-
As someone else put it:a very brisk job indeed with 650 000 emails on the computer in question
"They went through 650k emails in 8 days. That's one email per second - highly plausible."
It looks to me like they were pressured to give her the all clear so that she would be free of that and they will wait until the election is over before they continue, if they will continue to investigate her which is highly unlikely if she gets into office."In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act." - George OrwellComment
-
You are right. If you cannot see the difference... Well, you said it yourself.
One of them was doing their job, which includes handling, discussing, and disseminating classified information on a daily basis. The other one took pictures of classified information for no reason after after being told it was against the law to do so.
How can you not see the difference between the two?Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NYComment
-
I have a confession to make. It was me that reviewed all 650,000 emails. I wore out like 5 rubber ''O.K." stamps and went through gallons of green ink.
I'll let nothing stop Hillary. NOTHING.Comment
-
So we can give the emails a break for now.
Game time in 2 daysTelegram PhoenixBrad
https://quantads.ioComment
-
I would guess it's not difficult at all. A little bit of sorting and then comparing meta data and it should be an easy task.
Sort the emails by date to locate the ones sent while Clinton was Secretary of State. Take those and see which ones were sent from Secretary of State Clinton. Then compare those to the emails they have already looked over. If there are any from that date range that was sent from Clinton they can review them for classified information.
They had one hundred officers involved in the original case reviewing emails, so it doesn't sound unresonable at all that they would be able to sort through the information quickly.Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NYComment
-
Comment
-
Just for the record:
The crooked FBI leaker in NY said there were 650k emails. Comey, nor anyone else, has ever said how many state.gov emails were on that computer, which was the scope of the renewed investigation.
Skype: CallTomNow
Comment
-
Can't wait for this to be over. Then dread when it all starts up again in 2 years....XXXRewards - Karups - Boyfun - Jawked. Paying on time since 1997. Contact me at brent [at] xxxrewards.comComment
-
It is so fucking easy to search 650K emails -- it's a joke to think otherwise. Just have to know what terms to look for
WTF do you think they do -- open each one in Outlook -- and read them one by one?
Comment
-
Even if they did open and read/skim each one, a team of 20-25 people could easily go through that many emails in 8 days. People are acting like it was just one person manually flipping through all these emails.Comment
-
It is, is it? Ok here's a test. Go to https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/
Find the email where someone is discussing how personal it is to make a tough choice
You get back when you find the exact email ID I'm referring to. Post the ID here. I will PM it to an agreeable 3rd party on the board right now. You have 9 days starting now to find it in less than 10% of the emails they had to search.
The point here is unless every single email is read there's no way to know the content. You will not find the specific email I'm referring to based on what I've said.PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.Comment
-
Perhaps you're not aware of how digital storage systems such as emails can be searched by software tools... actually, from your idiotic challenge it's obvious you don't. For example, the whole mass of emails can be searched for specific keywords such as "classified" or "top secret" or "BENGHAZI" or whatever and then that subset of emails can be flagged for closer inspection. And you can bet the FBI has some cutting edge software tools to do that kind of work.
But don't take my word for it, here's Wired.com's take on this subject: https://www.wired.com/2016/11/yes-do...ls-eight-days/
Duh!Comment
-
So prove it. Find the email. There is one word in the english dictionary that will narrow it down to 314 results. That's the only hint you get. Maybe you can find a script that will count the entire english dictionary word frequency. To save you some time the word has nothing to do with anything I've mentioned. Nothing to do with anything really. Have at it. Time is ticking.
Who wants to be pm'ed the email ID?PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.Comment
-
I saw that first from a direct link in comments on a news site yesterday
now the only link available I found today is this - posted on Saturday:
FBI Agent Suspected in Hillary Email Leaks Found Dead in Apparent Murder-Suicide
today the Google news search doesn't return anything at all related to this apart from several conspiracy blogs that obviously reposted this article. Very hard to verify that information unless someone would get a direct confirmation from the police. May be a hoax, may be not. Mass media won't touch it anyway.
The foundation investigation continues although it will be probably swept under the carpet should HRC be elected as planned.Need hosting, cloud, CDN or solutions for your AI? Go faster while saving with The Last Host you'll ever need!| Double Impact PR | Telegram carl_boro | Read My Educational Series | Read my Adult Biz Chronicles|Comment
-
The point is considering the same email team worked on the follow up emails, and only worked on those not identified as duplicates to make the process efficient. It's still very hard to imagine this would be a matter of somebody asking "did you find anything?" and getting an answer "no" then to immediately run to the press and claim that "nothing was found".
Anybody remotely familiar with the FBI investigation process would confirm there's a rigorous procedure to be followed not to mention the approval process in order to conclude / document all the findings.
Plus there's the basic fact that all these government documents were found on the laptop that actually belongs to Weiner, and were there likely stored by Huma Abedin. That itself is already an undisputable proof of actually leaking the government documents.
The fact that this has happened on Sunday before the elections may hint at two things:
1) it was a charade from the start to give HRC a glimpse of "credibility" shortly before the election
2) the intention was genuine but the political pressure too strong so Corney eventually surrendered
Anyway this will likely do little to satisfy the public unless one is a die hard pro-HRC partisan.Need hosting, cloud, CDN or solutions for your AI? Go faster while saving with The Last Host you'll ever need!| Double Impact PR | Telegram carl_boro | Read My Educational Series | Read my Adult Biz Chronicles|Comment
-
I don't, for a second, doubt that this report came out so quickly because of intense political pressure. I remember when the first letter from Comey went public there were many experts saying it could take months to sift through these emails. That it happened so fast is no doubt political. I wouldn't be shocked if they were ordered to put hundreds of agents on this in order to either come up with some kind of chargeable evidence or come up with nothing before the election.Comment
-
650,000 emails on the machine - a small fraction of them from Clinton, so actually very easy to resolve.
No drama, no conspiracy.
Unless you believe of course that the whole thing was a political move by the FBI because she pissed them off. After all they could have just looked at the emails first before they decided to throw a fucking big spanner in the Clinton campaign.
So it all depends who you want to win - you can dress this up either way - you can massage your prejudices with the "facts".
Personally I think that that Comey guy is thoroughly regretting getting involved - his career is fucked now whoever wins.
I also think that we should have a level playing field here, not only should Mr Fart publish his tax returns, he should also hand over every email he has sent or received for the last 10 years to wikileaks to be published on the internet, and to the FBI for their brand of scrutiny.
"Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
“There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
“a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.comComment
-
Comment
-
shes not crookedComment
-
?You can?t review 650,000 emails in eight days,? Trump- Either Trump thinks his Trumpsters will believe anything he says; or,
- Donald Trump is really that digitally lame.
Comment
-
US election 2016: How to review 650,000 emails in eight days - BBC News
From above URL:
For Steven Murdoch, a research fellow at the University of London, the key word is "review".
"It doesn't mean they have been read," he said, adding that privacy considerations and the sheer volume of data would have been prohibitive."In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act." - George OrwellComment
-
You are comparing oranges to sneakers.
The system on Wikileaks seems to be an HTML search with limited ability.
On the other hand, the FBI has complete access to the hard drive itself. I am guessing they aren't using Microsoft Outlook to do these searches. They are using metadata. They narrow down the search parameters by the dates Clinton was Secretary of State, then from the results pull all emails that involved Clinton herself. From there they compare the emails to the emails they have already reviewed in the original investigation. At this point, they haven't even physically looked over a single email yet - all of this was sorting using metadata. Once they have everything narrowed down (which most likely took them only a few minutes) they can review what is left by hand. They used over one hundred agents before, and the most likely used how every many they needed to.Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NYComment
-
FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot comComment
-
I'm going to explain the relevance of your $800 claimed transaction fees and how it proves you are lying.... to everyone else but you.
When processing you have failures and you have success transactions. Failures out weigh success by about 3:1. That means, every 4 transactions has 1 success. You said $800 is your transaction fees meaning you have 800 transactions at 25 cents each... your words.
Average transaction is maybe, maybe $30 if you are lucky. 30 X 800 does not equal 250K. And you are saying 250K is your cascade biller...
.....
You are lying about your billing and I would be surprised if you made $100 in a month. You have such an erroneous grasp on how to lie effectively about what you make and I've clearly shown why, what you have claimed in past, is nothing but a lie.
P.s. trump will win tomorrow and then off to jail goes hillary and the world will be a better place without that greedy stank ass cunt who has been selling out the US since her husband l e ft office in 2000.Comment
-
YOU PROVE IT!
All you do on here is post drive by Putin propaganda lies and when called on it you slither away and make a new thread with a new lie!
You even think there were 650k Hillary emails when the FBI NEVER SAID THAT.
You think, believe & post SHIT that isn't based on fact and already debunked.
You waste the time of so many people on here for nothing because whenever you post you're disproved and people take you less seriously to the point you have no respect here anymore by Trump supporters
Skype: CallTomNow
Comment
-
the system is rigged towards herSkype: gallag97
Email: [U]comingsoon/U]Comment
-
email:badgirlartwork -at- gee mail dot comComment
-
Looking forward to seeing the results of an impartial investigation conducted at the behest of President Trump.Comment
-
The FBI are going to be told to crawl up her ass and make sure they come back with something concrete.Comment
Comment