God bless England

you like your facts huh

Unlike the liberal PC mob who are racist.

someone should tell the bbc, those cunts are showing a programme at the moment telling us that our history is a lie and that we are all scum, ect, and of cause presented by some foreigner.

bullshit LOL if the brits were against slavery why did they not leave the colonies they exploited the shit out of and go home instead of starving 80.000.000 people to death just in india?

what a load of bullshit with the "england giving 5% of its GDP to free slaves" nigga, they did not want the competition getting cheap labor and undercutting the british colonies slave work profits...like the brits gave a shit about slaves

for every living british person today more than 1 indian was starved to death because they ordered them to grow opium and not rice...this is how much the brits cared about others...

fake news OP

David Cameron's ancestors profited from salves

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...wning-ancestor

No one ever talks about the 110 Million Blacks that were killed by Muslim slave raids in Africa ...

so do i read that correct?
you are ALL against slavery but you agree with trump who want to make america first and the world his slaves ?

tell me the difference between that.

greetings
thommy

Trump is a nationalist, unlike the globalists he want the low-level wageslave jobs back in the US rather than the third world. The Chinese people enjoyed their jobs so much that nets were put up under the building windows to make it more difficult for them to commit suicide

It's the opposite of Trump's policies. He wants to take away jobs from the Third World and give them back to the US. He wants to stop Third world workers without visas coming into America to undercut American workers.

He wants to put America and Americans first and let the Third World look after itself. Why is that bad? For Americans. We know why it's bad for countries like Thailand. But that's not his problem.

How many Chinese-owned businesses are in Thailand?

Why you never shoot any black girls Paul?

What kind of white nationalist are you a supremacist or separatist?

Or the Irish indentured servants forced to come to the new world then having their "contracts" extended indefinitely.

bahahahaha

Less than owned by the US - I believe China is fourth after the US, Japan and Singapore in investments in Thailand - but then China is pretty smart and will increase that in the future. Which kind of begs the question of what is your point?? The US has huge investments there that won't be going anywhere - it's the gateway to a billiion people in Asia that no US company is going to give up

Yeah, I know, I kinda require facts before arriving at opinions.

Feelings can only go so far

I started focusing on facts solely after being told the message in the picture below several times

Wow, I didn't know his ancestors sold OINTMENTS.

Yes, made from the blood and tissue of the slaves once the slaves got too old

It's been claimed the Irish saved Western civilization you know.

what do you mean BACK ???

the unemplyment rate of USA is far under the most modern countries in the world. in fact less than 5% is called FULLEMPLOYMENT !!!! an unemployment rate 0% has never exist anywhere in the world. not even in the communist countries.

so what is he talking about ??? what jobs - carpet carpets ? work in the rice fields? taxi drivers or what?

greetings
thommy

but do you think this companies wuld went to thailnd if they can produce in US on the same price?

i live in thailand the most time of the year and i see what prosperity means. it does not mean to make a lot of money - it means that you can buy a lot for the money you make.

so even if the income in US increase 100% it will not give you any better life if the prices will double up too.

correct - and btw - if you know how that is handled usually in asia - sure this companies do pay tax here but AFTER reducing their costs. one part of the costs is going back to US for so called "namelicences". that means that us have incomming money from this markets and not little.
also the technology these companies are using here comes from US. and the technology from the german companies comes from Germany and it is PAID WITH MONEY from the ASEAN market.
sure the buying power in asi ist not similar to the 35.000 dollar per head of each of the 350 americans but asia have 4,4 billion citizens and even when each one have a tenth of the american buying power the market volume is much higher as in USA.

trump is on the best way to lose all that and force the rest of the world to get nearer to each other to fill out this hole. but who will get hurt at the end?

for me he is not in the near of a good economist - he might be good as a corruptionist.

greetings
thommy

since the opening video mentioned simcoe and the act to limit slavery in upper ca, a little heritage moment to supplement the narrative

Stupid.

I have shot a few in my time. The problem was they're a hard sell in the US and thin on the ground here in Czech. The black girls I shot were in the UK.

My point is the pace at which China is growing and already starting to flex its military muscle.

And the money being invested in giving away American jobs that you so rightly point out.

The drop in US manufacturing and wage levels proves what I'm saying.

So if the top 10% get richer and the rest get poorer. That's good in your opinion?

The problem is the democratic system. When so many get poorer they start to vote for people who will change things. This is happening all over the US and EU. People are sick of excessive borrowing, losing jobs, companies, taxes, GDP, to the Third World because it makes only the top 10% richer.

Saying it's good because some of the money comes back to the West is ignoring the fact that it doesn't replace the money lost and the fact that the Third World is now doing the inventing itself.

that is a VERY OTHER Topic - and NO it is not good in my opinion.
but only money what is earnt can go into workers hands.

if you see the world economy same as a business you have to know that there can not be income from the own country. that would be the same as you are a business ower open the cash, take money out and buy in your own shop.

that have nothing to do with worls economy and money circle.

AND the new "so called president" is already in bed with exactly this people you talk about and he is not willing to accept the US constitution. he want that everything goes as he wants - and not only I call that a DICTATOR.

that makes sense what you say - but the problem is not the democrathy itself - the problem is that voters are usually not informed enough and not smart enough to understand markets, connections and reasons.

that´s why it is so easy to teach them to vote against their own interests, bacsue you just have to give them an enemy and than things seem to be easy enough that even a halfbrainer thinks that he understands.

paul: the very FIRST thing you have to understand is WHAT MONEY IS. Money is the equivalent or bargain for completed performance.
that means: one performace for the other in kind of xchange rate.

if a country have that much dept as US it means that they have spend money already for performances what haven´t be made.

In other words, the country has laid its own conditions for decades and created artificial prosperity at the expense of its own children. And now they want that back from other countries what haven´t created that issue.

Without cheap foreign labours Americ acan not survive because things would be MUCH more expensive as they are now - that would lead to less consumption and leass consumption leads to less work.

And what was mentioned here was also another CORRECT issue, because we spoke about US companies what are producing in Thailand FOR the ASEAN market. Make wins there and a part of this wins floods back to US. If they would think here the same as cramp does, they would not even allow it, because that good are produced IN the asean market FOR the asean market and US companies make profits wich are partial directed to USA.

and not only that. these companies are producing in Thailand with high tech imported from USA what keeps even more jobs in USA alive.

we can discuss that as long as you want - if trump not change his mind and listens to the real wize and expirienced economists in the world USA will have in 2 years a MUCH bigger crisis as the one from 2007 what is still effecting tha markets after 10 years.
the next crisis will make US completely bankrupt, because there is no one in the world who will help. all the countreis what could help than are already in own treade exchanges and used to survive without USA. they will not pay money for buying a disease.


greetings
thommy

you better should inform yourself to WHO this wage levels appear.

the biggest part of this low wage level average appeas to FOREIGN WORKERS in USA.

sure you can replace a taxi driver from pakistan with a US driver when you pay him 6000 dollar per month. but WHO can afford to drive taxi then ?

and yes there are MANY of them in this low paid jobs because no american will work for this money but want to buy this goods CHEAP.

have you ever reseached what kind of people are working in this jobs ?

do you know how this is called ? SLAVERY !!!! and this slavery is the one and only chance that americans are still able to live a good live with all they need.
without it they will have a 30.000 dollar job what makes them able to buy a bycicle instead of a new car.

you do really not understand what prosperity means.
prosperity means that ONE IS FIRST and the other one is underpaid.
so what trump wants is slavery and share the profits with his mafia and give a few % of it to the american people to keep them quiete.

greetings
thommy

Wilberforce and others really changed history. Thanks, England!

Everything depends on where the workers are, their wages and location of the company in terms of their taxes.

Once you start a post with a something that's so blatantly wrong. I will stop reading.

Not the guy who used to drive a taxi.

Foreign workers are imported to keep wages lower. Your point, once again, is rubbish.

Would you guys agree that, on the whole, English/UK cultural/political contributions have been a NET PLUS for humanity?

well look at it this way...before the brits inidia had 25% of the global GDP...after the brits it had 2%...its not that the brits used the money to contribute to anything other than their own personal wealth...

its like asking did pablo escobar contribute to the colombian economy?...

I do for sure, I shoot straight up Shaniqua's from the heart of the ghetto all the time