Study finds ?adjustments? were made to surface temp readings to FAKE ?record-setting? warming

Yet another peer-reviewed study has proven that so-called ?global warming? is nothing but a fabricated hoax, and yet American institutions of primary and secondary education continue to push the lie that modern human activity is destroying Earth.

As reported by The Daily Caller, the new study, which was published by a pair of scientists and a veteran statistician, found that there were adjustments made to global surface temperature readings by other scientists in the past few years which ?are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data.?

As such, ?it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST [global average surface temperature] data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever ? despite current claims of record-setting warming,? the study, published last month, noted.

The study was authored by Dr. James P. Wallace III, Dr. Joseph S. D?Aleo, and Dr. Craig D. Idso. Their results were supported by seven additional scientists and researchers.

?The objective of this research was to test the hypothesis that Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data, produced by NOAA, NASA, and HADLEY, are sufficiently credible estimates of global average temperatures such that they can be relied upon for climate modeling and policy analysis purposes,? says the study?s abstract.

?In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified,? the abstract continues. ?It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.?

The trio concluded: ?The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality.?

The Daily Caller noted that climatologists very often apply adjustments to surface temperature thermometers in order to account for ?biases? in data. And while the study does not question those adjustments, per se, it does note that the adjustments are nearly always upward, as in, warmer.

Continued Climate change baloney: Study finds â??adjustmentsâ? were made to surface temp readings to FAKE â??record-settingâ? warming â?? NaturalNews.com