News I guess it is mainly surfers here now - GoFuckYourself.com

baddog · 08-11-2016, 05:01 PM

This is pretty big news to not be on the front page here - 3rd Circuit Won't Rehear 2257 Case - XBIZ.com

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday denied the Justice Department?s petition for a rehearing over a three-judge panel?s decision over 18 U.S.C. §§2257 and 2257A, the federal statutes that govern performer record-keeping for sexually explicit content.

?The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the panel and the Court en banc, is denied,? a panel for the 3rd Circuit decided today.

Spike D · 08-11-2016, 05:26 PM

Great news!

Bladewire · 08-11-2016, 05:29 PM

Nice !!!

crockett · 08-11-2016, 06:16 PM

Just look at that, it literally took 2 presidential terms to undo the fuck ups of the last Republican Baddog helped vote into office!

sarettah · 08-11-2016, 06:58 PM

Quote:

I guess it is mainly surfers here now

Surfers.... Yum :P

All images stolen from Surfer Girls That Will Have You Staring who stole them from other places who probably stole them from yet other places.

.

Spunky · 08-11-2016, 07:07 PM

Now I can fap

mineistaken · 08-11-2016, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Just look at that, it literally took 2 presidential terms to undo the fuck ups of the last Republican Baddog helped vote into office!

Republicans republicans republicans
Republicans republicans republicans
Republicans republicans republicans

On topic?

Look Chang · 08-11-2016, 07:14 PM

Wow! these surfer girls are so sexy

08-11-2016, 07:32 PM

YESS! This is incredible news!

crockett · 08-11-2016, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken

Republicans republicans republicans
Republicans republicans republicans
Republicans republicans republicans

On topic?

Its exactly on topic, because the next Republican wants to also go after porn on the net. It's very much on topic that 2257 and the 8 or 9 year fight to end it was a result of the last Republican president.

Not to mention all the money it cost everyone to become compliant as well as fight it.

Bladewire · 08-11-2016, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

its exactly on topic, because the next republican wants to also go after porn on the net. It's very much on topic that 2257 and the 8 or 9 year fight to end it was a result of the last republican president.

Not to mention all the money it cost everyone to become compliant as well as fight it.

^^ T r u t h ^^

kane · 08-11-2016, 08:22 PM

This thread is both informative and hot.

artwilliams · 08-11-2016, 08:27 PM

Not everyone baddog. Thanks for the report.

sarettah · 08-11-2016, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by artwilliams

Not everyone baddog. Thanks for the report.

This. Yes BD, thanks for posting that. Hopefully it is all done with.

.

Paul Markham · 08-12-2016, 01:42 AM

Imagine an industry where no one could put up porn content without being able to prove the age and complicity of the model.

Most here can only imagine and see their jobs go down the toilet. I can remember the times when it was real.

Seth Manson · 08-12-2016, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Imagine an industry where no one could put up porn content without being able to prove the age and complicity of the model.

Most here can only imagine and see their jobs go down the toilet. I can remember the times when it was real.

You can also remember when dirt was invented. You're old, we get it.

mechanicvirus · 08-12-2016, 10:49 AM

If this forum is full of surfers, what does that say about the true professionals who abandoned this industry then go on to complain about it?

CaptainHowdy · 08-12-2016, 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mechanicvirus

If this forum is full of surfers, what does that say about the true professionals who abandoned this industry then go on to complain about it?

AaronM · 08-12-2016, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mechanicvirus

If this forum is full of surfers, what does that say about the true professionals who abandoned this industry then go on to complain about it?

It says this forum used to be a fun place for industry people to hang out and do business. These days, obviously not su much.

Barry-xlovecam · 08-13-2016, 07:07 AM

They could still try to appeal to the US Supreme Court. However, with the rabid anti-porn Justice Scalia gone they probably couldn't get a Writ of Certiorari -- the 4th Amendment warantless searches are now unlawful as ordered by the Court (after the appeal window is closed).

Orin Hatch -- shit the bed ...

Congress will perhaps rewrite that part of the law.

8pt-buck · 08-13-2016, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sarettah

All images stolen from Surfer Girls That Will Have You Staring who stole them from other places who probably stole them from yet other places.

.

8pt-buck · 08-13-2016, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Its exactly on topic, because the next Republican wants to also go after porn on the net. It's very much on topic that 2257 and the 8 or 9 year fight to end it was a result of the last Republican president.

Not to mention all the money it cost everyone to become compliant as well as fight it.

What were the end results ? NOTHING

If you chose to discuss future misuse of tax payer funds, let's discuss Hillary's plan to allow 850 thousand Syrian Refugees in to the United States and who is going to foot the bill ?

Maybe she and her screwed up impeached Adulterated husband can entertain a few more Goldman Sachs speeches in order to pay for it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Imagine an industry where no one could put up porn content without being able to prove the age and complicity of the model.

Imagine surfing a adult site only to discover Magic Join Links!

JayAllan · 08-13-2016, 12:07 PM

Great News!

romeo22 · 08-13-2016, 12:19 PM

Making thread without single pussy is almost worthless

crockett · 08-13-2016, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8pt-buck

What were the end results ? NOTHING

If you chose to discuss future misuse of tax payer funds, let's discuss Hillary's plan to allow 850 thousand Syrian Refugees in to the United States and who is going to foot the bill ?

Maybe she and her screwed up impeached Adulterated husband can entertain a few more Goldman Sachs speeches in order to pay for it.

Imagine surfing a adult site only to discover Magic Join Links!

Why would you want to whine about Syrian Refugees in a topic about 2257?

Relic · 08-14-2016, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett

Why would you want to whine about Syrian Refugees in a topic about 2257?

You whine about everything bitch go cry in your corner.

JFK · 08-15-2016, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Imagine an industry where no one could put up porn content without being able to prove the age and complicity of the model.

Most here can only imagine and see their jobs go down the toilet. I can remember the times when it was real.

Are you back to toilets again ?

RyuLion · 08-16-2016, 01:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AaronM

It says this forum used to be a fun place for industry people to hang out and do business. These days, obviously not su much.

I agree.

Paul Markham · 08-16-2016, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK

Are you back to toilets again ?

It's my part-time job.

The problem here is those who are in business are mostly webmasters who could be promoting toilets and bog rolls. Needs a poll.

08-11-2016, 05:01 PM	#1
baddog So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: the beach, SoCal Posts: 107,089	I guess it is mainly surfers here now This is pretty big news to not be on the front page here - 3rd Circuit Won't Rehear 2257 Case - XBIZ.com The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday denied the Justice Department?s petition for a rehearing over a three-judge panel?s decision over 18 U.S.C. §§2257 and 2257A, the federal statutes that govern performer record-keeping for sexually explicit content. ?The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and to all the other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service, and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, and a majority of the judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, the petition for rehearing by the panel and the Court en banc, is denied,? a panel for the 3rd Circuit decided today.

08-11-2016, 05:26 PM	#2
Spike D Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Atlanta Posts: 600	Great news! __________________ SoloSlutCash email: Admin (at) SoloSlutCash (dot) com

08-11-2016, 05:29 PM	#3
Bladewire StraightBro Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA Posts: 56,229	Nice !!! __________________ Skype: CallTomNow

08-11-2016, 07:07 PM	#6
Spunky I need a beer Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: ♠ Toiletville ♠ Posts: 133,947	Now I can fap __________________ *YOUR INFORMATION HERE*

08-11-2016, 07:14 PM	#8
Look Chang Sexpat Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 17,534	Wow! these surfer girls are so sexy __________________ Hot & Juicy Asian Girls Sex Sites : SEDUCTION -> FELLATIO -> CONCLUSION

08-11-2016, 06:16 PM	#4
crockett in a van by the river Industry Role: Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 76,806	Just look at that, it literally took 2 presidential terms to undo the fuck ups of the last Republican Baddog helped vote into office!

08-11-2016, 07:32 PM	#9
shermo Guest Posts: n/a	YESS! This is incredible news!

08-11-2016, 08:22 PM	#12
kane Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: portland, OR Posts: 20,684	This thread is both informative and hot.

08-11-2016, 08:27 PM	#13
artwilliams Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 252	Not everyone baddog. Thanks for the report.

08-12-2016, 01:42 AM	#15
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Imagine an industry where no one could put up porn content without being able to prove the age and complicity of the model. Most here can only imagine and see their jobs go down the toilet. I can remember the times when it was real. __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

08-12-2016, 10:49 AM	#17
mechanicvirus Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Southern California Posts: 3,933	If this forum is full of surfers, what does that say about the true professionals who abandoned this industry then go on to complain about it?

08-13-2016, 07:07 AM	#20
Barry-xlovecam It's 42 Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Global Posts: 18,083	They could still try to appeal to the US Supreme Court. However, with the rabid anti-porn Justice Scalia gone they probably couldn't get a Writ of Certiorari -- the 4th Amendment warantless searches are now unlawful as ordered by the Court (after the appeal window is closed). Orin Hatch -- shit the bed ... Congress will perhaps rewrite that part of the law.

08-13-2016, 12:07 PM	#23
JayAllan So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Santa Barbara, CA Posts: 1,148	Great News!

08-13-2016, 12:19 PM	#24
romeo22 你自己去他媽的 Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 23,347	Making thread without single pussy is almost worthless