PaySites Have To Change Before It's Too Late. Here Are Some Ideas...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kafka
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2002
    • 466

    #301
    Originally posted by The Porn Nerd
    The #1 problem with shooters and they way they shoot porn? Too much focus on cock in pussy (or asshole).

    Guys do NOT want to look at a cock sliding into a pussy 50,000 times for eight minutes straight. In fact, to show how useless most shooters are:

    Gorgeous girl, in the midst of pleasure, her face contorted with ecstasy...the shooter IMMEDIATELY pulls away and goes down to the pussy. Man is fondling her beautiful breasts - shooter IMMEDIATELY goes back to the pussy. It's almost as if the shooter is emotionally uncomfortable with anything 'real' or focusing on the beauty of the female form. Nope, gotta be a CLOSEUP of a cock drilling a pussy for eight minutes.

    Get it? No, probably not. LOL Carry on.

    It can be worse, in the eighties often the camera panned to the guy's face. Wankers cumming looking at an ugly male face.

    Comment

    • Paul Markham
      Too old to care
      • Jun 2001
      • 52942

      #302
      Originally posted by Kafka
      It can be worse, in the eighties often the camera panned to the guy's face. Wankers cumming looking at an ugly male face.
      You were buying gay films.



      Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
      PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

      Comment

      • Pseudonymous
        Photographer/Owner
        • Apr 2006
        • 2661

        #303
        Originally posted by AmeliaG
        I like you and like your work, so don't take this wrong, but name 3 pay sites (not owned by tubes because they monetize differently) which are paying remotely $10k a scene for pay site content.
        Why would you limit the companies to who are not involved in tubes? As an industry matures, the strongest survive and the weak begin to die, obviously. The remaining companies begin to be a little more corporate and have their hands in everything as few companies begin to take over. Almost all big companies have their hands in other brands/including tubes. Half of them, thats the reason theyre still alive to begin with. It bought them the profit/time in order to learn what sells in todays market and continue to be successful. So basically youre saying, what small sites who can't afford or weren't smart enough to get involved in tube sites are still producing content at a high cost? Obviously that number will be limited. It has no reflection on the current state of paysites

        Blacked owners are involved in a large tube, however it doesn't mean they could not have reached the success without it, it just helped them reach the level they are at, perhaps at a faster pace. Anybody is free to use tubes to their advantage. It is just more obvious to tube owners what sells and what profit they can make off their sites so theyre more willing to spend, they also have less "risk" because they have the traffic already and aren't as scared to spend the money. They were also the ones smart enough and had the budget in order to get involved with them. The people without the budget weren't typically the smartest, given how lucrative this industry was.

        Not being involved in tubes isn't an excuse to be a failure.

        Tubes are the highest source of traffic/sales, so why would they not be involved?

        Strange question is all
        Previous owner of SoloRevenue
        Previous product manager @ Modelcentro.com/MCProfits.com, IsMyGirl.com, SMRevenue.com

        Comment

        • Pseudonymous
          Photographer/Owner
          • Apr 2006
          • 2661

          #304
          Originally posted by Paul Markham
          Have you ever been in the porn industry apart from driving traffic?
          I am right now, producing in 2016 for some of todays top pornstars. I have went from driving traffic to being an owner and worrying about ROI and dealing with producers to producing myself in todays market. So yes im familiar with all sides, which most are not. Its very easy to have an opinion that stems from one area of expertise but until you've really been on all sides, and in todays market as well, you really dont have a full grasp. IMO
          Previous owner of SoloRevenue
          Previous product manager @ Modelcentro.com/MCProfits.com, IsMyGirl.com, SMRevenue.com

          Comment

          • AmeliaG
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Jan 2003
            • 10662

            #305
            Originally posted by Pseudonymous
            Why would you limit the companies to who are not involved in tubes? As an industry matures, the strongest survive and the weak begin to die, obviously. The remaining companies begin to be a little more corporate and have their hands in everything as few companies begin to take over. Almost all big companies have their hands in other brands/including tubes. Half of them, thats the reason theyre still alive to begin with. It bought them the profit/time in order to learn what sells in todays market and continue to be successful. So basically youre saying, what small sites who can't afford or weren't smart enough to get involved in tube sites are still producing content at a high cost? Obviously that number will be limited. It has no reflection on the current state of paysites

            Blacked owners are involved in a large tube, however it doesn't mean they could not have reached the success without it, it just helped them reach the level they are at, perhaps at a faster pace. Anybody is free to use tubes to their advantage. It is just more obvious to tube owners what sells and what profit they can make off their sites so theyre more willing to spend, they also have less "risk" because they have the traffic already and aren't as scared to spend the money. They were also the ones smart enough and had the budget in order to get involved with them. The people without the budget weren't typically the smartest, given how lucrative this industry was.

            Not being involved in tubes isn't an excuse to be a failure.

            Tubes are the highest source of traffic/sales, so why would they not be involved?

            Strange question is all

            Because tubes monetize differently, what it makes sense for a tube to spend on is very different from what it makes sense for a pay site to spend on. Aside from all the factors you mentioned, which I agree with, the most important factor is the business model is different.

            The topic is not would it be awesome to decide to fail (only with super excuses), but what should pay sites do. All I'm saying is pay sites should not spend like their business model is different from what it is.
            GFY Hall of Famer

            AltStar Hall of Famer




            Blue Blood's SpookyCash.com

            Babe photography portfolio

            Comment

            • Paul Markham
              Too old to care
              • Jun 2001
              • 52942

              #306
              Originally posted by Pseudonymous
              Why would you limit the companies to who are not involved in tubes? As an industry matures, the strongest survive and the weak begin to die, obviously. The remaining companies begin to be a little more corporate and have their hands in everything as few companies begin to take over. Almost all big companies have their hands in other brands/including tubes. Half of them, thats the reason theyre still alive to begin with. It bought them the profit/time in order to learn what sells in todays market and continue to be successful. So basically youre saying, what small sites who can't afford or weren't smart enough to get involved in tube sites are still producing content at a high cost? Obviously that number will be limited. It has no reflection on the current state of paysites

              Blacked owners are involved in a large tube, however it doesn't mean they could not have reached the success without it, it just helped them reach the level they are at, perhaps at a faster pace. Anybody is free to use tubes to their advantage. It is just more obvious to tube owners what sells and what profit they can make off their sites so theyre more willing to spend, they also have less "risk" because they have the traffic already and aren't as scared to spend the money. They were also the ones smart enough and had the budget in order to get involved with them. The people without the budget weren't typically the smartest, given how lucrative this industry was.

              Not being involved in tubes isn't an excuse to be a failure.

              Tubes are the highest source of traffic/sales, so why would they not be involved?

              Strange question is all
              I suspect Tubes pay very little for traffic to their sites, this saves them a huge chunk other paysites have to payout. The Tubes run at a profit anyway.

              However, it doesn't take a huge budget to produce kick ass porn. It takes a lot of porn production skill and sites that are willing to pay for that skill are few and far between. Which takes us back to Tube Sites.

              I could produce kick ass porn, along with many others, Buttman, Ben Dover, Ed Powers, etc. Will Tubes pay us the money we want or get some lame dick who works cheap to do it on a tight budget?



              Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
              PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

              Comment

              • Paul Markham
                Too old to care
                • Jun 2001
                • 52942

                #307
                Originally posted by Pseudonymous
                I am right now, producing in 2016 for some of todays top pornstars. I have went from driving traffic to being an owner and worrying about ROI and dealing with producers to producing myself in todays market. So yes im familiar with all sides, which most are not. Its very easy to have an opinion that stems from one area of expertise but until you've really been on all sides, and in todays market as well, you really dont have a full grasp. IMO
                You talk as if great porn just falls off a shelf. Which made me think you weren't in the sharp end of producing it.



                Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                Comment

                • Barry-xlovecam
                  It's 42
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 18083

                  #308
                  You got it all wrong (as usual).
                  • Investing in new technologies can yield great returns or tax losses. No balls no glory.
                  • The second to wost thing that can happen to a business model is commiditization even worse is the zero sum game of free.

                  So there is;
                  1. the niche market that will pay for a unique value proposition,
                  2. the middle market of value buyers (*Netflix or Amazon prime),
                  3. the low market 100% advertised subsidized.

                  Whether or not the content is legit or copyright infringing will not make you any money this instant (today). Youtube is proof of this business model. It's not going away.

                  Trying to convert the low market to a higher market is going to be an uphill struggle with a lousy ROMI (return on marketing investment).

                  Comment

                  • webgurl
                    Confirmed User
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 7954

                    #309
                    Shap! Look what you started, a monster size thread! I'm just in here for sport, hope you are doing great!

                    Comment

                    • The Porn Nerd
                      Living The Dream
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 19784

                      #310
                      Originally posted by JayAllan
                      Not ever in my scenes ;) But you are totally correct.
                      My comments do not apply to you Sir. You are in the top 1% of talented shooters on the planet.

                      Originally posted by Pseudonymous
                      Why would you limit the companies to who are not involved in tubes? As an industry matures, the strongest survive and the weak begin to die, obviously. The remaining companies begin to be a little more corporate and have their hands in everything as few companies begin to take over. Almost all big companies have their hands in other brands/including tubes. Half of them, thats the reason theyre still alive to begin with. It bought them the profit/time in order to learn what sells in todays market and continue to be successful. So basically youre saying, what small sites who can't afford or weren't smart enough to get involved in tube sites are still producing content at a high cost? Obviously that number will be limited. It has no reflection on the current state of paysites

                      Blacked owners are involved in a large tube, however it doesn't mean they could not have reached the success without it, it just helped them reach the level they are at, perhaps at a faster pace. Anybody is free to use tubes to their advantage. It is just more obvious to tube owners what sells and what profit they can make off their sites so theyre more willing to spend, they also have less "risk" because they have the traffic already and aren't as scared to spend the money. They were also the ones smart enough and had the budget in order to get involved with them. The people without the budget weren't typically the smartest, given how lucrative this industry was.

                      Not being involved in tubes isn't an excuse to be a failure.

                      Tubes are the highest source of traffic/sales, so why would they not be involved?

                      Strange question is all
                      AmeliaG can speak for herself but to expand on what I think she was getting at:

                      There are tubes and large companies who finance paysite production. They have exclusive agreements with the mega-tubes. Therefore the tubes are spending more than a paysite not financed by a tube would spend. I know what an expensive, professional shoot costs and most small paysites doing 10 joins a day or less cannot compete on that level. So what we are left with is a handful of mega-paysites being financed by mega-tubes to keep the whole daisy chain of porn going. This will continue for years to come, I think, while smaller paysites will have to re-adjust their marketing and expectations because you simply cannot 'compete' with a Blacked or DDF if they are being financed by million dollar tubes.
                      My Affiliate Programs:
                      Porn Nerd Cash | Porn Showcase | Aggressive Gold

                      Over 90 paysites to promote!
                      Now on Teams: peabodymedia

                      Comment

                      • lagwagon
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jul 2001
                        • 8464

                        #311
                        If people keep bumping this thread it will never die. Wait!

                        FTVGirls - FTVMilfs - DanielleFTV

                        Comment

                        • fuzebox
                          making it rain
                          • Oct 2003
                          • 22351

                          #312
                          Originally posted by The Porn Nerd
                          most small paysites doing 10 joins a day or less
                          I assumed this was a business thread.

                          Comment

                          • Bladewire
                            StraightBro
                            • Aug 2003
                            • 56228

                            #313
                            Originally posted by fuzebox
                            I assumed this was a business thread.
                            It isn't?


                            Skype: CallTomNow

                            Comment

                            • phil-flash
                              Confirmed User
                              • Apr 2003
                              • 650

                              #314
                              I read this thread to the end of page 5 and I couldn't take it any longer.

                              There is power in numbers. If we could get a coalition of producers and site owners together, maybe we would be able to come up with enough resources to push the tubes and file lockers out.

                              I know I can't do it, a lawsuit would chew me up and spit me out. That's probably the same for most of us. We need a "Trump type figure" to lead this and make it happen. Someone who kicks the door in, and goes for the juggler.

                              There is no magic potion in my opinion. It's been said a million times on this board. If it's free... sales go to shit. Most people would say that compared to the past, that sales are shit.

                              You cannot walk into wal mart and walk out with a new fishing pole. You have to pay for it. If everything can be locked up in our tours and members areas again... the people will pay for it. They JUST WOULD.

                              THERE IS NO MAGIC POTION. The free content has to stop.

                              I believe a focus should be on finding a Trump type figure to lead this cause, gather followers and recourses, and take on the free content sites, tubes, and file lockers.

                              Maybe even the billing companies could invest in this. They have big money, and I am sure that if the reign of free porn would end... that the billing companies would make larger fortunes than before since there are more "potential buyers" and more devices to access porn from than ever before.

                              Let me guess though, the billing companies are probably in bed with the tube sites and file locker rev share programs...

                              Would anyone be interested in trying to start something like this up?


                              phil-flash Cash - Gallery Exporter

                              Comment

                              • JayAllan
                                So Fucking Banned
                                • Jan 2008
                                • 1148

                                #315
                                Originally posted by The Porn Nerd
                                My comments do not apply to you Sir. You are in the top 1% of talented shooters on the planet.

                                I don't know about that but thank you
                                Now just let me know where to send you the check

                                Comment

                                Working...