GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The result of this wrong war (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=121655)

directfiesta 04-02-2003 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks


We were leaving that to the mighty canadians. You know, the ones who didn't want to be used as props *again* in a real war.:1orglaugh
Take your aircraft carriers down to the congo and take charge!
(oh, wait. you don't have aircraft carriers do you?)

well, shit, hop on aircanada, fly over there and save the congo. (oh, wait. aircanada just went bankrupt)

hmmmmm, I guess your impotence could very well explain the bitterness you spend on your betters.
:1orglaugh

Your answer is proof of your idiocy.

WE are not at war and don't want to, and we do not proclaim that we liberate people.

The US does that. so when are you goiing to liberate the population of Congo. After all, you are the one that brings this " liberation shit" in your justification of war....

If you have no intelligent answer, abstain.

ADL Colin 04-02-2003 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta


Huuummmmm ... Let me think .... What do countries do .......
Do they have an organisation.... Huuuum.... I think there is a building in NY....... Hummmmmm, probably to store servers.....

Ohhhhh! Just found it. We make a proposal to a group of countries and we get their approval. Then our war operation is legitimate.... I think it is called UN... not sure tough

:321GFY

What makes the UN THE de facto organization that decides the legitimacy or illegitimacy of military action?

If it is, why have so many countries in the UN been involved in military conflicts without it's approval including the US, UK, USSR, and China?

Which conflicts of the literally hundreds since the founding of the UN were legitimate? If there are hundreds of conflicts that occured without UN approval and only a handful that occured with it, doesn't that make the necessity of the UN's approval a sort of silly idea?

Note: there is NO UN resolution AGAINST the current conflict in Iraq. That would make it more illegitimate but it is clearly a matter of degree. The UN attempted to pass a resolution againt the USSR's invasion of Hungary and Russia just vetoed it. They exercised their veto power "legally" and I suppose that made it legitimate. Correct?

There is not much history AT ALL of countries getting PERMISSION from the UN to go to war. Where does this idea of needing international approval attached to a concept of "legitimacy" come from?

ADL Colin 04-02-2003 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta


WE are not at war and don't want to, and we do not proclaim that we liberate people.


Your country flew combat missions in Kosovo.

A war of "liberation" that did not have UN approval.

Screwed Up 04-02-2003 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by galleryseek



lol YEAH lets just turn our backs and let saddam to continue killing thousands of people for the hella it, i mean, we'd HATE for the world to have such a bad impression of us thinking we're all for oil! we'd rather let people die than projecting such a greedy image!

idiot

You are the idiot here. Good ole' USA probably killed far more people than any other country.

And wake the fuck up, there are worse dictators than Saddam. Why isn't Bush "freeing" those people?

digi 04-02-2003 10:58 AM

Its funny how the media here says the iraqi people are getting more and more hateful towards the usa, and us media says the opposite.

conclusion: none of us fucking know.

mule 04-02-2003 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
The UN attempted to pass a resolution againt the USSR's invasion of Hungary and Russia just vetoed it. They exercised their veto power "legally" and I suppose that made it legitimate.
While you're obviously researching, just check out what the US had to say about that

ADL Colin 04-02-2003 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by digi
Its funny how the media here says the iraqi people are getting more and more hateful towards the usa, and us media says the opposite.

conclusion: none of us fucking know.

Good guess. Some are getting more hateful, some less.

Yo Adrian 04-02-2003 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yahook
I've recently found http://www.aljazeera.net/news/arabic/2003/3/3-22-26.htm and was shocked. Innocent people die in thie wrong war.
It's well known that Iraq is winning the propoganda war, he sets his own citizens up to be killed.

He has recently created small military command stations in schools, hospitals and other public places then fires upon our troops trying to force us to return fire, this would of course cause civillian casualties which is what Saddam is hoping for.

These innocent deaths ARE horrible and tragic, but the blood's on Saddams hands, he put them in harms way intentionally.

Screwed Up 04-02-2003 11:06 AM

Wake the fuck up.
No matter how fucked up your dictator is, if another country came over to bomb the shit out of your beautifull capital city you would be pissed!

ADL Colin 04-02-2003 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by mule

While you're obviously researching, just check out what the US had to say about that

1. That was off the top off my head. Funny you'd assume that someone would have to research a very important conflict of the 20th century. See Warsaw Pact for why.

2. I don't care whether the US thinks something is legitimate or not. I care about whether I do.

3. No shit. People that are opposed to conflict but are unwilling to pay the price or are incapable of stopping it cry to international bodies and claim the acts are illegitimate. The US did it in 1956. You are doing it now.

ADL Colin 04-02-2003 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Screwed Up
Wake the fuck up.
No matter how fucked up your dictator is, if another country came over to bomb the shit out of your beautifull capital city you would be pissed!

No reason to wake up. Many interviews, including one on Saudi Arabian based "Arab News" show that there are many people in Iraq that WANT the US to take out Saddam and many that don't.

Why should anyone assume that 25 million people are going to agree on ANYTHING?

iroc409 04-02-2003 11:15 AM

another thing to consider when you're bashing the "liberation" argument.

do these other countries in need of liberation directly threaten, or pose any sort of threat to the US? do their leaders openly voice threats to us? not that i've heard, but i could be wrong. are they attempting to obtain biological, chemical and possibly nuclear weapons, with their highly anti-US sentiment? doesn't appear so.

the US DOES have to protect its interests, as much as people hate that. what do you do? most people individually take priority stock in their interests, and then the interests of others. if you never consider your own interests, you generally don't fair too well.

think about that in your online biz. do you give away your traffic, or your rebills, just because it benefits someone else more than you? if that's the case, hit me up i could use some liberation myself.

dirtyone 04-02-2003 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Screwed Up
Wake the fuck up.
No matter how fucked up your dictator is, if another country came over to bomb the shit out of your beautifull capital city you would be pissed!

...

12clicks 04-02-2003 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta


Your answer is proof of your idiocy.

WE are not at war and don't want to, and we do not proclaim that we liberate people.

The US does that. so when are you goiing to liberate the population of Congo. After all, you are the one that brings this " liberation shit" in your justification of war....

If you have no intelligent answer, abstain.

son, I guess you need it spelled out for you.
We, the United States of America, shall do as we please.
You, impotent country to our north, can rant on chat boards all you want. It still doesn't change the fact that We, the United States of America, shall do as we please.

its gotta suck to be a directfiesta :1orglaugh

rooster 04-02-2003 12:25 PM

saddams regime poses more of a threat to usa than hitler ever did.

Fugly 04-02-2003 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yahook
I've recently found http://www.aljazeera.net/news/arabic/2003/3/3-22-26.htm and was shocked. Innocent people die in thie wrong war.
Aww, come on. That's bullshit. They made that up. None of that's real. Just like the hollocaust.

Fugly 04-02-2003 12:28 PM

Aww man. That was terrible. That was really just a joke. I'm sorry.

ThunderBalls 04-02-2003 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks


son, I guess you need it spelled out for you.
We, the United States of America, shall do as we please.
You, impotent country to our north, can rant on chat boards all you want. It still doesn't change the fact that We, the United States of America, shall do as we please.

its gotta suck to be a directfiesta :1orglaugh


Its this fucked up drunken hick ignorant attitude that caused 9/11.
I bet every time you come home to your trailer you kick the dog and beat your fat ass wife. :thefinger

mule 04-02-2003 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
3. No shit. People that are opposed to conflict but are unwilling to pay the price or are incapable of stopping it cry to international bodies and claim the acts are illegitimate. The US did it in 1956. You are doing it now.
Nope, I'm not. I never belived in the UN. I'm appealing to common sense

12clicks 04-02-2003 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ThunderBalls



Its this fucked up drunken hick ignorant attitude that caused 9/11.
I bet every time you come home to your trailer you kick the dog and beat your fat ass wife. :thefinger

dude, don't assume the rest of us live your life. :1orglaugh
No one here will ever want to lead your life if they could lead mine:thumbsup

but then, that's all caused by how you think isn't it?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123