GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Ontario to commit suicide (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1197395)

2MuchMark 05-17-2016 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20901290)
Deforestation is the problem. Not CO2.

No, BOTH are the problem. We are pumping way too much greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere, and there is not enough trees and plants to absorb it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20901290)
Stop cutting down forests to plant crops to be used as biofuels to reduce CO2.

Agreed! Cutting forests to make farms is ridiculous, and biofuels never made sense to me either. See dude? We can agree on some things.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20901290)
I can't understand how a supposedly intelligent guy like yourself does not see the lunacy inherent in some of the positions you support.

More insults? Eon you have insulted and jabbed at me about 10 times in this thread, and again I never once took a jab back at you. Come on man...



Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20901290)
CO2 does not have an infinite capacity to absorb and re-emit radiation. It has already maxed out the amount it can absorb. Adding more to the atmosphere will have zero effect.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Causes & Sources


Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20901290)
Yes lets leave them with destroyed economies, unreliable and unnafordable energy and no chance for a financially secure and stable future because we destroyed all of that trying to get rid of a harmless trace gas.

Makes sense.

No one wants that, but of course that is a part of the challenge. How do you move the world off of dangerous and polluting forms of energy to a cleaner source of energy without disrupting the economy? It's a problem that only people smarter than you and me can figure out, but it doesn't stop us from speculating and coming up with new ideas.


Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20901290)

The oceans are not acidic they are alkaline. A slight decrease in alkalinity does not make them acidic.


What is Ocean Acidification?

Quote:

Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the pH of surface ocean waters has fallen by 0.1 pH units. Since the pH scale, like the Richter scale, is logarithmic, this change represents approximately a 30 percent increase in acidity



Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20901290)
And no CO2 is not killing the oceans.

From the same article at What is Ocean Acidification?

Quote:

studies have shown that a more acidic environment has a dramatic effect on some calcifying species, including oysters, clams, sea urchins, shallow water corals, deep sea corals, and calcareous plankton. When shelled organisms are at risk, the entire food web may also be at risk.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20901290)
And if the oceans are warming as much as you say then they will be out-gassing CO2 and not absorbing it. In fact the oceans may very well the source of much of the "excess" CO2 you worry about since it has been proven then rising CO2 follows rising temperatures, not the other way around.

I see what you are trying to say but I think you are forgetting something. The ocean naturally absorbs some CO2, and maybe releases some too I'm not sure. The natural cycle adds and removes CO2 to keep a balance; humans add extra CO2 without removing any. This my friend is the basic source of the problem.


Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20901290)
I have studied geology and climate - in university. And I've been closely following both sides of this debate since then - not just one side like yourself.

It's very cool that you have studied that. I am impressed. I don't think its fair for you to call me one-sided though. As I've said in the past, I think getting rid of fossil fuels is impossible, and probably unnecessary. All I want to see is better use of energy. Driving and heating with electrons instead of carbon molecuels *where possible* makes lots of sense to me. That my friend Eon, is my base belief, nothing more.


Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20901290)
Anyways, I am done with this topic with you. It's a waste of time and I don't have time to waste. You can get the last word in if you like but I'm certain it will just be more of the same.

Again, you don't need to be insulting, and this time does not need to be a waste. Talking about subjects like these is a good excuse to research and learn about new things. I encourage you do do this too.

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 20901290)
This thread was supposed to be about the suicidal economic policy on Ontario based on bad science and not the bad science itself.

The science isn't bad - its the policy thats bad, and they should know it. They shouldn't try to push electricity down peoples throats, especially when its so expensive in Ontario. They should get the price down and get people to WANT to switch.

I'm done too on the subject. I enjoyed talking to you about it. Please don't insult me anymore, ok? It's uncalled for. Hand-shake?

Paul Markham 05-18-2016 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20900954)
No dude. Ontario is being reamed with extremely high electric bills. Going green is a good thing, but what has to be done is to find a way to lower the cost for you. No one will want to go green and pay so much for it.

This is why the planet will undergo a huge climate change, killing 99.999% of humans. Saving more would mean people living a little less affluently.

When plants and the herbivores that feed off them are dying. Food will skyrocket in price. Water will either be up to our necks because the ice caps have melted or as scarce as fine wine and cost as much.

All because it costs too much to go green or build huge safe guards. .

Paul Markham 05-18-2016 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20901626)
In fact I haven't heard any plans from the government on if they're even looking into implementing storage methods. At this point they're just happy to continue increasing our rates to pay for their broken system.

Try Googling Storing energy from wind farms.

Paul Markham 05-18-2016 01:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 20902061)
Exactly.

And still I see convoys of flatbed trucks hauling wind turbine tower segments outta Port Weller where they're being mass-produced. They've built a massive production facility along the Welland Canal near Lock 1. And the turbines are blocking out the sky just to the immediate west of us along Lake Erie. Too many to count.

Try Googling Storing energy from wind farms.

BlackCrayon 05-18-2016 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 20902298)
This is why the planet will undergo a huge climate change, killing 99.999% of humans. Saving more would mean people living a little less affluently.

When plants and the herbivores that feed off them are dying. Food will skyrocket in price. Water will either be up to our necks because the ice caps have melted or as scarce as fine wine and cost as much.

All because it costs too much to go green or build huge safe guards. .

lol a little less affluently? you do realize poor people need electricity too. i know people who work for ontario welfare and they constantly have people calling who can't pay their bills and need the government to bail them out. this will only make it worse. most people live paycheck to paycheck and are not affluent.

Paul Markham 05-18-2016 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 20902571)
lol a little less affluently? you do realize poor people need electricity too. i know people who work for ontario welfare and they constantly have people calling who can't pay their bills and need the government to bail them out. this will only make it worse. most people live paycheck to paycheck and are not affluent.

You're missing the point. Poor people, the ill, infirm, etc. Are Fucked.

The world is doing what it has done for the last billion or so years. It's evolving and changing its climate.

It was only due to climate change that we humans evolved, walked out of Africa, don't compete with Neanderthals, see sabre tooth tigers, giant sloths, megafauna, etc. Roaming the countryside. Read this.

It's already happening now.

Water has to be the key element, assuming we don't gas ourselves to death first. Should that drop too low, crops fail people die in millions or billions? Should it rise too high, fields are swamped.

Can 7 billion survive that? NO.

Can some live off the sea? Yes, but only a select few. Which I'm sure is already being planned for the very rich and powerful.

I give it 100 years before the shit that's hitting the fan now starts to bounce back.

Now everyone can keep debating whether they will be able to afford to fill a gas guzzler, or keep the heating on.

MrBottomTooth 05-18-2016 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 20902328)

What's your point? I know it can be done. The point is our government has not done this and doesn't appear to have any plans in works to do so.

So their retarded system has resulted in us having the highest and fastest growing electricuty costs in all of North America. People are already struggling to pay their hydro bills and now they want to force us to heat with it as well. And rates are set to continue to rise. The problem is not renewable energy but an incompetent government who act to save the environment before planning things correctly. They offer ridiculous subsidies to wind and solar generators when they should have had a system in place to store the energy before doing anything.

I've got a solar panel in my back yard that's probably the size of your house. I'm all for green enetgy. Unfortunately I need the revenue from it to pay my massive hydro bills because the whole system is fucked and looks like things will continue to get worse.

Klen 05-18-2016 05:04 AM

It is already bouncing back, as i dont remember seeing snow ever in late may in 31 years of my life.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 20902616)
You're missing the point. Poor people, the ill, infirm, etc. Are Fucked.

The world is doing what it has done for the last billion or so years. It's evolving and changing its climate.

It was only due to climate change that we humans evolved, walked out of Africa, don't compete with Neanderthals, see sabre tooth tigers, giant sloths, megafauna, etc. Roaming the countryside. Read this.

It's already happening now.

Water has to be the key element, assuming we don't gas ourselves to death first. Should that drop too low, crops fail people die in millions or billions? Should it rise too high, fields are swamped.

Can 7 billion survive that? NO.

Can some live off the sea? Yes, but only a select few. Which I'm sure is already being planned for the very rich and powerful.

I give it 100 years before the shit that's hitting the fan now starts to bounce back.

Now everyone can keep debating whether they will be able to afford to fill a gas guzzler, or keep the heating on.


BlackCrayon 05-18-2016 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 20902616)
You're missing the point. Poor people, the ill, infirm, etc. Are Fucked.

The world is doing what it has done for the last billion or so years. It's evolving and changing its climate.

It was only due to climate change that we humans evolved, walked out of Africa, don't compete with Neanderthals, see sabre tooth tigers, giant sloths, megafauna, etc. Roaming the countryside. Read this.

It's already happening now.

Water has to be the key element, assuming we don't gas ourselves to death first. Should that drop too low, crops fail people die in millions or billions? Should it rise too high, fields are swamped.

Can 7 billion survive that? NO.

Can some live off the sea? Yes, but only a select few. Which I'm sure is already being planned for the very rich and powerful.

I give it 100 years before the shit that's hitting the fan now starts to bounce back.

Now everyone can keep debating whether they will be able to afford to fill a gas guzzler, or keep the heating on.

i agree that it *could* happen but in the timeline you are talking about 100 years is nothing. it could easily be 1000-5000 years before anything major happens that will really take a chunk of the population out. regardless, this kind of climate change is really completely out of our control. sure we can do things that *might* slow it down but the reality is the earth is going to do what its going to do with or without us. for now im focused on the near future rather than that may happen in the distant.

Paul Markham 05-18-2016 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20902640)
What's your point?

Electricity bills will be the last of your problems. Affording food will come top of the list. In 2216.

Until then keep worrying about minor issues of fuel costs going up to slow down the process. By a few days.

People. This isn't something that can be stopped. It can be slowed down, we can even prepare for it. The costs are going to be huge. And probably more than most can afford.

https://www.google.cz/webhp?hl=en&gw...d+water+crisis

This is just the start. The problem is climate change and population increases. As I said give it 100 years. The younger ones will see it going pear shaped in 50 years.

MrBottomTooth 05-18-2016 05:53 AM

Why are you blathering on about what might happen in 100 years. This thread is about the Ontario government fucking over its citizens today. They are making it impossible for people to survive TODAY.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123