GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   ANOUNCEMNET: Movie Anti Hotlinking is Here! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=123513)

Jizar II 04-09-2003 06:12 AM

I don't see why anyone think this is expensive.. I would say it's a fair price! How to stop movie hotlinking has been the topic of many threads on GFY and the outcome has always been the same - No one had a working solution that didn't require cookies or wasn't dependable on using a specific host.

X3M - Good luck with it :thumbsup

jimmyf 04-09-2003 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jizar II
I don't see why anyone think this is expensive.. I would say it's a fair price! How to stop movie hotlinking has been the topic of many threads on GFY and the outcome has always been the same - No one had a working solution that didn't require cookies or wasn't dependable on using a specific host.

X3M - Good luck with it :thumbsup

:thumbsup :thumbsup and $ 250.00 you movie people will make that back quick, get to sleep good at night also.:thumbsup

Ray@TastyDollars 04-09-2003 07:13 AM

If this thing does what he sais it does and TGP srcrips accept the gallery, AND if does not mess up causing your posted gallery to 404. Its dam cheap at the price!!

x3m 04-09-2003 07:13 AM

justsexxx, Jizar II, jimmyf, thank you for the good words! :)

I am glad that there are people on this board who understand the value of AHL.

You will think that I am joking, but we started selling AHL at $199.00 last month and we increased the price after many our clients told us that they would pay a lot more for it, after seeing how it works.

Unfortunately, I cannot set up a trial with our current cc processor, but if I will find a way, I think I will increase the price of the full version.

x3m 04-09-2003 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ray
If this thing does what he sais it does and TGP srcrips accept the gallery, AND if does not mess up causing your posted gallery to 404. Its dam cheap at the price!!
I have setup a gallery http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demogallery.html protected by AHL if yuo want to test submit it to any TGP, such as the most detailed TGP script - Brownie.

WARNING: Do not confirm the submission, if you will decide to submit this gallery to the TGP that you have no control of. We don't want to get someone like Worldsex.com get pissed at us.

We have out galleries protected by AHL on all major TGP's and MGP's. It's 100% compatible with all TGP scripts.

----------

This is Brownie submission results for the above gallery

Please be patient
We are checking your gallery

http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demogallery.html... OK
Reciprocal link...NOT FOUND
http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demo01.mpg... OK (348 kb)
http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demo02.mpg... OK (348 kb)
http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demo03.mpg... OK (348 kb)
http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demo04.mpg... OK (348 kb)
http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demo05.mpg... OK (348 kb)
http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demo06.mpg... OK (348 kb)

Thank you Max Artamonoff

Your submission:

URL: http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demogallery.html
Category: Movies
Video: 6

Ray@TastyDollars 04-09-2003 07:40 AM

Thats cool. However im a little concerned because about a month ago someone linked me to your site, I clicked the gallery and when I click a movie it redirected to Google. What was that about? I remember reading something about some delay or somthing to that nature.

x3m 04-09-2003 07:47 AM

If you tried to hotlink a movie first and then went to the gallery, your browser probably cached the denied URL. Actually, we have a setting right now which will either let the browser to cache that deny URL or not to cache it, depending on your needs.

Ray@TastyDollars 04-09-2003 08:07 AM

Ahh, gotcha. Well, what else can I say except.. It Looks Good!

codemebaby 04-09-2003 09:12 AM

Why does it seem that with my tests, the referer checking built into thttpd seems to work fine with windows media player...Not saying thttpds internal hotlink protection is exactly the same as a modrewrite rule, but apache sucks anyway.

Does this thing even work without apache? I have too much traffic to use apache without load sharing, and since I can use thttpd and not do load sharing...this leaves my other machines free for different tasks, so switching back to apache would be out of the question

nevermind 04-09-2003 09:19 AM

Just my personal opinion, but I wouldn't want IP based hotlinking protection, especially now that AOL users IP addresses change while they're still online (and I'm not talking about proxies)

Apparently AOL has done this recently because they've run out of IP addresses --- setting off all kinds of password and security thresholds for legit customers and causing major headaches for a lot of sites.

IMHO, time stamped urls are still the best way to go if you want to prevent hotlinking. Granted, I've only seen it with streams, but lots of adult sites use it and it helps prevent a lot of copying as well.

cotsios 04-09-2003 11:07 AM

We already using that script on few of our servers.
It a nice script. No problems at the moment. We offer it for free on our dedicated - virtual servers.

VeriSexy 04-09-2003 01:10 PM

http://www.galleryjapan.com/ahl_status_report

Works good, saves allot of bandwidth and $249 is nothing compared to the amount of bandwidth it saves. Each additional server license is only like $20 bucks for me.

x3m 04-09-2003 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by VeriSexy
http://www.galleryjapan.com/ahl_status_report

Works good, saves allot of bandwidth and $249 is nothing compared to the amount of bandwidth it saves. Each additional server license is only like $20 bucks for me.

You weren't supposed to be telling people that we give discounts! :BangBang:

Madball 04-10-2003 01:15 AM

I installed this & started sending hotlinkers to popuphell. Made the $249 back in 3 or 4 days.

They install it on your box and babysit you through the whole process. If you host movies and don't use this you're throwing cash outta the window, period...

Theo 04-10-2003 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jizar II
I don't see why anyone think this is expensive.. I would say it's a fair price! How to stop movie hotlinking has been the topic of many threads on GFY and the outcome has always been the same - No one had a working solution that didn't require cookies or wasn't dependable on using a specific host.

X3M - Good luck with it :thumbsup

yes,i was wondering the same. At least the ones that do have big movie posts or do movie galleries should save them wayy more money.

m0rph3us 04-10-2003 02:32 AM

script works very good. no more js/cookie baby :glugglug

sync 04-10-2003 07:36 AM

We at http://likewhoa.com have an Apache module for anti-hotlinking that works exactly as this program; however we're not charging for it. Most of the major Adult ISPs provide this protection as well. Just an FYI

pancake7 04-10-2003 10:01 AM

Just so you all don't get a false sense of security, this can be easily defeated. Let's say you have a page that you have a bunch of hot links on. To get around the AHL protection, just rename your main page, say index.html, to index_frame.html, then create a new index.html that looks like this:

Code:

<frameset rows="0%,100%">
  <frame name='gallery' src='http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/gallery.html'>
  <frame name='mypage' src='index_frame.html'>
</frameset>

Then on your index_frame.html page you can have a link to http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demo.mpg and it will work perfectly. What is happening here is that the browser is loading the "approved" page in a hidden frame that the user never sees. They only see your index_frame.html page. Then because they have loaded the approved page in the background, they are fully able to load the video you're linking to. So now when someone hot links to you, they're going to be causing 2 hits instead of 1... one to the main gallery, then another to the movie file itself. Thus increasing your bandwidth usage. BTW, I have seen this in the wild... this isn't just something I came up with myself.

Also, for all those posting thieir stats for number of hot-linkers blocked by the AHL script, think about how many of those might have been legitimate users getting an error.

In short, there is no way to protect against hot-linkers. The best you can do is slow them down, which this script will probably do. Just don't think that it's bullet-proof. And use this information when deciding if $250 plus a per-server fee is worth it. You might be enjoying low-bandwidth for now, but hot-linkers might eventually get around it.

If you want to test this frames tactic yourself, create an index.html file with the code above, then create index_frame.html with the following:

Code:

<html>
<body>
<h2>Anti-hotlinking crack</h2>

<a href="http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demo.mpg">The hot-linked video file</a>

</body>
</html>

Then load index.html in your browser and click the link. You do still have to click it within 3 minutes, just like the main gallery page.

At the site I work for, we use a rotating temp link. It also can be defeated, but it would take a little scripting on the hot-linkers side, and wouldn't be as easy as just dropping in some HTML. It also works perfectly with our setup of multiple seperate video servers. Again, nothing is bullet-proof, especially not referer-checking.

One last question for x3m. Does your script work with multiple load balanced servers? We have our "gallery" page served off of a load balanced cluster, then the video files are served off of other dedicated video servers. So each request to the gallery page will go to a different server, and the request to the video file itself goes to a completely different set of servers. My guess is that your script is storing the client info on the server, so it only works if both hits go to the same server, which of course won't work for any large scale site using load-balancing like Cisco's Local Directory or a Coyote Point Equalizer. The logistics of sharing the client-info between several servers presents many challenges, especially if those servers are at disparate networks across the world, and the connection between each has its own lag. Let me know what you're thoughts are on this.

Anyways... I'm not trying to discourage any of your from buying the AHL script. It will proabably help in the short run. I just want you to be informed that it's not all that the AHL guys hype it up to be. Make an informed decision.

Thanks

Mole 04-10-2003 10:49 AM

Wouldn't a simple script which randomly renames the directory the movies are stored in every couple minute or so work as well?

That's what they use on ProAdult free hosts.

ServerGenius 04-10-2003 10:59 AM

php session id's and movies stored outside webroot.
Have a simple script serve the movie file on authoritive sessions
and redirect non auth session to wherever you want to send them.

That way impossible to download the movies as they are not
accessible through the webserver.....only by script and if you
use file sessions itīs fast and not heavy to run on your server.

Allthough for movie galleries this would not be ideal because of
most tgp/mpg have blocked any type of scripting and donīt
accept variables.

This you can fix by a little wrapper that translates variables to
look at dir structures....similar as a lot of scripts use for search
engine stuff as they also donīt like variables too much.

so movie.php?file=filename will become movie/file/filename I
think that way it would work again

DynaMite

Pipecrew 04-10-2003 11:07 AM

I am glad i am on likewhoa yet again :) Saved me 250 for this script, I told you guys on videosboard that people on GFY could make this for cheaper and I wasnt lying :)

x582 04-10-2003 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pipecrew
I am glad i am on likewhoa yet again :) Saved me 250 for this script, I told you guys on videosboard that people on GFY could make this for cheaper and I wasnt lying :)
correct me if im wrong, but likewhoa's script cannot send your hotlinkers traffic to a specific URL

and if you serve your HTML from server #1 and you movies from server #2, likewhoa script won't work for that. At least this is what noc told me.

ServerGenius 04-10-2003 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by pancake7
Just so you all don't get a false sense of security, this can be easily defeated. Let's say you have a page that you have a bunch of hot links on. To get around the AHL protection, just rename your main page, say index.html, to index_frame.html, then create a new index.html that looks like this:

Code:

<frameset rows="0%,100%">
  <frame name='gallery' src='http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/gallery.html'>
  <frame name='mypage' src='index_frame.html'>
</frameset>

Then on your index_frame.html page you can have a link to http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demo.mpg and it will work perfectly. What is happening here is that the browser is loading the "approved" page in a hidden frame that the user never sees. They only see your index_frame.html page. Then because they have loaded the approved page in the background, they are fully able to load the video you're linking to. So now when someone hot links to you, they're going to be causing 2 hits instead of 1... one to the main gallery, then another to the movie file itself. Thus increasing your bandwidth usage. BTW, I have seen this in the wild... this isn't just something I came up with myself.

Also, for all those posting thieir stats for number of hot-linkers blocked by the AHL script, think about how many of those might have been legitimate users getting an error.

In short, there is no way to protect against hot-linkers. The best you can do is slow them down, which this script will probably do. Just don't think that it's bullet-proof. And use this information when deciding if $250 plus a per-server fee is worth it. You might be enjoying low-bandwidth for now, but hot-linkers might eventually get around it.

If you want to test this frames tactic yourself, create an index.html file with the code above, then create index_frame.html with the following:

Code:

<html>
<body>
<h2>Anti-hotlinking crack</h2>

<a href="http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demo.mpg">The hot-linked video file</a>

</body>
</html>

Then load index.html in your browser and click the link. You do still have to click it within 3 minutes, just like the main gallery page.

At the site I work for, we use a rotating temp link. It also can be defeated, but it would take a little scripting on the hot-linkers side, and wouldn't be as easy as just dropping in some HTML. It also works perfectly with our setup of multiple seperate video servers. Again, nothing is bullet-proof, especially not referer-checking.

One last question for x3m. Does your script work with multiple load balanced servers? We have our "gallery" page served off of a load balanced cluster, then the video files are served off of other dedicated video servers. So each request to the gallery page will go to a different server, and the request to the video file itself goes to a completely different set of servers. My guess is that your script is storing the client info on the server, so it only works if both hits go to the same server, which of course won't work for any large scale site using load-balancing like Cisco's Local Directory or a Coyote Point Equalizer. The logistics of sharing the client-info between several servers presents many challenges, especially if those servers are at disparate networks across the world, and the connection between each has its own lag. Let me know what you're thoughts are on this.

Anyways... I'm not trying to discourage any of your from buying the AHL script. It will proabably help in the short run. I just want you to be informed that it's not all that the AHL guys hype it up to be. Make an informed decision.

Thanks

This can be solved very easy.....just use a java-script frame buster

DynaMite

x3m 04-10-2003 12:12 PM

Let me first address the free advertisement comment from Likewhoa and then I will get to the real questions in more details.

I am more that happy for your customers. Pipecrew seems to be very happy with your services. I don't know how long he is hosted with you but I bet he just learned today that you provide anti-hotlinking protection :) Otherwise I am sure he would have mention it earlier.

I went through all of the pages on your site, but I could not find any information about the ability for your customers to save money on their bandwidth bills with anti-hotlinking protection. I wonder why? :)

x3m 04-10-2003 12:38 PM

Dear pancake7,

Since you it took you quite a while to post your comments and questions, I will answer all of your post in several parts, just so I don't miss anything out.

Quote:

Originally posted by pancake7
Just so you all don't get a false sense of security, this can be easily defeated....
The method you're describing in such details :) is indeed something that can be done, but ...

First of all, the hotlinking webmaster must understand what exactly is going on on the protected domain which causes his loyal freeloader get redirected to a pop-up hell, dialers, ect. while he was sure that when he posted the link on his site, everything was working fine for him.

When he went to my gallery where he grabed the links to my movies that he wanted to post at his site, he was authorised for 1 hour to watch the movies in a ny way, so when he posted them on his site and checked the links everything works fine.

Until he got hate emails from his freeloaders that the links don't work, I already made a few bucks from those freeloaders. :)

After observind the source of my html pages and not finding any Java, CGI, or PHP code in there, he MOST LIKELY decided that he fucked up and simply removed the links.

In the situation, when he decided to find what out what the hell was going on, and implemented the methos you're describing, he will allow his freeloaders to view my movies and will indeed send a few more gigs of transfer to my html pages (20k per page at the most for which I am already compensated from his traffic redirected to dialers :) ), As soon as I see this activity in my logs, all I have to do it to block his domain in my httpd.conf and that's it. We are done with this guy once and for all and probably still made a few bucks in the end. But, honestly, how many people do yuo think will go through all that. My guess is, not many.

Actually, we already have a new version of AHL that will have a feature to block and redirect domains through AHL configuration file. It was suggested by one of our customers. :) This will also allow you to block and redirect the domains from which you believe you have unproductive traffic and actually never posted at. such as phatforims.com or even all of the .ru

Last comment on this issue. I LOVE HOTLINKERS after I started using AHL. I encourage them to hotlink my movies as much as they can. I even consider signing up at those forums and hotlink my own movies! All it does for me, is extra income from people redirected to "for free sponsors" and dialers. :thumbsup

BR Guy 04-10-2003 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DynaSpain


This can be solved very easy.....just use a java-script frame buster

DynaMite

I bypassed the protection using i.f.r.a.m.e. html tag.
It's possible to bust i.f.r.a.m.e.
s using java-scrpt?

here's the link:
http://www.brguy.com/gfy/bypassAHL.html

darksoul 04-10-2003 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by x582


and if you serve your HTML from server #1 and you movies from server #2, likewhoa script won't work for that. At least this is what noc told me.

the same thing happens with ahl

jojojo 04-10-2003 01:20 PM

Quote:

http://www.antihotlinking.com/demo/demogallery.html
How come I can highlight the urls and paste them into another browser window and they work?


I thought you said it protects cut + paste which is how a lot of hotlinkers set things up these days?

x3m 04-10-2003 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by pancake7


One last question for x3m. Does your script work with multiple load balanced servers? We have our "gallery" page served off of a load balanced cluster, then the video files are served off of other dedicated video servers. So each request to the gallery page will go to a different server, and the request to the video file itself goes to a completely different set of servers. My guess is that your script is storing the client info on the server, so it only works if both hits go to the same server, which of course won't work for any large scale site using load-balancing like Cisco's Local Directory or a Coyote Point Equalizer. The logistics of sharing the client-info between several servers presents many challenges, especially if those servers are at disparate networks across the world, and the connection between each has its own lag. Let me know what you're thoughts are on this.

Current version oh AHL supports the following types of setups:

1. Single server setup - when html and movies are served from the same box (right off the box)
2. Multiple server setup - when html on server "A" links to movies hosted on other domains or subdomains on servers "B" "C" ..., providing that those subdomians are hosted entirely on one server (there also needs to be a change to html pages done in this case)
3. DNS load balancing setup - when html and movies are hosted on multiple servers providing that user session is kept alive on one server with serves both html and movies

Load balancing setup with multiple servers described above by pancake7, will be supported by AHL Enterprise, scheduled to be released in a few weeks. It's already coded and is under testing on our stands. :)

x3m 04-10-2003 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BR Guy

I bypassed the protection using i.f.r.a.m.e. html tag.
It's possible to bust i.f.r.a.m.e.
s using java-scrpt?

here's the link:
http://www.brguy.com/gfy/bypassAHL.html

Try again! :)

Pipecrew 04-10-2003 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by x3m
I am more that happy for your customers. Pipecrew seems to be very happy with your services. I don't know how long he is hosted with you but I bet he just learned today that you provide anti-hotlinking protection :) Otherwise I am sure he would have mention it earlier.


I've known they have had it forever, I dont do galleries therefore I dont use it, You are going to kill your product, I've seen you spam it on 3 boards now, Give it a bit of time and someone will come out with something better and cheaper

x3m 04-10-2003 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mole
Wouldn't a simple script which randomly renames the directory the movies are stored in every couple minute or so work as well?

That's what they use on ProAdult free hosts.

That will probably work if you don't post movies to TGPs that prohibit page changes. If you do, TGPs will blacklist you. AHL is 100% TGP compatible.

jayeff 04-10-2003 04:29 PM

I do think your product is too expensive... way too expensive.

The reason has nothing to do with "fair" or any other considerations like that: solely the market place.

If you write a script (for want of a better word) that has a very small potential market, then a high margin business model is more or less forced on you. But a script which has potentially (tens of) thousands of customers gives sellers the freedom to choose whether to sell a lot of scripts at a low price, or a small(er) number at a high price.

In some markets there is room for both price models because you can sometimes offer additional features or something else to make a high price worthwhile for some customers. But in this case the script basically either works or it doesn't.

There are already other anti-hotlinking scripts around that work for movies and as broadband content becomes more and more popular, there will be more. You can bet that many of the sellers will go for low price/high sales.

When that happens your pricing will seem like a scam (please note that I am not saying it is a scam, only what the perception will be). That will hurt your reputation, damaging not only your sales of this product, but of any others you try to sell.

Nor can you later on suddenly drop your price to a competitive level: at least, not without pissing off everyone who paid the original price.

x3m 04-11-2003 04:08 AM

Jayeff,

Let me give you some numbers so you can see that $249.00 for AHL is indeed fair.

Any newbie webmaster who posts movies even only twice a week is burning at least 5 mpbs or 1600 gigs of transfer (5*320).

Although most of our current clients report up to 60% !!! of their bandwidth stolen by hotlinkers, I am taking only 8% into my calculations, since this is what I am seeing on my sites after 3+ months of using AHL. It was over 15% when AHL was just turned on and it went down to 8% right now.

So, 1600 gigs per month * 8% = 128 gigs stolen by hotlinkers

Even if this newbie is paying only 25 cents per gig, he is loosing:
128 gigs * $0.25 = $32.00 stolen by hotlinkers every month.

As you can see, even with these conservative numbers, any newbie webmaster working with movies will make the investment back in under 8 months. But, with the income from redirecting hotlinkers even faster. Most likely under 4-6 months.

From that point on, this webmaster will have net savings and profit from using AHL for the rest of his movie posting career.

Now, look at your bandwidth usage and you will understand why people who burn 30+ mpbs (minimal rate for any serious movie webmaster) report that they make their investment back in no time. :thumbsup

Madball 04-11-2003 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jayeff
I do think your product is too expensive... way too expensive.
Too expensive? Ok fine, let's try this again:

So you do $5k a month in bandwidth. This software let's you

a) save 10% or whatever (e.g. $500) in raw bandwidth costs by blocking hotlinkers
b) send the hotlink traffic to either your own programs or offshoreclicks (insert: amateurpages, dialers etc.) and generate additional cash. Let's assume that's another $500 a month.

So you pay $249 and come out $1k after 30 days. That's a 300 % ROI after 30 days for this investment. WHAT THE FUCK IS EXPENSIVE HERE???

BRISK 04-11-2003 04:47 AM

I don't believe there is that much money to be made redirecting hotlinkers to dialers, etc...

Most hotlinkers come from countries that are on the usual shit lists, somehow I doubt there is much money to be made from them.

nevermind 04-11-2003 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by pancake7


At the site I work for, we use a rotating temp link. It also can be defeated, but it would take a little scripting on the hot-linkers side, and wouldn't be as easy as just dropping in some HTML. It also works perfectly with our setup of multiple seperate video servers. Again, nothing is bullet-proof, especially not referer-checking.


By far the best solution because, as you pointed out:

Quote:

Originally posted by pancake7



Also, for all those posting their stats for number of hot-linkers blocked by the AHL script, think about how many of those might have been legitimate users getting an error.


Rotating temp links do not block legitimate viewers ...

x3m 04-11-2003 08:11 AM

Just send them to an email collection program and you will like the results! :)

x3m 04-11-2003 08:14 AM

nevermind,

AHL does not block legit user as well, but as compared to rotating temp link scripts, AHL is 100% safe with TGP scripts.

nevermind 04-11-2003 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by x3m
nevermind,

AHL does not block legit user as well, but as compared to rotating temp link scripts, AHL is 100% safe with TGP scripts.

You can hype your product all you want, but it doesn't change the facts.

Any IP based "solution" is going to cause at least some problems with legit viewers. Perhaps you have missed numerous discussions on various webmaster boards to this effect.

And I haven't had any problems with TGP's regarding time-stamped urls because the actual page link to the video doesn't change under the system set up by my hosting company.

Cost to me for this service: ZERO


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123