you keep telling yourself that in the mirror but don't expect others to buy your nonsense.

Convicted of a civil misdoing. About to go into court yet again and get his ass handed to him,

Is Fraud a crime?

Trump is controlled by the people he owes money to, to build the hotels. He will also be controlled by the World Banks. Who do you think is buying US debt? You won't find many individuals there.

why do you pretend you want an "outsider", when you really want a socialist?
Trump is 10x more of an "outsider" than Sanders ever was... and yet given the choice between "outsider" Trump and career-politician Hillary whose presidency will 100% surely result in 4 more years of status quo, you pick Hillary... :error

Americans rely on US Bonds being bought at a low rate of interest. Previous Presidents have sold you down the line. Along with us and our Governments.

Should the Ratings Agency decide Trump is a bad egg, your interest goes up, along with your debt. Should he piss off the Chinese, EU or anyone else? The Bonds might not get sold as advantageously.

All of our economies rely on cheap debt. Therefore putting us all in the hands of the Bankers. Trump's personal wealth is not known. I suspect he's riding a debt mountain. Even his Mortgage Company is in the business of selling those mortgages to other banks.

Remember what happened in 2008?

Yes, Hillary is the best option, she will play to the tunes others whistle. If Trump does that, you're no better off.

so markham, you don't understand debt markets either. got it.

She also holds corruption, just not to the extent that trump does.

wait the words "Hillary" and " illuminati" both have the letter "i"in them. The letter "i" sounds like the word "eye" The illuminati also has an eye in the middle of the triangle. Hillary= illuminati confirmed. I'm done...

FYI Criminal Fraud in the US requires proof beyond doubt of criminal mens rea or what is common known as intent.

Failing in a business venture and by circumstance screwing customers, employees and/or creditors is failing in business -- civil fraud with suits for damages claimed by the plaintiffs.

There is no criminal law barring fucking-up or being stupid -- we couldn't afford to build the jail space if there was:2 cents:

Suck it up, Dynamo:

Hillary will win.

yes, ********** is right. Americans like me need to suck up the fact that foreigners like him and the op support corrupt politicians like hillary to run another country, thank you **********, https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...rkprinces.html


high 5!

Haha.
Fuck I have no sig to spam.

100% wrong. In the UK I would vote for a right wing party, UKIP.

If you want to see change you have to stop voting for the same thing every time. The problem is as you say Trump is 10x more of an outsider. Verging on the edge of disaster.

He has now said America is broken, infrastructure is terrible, unemployment high, etc. He's spot on. Americans don't pay enough taxes. That's the only way to reduce debt, build more and better schools, roads, healthcare, jobs, etc. Yet he wants to double the spending on military which some are delusional enough to think he will never use.

My suggestion goes beyond Sanders, it's to keep voting for people who don't follow the rules. More than once every four years. Then the major parties will listen to you.

Failing by not doing well enough, is a civil matter. Promising something and not supplying it is fraud.

Last night it became official. Clinton will be the next US President.

Because the outsider in the race is batshit crazy and proven to be incapable of supplying what he promises, crooked, fails too often. And a Blowhard.

He's also been in court and lost more times than is comfortable.

Until Americans start to vote in ways to scare the two parties, nothing will change. The problem of voting for Trump is he's not credible so after this nothing will change.

Vote for someone who will change the way things are done and have a chance of getting elected, or go on being ruled by those who buy politicians. You had a chance with Obama, then voted for Republicans to stop all the changes. Because Obama might take a bit more money from you.

When greed comes first, you're in the pockets of the men with the money.

I'm willing to put a wager on the election if anyone is interested ;) (Mutt??? hehehe)

Stop worrying so much, republicans. If she does win, Clinton will face a divided senate and a republican house, and it will probably get worse at mid-terms, if history is any guide.

so in markham world, the USA must move left to be saved. But you would vote for right wing in your country.

nothing you say makes any sense, at all. :2 cents:

Civil fraud and criminal fraud are not the same thing -- US mens rea doctrine is from English common law
see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mens_r...land_and_Wales
You should know better.

Criminal Fraud is almost as hard to convict someone of as a capital crime.

That's how these guys always skate in civil courts and bankruptcy courts -- rules of evidence :2 cents:

You're confusing her with Trump.

Trump was federally indicted and lost to the Department of Justice. Hillary has never been indicted or guilty of any crime.

United States of America, Plaintiff v. Donald J. Trump, Defendant.

FTC MATTER/FILE NUMBER: 861 0148

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 88-CV-0929

FEDERAL COURT: District of Columbia

https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/case...mp-donald-j-us

Wait. A billionaire that had Hillary Clinton in the first row of his wedding is an outsider?

This guy is a non status quo outsider?

You're reality is askew, Mr. Mo. I did not say I support her, and I did not say I support corrupt politicians. It's amazing how much imaginary stuff you insert into everything and instantly label as fact.

And like it or not Dyna, what happens in the US affects the entire world, and we Canadians really care about one of our biggest trading partners.

You and I share nearly the same culture, the same value of currency, and are practically next-door neighbours. You and I are even in the same business sector (or so you claim), and are on the same industry forum. Why you choose to get so hostile about my PREDICTION (not opinion), is bewildering. But then again, you are extremely hostile to everyone else on GFY for anything and everything anyone ever says, so maybe I shouldn't be surprised.

Good luck to you. I hope you don't vote Trump.

And Trump will be that last GOP Nominee!

(Thanks Stephen Colbert for that joke).

So am I. Who else?

but Bernie, a guy who was a politician most of his life, is? or Hillary? :error

getting invited to a wedding suggests he is an "outsider" that has some connections in high places... actually working in politics most of one's life makes one not an "outsider"... so Hillary or Bernie certainly are not "outsiders"...

My reply was hostile on your eyes? Im extremely hostile to everyone who says anything on GFY?

Ahahahahahahahaahahahahah

High5!

What's your SnapChat?

so extremely hostile.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

it's also weird how you're stepping back from supporting your girl hillary though, warts and all.

this is why you crack me up **********


high 5!

i'm not really a snappychatter.

bladwire again, sees only what he wants to see.

on january 20, 2017, trump will be taking oath of office, because he was not under FBI investigation during campaign. hilary will be meeting with her attorneys over her legal issues surrounding not only emails, but the clinton foundation.

but in bladewires mind, a civil judgement is worse than investigations for espionage, obstruction of justice & selling state favors for cash.

tick tock goes the FBI clock...:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

The judge traded a criminal conviction for $750,000 in penalties. He was federally indicted and lost. Pointing false fingers at Hillary isn't reality. Trump losing in federal court, on federal indictments, actually happened, you can't deflect from that.

Wrong, Mo. I never supported Hillary. I wanted Bernie to win, but I have been predicting in about 90% of my posts that Hillary would win.

I crack you up? Strange.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:thumbsup

oopsie. you busted me.

support, prediction, opinion, whatever you want to call it, obviously i don't bother to make sense of any of it. i guess it's becoming obvious to you that i don't pay any real attention to your posts at all.


high 5!

Bill will have so many memories moving back in the house ;)

Wonder If she has balls for this prestigious title

I can see most things are above your pay grade. So I will explain it for you.

Politicians no longer fear the voters. Because the voters keep voting for the same old time and again. In the US politicians are mostly led by corporations and Right Wing. Only one person on the GOP had a chance of scaring the status quo. Trump. The problem is he's batshit crazy. If he were saner and appeared to understand and have better answers than "I'm great" I would support him.

On the Democrat side, the person is Sanders. He's not batshit crazy, knows the problems and wants to break the stranglehold billionaires have on both parties. His only downside is immigration.

In the UK the established politicians mostly support being in the EU and ruled by it. The EU is moving to rule Europe from the center. The UK economy is marginally stronger by being in the EU. Most Britains are poorer by being in the EU. Because their wages have stagnated and prices rose.

UKIP are the party to break the EU, along with a few others in Europe who are also dedicated to retaining their countries ability to rule their own country.

On both occasions, I'm saying vote for the anti-establishment man to break the establishment.

Trump is a joke. He had a real chance of being President. He threw it away by going crazy. Or maybe he already was. Some of his aims are great. His policies are crap. And if you want to debate me on that I'm prepared to do it.

Proving it in court is a problem, doesn't make him innocent of the crime. With the Public.

He either had nothing to do with setting up the school, or was hands on. He claims he was hands on. Over and over again he claims one thing and doesn't supply it. Infact had no intention to supply it.

The GOP needs to start thinking about its voters and not its puppet masters.

Obama was asked if he thinks the GOP are happy with Trump. His reply.

"I know we are" :1orglaugh

He can still be an outsider and work in politics. UK has Corbyn. Look at their record not job title.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/06/us...ettlement.html

Donald Trump Will See You in Court

And he still doesn't know a Mexican can't be a judge.