Olympic Medal Tracker

What is your point? 28 countries combined have more medals than any other 1 country?
Or should I say what is that tool's point as you are only exposing/laughing at the idiot

And lol at him admitting "not entirely fair" due to participant quota. Not entirely, lol. How about ridiculously idiotically not fair comparison due to this fact alone.

Yup, European Union COULD lead the world

it doesn't even include all the countries either... no India? no Cuba?

All he have to do is post one link, and you get your panties in a bunch


Some of you are so easy to troll

... aaannnd a member of the EU

still technically yes, but on the way out, so debatable if it should be included in the EU statistics...

No, not even close to being debatable. It's a member and most likely will be for at least two more years. They expect to hand in Article 51 around the last quater of 2017, and then it will take up to two years from that day, before they are out of the EU.

Try again....

I do not mind being trolled, especially knowing OP is famous for that.

I am just amazed at the stupidity of the creator, and no, he did not make it just to troll.

How so? It says 28 countries are included.

medals per population would be a better way:

Olympic Medals per Capita

1 Grenada 1 106,825 106,825
2 Bahamas 2 388,019 194,009
3 Jamaica 11 2,725,941 247,812
4 New Zealand 18 4,595,700 255,316
5 Denmark 14 5,676,002 405,428
6 Croatia 10 4,224,404 422,440
7 Slovenia 4 2,063,768 515,942
8 Georgia 7 3,679,000 525,571
9 Azerbaijan 15 9,651,349 643,423
10 Hungary 15 9,844,686 656,312
11 Bahrain 2 1,377,237 688,618
12 Lithuania 4 2,910,199 727,549
13 Armenia 4 3,017,712 754,428
14 Australia 29 23,781,169 820,040
15 Sweden 11 9,798,871 890,806
16 Fiji 1 892,145 892,145
17 Netherlands 18 16,936,520 940,917
18 Great Britain 66 65,138,232 986,942
19 Serbia 7 7,098,247 1,014,035
20 Kazakhstan 17 17,544,126 1,032,007
21 Cuba 11 11,389,562 1,035,414
22 Belarus 9 9,513,000 1,057,000
23 Czech Republic 9 10,551,219 1,172,357
24 Norway 4 5,195,921 1,298,980
25 Estonia 1 1,311,998 1,311,998
26 Slovakia 4 5,424,050 1,356,012
27 Switzerland 6 8,286,976 1,381,162
28 Mongolia 2 2,959,134 1,479,567
29 Canada 22 35,851,774 1,629,626
30 France 40 66,808,385 1,670,209
31 Greece 6 10,823,732 1,803,955
32 Kosovo 1 1,859,203 1,859,203
33 Belgium 6 11,285,721 1,880,953
34 Germany 41 81,413,145 1,985,686
35 Qatar 1 2,235,355 2,235,355
36 Ireland 2 4,640,703 2,320,351
37 Italy 26 60,802,085 2,338,541
38 South Korea 21 50,617,045 2,410,335
39 Russian Federation 53 144,096,812 2,718,807
40 United States 116 321,418,820 2,770,851 <========LOL

per capita is often a good way to compare countries but not in this case... higher population only marginally increases chances of winning, so countries with high population are at a disadvantage look at for example:

75 China 70 1,371,220,000 19,588,857
85 India 2 1,311,050,527 655,525,263

China or India wouldn't make it to the top 10 even if they won pretty much every single medal available, which clearly is not possible....

Because the UK is one of the 28 EU member states

india is not a good example, they do not have a widely propagated sports culture...chinamen are tiny fuckers they will be good only at certain sports and also have low testosterone and growth...the only strength medals china has is in lightweight category weightlifting...they will hardly make for good sprinters against giants like usain bolt or swimmers like phelps...they are practically useless in speed and strength events...in china everybody is up to my nipple...

but yes billions in population does become a negative factor given the finite amount of medals at the olympics...

Of course it is.
I misread your post as if you were saying that list did not include it.

Indeed, it amazes me how some people do not get what per capita medals is a stupid metric.

Yes yes if my country was number 40 I would think so too ROR! Having lots of money and population is a clear disadvantage...