Based on the demographic data it would appear more like that HRC basically counts on three groups:
- those depending on handouts
- minorities (that rely on affirmative action and support open immigration policy)
- "trendy" people that are in many cases educated yet at the same time unable to challenge the current mainstream narrative / government, those who worship the current status quo because they're taught to do so and can't imagine otherwise
Based on the demographic data it would appear more like that HRC basically counts on three groups:
- those depending on handouts
- minorities (that rely on affirmative action and support open immigration policy)
- "trendy" people that are in many cases educated yet at the same time unable to challenge the current mainstream narrative / government, those who worship the current status quo because they're taught to do so and can't imagine otherwise
I think Trump is closer to libertarian than Hillary but Gary would have to come out in support of Trump.
Even just 1% of his 6% could make the difference at this point.
What could make even more difference would be if Johnson as a candidate actually got space to articulate his views. And Stein also.
Imagine having somebody cultured like Gary Johnson as a part of the debates.
You have the incredibly fake Clinton that would be, in a healthy political climate, disqualified to run for any kind of office. Then the Donald who's notorious for self destructing on stage. And then somebody cultured with actual track record of getting things done. That is what could already make a difference.
Also imagine all the TV channels would ONLY have to broadcast original materials, original speeches. You'd have no "commentaries" "breaking reports" no smart asses telling everybody who to vote for and what to think, none of that.
Just each candidate with the same coverage, in his own words, his own program, his own rallies, his own debate performances.
What could make even more difference would be if Johnson as a candidate actually got space to articulate his views. And Stein also.
Imagine having somebody cultured like Gary Johnson as a part of the debates.
You have the incredibly fake Clinton that would be, in a healthy political climate, disqualified to run for any kind of office. Then the Donald who's notorious for self destructing on stage. And then somebody cultured with actual track record of getting things done. That is what could already make a difference.
Also imagine all the TV channels would ONLY have to broadcast original materials, original speeches. You'd have no "commentaries" "breaking reports" no smart asses telling everybody who to vote for and what to think, none of that.
Just each candidate with the same coverage, in his own words, his own program, his own rallies, his own debate performances.
Yeah because the candidates would never lie and wouldn't need anyone fact checking them.. Dream on..
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
This chart is about "who do u think is going to win" here's one on Trump voters demographics - http://politicsthatwork.com/blog/trump-supporters.php
Unless you hot your education at Trump U, educated people are less likely to vote for Trump. 12clicks is your prime example
If you look on the map, the obvious thing is aside from say Texas, all the states that support Trump are full of poor people. This can also be said for Republican support as well. Typically these states don't have high percentages of college educated people and jobs are typically under wages of middle class or at the very low rung of the middle class.
I think it shows that these people are not well informed and are more gullible than people who have better educations and higher paying jobs. Even Texas has low wages (like FL) but it's only the oil industry which props it up.
Why do poor people support Trump/Republican party while higher earners and college educated people support Democrats? Things that make you go hummm..
Actually they are full of smart people, Hillary is a dumb cunt..
This chart is about "who do u think is going to win" here's one on Trump voters demographics - Who is Voting for Trump?
Unless you hot your education at Trump U, educated people are less likely to vote for Trump. 12clicks is your prime example
No it's a poll with one of the questions being that and other demographic questions asked. As with every poll. Thanks for proving your poor ignorant status.
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
This chart is about "who do u think is going to win" here's one on Trump voters demographics - Who is Voting for Trump?
Unless you hot your education at Trump U, educated people are less likely to vote for Trump. 12clicks is your prime example
oh look, one of the rabble explaining how his betters are less educated.
hahaha, seriously dude, look around the shit hole you live in before explaining how dumb someone else is.
I'm not a dinosaur, I'm a crocodile. I've seen dinosaurs come and go and I'm left unimpressed.
oh look, one of the rabble explaining how his betters are less educated.
hahaha, seriously dude, look around the shit hole you live in before explaining how dumb someone else is.
Come see my shithole in Aruba for Christmas. I may have a roofing job for you.
Betters my ass, jersey boy
Comment