What? Gary havent posted here yet?

All of them. In what way do you think that is not the case?

I was a speaker at SXSW the year Twitter broke big there, getting a lot of influencers on board, but that doesn't mean there was no starting point.

Paul we are not bottom-feeders.
IMHO the world does not need a new Facebook or Twitter.


FB
https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/file...ual-Report.pdf

$292,467,645 Market value of outstanding shares

$11,267M Assets
($1,052M) Liabilities

Who the fuck are you Paul -- Bozo the Clown?
Someone coming to the craps table with a pocket full of spare change -- hoping to get lucky?

I think trying to be the next Facebook or Twitter is a sure way to lose your investment right now. This is like the Slob Republic attacking the US, Russia or China -- assured lose.

Private capitalization is needed and this is not one co-lo server and some CMS platform -- give me a break ...

Adult is a niche that these monster businesses do not want.
You have a touchpoint to exploit.
You won't have access to bank money, VC funding or a realistic chance of an IPO.
Private capitalization is the only way.

You also have an adult presence in the mainstream social media the is a very unwelcome guest. A presence to be rid of like a toothache to keep the public shareholders (many institutional) happy.

We are currently starting development of a non adult platform a .cam "social media." I would rather spend the money in adult social media segment for the above reasoning.

Millions of dollars include marketing and branding costs -- that is a very big part to make anything successful.

Actually, commercial businesses will be able to buy slots (accounts) to display their "wares" without any display or link advertising other than their own. They will also be able to buy ads in the free-zone of users and free-sites in the community. I would not even consider starting a development of this magnitude without solid 7 figure funding.

:1orglaugh Gary & I have been too busy posting and socialising on our twitter accounts.

Twitter, the best for personal sales & communications with any models fans, guy or girl, also for all businesses these days :thumbsup

:2 cents: tell all your models to add all their users's accounts! :2 cents:

I think most models have twitter and IG account.

Which is why a porn friendly alternative to the anti-porn present is a great opportunity to start from the bottom.

The world may not. Porn does need a place where it can market without fearing losing accounts.

Who the fuck are you Barry -- Bozo the Clown?


If you go head to head with giants doing the same as they do, you lose.

And until you free yourself from the box you won't understand.

2008 Tubes opened on small budgets without private funding, traffic, real marketing etc. They had one thing over FB, YT. Tits and Ass. Twitter isn't going to compete for porn traffic against the top Porn Tubes.

A site that can allow porn to market without the fear of being shut out is what the industry needs. Surfers will come because it's porn the job of the site is to make it good enough to bring them back.

Your constant cry of not having enough money to take on FB, YT, etc. Shows you haven't got enough money to do anything.

How many would have an account on a site similar to FB, YT that was more porn-friendly?

Models, affiliates, publishers are looking for better alternatives and one where there is no fear of getting banned.

Barry has missed that part. Pity he can't see out of his box.

@Paul you really don't stand a chance -- stay retired ...

You are actually agreeing with what is said point by point? WTF?

Porn tubes used the content theft model so you can do that low budget.

Smash and grab takes a hammer, running shoes and bail money BOZO PAUL!

You really are either not able to keep up or and early Alzheimer's victim

You haven't answered the questions I asked about your model? Will it be primarily to promote models and sites or to sell recorded content?

As for the content statement, the stolen content was mostly in the early days because they didn't have the money to get content. You have models, contacts, money, you said so.

Our disagreement seems to be over the money it takes. $10 million is a joke. You only need to build the site, which is a programmers job and tell people what it is. They will come.

OK know nothing.

I will not answer your questions as I don't need to justify my expenditures to you
" You only need to build the site, which is a programmers job and tell people what it is.

They will come."
Like you did with PaulMarkhamTeens.com -- your long lost empire of treasures ...

This is why your opinion is irrelevant to me. Not that you failed but you haven't since shown me any success, other that your GFY Troll of the Year Award 2012? (I forget now :1orglaugh).

Programmers do not build websites; Developers, Designers and Coders do. You are so out of touch with your 1999 mentality.

I didn't ask for your opinion or mentoring -- you can shove it up your ass.