2nd Presidential Debate statements fact-checked

Nytimes... lolol

The people will be heard this election and it will be a trump victory like no other.

Save yo money ho... I'll be acollecting

why is mark price a conduit for liberal fraud & deceit?

he's like a mosquito carrying around zika...whoever believes the times turns into a retarded baby with a small head.

Here is a fact for you...Hillary lost it when Trump ripped her wide open with the Abraham Lincoln bullshit. She was visibly shaken and I have seen that defeated face before on lying cunts (both male and females) when I have also ripped into them and called them out for being liars. I woke up this morning thinking last nights brutal defeat was a dream and had to watch the debate again to convince myself. Not only did President Trump destroy Hillary he also destroyed those two fleabags who were moderating. Their careers need to be over and they need to do something halfway honorable like serving fries or un clogging toilets.

$1000 bet right now? you trump fanatics are giving way better odds than the casinos

I guess they are about to lose their shirts?

Unironically agreed, Poster of dis post.

I betcha you won't! ;)


Why wouldn't you take the bet? (I know why).


VikingMan: Did Donald Trump lie yesterday, when he said he was against the war in Iraq? Just wondering what you think about that.

Trump didn't destroy Hillary. I'd say its true that she was shaken at one point, and I'd say that it wasn't Hillary's best debate. Trump avoided answering questions, and tried to change the subject when asked questions, just like he always does. (And to be fair, Clinton did this too at least once).

Fortunately though, there's another debate coming up, and finally the election. I think you'll see Hillary win. I think it will be a close election, but I think it will be big.

electoral votes won't be close...he was already in tough a week ago

now this, come on now

oh goodness, look what i found about the CNN poll.

liberal lies by the liberal media CNN. this is why hilary is going down...because the media has to manufacture clinton support. it does not actually exist.

If the Mark Princes of the world held Hillary's feet to the fire to the same degree they have Trump's they would not be rallied around a complete fraud right now. Shameful shit, my dudes.

Here is exactly what Clinton said in her speech...

"I mean, politics is like sausage being made. It is unsavory, and it always has been that way, but we usually end up where we need to be. But if everybody's watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. So, you need both a public and a private position."

The reference to laws "being like sausages" is a rather common analogy.

This section of the speech was about President Lincoln, and his attempts to get the 13th Amendment abolishing slavery passed. The reference was about how difficult it can be to get things done in government.

I am so sorry; These Wikileaks release was supposed to be damning and would end Clinton's attempt to win the White House. This was the October surprise? LOL. A handful of pieces from some speeches that are easily explained away?

We are now twenty-nine days from the election. Overall Trump is behind by a solid five points (and this most likely doesn't include any fall out from the video or the debate). WSJ just released a poll saying Clinton is beating Trump by 11%. To put this in perspective, Romney lost by four tenths of a percent.

Sure sure.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton

your poll aggregate does not conform to the candidates rally sizes.

this one does.

I know you asked someone else this question, but I would like to answer it....

I think this is an unfair question to ask, and I do not believe we can (or should) hold him to his answer. Keeping in mind he was a private citizen at the time, he didn't seem to have given it any thought when he was asked the question on a talk show. He said something along the lines of "Yeah, I guess" which is a far cry from "Fuck yes, bomb them back to the stone age". He was really hesitant on his answer and it was clear he didn't put much thought into it.

Trump is a super alpha male and after being tortured for decades with super weenies like Ross on the show Friends or cucked traitors like Paul Ryan many people are not used to seeing a man like Trump. He did not approve of the Iraq war. The reason people think that he was against the war initially is because as usual the fleabags in the media twist and distort things. If we are standing in a room of people with the IQ and life experience of a potato then yes we can say that Trump said he was for the Iraq war. However if you have moderate IQ and some life experience of being around alpha males and super alpha males then you would know that the way he says it is much more important that his actual words. Listen to Howard Stern interview where trump says "I guess so". He says "guess" which which coupled with his tone tells me his true belief. If you hear his tone you can tell he really does not but this is just how men like him communicate (if they feel like it). No fucks given

And remember people this was on the freaking Howard Stern show and this was not when Trump was running for political office. Responding in that way while president is not really acceptable because you have to be direct however I think it is acceptable for the same show that brought us such cultural icons as Gary the horse toothed jack ass and Crackhead Bob.

The New York Times... great unbiased source

I bet next time you're gonna post a CNN link

Very selective fact checking there. Why no mention of her Honest Abe answer to the quote in my sig?

Here's another good one.



https://twitter.com/NBCNews/status/7...rc=twsrc%5Etfw

Holy shit that's a huge fucking fail... and this is a so called 'news' channel... this is very, very sad.

(((FACT-CHECKERS)))

(except for when it comes to historical accuracy)