GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   How many people have WE killed? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=120447)

Sly_RJ 03-28-2003 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


Eating veal is an exercise in cruelty, and if you can't do without veal or foie gras to help make that not happen then you're so selfish that you're worthless, or you just completely lack empathy. You can drive an SUV if you can afford it, I don't give a fuck. You CANNOT destroy the environment we ALL have to live in just to line your pockets, unless you're sharing the $$.

Is everyone reading this?

Donovon, Unseen, even stocktrader...

Read dig's response to my response. It's comical at best.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

Is everyone reading this?

Donovon, Unseen, even stocktrader...

Read dig's response to my response. It's comical at best.

don't be screaming for help already :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Donny 03-28-2003 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


you can make a heart beat in a petri dish. Is it alive?

Whatever you have to believe to keep a clear conscience. No use arguing any further. You believe what you want and I'll believe what I believe. My opinions will never change. Yours likely won't either.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips


Whatever you have to believe to keep a clear conscience. No use arguing any further. You believe what you want and I'll believe what I believe. My opinions will never change. Yours likely won't either.

no, yours never will because you get your opinions out of a conservative set of beliefs you're 'supposed' to have. If you people really believed all this shit deep down in your most basic character, you wouldn't be in this business. You just parrot what you hear.

Sly_RJ 03-28-2003 10:15 PM

Ok, for anyone who missed it, here's the line of posts I'm talking about. Surely I'm not the only one laughing my ass off.

Some "tyrannical state" can't stop an abortion but it can stop me from eating veal.

Hehe. Ok. If you say so.

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


we believe that we have no right to tell a woman what she can and can't do with their own body. Men either, when it comes to it. We believe in each person's ability to govern their own actions. We don't need a tyrannical state to tell us what to do.

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

Good. Thank God you won't be telling me I can't drive SUVs, cut down trees, and eat veal.

Now I just need to work on the others...

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


Eating veal is an exercise in cruelty, and if you can't do without veal or foie gras to help make that not happen then you're so selfish that you're worthless, or you just completely lack empathy. You can drive an SUV if you can afford it, I don't give a fuck. You CANNOT destroy the environment we ALL have to live in just to line your pockets, unless you're sharing the $$.


jake2000xp 03-28-2003 10:15 PM

Quote:

Humans are disappointing to say the least.
Yes, we are living proof

dig420 03-28-2003 10:16 PM

HEY that was my 1,000th post!!! :glugglug

StupidNewbie 03-28-2003 10:16 PM

If babies didn't *love* being aborted I'm sure they would complain.

:1orglaugh

Gutterboy 03-28-2003 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by UnseenWorld



Well, are you going to draw some sort of parallel, because this is no argument. It might be a setup to an argument, but it's not an argument. This is premise A, we stand in need of premise B and the conclusion.

I see. So you get to draw all the paralells you'd like, but when I do it back.. its syllogism time.

hahahahahaha

I wasn't drawing a paralell in the first place. Precedent is a valid legal argument. I was simply showing that there is legal precedent for justifying the ending of a life for less than "extreme" purposes.

UnseenWorld 03-28-2003 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


except all the instances of messing with another's body that you cite have to do with preventing that person from harming another person. When you're telling a woman she HAS to have a kid, you're stepping into her space and you have no right to be there without being invited.

And your citation for that legalism is? I might add that we can take DNA samples from male sperm, we can invade their psyches with court-ordered psych testing and psychological analysis (people who have not been convicted of any crime, BTW). Besides, if you can order someone to pick up a rifle and risk their lives at war, I find the distinction between inside and outside the body a little frail.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:17 PM

A state can set minimum standards of decent treatment of animals in the food industry, yes.

you have a problem with that Sly? Let's hear it!

dig420 03-28-2003 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by UnseenWorld


And your citation for that legalism is?

it's called RESPECT for your fellow human being and their right to make their own decisions independently of you sticking your big nose in their affairs. you're not particularly intelligent. What makes you think you have a right to make a decision for her?

Sly_RJ 03-28-2003 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
A state can set minimum standards of decent treatment of animals in the food industry, yes.

you have a problem with that Sly? Let's hear it!

Shall I dig up some abortion pictures?

Very nice treatment there, oh yes.

Would you really like me to?

I wasn't even going to bring this up because it certainly isn't my main concern or the best argument, but if you're "protesting" "decent treatment of animals"...

dig420 03-28-2003 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

Shall I dig up some abortion pictures?

Very nice treatment there, oh yes.

Would you really like me to?

I wasn't even going to bring this up because it certainly isn't my main concern or the best argument, but if you're "protesting" "decent treatment of animals"...

yeah Sly, why don't you just go to http://www.armyofgod.com and grab them for us? You can also hit http://www.godhatesfags.com on the way, they have some good pix.

Go hang out with like minded people.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:23 PM

maybe I could dig up some pix of open heart surgery, that's pretty ugly too.

WE SHOULD OUTLAW IT!!!

dig420 03-28-2003 10:24 PM

Quote of the week:
From Sunday, April 1, 2001 A.D. New York Post

Lynne Slepian (Wife of babykilling abortionist Barnett Slepian)
speaking of James Kopp:

" I'd like to see him dead..."
"I'd like to see a slow, painful death ..."

Like the slow, painful death your abortionist husband caused innocent
children when he murdered them? Barnett Slepian caused children to
have a slow, painful death when he used his suction machine to rip
their helpless little bodies all to pieces.
http://www.armyofgod.com

they know how to take care of us babykilling abortionists over there!

Donny 03-28-2003 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


no, yours never will because you get your opinions out of a conservative set of beliefs you're 'supposed' to have. If you people really believed all this shit deep down in your most basic character, you wouldn't be in this business. You just parrot what you hear.

That was a pretty ridiculous argument. You think that because I shoot photos of naked girls I can't possibly be against abortion? I don't see the connection. How old are you? That's a serious question.

Does shooting "nudie pics" also mean I'm for legalizing drugs, hugging trees, saving whales, protesting wars, etc?

No... I happen to believe abortion is wrong. It's that simple. I have a little boy that means more to me than anything in the world. I can't fathom why someone would want to do anything to steal the life from another human. I understand fear that some women must have when they find out they're pregnant. I also understand that some people aren't cut out to be a parnent and don't want to be a parent. But I can't understand why someone would want to end human life.

As I said, I won't change my mind. You likely won't change yours. Great! That's the wonderful thing about life... we can disagree.

Rutopls 03-28-2003 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by UnseenWorld


Besides, if you can order someone to pick up a rifle and risk their lives at war, I find the distinction between inside and outside the body a little frail.

Sorry dont see how this fits unless you are arguing against Saddam's regime, as no one ordered the ALL VOLUNTEER ARMY FO THE UNITEd STATES, to pickup a rifle... they did that already on thier own decision or did you miss that fact?

A woman has a right to do whatever is best in her situation that she decides, or the fact that we all masturbate killing thousands of potential babies should be illegal too you boneheads.

Sly_RJ 03-28-2003 10:27 PM

Ok everyone, this is what "decent treated beings" look like:
http://www.abortiontv.com/images/BabyOnSide.JPG
http://www.abortiontv.com/images/SaltPoison2.gif
http://www.abortiontv.com/images/Fetus-PartialBirth.jpg
http://www.abortiontv.com/images/11WeekAbortion.jpg

But hey, do what you like. Just don't stop me from eating veal.

Gutterboy 03-28-2003 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

Shall I dig up some abortion pictures?

Very nice treatment there, oh yes.

Would you really like me to?

I wasn't even going to bring this up because it certainly isn't my main concern or the best argument, but if you're "protesting" "decent treatment of animals"...

Think. There is no compelling health reason for someone to eat veal. No one is going to suffer adverse physical and psychological consequences because they don't get their veal.

With abortion, the taking of the life is justified by the fact that the life in question was a parasite which would have caused the mother considerable physical and emotional damage had she been forced to carry it to term.

In other words, for your analogy to be valid, the veal in question would have to be parasitizing some womans body to stay alive.

The State has a compelling interest in protecting the health of its female citizen. It does not have a compelling interest in your veal.

I don't think veal should be illegal, or foie gras for that matter, but the parallel you are trying to draw is absurd.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:28 PM

is that what you're reduced to Sly? you're easier than I thought. How long til we see you standing at the side of the road with one of those pix on a big sign?

go torture some animals.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips


That was a pretty ridiculous argument. You think that because I shoot photos of naked girls I can't possibly be against abortion? I don't see the connection. How old are you? That's a serious question.

Does shooting "nudie pics" also mean I'm for legalizing drugs, hugging trees, saving whales, protesting wars, etc?

No... I happen to believe abortion is wrong. It's that simple. I have a little boy that means more to me than anything in the world. I can't fathom why someone would want to do anything to steal the life from another human. I understand fear that some women must have when they find out they're pregnant. I also understand that some people aren't cut out to be a parnent and don't want to be a parent. But I can't understand why someone would want to end human life.

As I said, I won't change my mind. You likely won't change yours. Great! That's the wonderful thing about life... we can disagree.

you shoot nude pix, make sites about fucking and sucking and all that good shit and then you wanna try to come off as a good republican pro-lifer?

I'd say that makes you a hypocrite at best, a schitzophrenic at worst.

TurboTrucker 03-28-2003 10:30 PM

The real arguement is what rights does a fetus have? Is it a person, does it have the right to not be killed?

Now there are some people who believe that human life is a precious gift. I'll tell you right now there's no way in hell I would want a girl to have an abortion with my kid. No fucking way.

The pro-death side however does make a compelling case for the fact that some people are completely worthless. Poster children for their own cause.

Sly_RJ 03-28-2003 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420
is that what you're reduced to Sly? you're easier than I thought. How long til we see you standing at the side of the road with one of those pix on a big sign?

go torture some animals.

I killed my dogs tonight. I'm about to throw 'em on the grill. Wanna come over?

Sly_RJ 03-28-2003 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


you shoot nude pix, make sites about fucking and sucking and all that good shit and then you wanna try to come off as a good republican pro-lifer?

I'd say that makes you a hypocrite at best, a schitzophrenic at worst.

I fail to see the correlation between shooting nude pictures and getting an abortion.

Care to explain? I'm stupid, remember?

Donny 03-28-2003 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


you shoot nude pix, make sites about fucking and sucking and all that good shit and then you wanna try to come off as a good republican pro-lifer?

I'd say that makes you a hypocrite at best, a schitzophrenic at worst.

So all Republicans are pro life? Not. All democrats are pro choice? Wrong again.

Do you think everyone falls into stereotypical categories? What's the highest level of education you've completed? Your ignorance is amazing.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

I killed my dogs tonight. I'm about to throw 'em on the grill. Wanna come over?

nah, I can't stand lowlifes who are cruel to animals.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips


So all Republicans are pro life? Not. All democrats are pro choice? Wrong again.

Do you think everyone falls into stereotypical categories? What's the highest level of education you've completed? Your ignorance is amazing.

a B.A., Einstein. I wouldn't criticize MY intellect if I were you. Pro-lifers have been proven to be 25 i.q. points, seven teeth and two shoes below pro-choicers on average.

Donny 03-28-2003 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips


So all Republicans are pro life? Not. All democrats are pro choice? Wrong again.

Do you think everyone falls into stereotypical categories? What's the highest level of education you've completed? Your ignorance is amazing.

And by the way, I'm against the death penalty too.... kinda throws a wrench into your stereotype, now doesn't it?

Sly_RJ 03-28-2003 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


nah, I can't stand lowlifes who are cruel to animals.

Great. I didn't really want you coming over anyway.

But hey, I don't consider you a lowlife. You're perfectly entitled to your opinion. No problems here.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips


And by the way, I'm against the death penalty too.... kinda throws a wrench into your stereotype, now doesn't it?

no. just means you're not totally worthless.

Donny 03-28-2003 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


a B.A., Einstein. I wouldn't criticize MY intellect if I were you. Pro-lifers have been proven to be 25 i.q. points, seven teeth and two shoes below pro-choicers on average.

Can you please point me to the study that shows this IQ difference??

Sly_RJ 03-28-2003 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips


And by the way, I'm against the death penalty too.... kinda throws a wrench into your stereotype, now doesn't it?

Hey, so am I. Amazing how we can break the stereotype.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

Great. I didn't really want you coming over anyway.

But hey, I don't consider you a lowlife. You're perfectly entitled to your opinion. No problems here.

seriously. I have no interest in spending any time with anyone who lacks the basic human characteristic of sympathy. They always turn out to be an asshole in the end.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips


Can you please point me to the study that shows this IQ difference??

http://www.armyofgod.com

stocktrader23 03-28-2003 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


a B.A., Einstein. I wouldn't criticize MY intellect if I were you. Pro-lifers have been proven to be 25 i.q. points, seven teeth and two shoes below pro-choicers on average.

So what's your IQ then Einstein?

Sly_RJ 03-28-2003 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


seriously. I have no interest in spending any time with anyone who lacks the basic human characteristic of sympathy. They always turn out to be an asshole in the end.

Hey I just said that's fine. No problems here.

Donny 03-28-2003 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


no. just means you're not totally worthless.

You show hypocrisy here, my friend. I show consistency in respecting life of all forms by being both pro-life and anti-death penalty. You think killing unborn children is okay, but killing murderers is not.

Show some consistency. I respect all life.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stocktrader23


So what's your IQ then Einstein?

228

jas1552 03-28-2003 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


seriously. I have no interest in spending any time with anyone who lacks the basic human characteristic of sympathy. They always turn out to be an asshole in the end.

I wonder if it hurts when the baby is stabbed to death.

stocktrader23 03-28-2003 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dig420


228

What a waste.

dig420 03-28-2003 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips


You show hypocrisy here, my friend. I show consistency in respecting life of all forms be being both pro-life and anti-death penalty. You think killing unborn children is okay, but killing murders is not.

Show some consistency. I respect all life.

I don't have a problem with killing murderers per se, I just don't want to lower myself to sharing their way of thinking, and it has no deterrent effect.

Gutterboy 03-28-2003 10:40 PM

There is one good thing about this thread, no one has tried the "It could have grown up to cure cancer!" argument.

A prolifer outside the Daly City BART station got a mouthful of coke all over his new loafers the first time I heard that. There aren't too many things that send my diaphragm into spontaneous convulsions.. but that was one of them.

nap 03-28-2003 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL


You laugh at the millions of babies that have been butchered??

Have you ever watched an abortion in person. Try it sometime and you might have a change of opinion.

have you ever watch an abortion in person? last time I was with a girl and she got an abortion she was the only person allowed in the back with the doctor. so please tell us where you actually witnessed a live abortion in person.

Donny 03-28-2003 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gutterboy
There is one good thing about this thread, no one has tried the "It could have grown up to cure cancer!" argument.

A prolifer outside the Daly City BART station got a mouthful of coke all over his new loafers the first time I heard that.

"It" could have grown up to be the next Osama Bin Laden for all I care. "It" should get that chance.

Gutterboy 03-28-2003 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DonovanPhillips


"It" could have grown up to be the next Osama Bin Laden for all I care. "It" should get that chance.

No it shouldn't!

See how easy pro-life logic is? :winkwink:

Yassi 03-28-2003 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL
Its hard to comprehend how many people we've probably killed in the first week of this war. I'm sure its in the 10's of thousands already. US deaths in other wars are below and at the end the worst of our killing sprees.

TIME FRAME WAR DEATHS (US) COSTS

1775-1783 American Revolution 4,435 $101,100,000


1812-1815 War of 1812 2,260 $90,000,000


1846-1848 Mexican War 13,283 $71,400,000


1861-1865 Civil War 558,052 $5,183,000,000


1898 Spanish American War 2,446 $283,200,000


1914-1918 World War I 116,708 $18,676,000,000


1939-1945 World War II 407,316 $262,259,000,000


1950-1953 Korean Conflict 33,651 $67,386,000,000


1957-1975 Vietnam Conflict 58,168 $150,000,000,000


1991 Gulf War 293 $61,100,000,000


1973 to Present Abortions 35,000,000 (35 MILLION)

Dude,
you need help

Rutopls 03-28-2003 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by nap


have you ever watch an abortion in person? last time I was with a girl and she got an abortion she was the only person allowed in the back with the doctor. so please tell us where you actually witnessed a live abortion in person.

Actually in 1990 I was allowed back with a 30 year old woman who I got pregnant while I was 18. This was in Chicago at the time, so I have witnessed a live abortion as it was going and I still respect the will of the woman making the decision even now.

Donny 03-28-2003 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gutterboy


No it shouldn't!

See how easy pro-life logic is? :winkwink:

Please elaborate on that statement. My simple mind can't see a point to it.

TurboTrucker 03-28-2003 10:48 PM

Just 1 question for you pro-death guys, would you support your mother having an abortion while she was pregnant with you?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123