First post debate polls shows a bump for Clinton

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • SuckOnThis
    So Fucking Banned
    • Oct 2003
    • 6844
    #1

    First post debate polls shows a bump for Clinton

    Wait, I thought Trump won the debate?


    PPP Polling Sept 27-28

    National +4 Clinton

    Colorado Clinton +6
    Florida Clinton +2
    Pennsylvania Clinton +6
    North Carolina Clinton +2
    Virginia Clinton +6

    http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/p...ates_92916.pdf
    Tags: None
    • onwebcam
      Fake Nick 1.0
      • Oct 2005
      • 27689
      #2
      PPP is a liberal paid private polling company. Meaning they are paid by liberals to do a poll. So who paid for this poll and what was their desired result? Oh btw this wasn't the first poll since.

      A few pollsters are shameless about their herding. One of them is Public Policy Polling (PPP), a polling firm that conducts automated polls for both public consumption and for liberal and Democratic clients.

      Take a look at this exchange, for example, between The New York Times’ Nate Cohn13 and PPP’s Tom Jensen. Cohn discovered that in 2012, the racial composition of PPP’s polls was correlated in an unusual way with President Obama’s performance among white voters in their surveys. If Obama was performing especially poorly among whites in one PPP poll, it tended to have a higher share of nonwhite voters, which boosted Obama’s result. And if Obama was doing relatively well among whites, PPP projected less nonwhite turnout, keeping his lead in check. As a result, PPP’s polls tended to show an unusually steady race between Obama and Mitt Romney.

      I’m picking on PPP for a reason: They’re the biggest herders in the business. Here’s the chart I showed you before, but with only PPP’s polls highlighted. On average, in states with at least three other recent polls, their polls deviated from the polling average by only 1.6 percentage points. The evidence for herding is extremely clear visually and statistically.14

      Here’s Proof Some Pollsters Are Putting A Thumb On The Scale | FiveThirtyEight

      I hate quoting Nate Silvers site since he admitted to changing his algorithm to help Hillary as well. But who knows a cheat better than another cheat?
      PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
      ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

        Comment

        • SuckOnThis
          So Fucking Banned
          • Oct 2003
          • 6844
          #3
          Originally posted by onwebcam
          PPP is a liberal paid private polling company. Meaning they are paid by liberals to do a poll. So who paid for this poll and what was their desired result? Oh btw this wasn't the first poll since.

          A few pollsters are shameless about their herding. One of them is Public Policy Polling (PPP), a polling firm that conducts automated polls for both public consumption and for liberal and Democratic clients.

          Take a look at this exchange, for example, between The New York Times? Nate Cohn13 and PPP?s Tom Jensen. Cohn discovered that in 2012, the racial composition of PPP?s polls was correlated in an unusual way with President Obama?s performance among white voters in their surveys. If Obama was performing especially poorly among whites in one PPP poll, it tended to have a higher share of nonwhite voters, which boosted Obama?s result. And if Obama was doing relatively well among whites, PPP projected less nonwhite turnout, keeping his lead in check. As a result, PPP?s polls tended to show an unusually steady race between Obama and Mitt Romney.

          I?m picking on PPP for a reason: They?re the biggest herders in the business. Here?s the chart I showed you before, but with only PPP?s polls highlighted. On average, in states with at least three other recent polls, their polls deviated from the polling average by only 1.6 percentage points. The evidence for herding is extremely clear visually and statistically.14

          Here?s Proof Some Pollsters Are Putting A Thumb On The Scale | FiveThirtyEight

            Comment

            • onwebcam
              Fake Nick 1.0
              • Oct 2005
              • 27689
              #4
              Originally posted by SuckOnThis
              It is funny that you quoted one of the biggest polling cheats known. What they do is what I've been referring to all along. I could setup a private polling company today and tomorrow have Putin winning the US election according to my poll.
              PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
              ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                Comment

                • C H R I S
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Nov 2005
                  • 10842
                  #5
                  If its good news for Hillary its "The liberal Media"

                  If its good news for Trump its the "Alt Right wing press"

                  In this day and age nobody trusts any news outlet in the US....

                  Carry on...
                  C H R I S
                  Retired Porn Veteran

                  BH4L

                    Comment

                    • Rochard
                      Jägermeister Test Pilot
                      • Dec 2001
                      • 75733
                      #6
                      It was Obvious Clinton won. All serious polls are showing a slight bump for her too.

                      RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton

                      Up three points.
                      Herschel Savage
                      Brooklyn, NY

                        Comment

                        Previous template Next
                        Working...