Trump: We're not really going to drain the swamp. That was just something I said.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TCLGirls
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2010
    • 3068

    #31
    Originally posted by onwebcam
    Considering USA Inc has been in bankruptcy receivership by it's private lender the Federal Reserve of which Goldman is a shareholder and has been operating as such in a perpetual State of Emergency since the 1930's it should be no surprise that said owners place someone in that position. Trump has no choice there, that you can bank on.. This will never change no matter who is President until the Fed is abolished and the last person who tried that was JFK.
    Fake news. The US is not in "bankruptcy receivership". Bankruptcy and receivership are two different things.

    Bankruptcy Alternatives: Receiverships and Assignment

    Comment

    • Bladewire
      StraightBro
      • Aug 2003
      • 56228

      #32
      Originally posted by TCLGirls
      Fake news. The US is not in "bankruptcy receivership". Bankruptcy and receivership are two different things.

      Bankruptcy Alternatives: Receiverships and Assignment
      Facts don't matter to them it's a waste of time.

      He defended the Trump U case saying the people were suckers, ignoring the fact that Trump was the one RIPPING OFF the suckers


      Skype: CallTomNow

      Comment

      • onwebcam
        Fake Nick 1.0
        • Oct 2005
        • 27689

        #33
        Originally posted by TCLGirls
        Fake news. The US is not in "bankruptcy receivership". Bankruptcy and receivership are two different things.

        Bankruptcy Alternatives: Receiverships and Assignment
        Did you even read your own article?

        "For secured creditors, a federal receivership can offer the quickest and most cost-effective method of gaining control over a borrower’s collateral upon default. A federal receivership maintains the value of the collateral by allowing the business to continue to operate. The receiver will preserve and protect the collateral as well as the financial integrity of the business as a going concern. In addition, the receiver may be able to stabilize the operations to mitigate further potential losses"

        Cal it what you want. The US was bankrupt and the Fed holds it in receivership.. The Fed was on a 20 year contract from 1913 to 1933. During which time it drained US Inc. of it's gold until what happened? Roosevelt was forced to seize the peoples gold to repay it's debt. They have been in receivership operating in a perpetual State of Emergency using the Feds paper currency since 1933. FACT JFK was killed because he wanted to return to the gold standard. FACT.



        Originally posted by Bladewire
        Facts don't matter to them it's a waste of time.

        He defended the Trump U case saying the people were suckers, ignoring the fact that Trump was the one RIPPING OFF the suckers
        Point us to this post, prove where I said anything like that and I will never post here again. Sound good?
        PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
        ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

        Comment

        • Bladewire
          StraightBro
          • Aug 2003
          • 56228

          #34
          Originally posted by onwebcam
          Point us to this post, prove where I said anything like that and I will never post here again. Sound good?
          So you're changing your mind or you still think Trump did no wrong ripping those people off?


          Skype: CallTomNow

          Comment

          • noshit
            Confirmed User
            • Dec 2001
            • 1582

            #35
            Originally posted by TCLGirls
            Trump: We're not really going to drain the swamp. That was just something I said.
            Incorrectly stated Phrase, picked up and quoted like it's fact ...by a Nolt

            This is why Nolts never get anywhere in life

            .

            Comment

            • TCLGirls
              Confirmed User
              • Feb 2010
              • 3068

              #36
              Originally posted by onwebcam
              Did you even read your own article?

              "For secured creditors, a federal receivership can offer the quickest and most cost-effective method of gaining control over a borrower?s collateral upon default. A federal receivership maintains the value of the collateral by allowing the business to continue to operate. The receiver will preserve and protect the collateral as well as the financial integrity of the business as a going concern. In addition, the receiver may be able to stabilize the operations to mitigate further potential losses"

              The Fed was on a 20 year contract from 1913 to 1933. During which time it drained US Inc. of it's gold until what happened? Roosevelt was forced to seize the peoples gold to repay it's debt. They have been in receivership operating in perpetual State of Emergency using the Feds paper currency since 1933. FACT

              I did read the article. It says receivership is an alternative to bankruptcy. You said the US is in "bankruptcy receivership"...which means you did not know bankruptcy is different from receivership.

              Comment

              • TCLGirls
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2010
                • 3068

                #37
                Originally posted by onwebcam
                Did you even read your own article?

                "For secured creditors, a federal receivership can offer the quickest and most cost-effective method of gaining control over a borrower?s collateral upon default. A federal receivership maintains the value of the collateral by allowing the business to continue to operate. The receiver will preserve and protect the collateral as well as the financial integrity of the business as a going concern. In addition, the receiver may be able to stabilize the operations to mitigate further potential losses"

                Cal it what you want. The US was bankrupt and the Fed holds it in receivership.. The Fed was on a 20 year contract from 1913 to 1933. During which time it drained US Inc. of it's gold until what happened? Roosevelt was forced to seize the peoples gold to repay it's debt. They have been in receivership operating in a perpetual State of Emergency using the Feds paper currency since 1933. FACT JFK was killed because he wanted to return to the gold standard. FACT.


                That's the 2nd time you've referenced "US ,Inc". What specific entity are you referring to, and what state is "US, Inc." incorporated in?

                Comment

                • onwebcam
                  Fake Nick 1.0
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 27689

                  #38
                  Originally posted by TCLGirls
                  That's the 2nd time you've referenced "US ,Inc". What specific entity are you referring to, and what state is "US, Inc." incorporated in?
                  All US local State and Federal governments are incorporated.. Even President Barack Obama is incorporated. The man Barack Obama is acting on behalf of the corporation President Barack Obama. This is why cases brought against him are generally thrown out due to standing. Because they aren't bringing the case against the right entity.

                  Search dnb.com for any entity you want. Unfortunately now you have to pay but it's all there. I've posted it all here before they went to paid info..

                  Barack Obama returns
                  executive office of the united states government 1600 pennsylvania ave nw washington, DC - 20006

                  Hell even Canada is registered here in the US.
                  PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                  ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                  Comment

                  • TCLGirls
                    Confirmed User
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 3068

                    #39
                    Originally posted by onwebcam
                    All US local State and Federal governments are incorporated.. Even President Barack Obama is incorporated. The man Barack Obama is acting on behalf of the corporation Barack Obama. This is why cases brought against him are generally thrown out due to standing. Because they aren't bring the case against the right entity.

                    Search dnb.com for any entity you want. Unfortunately now you have to pay but it's all there. I've posted it all here before they went to paid info..

                    Barack Obama returns
                    executive office of the united states government 1600 pennsylvania ave nw washington, DC - 20006

                    Hell even Canada is registered here in the US.

                    If you tell me the specific State that "US, Inc." incorporated in, then I can verify your claim.

                    Comment

                    • TCLGirls
                      Confirmed User
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 3068

                      #40
                      "We may say in passing that the argument that the
                      United States may be treated as a corporation

                      organized under its own laws, that is, under the
                      Constitution as the fundamental law, seems so strained
                      as not to merit serious consideration
                      ."


                      UNITED STATES v. COOPER CORPORATION | FindLaw

                      Comment

                      • onwebcam
                        Fake Nick 1.0
                        • Oct 2005
                        • 27689

                        #41
                        Originally posted by TCLGirls
                        "We may say in passing that the argument that the
                        United States may be treated as a corporation

                        organized under its own laws, that is, under the
                        Constitution as the fundamental law, seems so strained
                        as not to merit serious consideration
                        ."


                        UNITED STATES v. COOPER CORPORATION | FindLaw
                        That would be because it's not. It's maritime / contract law. Not Constitutional / Civil law. Everything was changed as a result of what was done in the 1930's. When it pertains to civil law /constitutional and maritime / contract law it revolves around this case https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_R...o._v._Tompkins
                        PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                        ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                        Comment

                        • Major (Tom)
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Nov 2003
                          • 32492

                          #42
                          I never bought any of that rhetoric. I voted for him because I'm tired of PC, I'm tired of illegal immigrants and I'm tired of letting terrorists in. Anyone but hillary. I never bought any of the other bs. Not for a moment

                          Comment

                          • Bladewire
                            StraightBro
                            • Aug 2003
                            • 56228

                            #43
                            Originally posted by DukeSkywalker
                            I never bought any of that rhetoric. I voted for him because I'm tired of PC, I'm tired of illegal immigrants and I'm tired of letting terrorists in. Anyone but hillary. I never bought any of the other bs. Not for a moment
                            She said today that she's putting her hat in for 2020 so that will be something to look forward to.


                            Skype: CallTomNow

                            Comment

                            • crockett
                              in a van by the river
                              • May 2003
                              • 76818

                              #44
                              Originally posted by DukeSkywalker
                              I never bought any of that rhetoric. I voted for him because I'm tired of PC, I'm tired of illegal immigrants and I'm tired of letting terrorists in. Anyone but hillary. I never bought any of the other bs. Not for a moment
                              Yet he's not getting rid of illegals in fact he's trying to get 218 work permits for them at one of his business.. He's also not banning any Muslims..

                              EVERYTHING he said was bullshit not just the parts you don't care about..
                              In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                              Comment

                              • TCLGirls
                                Confirmed User
                                • Feb 2010
                                • 3068

                                #45
                                Originally posted by onwebcam
                                That would be because it's not. It's maritime / contract law. Not Constitutional / Civil law. Everything was changed as a result of what was done in the 1930's. When it pertains to civil law /constitutional and maritime / contract law it revolves around this case https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erie_R...o._v._Tompkins
                                Except you're the one who referenced "US Inc."

                                Now you are saying the US is not a corporation

                                Get your story straight.

                                Comment

                                Working...