Mattis warns North Korea of 'overwhelming' response to nuclear use

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paul Markham
    Too old to care
    • Jun 2001
    • 52942

    #1

    Mattis warns North Korea of 'overwhelming' response to nuclear use

    Mattis warns North Korea of 'overwhelming' response to nuclear use

    After decades of appeasing N.K. while N.K. resolutely improved its military capabilities. The US is drawing a line.

    Doing nothing hasn't made the world safer, it's made it more dangerous. China is now a serious military threat and backs N.K. who have built more and better arms.

    If war is coming, better to be a trade war or a war against an inferior opponent. Sitting back and wishing it all stays good. Didn't work before and won't work now.



    Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
    PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70
  • Barry-xlovecam
    It's 42
    • Jun 2010
    • 18083

    #2
    You are not going to war with anybody.
    You talk big and carry a little stick.

    Comment

    • EddyTheDog
      Just Doing My Own Thing
      • Jan 2011
      • 25433

      #3
      I'm not really sure it needed to be said - I think they kind of guessed what with the 27,000 US soldiers on their doorstep...

      Comment

      • Barry-xlovecam
        It's 42
        • Jun 2010
        • 18083

        #4
        Korea was a lose-lose in 1954
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War
        A war in Korea is still a lose-lose

        That fool is just trying to force China's hand and that is a real BIGLY lose-lose

        Comment

        • Paul Markham
          Too old to care
          • Jun 2001
          • 52942

          #5
          Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
          Korea was a lose-lose in 1954
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War
          A war in Korea is still a lose-lose

          That fool is just trying to force China's hand and that is a real BIGLY lose-lose
          You have a point. Just allow NK to overrun SK.

          Or just hope the huge military build up is never put to use. Whoops to late for that China has already invaded other lands.

          I do agree with your comment on 1954. Allowing NK to take SK would have meant a bigger useless State relying on China to feed it. Seeing as China couldn't feed itself in 1954, the death by starvation would have been horrible.

          Interesting reading. https://www.quora.com/How-does-North...sustain-itself



          Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
          PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

          Comment

          • directfiesta
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Oct 2002
            • 30136

            #6
            Originally posted by EddyTheDog
            I'm not really sure it needed to be said - I think they kind of guessed what with the 27,000 US soldiers on their doorstep...


            maybe they think they are vacationning ?
            I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

            But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

            Comment

            • Linkster
              Confirmed User
              • Feb 2003
              • 3216

              #7
              Originally posted by Paul Markham
              Mattis warns North Korea of 'overwhelming' response to nuclear use

              After decades of appeasing N.K. while N.K. resolutely improved its military capabilities. The US is drawing a line.

              Doing nothing hasn't made the world safer, it's made it more dangerous. China is now a serious military threat and backs N.K. who have built more and better arms.

              If war is coming, better to be a trade war or a war against an inferior opponent. Sitting back and wishing it all stays good. Didn't work before and won't work now.
              Where these people come up with their opinions is amazing...there is no way in hell China would back NK...as a member of the UN, China has backed sanctions on them...and they certainly don't want 100s of thousands of refugees from NK pouring into China.

              China likes the little buffer zone between SK and China..and the US along with China and Japan has been supplying North Korea with 75% of their food for years

              Posturing is only as good as the lack of intelligence of the people you posture towards - otherwise you just look like a fool that falls for everything reporters put out these days as "experts" on foreign issues
              Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted
              FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

              Comment

              • Barry-xlovecam
                It's 42
                • Jun 2010
                • 18083

                #8
                Or I'll huff and puff and BLOW YOUR HOUSE DOWN ...

                Comment

                Working...