AAA Study Finds No Scientific Basis for Drugged Driving Laws Based on THC Levels

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wehateporn
    Promoting Debate on GFY
    • Apr 2007
    • 27176

    #1

    AAA Study Finds No Scientific Basis for Drugged Driving Laws Based on THC Levels

    The American Automobile Association recommends states abandon such laws in favor of testing for actual impairment.

    Legal blood limits for marijuana are not an accurate way to measure whether someone was driving while impaired, and can lead to unsafe drivers going free while others are wrongfully convicted, according to a new study.

    The study released Tuesday by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety found that drivers can have a low level of THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, in their blood and be unsafe behind the wheel, while others with relatively high levels may not be a hazard.

    Marijuana is not metabolized in the system in the same way as alcohol. So while a person with a blood-alcohol level of .08 or higher is considered too drunk to drive, it's not possible to say the same thing absent other evidence about a person testing at 5 nanograms per milliliter of blood of THC ? the level used to find impairment by Colorado, Montana and Washington, the study found.

    Continued AAA Study Finds No Scientific Basis for Drugged Driving Laws Based on THC Levels | Alternet
  • PornWorx
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2015
    • 235

    #2
    There is no reason for anyone with any amount of alcohol or marijuana in their system to be driving at all. I would personally prefer a zero tolerance instead of all these bullshit guidelines to manage it for small amounts. Just my opinion.

    Comment

    • kane
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Aug 2001
      • 20684

      #3
      There is a slippery road with pot. You can smoke it then 10 hours later be 100% sober and fine, but still have a high level in your blood. It can actually stay in your system for up to 30 days and beyond after you smoke it.

      I think checking for impairment would work better, but I have zero tolerance for anyone driving under the influence of anything and I think the punishment for doing so should be very severe.

      Comment

      • shake
        frc
        • Jul 2003
        • 4663

        #4
        Originally posted by PornWorx
        There is no reason for anyone with any amount of alcohol or marijuana in their system to be driving at all. I would personally prefer a zero tolerance instead of all these bullshit guidelines to manage it for small amounts. Just my opinion.
        Zero tolerance is a bad idea. Driving by people smoking up? Now you've got some in your system.
        Crazy fast VPS for $10 a month. Try with $20 free credit

        Comment

        • PornWorx
          Confirmed User
          • Apr 2015
          • 235

          #5
          Originally posted by shake
          Zero tolerance is a bad idea. Driving by people smoking up? Now you've got some in your system.

          You would need to hot box a room and basically breathe in enough secondhand smoke on purpose to fail the test:

          Second-Hand Pot Smoke Gets You High, Without Ventilation

          Comment

          • NETbilling
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2002
            • 8598

            #6
            Originally posted by PornWorx
            There is no reason for anyone with any amount of alcohol or marijuana in their system to be driving at all. I would personally prefer a zero tolerance instead of all these bullshit guidelines to manage it for small amounts. Just my opinion.
            Agreed...


            Mitch Farber
            CEO - NETbilling, Inc.
            Email / Phone: 888-357-8166 / 661-252-2456
            Transaction processing & 24/7 call center services with exceptional rates and flexibility, since 1998!

            Comment

            Working...