Trump: We're not really going to drain the swamp. That was just something I said.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TCLGirls
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2010
    • 3068

    #1

    Trump: We're not really going to drain the swamp. That was just something I said.

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/gingrich-...173426892.html






  • kane
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Aug 2001
    • 20684

    #2
    He does do things his way. Most elected officials at least wait to be sworn in before going back on all their campaign promises.

    Comment

    • Linkster
      Confirmed User
      • Feb 2003
      • 3216

      #3
      Quote "Reagan said. ?As the old saying goes, ?When you?re up to your armpits in alligators, it?s sometimes hard to remember that your original intention was to drain the swamp.??

      Didn't work then...won't work now...it's just a slogan to catch as many un-informed idiots as they can...even Pelosi used it - it's both parties

      I love gullible people...money making has never been easier
      Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted
      FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

      Comment

      • beerptrol
        Confirmed Asshole
        • Feb 2003
        • 12722

        #4
        Not surprised, someone from the establishment ran anti establishment in order to get elected! The sheeple fell for it
        Once again the establishment wins!
        “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
        -- Ulysses S. Grant

        Comment

        • bronco67
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Dec 2006
          • 29032

          #5
          Like I said...Trump says whatever word salad will get him through the next few moments with a win. There's no thought given to long term consequences of his words. When I say "long term", I'm talking about 10 minutes into the future.

          Comment

          • Bladewire
            StraightBro
            • Aug 2003
            • 56228

            #6
            Not draining the swamp, not locking her up, not building that wall, just gonna goto war and drain that treasury


            Skype: CallTomNow

            Comment

            • Rochard
              Jägermeister Test Pilot
              • Dec 2001
              • 75733

              #7
              He has gone back on everything he promised. And he's not even in office yet.
              Herschel Savage
              Brooklyn, NY

              Comment

              • mineistaken
                See signature :)
                • Apr 2007
                • 29656

                #8
                Another misleading title. He is not saying he is not going to drain the swamp, he is saying he does not like to use that specific slogan.

                Comment

                • EddyTheDog
                  Just Doing My Own Thing
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 25433

                  #9
                  Originally posted by beerptrol
                  Not surprised, someone from the establishment ran anti establishment in order to get elected! The sheeple fell for it
                  Once again the establishment wins!
                  ...

                  Comment

                  • crockett
                    in a van by the river
                    • May 2003
                    • 76818

                    #10
                    Originally posted by mineistaken
                    Another misleading title. He is not saying he is not going to drain the swamp, he is saying he does not like to use that specific slogan.
                    Spin, spin..spin.. You are so predictable as are all the other Trumpbots.

                    Not a single one of you will man up and admit you were duped. You will just fall in line and agree with everything and defend everything he does.. Just like a good little team sport.

                    BTW Newt Gingrich also thinks Congress needs to fix the "ethics" laws because he thinks Trump can't abide by them... I'm sure you are ok with that as well..
                    In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                    Comment

                    • directfiesta
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 30135

                      #11
                      Originally posted by mineistaken
                      Another misleading title. He is not saying he is not going to drain the swamp, he is saying he does not like to use that specific slogan.



                      what ? you are ashamed to have been suckered ?
                      I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                      But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                      Comment

                      • Grapesoda
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 46238

                        #12
                        must suck not being able to get over your self ... Merry Christmas!

                        Comment

                        • Matt 26z
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Apr 2002
                          • 18481

                          #13
                          Clearly, they are talking about the slogan.

                          Besides, anyone can see that Trump has gotten more done as president-elect than Obama has in the same timeframe.

                          Comment

                          • Barry-xlovecam
                            It's 42
                            • Jun 2010
                            • 18083

                            #14
                            I am just waiting for an AMAZING PLAN!!

                            Comment

                            • crockett
                              in a van by the river
                              • May 2003
                              • 76818

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Matt 26z
                              Clearly, they are talking about the slogan.

                              Besides, anyone can see that Trump has gotten more done as president-elect than Obama has in the same timeframe.
                              What has he done? Named a bunch of billionaire lobbyists to the cabinet?

                              Serious, what has he done?
                              In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                              Comment

                              • Grapesoda
                                So Fucking Banned
                                • Jul 2003
                                • 46238

                                #16
                                Originally posted by crockett
                                What has he done? Named a bunch of billionaire lobbyists to the cabinet?

                                Serious, what has he done?
                                we can say Merry Christmas again... and that's a great fucking start

                                Comment

                                • Barry-xlovecam
                                  It's 42
                                  • Jun 2010
                                  • 18083

                                  #17
                                  Yeah, whatever ...

                                  If Trump didn?t ?burn it down,? he sure didn?t ?drain the swamp.? In fact, just today Gingrich, interviewed by NPR, said, ?I?m told he now just disclaims that. He now says it was cute, but he doesn?t want to use it anymore.? Well, how could he? Government by Goldman Sachs and ExxonMobil is government by the swamp, of the swamp, and for the swamp. This isn?t a revolution, it?s a thoroughly conventional changing of the guard.

                                  The list goes on. ?Lock her up?? Nope. Trump already announced that he wouldn?t pursue charges against Hillary Clinton, and two weeks ago at one of his ?thank you? rallies in Michigan, he interrupted the crowd?s chant with, ?That plays great before the election ? now we don?t care, right?? I guarantee the people who put ?Hillary for prison? signs in their yard cared. But Trump never did.
                                  Donald Trump Abandons His Supporters | National Review

                                  You got played big time -- enjoy your victory.

                                  Merry Christmas

                                  Comment

                                  • suesheboy
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Nov 2002
                                    • 5211

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by mineistaken
                                    Another misleading title. He is not saying he is not going to drain the swamp, he is saying he does not like to use that specific slogan.
                                    Bullshit.

                                    Their people came to me and asked me since I attended numerous trump rallies if I liked their new slogan and I should use it when communicating with others about trump.
                                    Adult Web Site Domain Names For Sale
                                    Adult Sex Toy Domain Names For Sale
                                    Tantric Delights, Sex Toys Blog, Tantric Sex Toys

                                    Comment

                                    • CDSmith
                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                      • May 2001
                                      • 51460

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Linkster
                                      I love gullible people...money making has never been easier
                                      I'm envisioning that on bumper stickers, t-shirts.


                                      There's money in slogans about gullible people.
                                      Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

                                      ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!

                                      Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.
                                      ICQ me at: 31024634

                                      Comment

                                      • Bladewire
                                        StraightBro
                                        • Aug 2003
                                        • 56228

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Grapesoda
                                        we can say Merry Christmas again... and that's a great fucking start
                                        Who stopped you from clickitty clicking Merry Christmas on your keyboard before? NOBODY!

                                        My god you act like you've been shackled for 8 years in solidary confinement and are just now smelling fresh air not soiled by your shit and piss crusted hairless body of infected wounds.


                                        Skype: CallTomNow

                                        Comment

                                        • Bladewire
                                          StraightBro
                                          • Aug 2003
                                          • 56228

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Linkster
                                          I love gullible people...money making has never been easier






                                          Skype: CallTomNow

                                          Comment

                                          • crockett
                                            in a van by the river
                                            • May 2003
                                            • 76818

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Grapesoda
                                            we can say Merry Christmas again... and that's a great fucking start
                                            You fucking live in bumfuck Montana.. I'm pretty sure you never stopped saying "Merry Christmas".. I'm probably a "city folk" in your mind and I've never stopped saying it.

                                            You righties are so duped into believing you are the constant victim. Stop listing to radio stations and news channels that are always telling you what to think. Think for your fucking self for once in your life.

                                            Basically Trump hasn't done shit except run around the country stroking his ego and naming people with no experience but full of conflicts to his cabinet. He literally hasn't named a single fucking person to his cabinet that is qualified and isn't some form of cronie or lobbyist.

                                            This is your country he is about to fuck up just the same as it's mine.. You probably wont even admit Bush fucked the economy, but if you aren't so bull headed and actually do understand this, Trump is going to be an even bigger disaster. He is putting guys into office to allow big business to strip you of any rights you still had left and rape the fucking tax payers. Open your fucking eyes and stop worrying about dumb shit you are told to be outraged about so you are distracted from what the fuck they are actually doing.

                                            You claim you wanted to take the govt back , you just fucking handed what was left to big business and special interest.. Wake the fuck up..
                                            In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                            Comment

                                            • crockett
                                              in a van by the river
                                              • May 2003
                                              • 76818

                                              #23
                                              Trump is helping make the swamp great again!

                                              Rather than drain it, Trump advisers opt to join D.C. swamp - CBS News

                                              One of Donald Trump’s most trusted aides is setting up a government consulting shop a block from the White House - a move that complicates the president-elect’s promises to “drain the swamp” of Washington.

                                              Corey Lewandowski, Trump’s first campaign manager, and former Trump adviser Barry Bennett announced Wednesday they are starting a government relations and political consulting firm called Avenue Strategies. They’re pitching their ties to Trump as they seek clients.



                                              Trumps Quote about the news:

                                              It's ok everyone, this is going to be great, it's such a really a good thing. This isn't the same as the other swamp, we are making it better we are making it great because it's my swap now. It's great! No need for middle men unless they are my guys, we are just putting them right into the govt. This is much better, it's great!"

                                              In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                              Comment

                                              • Bladewire
                                                StraightBro
                                                • Aug 2003
                                                • 56228

                                                #24






                                                Skype: CallTomNow

                                                Comment

                                                • onwebcam
                                                  Fake Nick 1.0
                                                  • Oct 2005
                                                  • 27689

                                                  #25
                                                  "Someone incorrectly stated that the phrase "DRAIN THE SWAMP" was no longer being used by me. Actually, we will always be trying to DTS," he tweeted

                                                  Trump denies Gingrich claim that he's dropping 'drain the swamp' - CNNPolitics.com

                                                  Gingrich is acting as if he's in the loop to make himself feel important. He's finished just like the rest of them.
                                                  PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                                                  ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • mineistaken
                                                    See signature :)
                                                    • Apr 2007
                                                    • 29656

                                                    #26
                                                    As I said (and usually have to point out those fact twisting libsters who can not grasp the point and make adequate conclusions), fact twisting Op was wrong (again and again):

                                                    Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump · 7h7 hours ago

                                                    Someone incorrectly stated that the phrase "DRAIN THE SWAMP" was no longer being used by me. Actually, we will always be trying to DTS.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • TCLGirls
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Feb 2010
                                                      • 3068

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by mineistaken
                                                      As I said (and usually have to point out those fact twisting libsters who can not grasp the point and make adequate conclusions), fact twisting Op was wrong (again and again):

                                                      Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump · 7h7 hours ago

                                                      Someone incorrectly stated that the phrase "DRAIN THE SWAMP" was no longer being used by me. Actually, we will always be trying to DTS.
                                                      Because appointing Goldman Sachs cronies is draining the swamp. ...Hook, line and sinker.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • bronco67
                                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                        • Dec 2006
                                                        • 29032

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by crockett


                                                        Trumps Quote about the news:

                                                        It's ok everyone, this is going to be great, it's such a really a good thing. This isn't the same as the other swamp, we are making it better we are making it great because it's my swap now. It's great! No need for middle men unless they are my guys, we are just putting them right into the govt. This is much better, it's great!"

                                                        Is that quote a joke, or an actual thing he said? This whole thing has become so surreal the line is blurring between reality and satire.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • onwebcam
                                                          Fake Nick 1.0
                                                          • Oct 2005
                                                          • 27689

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by TCLGirls
                                                          Because appointing Goldman Sachs cronies is draining the swamp. ...Hook, line and sinker.
                                                          Considering USA Inc has been in bankruptcy receivership by it's private lender the Federal Reserve of which Goldman is a shareholder and has been operating as such in a perpetual State of Emergency since the 1930's it should be no surprise that said owners place someone in that position. Trump has no choice there, that you can bank on.. This will never change no matter who is President until the Fed is abolished and the last person who tried that was JFK.
                                                          PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                                                          ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Bladewire
                                                            StraightBro
                                                            • Aug 2003
                                                            • 56228

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by mineistaken
                                                            Someone incorrectly stated that the phrase "DRAIN THE SWAMP" was no longer being used by me. Actually, we will always be trying to DTS.
                                                            "We will always be trying to DTS"? He sounds like a powerless pussy now compared to before:






                                                            Skype: CallTomNow

                                                            Comment

                                                            • TCLGirls
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Feb 2010
                                                              • 3068

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by onwebcam
                                                              Considering USA Inc has been in bankruptcy receivership by it's private lender the Federal Reserve of which Goldman is a shareholder and has been operating as such in a perpetual State of Emergency since the 1930's it should be no surprise that said owners place someone in that position. Trump has no choice there, that you can bank on.. This will never change no matter who is President until the Fed is abolished and the last person who tried that was JFK.
                                                              Fake news. The US is not in "bankruptcy receivership". Bankruptcy and receivership are two different things.

                                                              Bankruptcy Alternatives: Receiverships and Assignment

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Bladewire
                                                                StraightBro
                                                                • Aug 2003
                                                                • 56228

                                                                #32
                                                                Originally posted by TCLGirls
                                                                Fake news. The US is not in "bankruptcy receivership". Bankruptcy and receivership are two different things.

                                                                Bankruptcy Alternatives: Receiverships and Assignment
                                                                Facts don't matter to them it's a waste of time.

                                                                He defended the Trump U case saying the people were suckers, ignoring the fact that Trump was the one RIPPING OFF the suckers


                                                                Skype: CallTomNow

                                                                Comment

                                                                • onwebcam
                                                                  Fake Nick 1.0
                                                                  • Oct 2005
                                                                  • 27689

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by TCLGirls
                                                                  Fake news. The US is not in "bankruptcy receivership". Bankruptcy and receivership are two different things.

                                                                  Bankruptcy Alternatives: Receiverships and Assignment
                                                                  Did you even read your own article?

                                                                  "For secured creditors, a federal receivership can offer the quickest and most cost-effective method of gaining control over a borrower’s collateral upon default. A federal receivership maintains the value of the collateral by allowing the business to continue to operate. The receiver will preserve and protect the collateral as well as the financial integrity of the business as a going concern. In addition, the receiver may be able to stabilize the operations to mitigate further potential losses"

                                                                  Cal it what you want. The US was bankrupt and the Fed holds it in receivership.. The Fed was on a 20 year contract from 1913 to 1933. During which time it drained US Inc. of it's gold until what happened? Roosevelt was forced to seize the peoples gold to repay it's debt. They have been in receivership operating in a perpetual State of Emergency using the Feds paper currency since 1933. FACT JFK was killed because he wanted to return to the gold standard. FACT.



                                                                  Originally posted by Bladewire
                                                                  Facts don't matter to them it's a waste of time.

                                                                  He defended the Trump U case saying the people were suckers, ignoring the fact that Trump was the one RIPPING OFF the suckers
                                                                  Point us to this post, prove where I said anything like that and I will never post here again. Sound good?
                                                                  PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                                                                  ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Bladewire
                                                                    StraightBro
                                                                    • Aug 2003
                                                                    • 56228

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by onwebcam
                                                                    Point us to this post, prove where I said anything like that and I will never post here again. Sound good?
                                                                    So you're changing your mind or you still think Trump did no wrong ripping those people off?


                                                                    Skype: CallTomNow

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • noshit
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Dec 2001
                                                                      • 1582

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by TCLGirls
                                                                      Trump: We're not really going to drain the swamp. That was just something I said.
                                                                      Incorrectly stated Phrase, picked up and quoted like it's fact ...by a Nolt

                                                                      This is why Nolts never get anywhere in life

                                                                      .

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • TCLGirls
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Feb 2010
                                                                        • 3068

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by onwebcam
                                                                        Did you even read your own article?

                                                                        "For secured creditors, a federal receivership can offer the quickest and most cost-effective method of gaining control over a borrower?s collateral upon default. A federal receivership maintains the value of the collateral by allowing the business to continue to operate. The receiver will preserve and protect the collateral as well as the financial integrity of the business as a going concern. In addition, the receiver may be able to stabilize the operations to mitigate further potential losses"

                                                                        The Fed was on a 20 year contract from 1913 to 1933. During which time it drained US Inc. of it's gold until what happened? Roosevelt was forced to seize the peoples gold to repay it's debt. They have been in receivership operating in perpetual State of Emergency using the Feds paper currency since 1933. FACT

                                                                        I did read the article. It says receivership is an alternative to bankruptcy. You said the US is in "bankruptcy receivership"...which means you did not know bankruptcy is different from receivership.

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • TCLGirls
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Feb 2010
                                                                          • 3068

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by onwebcam
                                                                          Did you even read your own article?

                                                                          "For secured creditors, a federal receivership can offer the quickest and most cost-effective method of gaining control over a borrower?s collateral upon default. A federal receivership maintains the value of the collateral by allowing the business to continue to operate. The receiver will preserve and protect the collateral as well as the financial integrity of the business as a going concern. In addition, the receiver may be able to stabilize the operations to mitigate further potential losses"

                                                                          Cal it what you want. The US was bankrupt and the Fed holds it in receivership.. The Fed was on a 20 year contract from 1913 to 1933. During which time it drained US Inc. of it's gold until what happened? Roosevelt was forced to seize the peoples gold to repay it's debt. They have been in receivership operating in a perpetual State of Emergency using the Feds paper currency since 1933. FACT JFK was killed because he wanted to return to the gold standard. FACT.


                                                                          That's the 2nd time you've referenced "US ,Inc". What specific entity are you referring to, and what state is "US, Inc." incorporated in?

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • onwebcam
                                                                            Fake Nick 1.0
                                                                            • Oct 2005
                                                                            • 27689

                                                                            #38
                                                                            Originally posted by TCLGirls
                                                                            That's the 2nd time you've referenced "US ,Inc". What specific entity are you referring to, and what state is "US, Inc." incorporated in?
                                                                            All US local State and Federal governments are incorporated.. Even President Barack Obama is incorporated. The man Barack Obama is acting on behalf of the corporation President Barack Obama. This is why cases brought against him are generally thrown out due to standing. Because they aren't bringing the case against the right entity.

                                                                            Search dnb.com for any entity you want. Unfortunately now you have to pay but it's all there. I've posted it all here before they went to paid info..

                                                                            Barack Obama returns
                                                                            executive office of the united states government 1600 pennsylvania ave nw washington, DC - 20006

                                                                            Hell even Canada is registered here in the US.
                                                                            PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                                                                            ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • TCLGirls
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Feb 2010
                                                                              • 3068

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by onwebcam
                                                                              All US local State and Federal governments are incorporated.. Even President Barack Obama is incorporated. The man Barack Obama is acting on behalf of the corporation Barack Obama. This is why cases brought against him are generally thrown out due to standing. Because they aren't bring the case against the right entity.

                                                                              Search dnb.com for any entity you want. Unfortunately now you have to pay but it's all there. I've posted it all here before they went to paid info..

                                                                              Barack Obama returns
                                                                              executive office of the united states government 1600 pennsylvania ave nw washington, DC - 20006

                                                                              Hell even Canada is registered here in the US.

                                                                              If you tell me the specific State that "US, Inc." incorporated in, then I can verify your claim.

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • TCLGirls
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Feb 2010
                                                                                • 3068

                                                                                #40
                                                                                "We may say in passing that the argument that the
                                                                                United States may be treated as a corporation

                                                                                organized under its own laws, that is, under the
                                                                                Constitution as the fundamental law, seems so strained
                                                                                as not to merit serious consideration
                                                                                ."


                                                                                UNITED STATES v. COOPER CORPORATION | FindLaw

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • onwebcam
                                                                                  Fake Nick 1.0
                                                                                  • Oct 2005
                                                                                  • 27689

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Originally posted by TCLGirls
                                                                                  "We may say in passing that the argument that the
                                                                                  United States may be treated as a corporation

                                                                                  organized under its own laws, that is, under the
                                                                                  Constitution as the fundamental law, seems so strained
                                                                                  as not to merit serious consideration
                                                                                  ."


                                                                                  UNITED STATES v. COOPER CORPORATION | FindLaw
                                                                                  That would be because it's not. It's maritime / contract law. Not Constitutional / Civil law. Everything was changed as a result of what was done in the 1930's. When it pertains to civil law /constitutional and maritime / contract law it revolves around this case https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_R...o._v._Tompkins
                                                                                  PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                                                                                  ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • Major (Tom)
                                                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                                                    • Nov 2003
                                                                                    • 32492

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    I never bought any of that rhetoric. I voted for him because I'm tired of PC, I'm tired of illegal immigrants and I'm tired of letting terrorists in. Anyone but hillary. I never bought any of the other bs. Not for a moment

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • Bladewire
                                                                                      StraightBro
                                                                                      • Aug 2003
                                                                                      • 56228

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      Originally posted by DukeSkywalker
                                                                                      I never bought any of that rhetoric. I voted for him because I'm tired of PC, I'm tired of illegal immigrants and I'm tired of letting terrorists in. Anyone but hillary. I never bought any of the other bs. Not for a moment
                                                                                      She said today that she's putting her hat in for 2020 so that will be something to look forward to.


                                                                                      Skype: CallTomNow

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • crockett
                                                                                        in a van by the river
                                                                                        • May 2003
                                                                                        • 76818

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        Originally posted by DukeSkywalker
                                                                                        I never bought any of that rhetoric. I voted for him because I'm tired of PC, I'm tired of illegal immigrants and I'm tired of letting terrorists in. Anyone but hillary. I never bought any of the other bs. Not for a moment
                                                                                        Yet he's not getting rid of illegals in fact he's trying to get 218 work permits for them at one of his business.. He's also not banning any Muslims..

                                                                                        EVERYTHING he said was bullshit not just the parts you don't care about..
                                                                                        In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • TCLGirls
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • Feb 2010
                                                                                          • 3068

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Originally posted by onwebcam
                                                                                          That would be because it's not. It's maritime / contract law. Not Constitutional / Civil law. Everything was changed as a result of what was done in the 1930's. When it pertains to civil law /constitutional and maritime / contract law it revolves around this case https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_R...o._v._Tompkins
                                                                                          Except you're the one who referenced "US Inc."

                                                                                          Now you are saying the US is not a corporation

                                                                                          Get your story straight.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • onwebcam
                                                                                            Fake Nick 1.0
                                                                                            • Oct 2005
                                                                                            • 27689

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            Originally posted by TCLGirls

                                                                                            If you tell me the specific State that "US, Inc." incorporated in, then I can verify your claim.
                                                                                            District of Columbia for most. Hell even entities of the government are separately incorporated. Here's a kicker for ya. If you do some searching check out the address listed for the Federal Reserve and I.R.S. It's the same.
                                                                                            PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                                                                                            ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • onwebcam
                                                                                              Fake Nick 1.0
                                                                                              • Oct 2005
                                                                                              • 27689

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by TCLGirls
                                                                                              Except you're the one who referenced "US Inc."

                                                                                              Now you are saying the US is not a corporation

                                                                                              Get your story straight.
                                                                                              It is. Where did I say it wasn't? Corporations are not done under civil law....

                                                                                              Ah here's the confusion.. "under the Constitution as the fundamental law" That's what I meant by it's not.. It's not a corporation under constitutional law. It is under a form of maritime law. These people aren't stupid. They word things very carefully so as to not make record of what is really going on. So read your quote again taking into consideration it's not under constitutional law. There is a reason why there are civil law courts and separate >> maritime contract law courts.
                                                                                              PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                                                                                              ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • Bladewire
                                                                                                StraightBro
                                                                                                • Aug 2003
                                                                                                • 56228

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by onwebcam
                                                                                                the address listed for the Federal Reserve and I.R.S. It's the same.
                                                                                                The IRS should be abolished


                                                                                                Skype: CallTomNow

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • TCLGirls
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • Feb 2010
                                                                                                  • 3068

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  Originally posted by onwebcam
                                                                                                  It is. Where did I say it wasn't? Corporations are not done under civil law....

                                                                                                  Ah here's the confusion.. "under the Constitution as the fundamental law" That's what I meant by it's not..
                                                                                                  This is what you said: "That would be because it's not."

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • TCLGirls
                                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                                    • Feb 2010
                                                                                                    • 3068

                                                                                                    #50
                                                                                                    Originally posted by onwebcam
                                                                                                    District of Columbia for most. Hell even entities of the government are separately incorporated. Here's a kicker for ya. If you do some searching check out the address listed for the Federal Reserve and I.R.S. It's the same.
                                                                                                    So if the US is a corporation, then what state is it incorporated in? Corporation law is a state power.

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...