad would risk everything by using chemical weapons against a target of zero military value, at a time when the strategic balance of power had shifted strongly in his favor. Likewise, why would Russia, which had invested considerable political capital in the disarmament of Syria?s chemical weapons capability after 2013, stand by idly while the Syrian air force carried out such an attack, especially when their was such a heavy Russian military presence at the base in question at the time of the attack?
Such analysis seems beyond the scope and comprehension of the American fourth estate. Instead, media outlets like CNN embrace at face value anything they are told by official American sources, including a particularly preposterous insinuation that Russia actually colluded in the chemical weapons attack; the aforementioned presence of Russian officers at Al Shayrat air base has been cited as evidence that Russia had to have known about Syria?s chemical warfare capability, and yet did nothing to prevent the attack.
To sustain this illogic, the American public and decision-makers make use of a sophisticated propaganda campaign involving video images and narratives provided by forces opposed to the regime of Bashar al-Assad
Such analysis seems beyond the scope and comprehension of the American fourth estate. Instead, media outlets like CNN embrace at face value anything they are told by official American sources, including a particularly preposterous insinuation that Russia actually colluded in the chemical weapons attack; the aforementioned presence of Russian officers at Al Shayrat air base has been cited as evidence that Russia had to have known about Syria?s chemical warfare capability, and yet did nothing to prevent the attack.
To sustain this illogic, the American public and decision-makers make use of a sophisticated propaganda campaign involving video images and narratives provided by forces opposed to the regime of Bashar al-Assad
Gfy ad hominem libby crowd so owned by own libby huff post
Could not get better than that
Ps: if this article was written by something else, ad hominem crowd would attack the source. But it is written by their own saint huff post, they lose that "valid" argument
Comment