Welp, the Country has been taken over... and the Nolts Think ANYONE Who Knows It IS A Lunatic!

.

No real surprise here.

Quit Giggling Girls...
It took FBI Director Comey a year to go through 50K emails, but 4 days to go through 650K? I guess you could say he was under the gun

This Guy Will Go Down Hard

.

He probably didn't want to suicide himself with 3 shots to the back of the head.

he was FAST AND FURIOUS with these... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Like an English cunt like you would have a clue

Didn't you get the memo? Nat, Gary, Prince, and Paul are all experts on US politics now.

non American or American...they're only informed by fake news, which makes them uninformed.

They've created the criminal called Hilary Clinton, if only they could cook up a crime to attach to her which will stick.

lol what a joke everyone knows she was guilty as hell. Either you full of shit or a idiot to believe she was not. That is the easiest way to put it. Now they know they can get away with anything. Congratulations to the FBI you guys rock. Our fore fathers are turning over in there graves now.

Actually they did find she did these things but called it "stupidity" just like it was Saucier's stupidity taking selfies in a sub and additional stupidity for telling anyone about it. But he doesn't get to play the stupid card like Hillary I guess..

God damn those Russian hackers and their doctored emails.

As someone else put it:

"They went through 650k emails in 8 days. That's one email per second - highly plausible."

It looks to me like they were pressured to give her the all clear so that she would be free of that and they will wait until the election is over before they continue, if they will continue to investigate her which is highly unlikely if she gets into office.

can't be much fun with health issues and then being hounded with bull shit. :(

You are right. If you cannot see the difference... Well, you said it yourself.

One of them was doing their job, which includes handling, discussing, and disseminating classified information on a daily basis. The other one took pictures of classified information for no reason after after being told it was against the law to do so.

How can you not see the difference between the two?

I have a confession to make. It was me that reviewed all 650,000 emails. I wore out like 5 rubber ''O.K." stamps and went through gallons of green ink.

I'll let nothing stop Hillary. NOTHING.

So we can give the emails a break for now.

Game time in 2 days

I would guess it's not difficult at all. A little bit of sorting and then comparing meta data and it should be an easy task.

Sort the emails by date to locate the ones sent while Clinton was Secretary of State. Take those and see which ones were sent from Secretary of State Clinton. Then compare those to the emails they have already looked over. If there are any from that date range that was sent from Clinton they can review them for classified information.

They had one hundred officers involved in the original case reviewing emails, so it doesn't sound unresonable at all that they would be able to sort through the information quickly.

They also said they were using analysis software searching for specific keywords, so really no surprise it went so quickly.

Just for the record:

The crooked FBI leaker in NY said there were 650k emails. Comey, nor anyone else, has ever said how many state.gov emails were on that computer, which was the scope of the renewed investigation.

Can't wait for this to be over. Then dread when it all starts up again in 2 years....

It is so fucking easy to search 650K emails -- it's a joke to think otherwise. Just have to know what terms to look for :2 cents:

WTF do you think they do -- open each one in Outlook -- and read them one by one? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Even if they did open and read/skim each one, a team of 20-25 people could easily go through that many emails in 8 days. People are acting like it was just one person manually flipping through all these emails.

It is, is it? Ok here's a test. Go to https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/

Find the email where someone is discussing how personal it is to make a tough choice

You get back when you find the exact email ID I'm referring to. Post the ID here. I will PM it to an agreeable 3rd party on the board right now. You have 9 days starting now to find it in less than 10% of the emails they had to search.

The point here is unless every single email is read there's no way to know the content. You will not find the specific email I'm referring to based on what I've said.

Apparently the Dunning-Kruger cohort here on GFY thinks that's exactly what the FBI did. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

assuming one person was doing it


use your heads guys the election is over...if the republicans want to win one try and find a candidate that does well in more demographics than uneducated white guy

"where my cuntry gone?"

Perhaps you're not aware of how digital storage systems such as emails can be searched by software tools... actually, from your idiotic challenge it's obvious you don't. For example, the whole mass of emails can be searched for specific keywords such as "classified" or "top secret" or "BENGHAZI" or whatever and then that subset of emails can be flagged for closer inspection. And you can bet the FBI has some cutting edge software tools to do that kind of work.

But don't take my word for it, here's Wired.com's take on this subject: https://www.wired.com/2016/11/yes-do...ls-eight-days/

Duh!

So prove it. Find the email. There is one word in the english dictionary that will narrow it down to 314 results. That's the only hint you get. Maybe you can find a script that will count the entire english dictionary word frequency. To save you some time the word has nothing to do with anything I've mentioned. Nothing to do with anything really. Have at it. Time is ticking.

Who wants to be pm'ed the email ID?

I saw that first from a direct link in comments on a news site yesterday

now the only link available I found today is this - posted on Saturday:

FBI Agent Suspected in Hillary Email Leaks Found Dead in Apparent Murder-Suicide

today the Google news search doesn't return anything at all related to this apart from several conspiracy blogs that obviously reposted this article. Very hard to verify that information unless someone would get a direct confirmation from the police. May be a hoax, may be not. Mass media won't touch it anyway.

The foundation investigation continues although it will be probably swept under the carpet should HRC be elected as planned.

The point is considering the same email team worked on the follow up emails, and only worked on those not identified as duplicates to make the process efficient. It's still very hard to imagine this would be a matter of somebody asking "did you find anything?" and getting an answer "no" then to immediately run to the press and claim that "nothing was found".

Anybody remotely familiar with the FBI investigation process would confirm there's a rigorous procedure to be followed not to mention the approval process in order to conclude / document all the findings.

Plus there's the basic fact that all these government documents were found on the laptop that actually belongs to Weiner, and were there likely stored by Huma Abedin. That itself is already an undisputable proof of actually leaking the government documents.

The fact that this has happened on Sunday before the elections may hint at two things:

1) it was a charade from the start to give HRC a glimpse of "credibility" shortly before the election
2) the intention was genuine but the political pressure too strong so Corney eventually surrendered

Anyway this will likely do little to satisfy the public unless one is a die hard pro-HRC partisan.

I don't, for a second, doubt that this report came out so quickly because of intense political pressure. I remember when the first letter from Comey went public there were many experts saying it could take months to sift through these emails. That it happened so fast is no doubt political. I wouldn't be shocked if they were ordered to put hundreds of agents on this in order to either come up with some kind of chargeable evidence or come up with nothing before the election.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I thought you've been around adult biz for a while and know the difference between processing fee and authorization fee? :1orglaugh Oh wait, hand submitting galleries don't need any of that :1orglaugh

650,000 emails on the machine - a small fraction of them from Clinton, so actually very easy to resolve.

No drama, no conspiracy.

Unless you believe of course that the whole thing was a political move by the FBI because she pissed them off. After all they could have just looked at the emails first before they decided to throw a fucking big spanner in the Clinton campaign.

So it all depends who you want to win - you can dress this up either way - you can massage your prejudices with the "facts".

Personally I think that that Comey guy is thoroughly regretting getting involved - his career is fucked now whoever wins.

I also think that we should have a level playing field here, not only should Mr Fart publish his tax returns, he should also hand over every email he has sent or received for the last 10 years to wikileaks to be published on the internet, and to the FBI for their brand of scrutiny.

:thumbsup

https://s18.postimg.org/4u40b0wop/snowdon.jpg

:glugglug

shes not crooked

OK, good enough for me.

I still think something will come out it later...

1. Either Trump thinks his Trumpsters will believe anything he says; or,
2. Donald Trump is really that digitally lame.

https://s21.postimg.org/l7xv8rup3/em...eral_flynn.png

Or the other possibility is that he did so for a good reason but was pressured to back down and don't forget, he would have the entire establishment against him.

US election 2016: How to review 650,000 emails in eight days - BBC News

From above URL:

For Steven Murdoch, a research fellow at the University of London, the key word is "review".

"It doesn't mean they have been read," he said, adding that privacy considerations and the sheer volume of data would have been prohibitive.

You are comparing oranges to sneakers.

The system on Wikileaks seems to be an HTML search with limited ability.

On the other hand, the FBI has complete access to the hard drive itself. I am guessing they aren't using Microsoft Outlook to do these searches. They are using metadata. They narrow down the search parameters by the dates Clinton was Secretary of State, then from the results pull all emails that involved Clinton herself. From there they compare the emails to the emails they have already reviewed in the original investigation. At this point, they haven't even physically looked over a single email yet - all of this was sorting using metadata. Once they have everything narrowed down (which most likely took them only a few minutes) they can review what is left by hand. They used over one hundred agents before, and the most likely used how every many they needed to.