Glad to see you are winning an argument Paul, but this guy is damaged goods and needs a psychiatrist more than anything. He is incapable of accepting responsibility for anything, even his own shortcomings, so he will continue to blame the rest of the world for his problems and take none for himself.
There Are Only 22 Countries in the World That the British Haven?t Invaded
Collapse
X
-
lol lol...you joking or serious ?
that type of thinking leads to all problems in this world. and usually noone invades country to "improve it" - usually main goal is to exploit it or make it obedient..eventual "impromevent" is only side effect.
and we all know how ended "improving" countries from tyrranies to democracies - Libya and Iraq are the best examples...also Syria, where "impromevent" is in progress
Comment
-
btw those "Barbaric indians" had 1/4 of the worlds GDP when britan invaded...just sayin...
and the only thing that "improved" was the 1%-s bank accounts


fucking unreal that people seriously entertain the thought that anything else went on

Report a suspicious cracker: Click HereComment
-
The essence of every state is exploitation since the state has monopoly on violence on a certain geographic area. Politicians don't kill us and take our possessions just because in the long term we'll bring them more $. That's why you work 35-40 years and give 50% of your earnings to the state.
And since the state is inevitable (for now), isn't it better to be ruled by those who have superior intellect and culture? You get way more for your cash. Politicians in my country are all cringeworthy, they all look and behave like they're product of incest. I wouldn't mind being ruled by someone who is more educated and talented and there are those kind of people in the West.
I can agree on that, but It can't be compared to history. Foreign politicians that ruled in colonies had different incentives than modern 4-year-term politicians. When you own something, you treat it way better than something you just rented.and we all know how ended "improving" countries from tyrranies to democracies - Libya and Iraq are the best examples...also Syria, where "improvement" is in progress
I can't believe someone from ex-Yugoslavia has the audacity to shit on states like USA or GB. You can nuke us today and nothing will change in the world. We make no inventions, no science, no philosophy (except that Slovenian troll Zizek). Every man who left a mark on society had emigrated from Balkans region. Even today brain drain is huge, people that stay are high time-preference (75 IQ) savages.-I can't quantify my hatred of the State. Preferences are ordinal.
-The absolute ruler may be a Nero, but he is sometimes Titus or Marcus Aurelius; the people is often Nero, and never Marcus Aurelius.Comment
-
*cough cough* 85million starved to death *cough cough*


Report a suspicious cracker: Click HereComment
-
-
-
Comment
-
I bet a lot of them food stampers are your former exploited population...you are going to pay for it one way or another LOL in about 245 years you got some cheap labor and grew "civilized" and "advanced" off their work...now its payback time
...you gone fucked up and now its costin' you...
Report a suspicious cracker: Click HereComment
-
-
Here is how the "advanced" advance:
Viewpoint: Britain must pay reparations to India - BBC News
Indian economy
At the beginning of the 18th Century, India's share of the world economy was 23%, as large as all of Europe put together. By the time the British departed India, it had dropped to less than 4%.
The reason was simple: India was governed for the benefit of Britain. Britain's rise for 200 years was financed by its depredations in India.
By the end of the 19th Century, India was Britain's biggest cash-cow, the world's biggest purchaser of British exports and the source of highly paid employment for British civil servants - all at India's own expense. We literally paid for our own oppression.
Grey line
De-industrialisation of India
Britain's Industrial Revolution was built on the de-industrialisation of India - the destruction of Indian textiles and their replacement by manufacturing in England, using Indian raw material and exporting the finished products back to India and the rest of the world.
The handloom weavers of Bengal had produced and exported some of the world's most desirable fabrics, especially cheap but fine muslins, some light as "woven air".
Britain's response was to cut off the thumbs of Bengali weavers, break their looms and impose duties and tariffs on Indian cloth, while flooding India and the world with cheaper fabric from the new satanic steam mills of Britain.
Weavers became beggars, manufacturing collapsed; the population of Dhaka, which was once the great centre of muslin production, fell by 90%.
So instead of a great exporter of finished products, India became an importer of British ones, while its share of world exports fell from 27% to 2%.
Report a suspicious cracker: Click HereComment
-
My official site
Custom vids
Make money & get into the business
First time girls
Skype: GspotProductions - "Converting traffic into income since 2005"Comment




Comment