Lol, blond moderator, asked wheter ban on muslims still stand, Trump started answering by saying that that ban now morphed into extreme vetting, and she repeated the question as if trump did not answer already
Which debate are you watching
He keeps on avoiding answering questions and has been cornered like a little punk.
Are you serious? He is doing WAY better than in the first one and is winning from start till now. Surely he avoided some stupid locker talk question as if it is very important issue in relation to actual issues. Ridiculous, that is not even presidential debate worthy question. I mean seriously...
Are you serious? He is doing WAY better than in the first one and is winning from start till now. Surely he avoided some stupid locker talk question as if it is very important issue in relation to actual issues. Ridiculous, that is not even presidential debate worthy question. I mean seriously...
Better doesn't means good. Yes, I give you that, he lasted 25 instead of 15 minutes before going apeshit. Yes, he is not snuffing as much.
When asked the question about treatment of women, trump went off about defeating ISIS
I think he did that meaning it is ridiculous to talk about locket room talk (to which he apologized) when you have actual issues to talk about (like isis and others he mentioned).
Weasel hilary is being controlled by her big money donors and she dares to pretend otherwise, dares to pretend being for poor people etc. Disgusting. Surely Trump (as ANY sane person) would use legal loopholes if they existed. It would be moronic to expect otherwise and moronic to bash him for using the same loopholes as Hilary's big donors did...
I think he did that meaning it is ridiculous to talk about locket room talk (to which he apologized) when you have actual issues to talk about (like isis and others he mentioned).
Right, lets not talk about emails, we have more important talk like paying taxes. No?
I think he did that meaning it is ridiculous to talk about locket room talk (to which he apologized) when you have actual issues to talk about (like isis and others he mentioned).
So we have a Presidential candidate who seems to spend a lot of treating women like shit and we expect school children to look up to him?
This debate has basically devolved into Hillary giving her positions and answering questions and Trump calling her a liar and not offering much more than a sniff. He's said some stuff his supporters will like, but he doesn't really seem to have many actual plans on how to run the country.
No, locker room talk is a pig on display .. Pig who shouldn't be talking about sex tapes or Clinton's blowjobs. Or running a country.
Emails.. dead horse. Non were hacked, none done any damage. If think otherwise please show proof.
So we have a Presidential candidate who seems to spend a lot of treating women like shit and we expect school children to look up to him?
I agree, that is a minus, but what would you choose: one who is not a nice person but good on actual issues or one who is a nice person and worse on actual issues?
If both are equally good on actual issues, nice vs not nice is a deal breaker, but in no way and important factor in comparison to actual issues.
hahaha...
Question about "Supreme court judges".
Clinton "I wil blah blah blah.."
Trump "I invested 100 mil of my money in my election..."...
Moderator: "Yo Trump, the equation is about Supreme court"..
Every answer he had had nothing to do with what he is about to do. Everything boils down to how bad Obama, Clinton and those who do not support him are.
This debate has basically devolved into Hillary giving her positions and answering questions and Trump calling her a liar and not offering much more than a sniff. He's said some stuff his supporters will like, but he doesn't really seem to have many actual plans on how to run the country.
Why is it that you're clearly denying reality? He is making many rock solid points and saying in very clear terms what he thinks needs to be done. "Not more than a sniff" is an absurd statement. come on. I know you're a partisan wonk but get it together.
hahaha...
Question about "Supreme court judges".
Clinton "I wil blah blah blah.."
Trump "I invested 100 mil of my money in my election..."...
Moderator: "Yo Trump, the equation is about Supreme court"..
Every answer he had had nothing to do with what he is about to do. Everything boils down to how bad Obama, Clinton and those who do not support him are.
Last question - Trump actually answered, Hilary not only did not answer (kids is barely the answer to what she likes about Trump) but also went into complete off topic. Trump answered fair and square.
And while trump did more of those, hilary also had a very fair share of avoiding or going off topic as well.
Why is it that you're clearly denying reality? He is making many rock solid points and saying in very clear terms what he thinks needs to be done. "Not more than a sniff" is an absurd statement. come on. I know you're a partisan wonk but get it together.
I was surprised to hear that from kane, he looked more objective than gfy libbies.
Last question - Trump actually answered, Hilary not only did not answer (kids is barely the answer to what she likes about Trump) but also went into complete off topic. Trump answered fair and square.
And while trump did more of those, hilary also had a very fair share of avoiding or going off topic as well.
he had 15 seconds of actual answer and then went off grid again. His whole strategy is to talk down on opponent. Thats it.
Face it, he blew it again. No-one is buying this locker room, I was 59 years young, but I changed bullshit.
He is done.
he had 15 seconds of actual answer and then went off grid again.
Huh? His answer was basically: I like that Hilary does not ever give up, I do not agree with most of what she says, but I like that she never gives up.
That was pretty much it, no off topic at all, not even took a minute, or maybe not even 30 seconds.
While Hilary did not even answer the question and went completely off topic for maybe 2 minutes.
It seems as if, as you suggested, we were watching different debates.
Huh? His answer was basically: I like that Hilary does not ever give up, I do not agree with most of what she says, but I like that she never gives up.
That was pretty much it, no off topic at all, not even took a minute, or maybe not even 30 seconds.
While Hilary did not even answer the question and went completely off topic for maybe 2 minutes.
It seems as if, as you suggested, we were watching different debates.
I was talking about supreme court question
PS: basically, as long as we have ISIS we are good to do anything we want. Domestic violence is OK, because we have isis. Wonder if this defense will work in court.
Kellyanne Conway @KellyannePolls · 1h1 hour ago
After a decent first debate, @HillaryClinton is back to form: pedantic, lawyerly, technocratic, (woefully untruthful) responses.
he had 15 seconds of actual answer and then went off grid again. His whole strategy is to talk down on opponent. Thats it.
Face it, he blew it again. No-one is buying this locker room, I was 59 years young, but I changed bullshit.
He is done.
He looked like he was stalking her, lurking behind her.
The ONLY difference is the other dirtbags have not been recorded...yet
Or more likely they are all cruising airport men's room for random cock with strange men...
This might be very true, and all of us have said things we've regret. The difference is Trump has a twenty year track record on saying such nonsense on tape.
I agree, that is a minus, but what would you choose: one who is not a nice person but good on actual issues or one who is a nice person and worse on actual issues?
If both are equally good on actual issues, nice vs not nice is a deal breaker, but in no way and important factor in comparison to actual issues.
But that is not what we have. Right now we have one candidate who is not nice and isn't good on the issues (and has no zero knowledge of politics) and a second candidate who is nice and is good on the issues (and is clearly qualified to be president).
The difference is Trump has a twenty year track record on saying such nonsense on tape.
So does Hillary. She has an even longer track recording of saying one thing and then another. Then, changing positions on whatever is politically expedient at the moment.
It's like there are four different Hillarys. The one then, the one now, the one in private and the public Hillary. The problem is none of them jive together well so the only logical assumption is that she's lying about everything she says.
They are on a level playing field in the tailor-made horseshit department.
This might be very true, and all of us have said things we've regret. The difference is Trump has a twenty year track record on saying such nonsense on tape.
Her husband getting bj in the Oval Office and sticking a cigar in her pussy isn't a big a deal as what trump said? Jeez! No big deal for ol' bill
Why is it that you're clearly denying reality? He is making many rock solid points and saying in very clear terms what he thinks needs to be done. "Not more than a sniff" is an absurd statement. come on. I know you're a partisan wonk but get it together.
It just seemed to me that when he was asked about what his policy was or what he would do in certain situations he talked a lot, but didn't really say much.
I'm not going to vote for either one of these assholes so I don't really care who won.
In the end, I think she had the better of it when it comes to policy. He had the better of it when it came to passion and, for lack of a better way of saying it, putting her to task on some things. So, to me, it was basically a draw.
The big question is this: "Did this debate do anything to convince any of the few remaining undecided voters to vote for him?" I don't think it did. After the debate, I was switching between football, CNN, and Fox. On both CNN and Fox they had panels of undecided voters who had watched the debate. As far as I saw, every woman they talked to said they didn't like his apology for what he had said and they weren't convinced by him. I don't think he did anything to win women voters over and that will cost him.
It just seemed to me that when he was asked about what his policy was or what he would do in certain situations he talked a lot, but didn't really say much.
I'm not going to vote for either one of these assholes so I don't really care who won.
In the end, I think she had the better of it when it comes to policy. He had the better of it when it came to passion and, for lack of a better way of saying it, putting her to task on some things. So, to me, it was basically a draw.
The big question is this: "Did this debate do anything to convince any of the few remaining undecided voters to vote for him?" I don't think it did. After the debate, I was switching between football, CNN, and Fox. On both CNN and Fox they had panels of undecided voters who had watched the debate. As far as I saw, every woman they talked to said they didn't like his apology for what he had said and they weren't convinced by him. I don't think he did anything to win women voters over and that will cost him.
This election is over.
Shiiit.. Search "hillary jail" even liberal news outlets are quoting Trump. He just ROCKED her World. Never has a Presidential candidate promissed to toss the other in jail. That bitch had her hit team on the phone before she left the premises.
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
Shiiit.. Search "hillary jail" even liberal news outlets are quoting Trump. He just ROCKED her World. Never has a Presidential candidate promissed to toss the other in jail. That bitch had her hit team on the phone before she left the premises.
Shiiit.. Search "hillary jail" even liberal news outlets are quoting Trump. He just ROCKED her World. Never has a Presidential candidate promissed to toss the other in jail.
It's nothing that he hasn't said a million times. It fires up his base, sure, but will it convince any of the few undecided voters to vote for him. I doubt it.
It's nothing that he hasn't said a million times. It fires up his base, sure, but will it convince any of the few undecided voters to vote for him. I doubt it.
He has never said "you're going to jail if I'm elected" Many independents know Hillary is a fucking lying snake. They don't care if Trump actually grabs Hillary in the pussy during a debate as long as she gets what she deserves. Many were on the fence if he was for real. Well he just told them and her he was.
PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
Comment