Is a Coup d'etat starting?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Elli
    Reach for those stars!
    • Apr 2003
    • 17991

    #46
    Originally posted by femdomdestiny


    As mentioned, that is your opinion based on your life experience. I could debate every single sentence of yours, whole night probably. (until now I've learned that is useless, because of many reasons that would again ask for tons of time spent to explain them. It is neverending spiral).

    Personally, I've gone through coup d'etat, few wars (and witnessed psychological and sociological effects on the population) and a watched things Muslims are capable of doing that you probably never could even imagine people are doing. Otherwise, I think you would have a different opinion. Some of those things, I've tried to post here but were threatened to be banned for posting images of that nature. Obviously, people were not interested to investigate further on the subject as you are suggesting that they should.

    In my case, I am trying to get as much data as possible if I am interested in some subject. So in my bookmark, I have American, Russian, Chinese, local and even Iranian news ( and I can spot a clear difference and a message behind the same news, depending on a source). This is just a response to your advice about getting news from more sources.

    To put it in short. You people there are still well protected from what Muslims are bringing with them. From that point, the world must be looking different.Can't blame you. There were many who were using the same logic and thinking that it is possible to assimilate them long term. Near my place, there is a spot where middle east migrants are coming on their way in further illegal penetration in Europe. All I can say is that there is no normal person who would love to see them as neighbors or coworkers.
    I'm glad you use many trusted news outlets as your preferred sources. It is also handy to keep an eye on the nutjob sources out there, to see what they are spouting to their rabid followers.

    It sounds like you've been through a lot of political shakeup in your lifetime. That's good experience to advise people who are looking at the possibility of the same in the States. Do you honestly believe that the Muslims being allowed into the States as the very slow trickle of highly vetted refugees were going to be a problem down the road? Would money not be better spent making sure that American mosques don't have any radical leaders in them, and making sure the children are being sent to mainstream schools instead of traditional Muslim schools? Surely there must be a better way than an all-out ban?
    email: [email protected]

    Comment

    • poncabare
      Confirmed User
      • Jul 2007
      • 2552

      #47
      weak parasites who live off the state, who all got a participation ribbons cannot deal with reality

      Comment

      • xXXtesy10
        Fakecoin Investor
        • Jul 2012
        • 7127

        #48
        Originally posted by brassmonkey
        elli nude i agree to whatever you say.
        but you no gang banger?
        WARNING: Stay Away From Marlboroack aka aka Brandon Ackerman
        http://gfy.com/21169705-post8.html
        Donny Long is Felon, Stalker, Scammer & Coward
        http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/...lon-int-761244

        Comment

        • Elli
          Reach for those stars!
          • Apr 2003
          • 17991

          #49
          Originally posted by ilnjscb
          Right now, unfortunately, all the media outlets (do you prefer that term?) are somewhat to very partisan. The best I can recommend is for you to read those publications that frequently post from a POV with which you do NOT agree. This might at least give you sense of what is going on. So for you, that would be Drudge Report and Breitbart. For a Trump supporter, it would be CNN and Huffington.

          The real issue is 77,000 votes in three states. Call your friends. Don't judge, listen. Urge them to vote. Drive them if needed. That will actually make a difference.
          Since you asked, my preferred news sources are:
          The Economist (slightly left leaning)
          Al Jazeera English
          The Washington Post (used to be right leaning?)
          The Guardian
          The CBC (very left leaning)
          PBS News Hour (fairly balanced from what I have seen so far)
          NHK World
          BBC World
          and I keep an eye on RT America for shits n giggles.

          I tried reading Breitbart, but their "articles" were all opinion pieces with no actual sources and their titles are just obnoxious clickbait. I wouldn't consider them a news source at all. I haven't read the Drudge Report in years. Huffington Post is like "AOL News:lite". It's just as click-baity as Breitbart.

          77k votes are the real issue? I disagree. I think the real issue at hand is Trump driving the bus off a cliff to prove that he is in control of the steering wheel. 77k votes are a project for a few years from now.
          email: [email protected]

          Comment

          • ilnjscb
            Confirmed User
            • Jun 2009
            • 8972

            #50
            Originally posted by Elli
            Since you asked, my preferred news sources are:
            The Economist (slightly left leaning)
            Al Jazeera English
            The Washington Post (used to be right leaning?)
            The Guardian
            The CBC (very left leaning)
            PBS News Hour (fairly balanced from what I have seen so far)
            NHK World
            BBC World
            and I keep an eye on RT America for shits n giggles.

            I tried reading Breitbart, but their "articles" were all opinion pieces with no actual sources and their titles are just obnoxious clickbait. I wouldn't consider them a news source at all. I haven't read the Drudge Report in years. Huffington Post is like "AOL News:lite". It's just as click-baity as Breitbart.

            77k votes are the real issue? I disagree. I think the real issue at hand is Trump driving the bus off a cliff to prove that he is in control of the steering wheel. 77k votes are a project for a few years from now.
            The WaPo is left.

            We'll then we'll agree to disagree. I think the Sturm und Drang is pointless, and we need to focus on 18 and 20 with real preparation and action. If you believe there is another way, then best of luck.

            Comment

            • Elli
              Reach for those stars!
              • Apr 2003
              • 17991

              #51
              Originally posted by ilnjscb
              The WaPo is left.

              We'll then we'll agree to disagree. I think the Sturm und Drang is pointless, and we need to focus on 18 and 20 with real preparation and action. If you believe there is another way, then best of luck.
              And good luck to you in your own efforts!

              I think "sturm und drang" might be a misnomer, as that seems to be what Trump's approach was to the election and the response is quite logical and reasoned as a pushback against his alternative-fact appeal to emotions above all else.
              email: [email protected]

              Comment

              • klinton
                So Fucking Banned
                • Apr 2003
                • 8766

                #52
                a) did you try to leave your mass media bubble for a while ? as long as there will be loonies and bad guys, there will be always a terror...it is not something to get rid off by 100 %... how many people are dying in car accidents per year in France and how many in terrorists attacks (that are not car "accidents" lol) ? if you are sheep to be ruled by fear, well then you are sheep. Not saying that letting in milions of people without any checks on them was a wise thing to do though
                b) too bad that you are hero Trump was saying completely different thing back then when the war in Iraq just started.

                You are putting so much faith in this guy that is rather funny and amusing, he is your ideal cure for all your bitterness, maybe you will get wiser after few years and see that this change wasnt actually for better but for worse. but it will be too late prolly for that, like it is always is for short sighted people.

                Originally posted by nico-t
                Tip: Leave that bubble once in a while to get a dose of reality. People are being blown, shot up and run over by Isis members who travelled along with the huge immigrant wave her in Europe.

                Throw millions of people of a women- and western culture hating ideology in a western society and you get a culture clash. Simple logic. Add in traveling Isis members to the mix and the melting pot of chaos and mayhem is complete.

                But please, continue to believe in fairy tales! Go spread your message to the families of the dead and raped


                FYI trump is the only one who publicly spoke out that Iraq and Libya would be better off without any war mongering by the US. Yet you libs condemn him and embrace the war mongering establishment of the Clintons = Obama = Bush. I thought you guys were anti war?

                Comment

                • klinton
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Apr 2003
                  • 8766

                  #53
                  and yeah, this thread wouldn't be complete without femdomdestiny's input of course

                  Comment

                  • wehateporn
                    Promoting Debate on GFY
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 27176

                    #54
                    Elli,

                    The Economist - Rothschild i.e. Western propaganda

                    Al Jazeera - Western propaganda for the Arab world (a small bit of truth thrown in too now and again)

                    The Washington Post - Fake News

                    The Guardian - Well written and sourced, but also filled with propaganda (global warming, vaccines, EU etc)

                    The CBC - Fake News

                    PBS News Hour - Fake News

                    NHK World - I've never tried it, will check it out

                    BBC World - BBC is official Western propaganda

                    RT America - Very good choice, they will tell you things that your own media won't. Of course they have their own propaganda about their own country, but they are in a position to tell you the truth about US/Europe.

                    If you want to find out some stories which the mainstream media are trying to avoid, you will often find it posted here

                    https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/

                    Comment

                    • Major (Tom)
                      So Fucking Banned
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 32492

                      #55
                      Originally posted by crockett
                      Reddit = fake news. It is the free buffet of fake news

                      Comment

                      • wehateporn
                        Promoting Debate on GFY
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 27176

                        #56
                        Originally posted by crockett
                        That's just a propaganda post by a sockpuppet, be careful about taking stuff on Reddit at facevalue

                        Comment

                        • _Richard_
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Oct 2006
                          • 30991

                          #57
                          Originally posted by RedFred
                          I'd like to introduce you to the actual President Of The United States, an unmarried, lonely, angry, whiskey-soaked, pig fucker named Steve Bannon.


                          the speech he gave in the Vatican was really disturbing

                          Comment

                          • ilnjscb
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jun 2009
                            • 8972

                            #58
                            Originally posted by Elli
                            And good luck to you in your own efforts!

                            I think "sturm und drang" might be a misnomer, as that seems to be what Trump's approach was to the election and the response is quite logical and reasoned as a pushback against his alternative-fact appeal to emotions above all else.
                            " extremes of emotion were given free expression in reaction to the perceived...." I think I hit it spot on. This is a human that can easily be defeated IMHO, and he isn't going to overthrow the government just like Obama wasn't going to go for anyone's guns. This heightened state of "war" is a fund raising tactic and a tragic result of our two party system.

                            Honestly reminds me of my friend's divorce where every single thing the other person does is seen from the most damning perspective, and they are treated as the basest demon wearing flesh.

                            We'll have to agree to disagree again.

                            Comment

                            • Yanks_Todd
                              Confirmed User
                              • Aug 2003
                              • 2493

                              #59
                              Originally posted by Rochard
                              I find this hard to believe.

                              Our military has always leaned Republican, but keeps out of political issues.

                              I am on a lot of military message boards and Facebook groups, and I haven't seen anything of the sort.
                              A good friend of mine whom I did happy hour while in the states with is an Army Lieutenant Colonel and runs a Battalion that does officer training. He is considering leaving his position specifically because he fears he is training new officers that will be set out to run ops of questionable ethics. There is some thought going into where this is all headed.
                              Todd Spaits - Co-founder -YanksCash
                              Premium ad-packages available - Skype for details - tmspaits

                              Comment

                              • Yanks_Todd
                                Confirmed User
                                • Aug 2003
                                • 2493

                                #60
                                Originally posted by _Richard_
                                the speech he gave in the Vatican was really disturbing
                                I read it and you are correct. It was absolutely disturbing.
                                Todd Spaits - Co-founder -YanksCash
                                Premium ad-packages available - Skype for details - tmspaits

                                Comment

                                Working...