GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   FBI is examining the emails again. New emails (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1224631)

onwebcam 10-28-2016 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axeman (Post 21254518)
NYT said they found thousands of emails related to the case on the phones of Huma and Anthony Weiner when they seized the phones investigating Weiner and the 15 year old girl.

Ahahahaha. The only electronics not destroyed! She's fucking toast. A lesbo smacked down by a wiener. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Coup 10-28-2016 02:41 PM


CarlosTheGaucho 10-28-2016 02:42 PM

Very curious how this plays out, seems there may be a hole or two in the whole operation. Waiting to hear the spin and twist on this.

VikingMan 10-28-2016 02:55 PM

What an unbelievable shift in consciousness of the American people in just a few months. It was not long ago that if you were seen with a Trump sticker on your car you were in fear of being labeled a social pariah. Now there are Trump signs EVERYWHERE and almost nobody has a Hitlery sticker on their car or yard sign because they are afraid of being labeled a pariah.

Now that we have exposed Hitlery and the hateful lying media to the masses we need to put the pressure on cuckservatives. Cucks are gonna cuck and we need to be there to DESTROY them! That also means that when god emperor Trump takes office we need to make sure he does not just fuck us over like every other president in recent memory.

Relic 10-28-2016 02:55 PM

http://i.imgur.com/8psGnFn.jpg

astronaut x 10-28-2016 02:57 PM

Wont amount to jack shit.

Comey said he was not sure how long the additional review would take and said the FBI "cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant."

It is ridiculous to think that they didn't already have this information. The material in question was found on a cell phone that they have had in their possession for awhile now.

"FBI Director Comey should immediately provide the American public more information than is contained in the letter he sent to eight Republican committee chairmen," Podesta said. "Already, we have seen characterizations that the FBI is 'reopening' an investigation but Comey's words do not match that characterization. Director Comey's letter refers to emails that have come to light in an unrelated case, but we have no idea what those emails are and the Director himself notes they may not even be significant. It is extraordinary that we would see something like this just 11 days out from a presidential election."

Nice try GOP. LOL.

Getting fucking desperate.

onwebcam 10-28-2016 03:12 PM

They say that the market calls the election.. Well..

Markets Rattled By Fresh FBI Review of Clinton Email - MoneyBeat - WSJ

Rochard 10-28-2016 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LatinaCamChat (Post 21254695)
It's incredible how much of a dopey cuckold you are

It find all of this absolutely hilarious.

We had a year long investigation into this and it was decided there was no wrong doing. There wasn't even a reason to press charges. The reality of this is it is not illegal for the Secretary of State to send classified information via email. The Secretary of State, in the normal course of routine business, sends classified information on a regular basis. There is no law that says the Secretary of State cannot send such information via private server. Or telephone. Or fax. Or smoke signals. It's just not illegal.

New emails isn't going to change a thing.

At the very same time, we haven't bothered to expand the investigation into anyone else. Multiple other Secretaries of State have used the same exact set up - It seems Hillary consulted former Secretary of State Colin Powell and used the same set up he used. Why aren't we investigating anyone else? If the handling of classified information via email is so important to national security, why aren't we investigating anyone else?

If the way our government officials handle classified information via email is so vital to national security, why hasn't our Congress changed the law to ensure it is not legal for classified information to be sent via email?

Ironically, the person leading the charge to investigate this - Jason Chaffetz - hands out business cards with his gmail account on it:

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics...03_4x3_992.jpg

Jason Chaffetz is handing out business cards identifying him as a member of Congress with a Gmail address yet no one seems to be interested in investigating him to see if he is turning these official emails over to properly stored.

This is nothing more than a witch hunt. Jason Chaffetz has already made it perfectly clear he has years of investigations lined up for Hillary "just because" they can.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...acb_story.html

I want my government to do it's job not play high school games.

CaptainHowdy 10-28-2016 03:18 PM

I'm lost ...

noshit 10-28-2016 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21254377)
Most likely this has been planned for a while, the timing is too perfect

What do you make of this being released on a Friday?

.

onwebcam 10-28-2016 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21254899)
It find all of this absolutely hilarious.

We had a year long investigation into this and it was decided there was no wrong doing. There wasn't even a reason to press charges. The reality of this is it is not illegal for the Secretary of State to send classified information via email. The Secretary of State, in the normal course of routine business, sends classified information on a regular basis. There is no law that says the Secretary of State cannot send such information via private server. Or telephone. Or fax. Or smoke signals. It's just not illegal.

New emails isn't going to change a thing.

At the very same time, we haven't bothered to expand the investigation into anyone else. Multiple other Secretaries of State have used the same exact set up - It seems Hillary consulted former Secretary of State Colin Powell and used the same set up he used. Why aren't we investigating anyone else? If the handling of classified information via email is so important to national security, why aren't we investigating anyone else?

If the way our government officials handle classified information via email is so vital to national security, why hasn't our Congress changed the law to ensure it is not legal for classified information to be sent via email?

Ironically, the person leading the charge to investigate this - Jason Chaffetz - hands out business cards with his gmail account on it:

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics...03_4x3_992.jpg

Jason Chaffetz is handing out business cards identifying him as a member of Congress with a Gmail address yet no one seems to be interested in investigating him to see if he is turning these official emails over to properly stored.

This is nothing more than a witch hunt. Jason Chaffetz has already made it perfectly clear he has years of investigations lined up for Hillary "just because" they can.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...acb_story.html

I want my government to do it's job not play high school games.

Pretty sure he's not discussing classified information on gmail.

wehateporn 10-28-2016 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noshit (Post 21254917)
What do you make of this being released on a Friday?

.

Perfect for the weekend newspapers, unless Clintons people can create a false flag school shooting or terror event to takeover the headlines

11 days before the election is a Freemason signature

Sly 10-28-2016 03:45 PM

I find it interesting that my Facebook is not blowing up about this.

It typically blows up when The Don farts in public.

onwebcam 10-28-2016 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 21254947)
I find it interesting that my Facebook is not blowing up about this.

It typically blows up when The Don farts in public.

It's damn near every other post on mine. No shit just scrolled down 9 out of 20 posts

Sly 10-28-2016 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21254968)
It's damn near every other post on mine. No shit just scrolled down 9 out of 20 posts

Ah, I have blocked most of those kinds of posts. I'm referring to the trending links on the right and posts built off of those.

Robbie 10-28-2016 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 21254647)
can he pardon someone whose not indicted or convicted? i dont think so, but...obama doesnt care.

Ford pardoned Nixon. And Nixon was not YET indicted when it happened. So yeah, the President can grant a full pardon to anyone.

noshit 10-28-2016 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21254941)
Perfect for the weekend newspapers, unless Clintons people can create a false flag school shooting or terror event to takeover the headlines

11 days before the election is a Freemason signature

:thumbsup 3, 7, and 9 are still up
My initial thought was a Friday downplay, because it's going to evolve big

.

8pt-buck 10-28-2016 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 21254278)
just wait...in a few hours NBC will find another woman to accuse trump of rape or something...

:upsidedow

Or CNN with that pig Brooke Baldwin or Know it all Como
:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

astronaut x 10-28-2016 04:42 PM

All this did was remind me to go early vote today before they closed.

LOL.

nico-t 10-28-2016 04:43 PM

I'll truly be happy for mankind when Hillary loses on november 8th.

2MuchMark 10-28-2016 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astronaut x (Post 21254875)
Wont amount to jack shit.

Comey said he was not sure how long the additional review would take and said the FBI "cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant.".

Finally! A post from someone who actually read the article and not just the headline.

Apologies to all Trumpsters who currently have a hard-on. Hillary will win.

Phoenix 10-28-2016 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 21255055)
Finally! A post from someone who actually read the article and not just the headline.

Apologies to all Trumpsters who currently have a hard-on. Hillary will win.

Yes let's consider it.
They just found some emails and without knowing anything about them they make an announcement. That sounds like the FBI.
They have already digested most of the content and are taking action soon. There is no way they mess with the election without valid reason.

We have emails and are going to investigate a full on presidential electee who has people disappeared and is married to an ex president. Then just say all good...lol

Phoenix 10-28-2016 06:28 PM

http://i.imgur.com/5dQ0olp.jpg

Coup 10-28-2016 06:37 PM


onwebcam 10-28-2016 06:46 PM

Hillary made a statement on the matter and urged everyone to get out and vote "early" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

bronco67 10-28-2016 07:01 PM

It'll be the same "nothing to see here, please move along" as last hundred thousand emails. But Republicans can have a moment of joy.

bronco67 10-28-2016 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 21255097)
Yes let's consider it.
They just found some emails and without knowing anything about them they make an announcement. That sounds like the FBI.
They have already digested most of the content and are taking action soon. There is no way they mess with the election without valid reason.

We have emails and are going to investigate a full on presidential electee who has people disappeared and is married to an ex president. Then just say all good...lol

All it is a case of CYA for Comey. He's already said he doesn't want this announcement to be misunderstood.... but republicans are already creaming in their pants over the prospect that some tiny tidbit of wrongdoing can be found so they can finally nail Hilary. It won't happen. They're just letting themselves go deeper down the rabbit hole.

onwebcam 10-28-2016 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 21255130)
It'll be the same "nothing to see here, please move along" as last hundred thousand emails. But Republicans can have a moment of joy.

Sorry but you're dead wrong. The problem is, the emails were on her personal assistants phone. This is the only device that wasn't destroyed. Everyone knows since it has been reported as so that those investigating this weren't happy when Comey came out and cleared her. My guess is that at least one of those people continued on. They put 2+2 together and found these emails and then very likely approached Comey with a demand. He reopen the investigation or they go to the press.. Since Huma was her personal assistant it's pretty likely she had access to the actual email server. At the very least there were some of the deleted emails on her phone. Probably a lot of them since she was her right hand woman... And if those emails weren't about tampon store runs she's done.

Coup 10-28-2016 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21255124)
Hillary made a statement on the matter and urged everyone to get out and vote "early" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Fucking shameless.

Paul Markham 10-28-2016 10:57 PM

The US has been pretty good at finding incompetents to be President. This is a new high for that strategy.

CarlosTheGaucho 10-30-2016 01:43 PM

It appears that Wiener is going to cooperate with FBI.

HRC camp already labeling FBI actions as "inappropriate" and even DOJ gets vocal which is telling.

That's the issue with too many people involved in their corruption network, at some point a weak, unexpected hole in the plan like sexting Wiener can bring the whole house down.

Still it can be a false flag with motivations that are yet unclear since it's hard to trust any government institution at this point.

A notable side effect is that it may help more people to get to know about Huma Abedin, her track record and jihadist roots that definitely help with getting additional funding from various islamofascist regimes such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Which would be great.

Jigster715 10-30-2016 01:50 PM

One of Hilary's advisors called the other people around her "dumb as birdshit". :1orglaugh

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/clinton-pr...194200675.html

CarlosTheGaucho 10-31-2016 07:32 AM

It appears the Foundation eventually gets a probe as well.

Appears that DOJ and FBI butting heads over that since DOJ claims it's "inappropriate" and that there's "not enough evidence".

Coming from an organisation its AG met with Clinton in privacy before the first half baked "investigation" was closed, and that is promised to keep the office should HRC be voted in as planned.

Joshua G 10-31-2016 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CarlosTheGaucho (Post 21259747)
It appears the Foundation eventually gets a probe as well.

Appears that DOJ and FBI butting heads over that since DOJ claims it's "inappropriate" and that there's "not enough evidence".

Coming from an organisation its AG met with Clinton in privacy before the first half baked "investigation" was closed, and that is promised to keep the office should HRC be voted in as planned.

funny to read the liberals whine about what comey did, not caring in the least when loretta met with bill...

:1orglaugh

Phoenix 10-31-2016 11:35 AM

Donna Brazile out at CNN amid leaks to Clinton campaign - Oct. 31, 2016

CarlosTheGaucho 10-31-2016 02:41 PM

About the Jihadi princess Huma Abedin

First time somebody told me about this Muslim brotherhood connection I thought it's just another borderline insane conspiracy. But then I reviewed what the Obama administration actually sported:

- servile behavior towards the most hostile islamic tyrranies (Obama bowing to Saudi King)
- absolute inaction towards radical Jihadis
- complete hostility towards a secular regime in Syria aiming to overthrow it the "Arabian spring" style
- no issues with the OPEC oil cartel putting US oil drillers out of business by dumping the price of crude oil
- filling Iran's pockets with cash (this makes no sense since I don't see how this would please Saudi's since it's supposed to be their main rival in the area, still it happened and the motivation still to be debunked)

Now if you add the Huma Story, her Jihadi roots (family are strong Sharia advocates), her special security clearance. The regular (can one say intentional) loss of intel and multiple documented cover ups, the Clinton foundation getting fat checks from Jihadi regimes...

One could even say these things don't seem all that unintentional anymore.

sicone 10-31-2016 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21254899)
It find all of this absolutely hilarious. I want my government to do it's job not play high school games.

Normally I would agree with you as I am tired of all the wasted time and money on the emails and Benghazi and other shit.

However, this time it seems the government was doing its job, as these new ones were found during a completely separate investigation that had nothing to do with Clinton.

As someone else said, they didn't cover all their bases when the get out of jail free cards got handed out and now we have the patsy.

CarlosTheGaucho 11-01-2016 09:39 AM

The panic mode continues

- DNC camp, MSM continue to try to paint what is "appropriate" for FBI to do and what is not
- more "Russian" claims coming up while nobody questions or disputes the evidence of corruption / collusion itself
- DNC's Donna Brasile terminated at CNN after the fiasco with leaking the debate questions to Clinton
- more pay to play cash revealed, coming from Morrocco
- more attack ads served in swing states by HRC as a reaction to the recent poll numbers

https://twitter.com/wikileaks

onwebcam 11-01-2016 09:54 AM

https://scontent.fbna1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...98&oe=58A284E6

Rochard 11-01-2016 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 21254938)
Pretty sure he's not discussing classified information on gmail.

How do we know that? We should have an investigation.

Also, how do we know he is turning over ALL government related email, as is required by law? We should have an investigation.

Or do we only have investigations on Democrats?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123