Holy shit, what the fuck is that ? - GoFuckYourself.com

DarkJedi · 04-11-2003, 08:11 AM

http://www.childsupermodels.com/

04-11-2003, 08:11 AM

Gutterboy · 04-11-2003, 08:14 AM

wow, didn't realize there were so many of those sites still in operation

angeleyes · 04-11-2003, 08:14 AM

04-11-2003, 08:15 AM

the pedophile's best friend

Jakke PNG · 04-11-2003, 08:16 AM

..and I thought that I was scum...

Cassie · 04-11-2003, 08:16 AM

to those who keep this site online.....sickos! may they come down with the worst for of SARS there is.

04-11-2003, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather
..and I thought that I was scum...

I swear I saw your banner of there...!

DarkJedi · 04-11-2003, 08:18 AM

damn, what kind of parents would let their kids model for this ?

04-11-2003, 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Equinox

I swear I saw your banner of there...!

... you sexy girl.

nofx · 04-11-2003, 08:20 AM

asacp...

- Jesus Christ - · 04-11-2003, 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
damn, what kind of parents would let their kids model for this ?

The Ramseys

http://reversespeech.com/ramsey.shtml

The second one is some haunting shit.

Jakke PNG · 04-11-2003, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by nofx
asacp...

Dunno if they can do anything about this. Maybe now that the new laws have passed (?) they have more power over this crap?

fnet · 04-11-2003, 08:36 AM

Disturbing stuff. What's the legality on this?

half of these domains are similar, i.e.

www.[a_girl's_name]-model.com

have the same button templates,

and the credit cards payment page source link shows their "secure server":

https://secure1.webeweb.net/blahblahblah

Joan · 04-11-2003, 11:31 AM

Although people with these types of sites could not become ASACP members, it is not illegal.

ASACP addressed this topic in a PR last month. A short segment is below, you can read the complete PR at
http://www.asacp.org/press/press0203a.html

Confusion Exists: ?What Is Child Pornography??

...When it comes to child pornography, it is always best to err on the side of caution. It may be legal, but you are asking for scrutiny by the government.

...Why isn't a picture of a naked seven-year-old child considered child pornography and why doesn't ASACP report this to the F.B.I.?

...Under the current Child Pornography Laws nudity does not always equal child pornography. If a child is nude, partially nude or fully clothed is not the determining factor; what the child is doing and/or having done to him/her is. If the image is lewd, sexual in nature or the picture focuses on the genitals, then chances are - it is child pornography.

Please help support the ASACP Mission by becoming an Approved Member![B][SIZE=3][COLOR=purple]

Damian_Maxcash · 04-11-2003, 11:52 AM

Are they all US sites?..... there must besome abuse issue

Surely a social worker or similar is allowed some "personal judgement" in a case like this....

Can it realy be a case of "we all know it is CP" but because they are bending some laws and not breaking them we can do nothing?

Its similar to "how hard can you smack a child before it become a beating?".... the social worker has to make a judgement call...

If not, I vote we just round and break the parents legs!

04-11-2003, 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
http://www.childsupermodels.com/

I cant beleive that poeple can actually use inncent kids like that.. Fucken pisses me off. TABERNAC!!!

For me porn is for mature and consent people.

Thats what they deserve!!!

Scootermuze · 04-11-2003, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by TeenGodFather

Maybe now that the new laws have passed (?) they have more power over this crap?

Or.. it may be that you'll see more and more of these type of sites popping up because now the new bill has included specifics.. so all anyone needs to do is not satisfy any of the items within the bill and they are legal.

Plat · 04-11-2003, 12:00 PM

mailto:[email protected]

picindex · 04-11-2003, 12:01 PM

Didnt the government just shut down some of these sites?

I'll search for the link

Funbrunette · 04-11-2003, 12:01 PM

That's WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!

WolfPack · 04-11-2003, 12:02 PM

I really hope those mother fuckers die

RedShoe · 04-11-2003, 12:27 PM

be sure you see their parents head completely in fron of the shot gun before firing.

Martin · 04-11-2003, 12:45 PM

Dooh

Rand · 04-11-2003, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joan
[B]Although people with these types of sites could not become ASACP members, it is not illegal.

...Under the current Child Pornography Laws nudity does not always equal child pornography. If a child is nude, partially nude or fully clothed is not the determining factor; what the child is doing and/or having done to him/her is. If the image is lewd, sexual in nature or the picture focuses on the genitals, then chances are - it is child pornography.

Please help support the ASACP Mission by becoming an Approved Member![SIZE=3][COLOR=purple]

Joan is quite correct in this statement.

However, I'm very glad to see so many posts against this type of content. Epoch does not and will not process for these types of sites.

We can all do our part to support the efforts against CP by becoming members of ASACP. It's the right thing to do.

UnseenWorld · 04-11-2003, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joan
[B]...Under the current Child Pornography Laws nudity does not always equal child pornography. If a child is nude, partially nude or fully clothed is not the determining factor; what the child is doing and/or having done to him/her is. If the image is lewd, sexual in nature or the picture focuses on the genitals, then chances are - it is child pornography.

Please help support the ASACP Mission by becoming an Approved Member![SIZE=3][COLOR=purple]

I would hope that mere nudity never becomes the standard. Classical paintings and sculpture, fine photography, etc., have long featured nude children and cherubs.

The equation of nudity with pornography is part of the sexual schizophrenia of our society. Out of one side of its mouth, our culture espouses the idea that the body is beauiful; out of the other it seems to say that there is something wrong with observing this beauty.

If the goal is to deny pedophiles any images they might appreciate, stop a minute and remember that J-Lo and Brittany Spears and Cindy Crawford are all still sexually attractive with their clothes on. To reach that goal, you'd have to eliminate ALL images of children which is just insane.

As Bertrand Russell observed (I have to paraphrase, not having the original quote with me, but this is close enough): "If you forbade anyone to look at trains, and a committee cut images of trains out of books and magazines, and shrouded paintings of trains, would this decrease people's interest in trains? No, it would have the opposite effect: It would create a morbid curiosity about trains."

Just look at the effect that attempting to prevent teens from having cigarettes has had. All teens have recognized the wisdom of not smoking, right?

Right...

foreverjason · 04-11-2003, 04:03 PM

wtf..

Rand · 04-11-2003, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by UnseenWorld

I would hope that mere nudity never becomes the standard. Classical paintings and sculpture, fine photography, etc., have long featured nude children and cherubs.

The equation of nudity with pornography is part of the sexual schizophrenia of our society. Out of one side of its mouth, our culture espouses the idea that the body is beauiful; out of the other it seems to say that there is something wrong with observing this beauty.

If the goal is to deny pedophiles any images they might appreciate, stop a minute and remember that J-Lo and Brittany Spears and Cindy Crawford are all still sexually attractive with their clothes on. To reach that goal, you'd have to eliminate ALL images of children which is just insane.

As Bertrand Russell observed (I have to paraphrase, not having the original quote with me, but this is close enough): "If you forbade anyone to look at trains, and a committee cut images of trains out of books and magazines, and shrouded paintings of trains, would this decrease people's interest in trains? No, it would have the opposite effect: It would create a morbid curiosity about trains."

Just look at the effect that attempting to prevent teens from having cigarettes has had. All teens have recognized the wisdom of not smoking, right?

Right...

Yes. Well said.

It's good to remember this to avoid the slippery slope of censorship and to maintain the objectives of fighting the real crimes.

That being said, (and this is striclty my own opinion) I still think those kiddie modeling sites are just wrong. They have obviously, it seems to me, taken their cues from the adult industry and exploitation is still exploitation wether it is pornographic or not.

My

KRL · 04-11-2003, 05:44 PM

That's child porn??? I didn't click the links but it looks like the same type of girls you see modeling bathing suits and shorts in a department store catalogue.

If that qualifies as child porn every retailer in America has child porn in their catalogues.

04-11-2003, 08:11 AM	#1
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	Holy shit, what the fuck is that ? http://www.childsupermodels.com/

04-11-2003, 08:14 AM	#4
angeleyes Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Wandering around FL using random Wireless Connections Posts: 3,584	__________________ Need a Writer? Contact Me. I write quality descriptions, short erotic stories, quality one-liners.. whatever you need.

04-11-2003, 08:16 AM	#6
Jakke PNG ex-TeenGodFather Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Suomi Finland Perkele Posts: 20,306	..and I thought that I was scum... __________________ ..and I'm off.

04-11-2003, 08:16 AM	#7
Cassie Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: NJ Posts: 3,139	to those who keep this site online.....sickos! may they come down with the worst for of SARS there is. __________________ ICQ: 309756847 ]

04-11-2003, 08:20 AM	#11
nofx Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Virgin Mary's womb Posts: 16,826	asacp... __________________ Often times I wonder why There's love and hate, theres live or die. When sickness comes I must decide: When feelings go, theres suicide.

04-11-2003, 08:14 AM	#3
Gutterboy So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Dis Posts: 4,751	wow, didn't realize there were so many of those sites still in operation

04-11-2003, 08:15 AM	#5
X37375787 Guest Posts: n/a	the pedophile's best friend

04-11-2003, 08:18 AM	#9
DarkJedi No Refunds Issued. Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: GFY Posts: 28,300	damn, what kind of parents would let their kids model for this ?

04-11-2003, 08:36 AM	#14
fnet Confirmed User Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 1,721	Disturbing stuff. What's the legality on this? half of these domains are similar, i.e. www.[a_girl's_name]-model.com have the same button templates, and the credit cards payment page source link shows their "secure server": https://secure1.webeweb.net/blahblahblah __________________ the sound of one hand googlewhacking

04-11-2003, 11:31 AM	#15
Joan Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: LA Posts: 191	Although people with these types of sites could not become ASACP members, it is not illegal. ASACP addressed this topic in a PR last month. A short segment is below, you can read the complete PR at http://www.asacp.org/press/press0203a.html Confusion Exists: ?What Is Child Pornography?? ...When it comes to child pornography, it is always best to err on the side of caution. It may be legal, but you are asking for scrutiny by the government. ...Why isn't a picture of a naked seven-year-old child considered child pornography and why doesn't ASACP report this to the F.B.I.? ...Under the current Child Pornography Laws nudity does not always equal child pornography. If a child is nude, partially nude or fully clothed is not the determining factor; what the child is doing and/or having done to him/her is. If the image is lewd, sexual in nature or the picture focuses on the genitals, then chances are - it is child pornography. Please help support the ASACP Mission by becoming an Approved Member![B][SIZE=3][COLOR=purple] __________________ ASACP - Protecting Your Business By Protecting Children

04-11-2003, 11:52 AM	#16
Damian_Maxcash So Fucking Banned Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: MaxCash.com Posts: 12,745	Are they all US sites?..... there must besome abuse issue Surely a social worker or similar is allowed some "personal judgement" in a case like this.... Can it realy be a case of "we all know it is CP" but because they are bending some laws and not breaking them we can do nothing? Its similar to "how hard can you smack a child before it become a beating?".... the social worker has to make a judgement call... If not, I vote we just round and break the parents legs!

04-11-2003, 12:00 PM	#19
Plat Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Clearwater, Florida Posts: 2,680	mailto:[email protected] __________________ Im fuckin retired

04-11-2003, 12:01 PM	#20
picindex Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 1,038	Didnt the government just shut down some of these sites? I'll search for the link __________________ Good Content:

04-11-2003, 12:01 PM	#21
Funbrunette Confirmed User Join Date: May 2002 Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 4,834	That's WRONG!!!!!!!!!!! __________________ Stephanie (Funbrunette) [email protected] ICQ: 155-713-409

04-11-2003, 12:02 PM	#22
WolfPack Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 39	I really hope those mother fuckers die

04-11-2003, 12:27 PM	#23
RedShoe 赤い靴 call me 202-456-1111 Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: The Valley Posts: 14,831	be sure you see their parents head completely in fron of the shot gun before firing. __________________ SPECIALTY COSTUMES • PROPS • FX Superheroes • Monsters • Robots PM for details For any manufacturing needs. Adult or otherwise. aka BonsHigh on Insta Bonsai weed plants

04-11-2003, 12:45 PM	#24
Martin "Assassins" Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: At home Posts: 17,277	Dooh __________________

04-11-2003, 04:03 PM	#27
foreverjason Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,452	wtf..

04-11-2003, 05:44 PM	#29
KRL Entrepreneur Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA Posts: 31,429	That's child porn??? I didn't click the links but it looks like the same type of girls you see modeling bathing suits and shorts in a department store catalogue. If that qualifies as child porn every retailer in America has child porn in their catalogues. __________________ If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION! * * * * * * * * * * * * Domains Adult News KRL's Newsletter Biz Tips Just Listed Domains