For anyone running a SendSafe Unlimited - Want Virgin Proxies?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • notjoe
    Confirmed User
    • May 2002
    • 5599

    #1

    For anyone running a SendSafe Unlimited - Want Virgin Proxies?

    I got a new service which i am offering to you guys..

    You overwrite your client.php with our client.php and your copy of SendSafe will use my proxy server list.

    DEAD Proxy servers are constantly being removed from the database in real time. We also check these dead servers once in a while incase they happen to come back to life.

    NEW proxy servers are constantly being added to the list. All proxy servers are verified VIRGIN proxy servers. 100's of new virgin servers are added daily!

    Anyone interested in running a demo of this, free of charge drop me a line and i will set you up.
  • ronbotx
    Registered User
    • Jan 2002
    • 1634

    #2
    Hmmm... Flag SPAM for deletion using multiple filters DNSRBL(SPEWS, SPAMHAUS, CHINA...Etc) and Regex( keyword(s), spam blurbage). This is a FREE product that moves the turdlets from your inbox and puts them in a seperate folder for easy flushing...

    NO SPAM

    Comment

    • bd_po
      Confirmed User
      • Jun 2002
      • 208

      #3
      Originally posted by notjoe
      I got a new service which i am offering to you guys..

      You overwrite your client.php with our client.php and your copy of SendSafe will use my proxy server list.

      DEAD Proxy servers are constantly being removed from the database in real time. We also check these dead servers once in a while incase they happen to come back to life.

      NEW proxy servers are constantly being added to the list. All proxy servers are verified VIRGIN proxy servers. 100's of new virgin servers are added daily!

      Anyone interested in running a demo of this, free of charge drop me a line and i will set you up.
      are you proxies really clean?
      in for example 7-8 dlack lists?

      Comment

      • notjoe
        Confirmed User
        • May 2002
        • 5599

        #4
        Originally posted by bd_po


        are you proxies really clean?
        in for example 7-8 dlack lists?
        Absolutely, why do you think i offer a try-before-you-buy service!

        Comment

        • bd_po
          Confirmed User
          • Jun 2002
          • 208

          #5
          Originally posted by notjoe


          Absolutely, why do you think i offer a try-before-you-buy service!
          could you please place right here 15 socks?
          i will check it - it will place right here results

          Comment

          • notjoe
            Confirmed User
            • May 2002
            • 5599

            #6
            Originally posted by bd_po


            could you please place right here 15 socks?
            i will check it - it will place right here results
            I do not actually sell the list.. I make your SS client connect to my server and obtain the Proxy servers it requires to work.

            Comment

            • bd_po
              Confirmed User
              • Jun 2002
              • 208

              #7
              Originally posted by notjoe


              I do not actually sell the list.. I make your SS client connect to my server and obtain the Proxy servers it requires to work.
              you said that your socks are clean
              so please give me 15 - i will check it

              Comment

              • notjoe
                Confirmed User
                • May 2002
                • 5599

                #8
                Originally posted by bd_po


                you said that your socks are clean
                so please give me 15 - i will check it
                | uin | ip | port | active |
                +------+-----------------+------+--------+
                | 3282 | 61.177.254.95 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3281 | 61.177.254.98 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3280 | 4.46.201.22 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3279 | 81.203.32.200 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3278 | 61.177.253.223 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3277 | 61.177.253.243 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3276 | 217.127.250.212 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3274 | 80.180.129.233 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3273 | 61.177.253.15 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3272 | 81.203.27.253 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3271 | 66.74.24.252 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3270 | 68.145.33.46 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3269 | 80.180.128.62 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3268 | 80.180.128.2 | 6588 | 1 |
                | 3267 | 81.203.25.74 | 6588 | 1 |

                Comment

                • bd_po
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jun 2002
                  • 208

                  #9
                  Originally posted by notjoe


                  could you please send it in format ip:port?

                  Comment

                  • notjoe
                    Confirmed User
                    • May 2002
                    • 5599

                    #10
                    Originally posted by bd_po

                    could you please send it in format ip:port?
                    Dont be so lazy

                    Comment

                    • High Quality
                      Confirmed User
                      • Feb 2002
                      • 5741

                      #11
                      Looks good joe.


                      RecurCash.com - Averaging $38/sale with 60% revshare in the first 4 months alone!

                      Convert your TEEN traffic today @ better than 1:500 guaranteed. ICQ me: 18287590!

                      Comment

                      • bd_po
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jun 2002
                        • 208

                        #12
                        Originally posted by notjoe


                        | uin | ip | port | active |
                        +------+-----------------+------+--------+
                        | 3282 | 61.177.254.95 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3281 | 61.177.254.98 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3280 | 4.46.201.22 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3279 | 81.203.32.200 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3278 | 61.177.253.223 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3277 | 61.177.253.243 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3276 | 217.127.250.212 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3274 | 80.180.129.233 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3273 | 61.177.253.15 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3272 | 81.203.27.253 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3271 | 66.74.24.252 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3270 | 68.145.33.46 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3269 | 80.180.128.62 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3268 | 80.180.128.2 | 6588 | 1 |
                        | 3267 | 81.203.25.74 | 6588 | 1 |
                        very poor
                        only 3 real clean
                        here is full report

                        hahahaha= LOG STARTED AT Sun Apr 13 12:17:30 2003 hahahaha=
                        Sun 12:18:25 Loaded 15 unique proxies
                        Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 66.74.24.252 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [rr.com.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                        Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 80.180.129.233 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [interbusiness.it.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                        Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 4.46.201.22 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [genuity.net.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                        Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 80.180.128.62 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [interbusiness.it.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                        Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 68.145.33.46 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [shawcable.net.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                        Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 80.180.128.2 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [interbusiness.it.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                        Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 61.177.253.15 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [spam.jsinfo.net.china.spam.exception.dialup.blackh oles.five-ten-sg.com]
                        Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 61.177.254.98 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [spam.jsinfo.net.china.spam.exception.dialup.blackh oles.five-ten-sg.com]
                        Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 61.177.253.223 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [spam.jsinfo.net.china.spam.exception.dialup.blackh oles.five-ten-sg.com]
                        Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 61.177.254.95 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [spam.jsinfo.net.china.spam.exception.dialup.blackh oles.five-ten-sg.com]
                        Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 61.177.253.243 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [spam.jsinfo.net.china.spam.exception.dialup.blackh oles.five-ten-sg.com]

                        Sun 12:19:24 <http 217.127.250.212 port 6588>: HTTP proxy OK
                        Sun 12:19:24 <http 81.203.27.253 port 6588>: HTTP proxy OK
                        Sun 12:19:25 <http 81.203.32.200 port 6588>: HTTP proxy OK
                        Sun 12:19:31 DONE: proxy check, 3 online proxies saved to

                        from 15 socks only 3 clean - not good

                        Comment

                        • vending_machine
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jun 2002
                          • 1070

                          #13
                          Originally posted by ronbotx
                          Hmmm... Flag SPAM for deletion using multiple filters DNSRBL(SPEWS, SPAMHAUS, CHINA...Etc) and Regex( keyword(s), spam blurbage). This is a FREE product that moves the turdlets from your inbox and puts them in a seperate folder for easy flushing...

                          NO SPAM

                          I hate SPAM more than anyone else, but SPEWS is the most worthless organization out there.

                          I feel better now!

                          Comment

                          • ronbotx
                            Registered User
                            • Jan 2002
                            • 1634

                            #14
                            Originally posted by vending_machine


                            I hate SPAM more than anyone else, but SPEWS is the most worthless organization out there.

                            I feel better now!
                            I don't agree with you about SPEWS, but the nice thing about SPAMPAL is you can individually select the blocklists you wish to use AND after that apply other filters like Baysian and Regex on top of that. SPEWS does not block individual SPAMMERS but targets the ISPs and hosts that ignore SPAM complaints. More and more ISPs are using their list.

                            It looks like many of notjoes "virgin" proxies have already been popped.

                            Comment

                            • bd_po
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jun 2002
                              • 208

                              #15
                              Originally posted by ronbotx


                              I don't agree with you about SPEWS, but the nice thing about SPAMPAL is you can individually select the blocklists you wish to use AND after that apply other filters like Baysian and Regex on top of that. SPEWS does not block individual SPAMMERS but targets the ISPs and hosts that ignore SPAM complaints. More and more ISPs are using their list.

                              It looks like many of notjoes "virgin" proxies have already been popped.

                              most powerfull black lists are

                              "relays.ordb.org",
                              "relays.osirusoft.com",
                              "relays.dorkslayers.com",
                              "spam.dnsrbl.net",
                              "blackholes.five-ten-sg.com",
                              "dun.dnsrbl.net",
                              "dews.qmail.org",
                              "bl.spamcop.net",
                              "opm.blitzed.org",
                              "list.dsbl.org",
                              "multihop.dsbl.org",
                              "sbl.spamhaus.org",

                              Comment

                              • notjoe
                                Confirmed User
                                • May 2002
                                • 5599

                                #16
                                Originally posted by bd_po


                                very poor
                                only 3 real clean
                                here is full report

                                hahahaha= LOG STARTED AT Sun Apr 13 12:17:30 2003 hahahaha=
                                Sun 12:18:25 Loaded 15 unique proxies
                                Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 66.74.24.252 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [rr.com.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                                Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 80.180.129.233 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [interbusiness.it.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                                Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 4.46.201.22 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [genuity.net.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                                Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 80.180.128.62 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [interbusiness.it.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                                Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 68.145.33.46 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [shawcable.net.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                                Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 80.180.128.2 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [interbusiness.it.dialup.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com]
                                Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 61.177.253.15 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [spam.jsinfo.net.china.spam.exception.dialup.blackh oles.five-ten-sg.com]
                                Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 61.177.254.98 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [spam.jsinfo.net.china.spam.exception.dialup.blackh oles.five-ten-sg.com]
                                Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 61.177.253.223 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [spam.jsinfo.net.china.spam.exception.dialup.blackh oles.five-ten-sg.com]
                                Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 61.177.254.95 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [spam.jsinfo.net.china.spam.exception.dialup.blackh oles.five-ten-sg.com]
                                Sun 12:19:01 <(unknown) 61.177.253.243 port 6588>: BLOCK by blackholes.five-ten-sg.com [spam.jsinfo.net.china.spam.exception.dialup.blackh oles.five-ten-sg.com]

                                Sun 12:19:24 <http 217.127.250.212 port 6588>: HTTP proxy OK
                                Sun 12:19:24 <http 81.203.27.253 port 6588>: HTTP proxy OK
                                Sun 12:19:25 <http 81.203.32.200 port 6588>: HTTP proxy OK
                                Sun 12:19:31 DONE: proxy check, 3 online proxies saved to

                                from 15 socks only 3 clean - not good

                                You're the one who wanted me to post them on here.. you dont think anyone started to spam from those as soon as i posted them? get a fucking grip. They got abused because they got posted. Want another 15? ICQ me

                                Comment

                                • notjoe
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • May 2002
                                  • 5599

                                  #17
                                  [13:36] <pscan639> Proxy Successfully Uploaded on 81.203.162.127
                                  [13:37] <prxscan99> 80.28.5.90 = Vulnerable, Uploading Proxy.
                                  [13:37] <prxscan46> 62.251.142.133 = Vulnerable, Uploading Proxy.
                                  [13:37] <prxscan68> 80.180.201.184 = Vulnerable, Uploading Proxy.
                                  [13:37] <pscan857> Proxy Successfully Uploaded on 218.6.144.75
                                  [13:37] <pscan704> 213.10.120.126 = Vulnerable, Uploading Proxy.
                                  [13:38] <prxscan99> 80.28.7.222 = Vulnerable, Uploading Proxy.
                                  [13:38] <pscan704> Proxy Successfully Uploaded on 213.10.120.126
                                  [13:38] <prxscan68> Proxy Successfully Uploaded on 80.180.201.184
                                  [13:39] <prxscan46> 62.251.143.243 = Vulnerable, Uploading Proxy.
                                  [13:39] <prxscan46> 62.251.142.130 = Vulnerable, Uploading Proxy.

                                  There are some more, no more freebies!

                                  I come across some wicked shit sometimes

                                  Comment

                                  • mule
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Jan 2002
                                    • 6085

                                    #18
                                    LOL, how many proxies per day do you spammers kill?
                                    Converting like a mofo

                                    Comment

                                    • Backov
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Mar 2001
                                      • 1600

                                      #19
                                      PROOF that SPEWS does its job:

                                      Every spammer I've ever met FUCKING HATES THEM.
                                      <embed src="http://banners.spotbrokers.com/button.swf" FlashVars="clickURL=http://banners.spotbrokers.com" quality=high pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="120" height="60"></embed>

                                      Comment

                                      • ronbotx
                                        Registered User
                                        • Jan 2002
                                        • 1634

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Backov
                                        PROOF that SPEWS does its job:

                                        Every spammer I've ever met FUCKING HATES THEM.
                                        Hehe. Good point. The main complaint against SPEWS is that they start with small block of IPs and increase it as the service provider continues to ignore the SPAM complaints. The result is that other users with the address space are effected as well. The theory is that the legit customers will pressure host to boot the SPAMMERS. The technique is simple and appears to work. Many hosts listwash for their pet spammers or change their IPs around. If they continue to ignore the complaints, their entire address space as well as some from their upstream provider , gets included in the block. When the host and many of their legit customers are all blocked, SPAMMY finally needs to find a new home.

                                        Comment

                                        • bd_po
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Jun 2002
                                          • 208

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by notjoe



                                          You're the one who wanted me to post them on here.. you dont think anyone started to spam from those as soon as i posted them? get a fucking grip. They got abused because they got posted. Want another 15? ICQ me
                                          you sell black-listed sock

                                          Comment

                                          • notjoe
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • May 2002
                                            • 5599

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by bd_po


                                            you sell black-listed sock
                                            Sure i do, we will see soon enough when i hook some peeps up with a demo of it and they post their feedback.

                                            You're the idiot who asked for the IPS to be made public and expected no one to use them as soon as they saw them.. DUH.

                                            Comment

                                            • bd_po
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Jun 2002
                                              • 208

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by notjoe


                                              Sure i do, we will see soon enough when i hook some peeps up with a demo of it and they post their feedback.

                                              You're the idiot who asked for the IPS to be made public and expected no one to use them as soon as they saw them.. DUH.
                                              only one idiot is here - you
                                              i asked you give me only 15 socks to check it
                                              you show that all your socks are shit, getted from sites where ppl shared their 100 years old lists

                                              Comment

                                              • ronbotx
                                                Registered User
                                                • Jan 2002
                                                • 1634

                                                #24
                                                I would never expect the "truth" from a spammer ......

                                                Comment

                                                • bd_po
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Jun 2002
                                                  • 208

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by ronbotx
                                                  I would never expect the "truth" from a spammer ......
                                                  i too from shit-seller

                                                  Comment

                                                  • notjoe
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • May 2002
                                                    • 5599

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by ronbotx
                                                    I would never expect the "truth" from a spammer ......
                                                    Since the other guy is an idiot and doesnt make much sense i'll make you an offer and you can come back here and post about it all..

                                                    if you're interested hit me up on ICQ at 5956902.. wont cost you a dime.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • mule
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Jan 2002
                                                      • 6085

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by notjoe


                                                      Since the other guy is an idiot and doesnt make much sense i'll make you an offer and you can come back here and post about it all..

                                                      if you're interested hit me up on ICQ at 5956902.. wont cost you a dime.
                                                      Has there been a big crack-down on spam or something? How come all you spammers are so desperate lately?
                                                      Converting like a mofo

                                                      Comment

                                                      • notjoe
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • May 2002
                                                        • 5599

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by mule

                                                        Has there been a big crack-down on spam or something? How come all you spammers are so desperate lately?
                                                        Its not that im desperate for $ but if i can make more by providing something that someone needs then why not?

                                                        Comment

                                                        • american pervert
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Sep 2002
                                                          • 6840

                                                          #29
                                                          I got lists for sale
                                                          tony at americanpervert dot com
                                                          I can resist everything except temptation

                                                          Comment

                                                          Working...