Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 04-02-2003, 12:36 AM   #1
Ace-Ace
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dayton, OH, USA
Posts: 1,863
War Deaths - American War Critics Read

Not starting another flame thread, just take some time to soak in these facts...

Check out the numbers blow (taken from infoplease.com, a property of the Family Education Network) We've lost 894468 people during these 12 major battles, about 74539 average per battle (lasting YEARS at a time). We're I believe twelve days into operation Iraqi Freedom and we've have WELL under 100 casualties (wounded or killed in battle). We're well into this war, arguably near the end of it...and we have less than 100 casualties (not even deaths, just injured/dead) in just TWELVE days. You guys do the math...but this is going amazingly fast. It's simply amazing. I think the skepticism comes from "embedded" reporters. We get live feedback about small, trivial setbacks, and the press is turning that into a major issue. If during WW2 we had these reporters, we wouldn't have won the war...people would have wanted to stop the chaos instantly.

Basically, pipe the hell down...this war is on an absolutely amazing pace as far as time and efficiency.

American Revolution (1775?1783)
- Battle deaths 4,435

War of 1812 (1812?1815)
- Battle deaths 2,260

Indian Wars (approx. 1817?1898)
- Battle deaths 1,0001

Mexican War (1846?1848)
- Battle deaths 1,733

Civil War (1861?1865)
- Battle deaths (Union) 140,414
- Other deaths in service (nontheater) (Union) 224,097
- Battle deaths (Conf.) 74,524
- Other deaths in service (nontheater) (Conf.) 59,2972

Spanish-American War (1898?1902)
- Battle deaths 385

World War I (1917?1918)
- Battle deaths 53,402
- Other deaths in service (nontheater) 63,114

World War II (1940?1945)
- Total servicemembers 16,112,566
- Battle deaths 291,557
- Other deaths in service (nontheater) 113,842

Korean War (1950?1953)
- Battle deaths 33,686
- Other deaths in service (theater) 2,830
- Other deaths in service (nontheater) 17,730

Vietnam War (1964?1975)
- Battle deaths 47,410
- Other deaths in service (theater) 10,788
- Other deaths in service (nontheater) 32,000

Gulf War (1990?1991)
- Battle deaths 148
- Other deaths in service (theater) 235
- Other deaths in service (nontheater) 914

America's Wars Total
- Battle deaths 650,954
- Other deaths in service (theater) 13,853
- Other deaths in service (nontheater) 229,661

Last edited by Ace-Ace; 04-02-2003 at 01:25 AM..
Ace-Ace is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2003, 01:03 AM   #2
Joe Sixpack
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,793
Where are you getting your statistics for this war?
Joe Sixpack is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2003, 01:14 AM   #3
Rochard
Jägermeister Test Pilot
 
Rochard's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NORCAL
Posts: 74,023
We did have these reporters in WWII and since then, and they were indeed "embedded" into battle. The general population knew about these deaths, although the US government toned them down.

There are huge differences here.....

For example, the civil war was fought with rifles that fired one shot a minute. In WWII, We had machine guns and dropped bombs - The US killed tens of thousands with two bombs dropped on Japan alone.

In the current war things are much more different.... We can not only target certain buildings, but certain rooms. We can see them from miles away before they even know we are there....
__________________
“The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.”
- Sarah Huckabee Sanders

YNOT MAIL | THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION
Rochard is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2003, 01:24 AM   #4
Ace-Ace
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dayton, OH, USA
Posts: 1,863
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Sixpack
Where are you getting your statistics for this war?
*sigh*

"Check out the numbers blow (taken from infoplease.com, a property of the Family Education Network)"
Ace-Ace is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2003, 01:25 AM   #5
Ace-Ace
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dayton, OH, USA
Posts: 1,863
Quote:
Originally posted by RocHard
We did have these reporters in WWII and since then, and they were indeed "embedded" into battle. The general population knew about these deaths, although the US government toned them down.

There are huge differences here.....

For example, the civil war was fought with rifles that fired one shot a minute. In WWII, We had machine guns and dropped bombs - The US killed tens of thousands with two bombs dropped on Japan alone.

In the current war things are much more different.... We can not only target certain buildings, but certain rooms. We can see them from miles away before they even know we are there....
Yeah, completely different types of warfare...for sure, so it's unfair to compare them directly. But, you can owe that to technology and other things. I'm talking about brute numbers and years here...it's amazing.

As far as embedded reporters go in WW2, I'm not so sure about that. If you could get me a link, I'd appreciate it. As far as I know, there were people with cameras...they filmed it and shipped films back (took like a week). I'd assume some used phones, but that's not quite the same effect.
Ace-Ace is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2003, 01:27 AM   #6
Ace-Ace
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dayton, OH, USA
Posts: 1,863
On a side note...I found it amusing what General Myers said this morning. He said something about the media needing to do "fair and balanced coverage". That's Fox's slogan exactly...and they definitely didn't shy away from saying that all day to day.

That's a nice big slap in the face for MSNBC and CNN, compliments General Myers.
Ace-Ace is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2003, 01:55 AM   #7
jas1552
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Land of the free, home of the brave
Posts: 1,462
Quote:
Originally posted by Ace-Ace
On a side note...I found it amusing what General Myers said this morning. He said something about the media needing to do "fair and balanced coverage". That's Fox's slogan exactly...and they definitely didn't shy away from saying that all day to day.

That's a nice big slap in the face for MSNBC and CNN, compliments General Myers.
Yeah, I noticed that.

CNN and MSNBC did reports about Geraldo reporting for FOX giving away too much info and the possiblity of him being kicked out of Iraq. MSNBC really milked it. After their Geraldo report they cut away to a black screen with like a flag on the left and white text to the right saying something like: OUR PROMISE TO YOU. We will continue to work hard to bring you objective accurate news while never doing anything that could put our soldiers lives at risk.
jas1552 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2003, 09:23 AM   #8
Ace-Ace
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dayton, OH, USA
Posts: 1,863
Quote:
Originally posted by jas1552

Yeah, I noticed that.

CNN and MSNBC did reports about Geraldo reporting for FOX giving away too much info and the possiblity of him being kicked out of Iraq. MSNBC really milked it. After their Geraldo report they cut away to a black screen with like a flag on the left and white text to the right saying something like: OUR PROMISE TO YOU. We will continue to work hard to bring you objective accurate news while never doing anything that could put our soldiers lives at risk.
Yah, saw that too. I don't think he's given anything away. On a side note, we could say "We have guys 1800 yards south of X Street, guys 3 miles west of X street...and it wouldn't make much of a difference at all.

If they can successfully cut off the Madena division from retreating back into Baghdad, this could come to an abrupt ending.
Ace-Ace is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.