GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Has Trump said or done ANYTHING racist? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1188543)

JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-20-2017 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20783466)
Barry how is he a bigot?

I actually watch his speeches. The majority of the speeches are about trade with other countries and also about how all of our politicians are bought and paid for by big corporations.

He also will spend about 2 or 3 minutes on illegal immigration and the problems of terrorism from Muslims.

Can you tell me how any of that is bigoted?

I just keep hearing the guys like Anderson Cooper, Van Jones, and John King types repeating it over and over without actually specifying it.
Oh yeah, they will say things like "Trump called Mexican's rapists" without pointing out that he was saying that the govt. of Mexico was encouraging people to cross the border illegally and in his mind they were sending their criminals in order to get rid of them.

Funny how Anderson Cooper, Chris Cuomo, John King and the like always make sure to "dig down" on the comments that Obama or Hillary make that sound bad...but they suddenly lose their ability to do that on Trump and simply cherry pick the quote with no context to it.
The media will continue it's assault for the next 8 years :1orglaugh

escorpio 02-20-2017 12:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyClips (Post 21561334)
The media will continue it's assault for the next 8 years :1orglaugh
He made them look like fools by winning and they're not going to forget it.

JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-20-2017 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by escorpio (Post 21561361)
He made them look like fools by winning and they're not going to forget it.
I still can't get over the Huffington post having Hillary at 98.1% chance :1orglaugh:1orglaugh at most it should have been 60-40...more like 50-50

thommy 02-20-2017 12:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by astronaut x (Post 20784483)
one guy says, "I'm right, you're wrong."
other guy says, "I'm right, you're wrong."
first guy says, "No, I'm right, you're wrong."
second guy says, "No, I'm right, you're wrong."
first guy says, "No, I'm right, you're wrong."
second guy says, "No, I'm right, you're wrong."
first guy says, "No, I'm right, you're wrong."
second guy says, "No, I'm right, you're wrong."
first guy says, "No, I'm right, you're wrong."
second guy says, "No, I'm right, you're wrong."

at this point, even if someone has learned something, 99% of the time, they won't admit if because they feel that might invalidate everything they have said, and of course they would be too proud to let that happen.

back to the argument...

one guy says, "You're stupid."
other guy says, "You're stupid."
first guy.....
well said - and the problem is that this 2 guys are not talking about the REAL problem - they talking about something what they THINK it is the reason for the problem.

i found today a very good written article what is not pro and not contra trump but what describes the problems WHY someone like trump could come up.

i think that hits the nail more than all discussion about immigrants and walls.

HERE IT IS

thommy 02-20-2017 01:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyClips (Post 21561379)
I still can't get over the Huffington post having Hillary at 98.1% chance :1orglaugh:1orglaugh at most it should have been 60-40...more like 50-50
i told you already yesterday in another thread that you can be HAPPY that they have published these figures. because NO ONE believed that trump will win because of that and the voters who would have prevented him have simply stayed at home therefore. Believe me, THAT will DEFINITELY not happen again in the 2018 election. I assume that you can count with 65% to 75% voter turnout.

JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-20-2017 01:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy (Post 21561502)
i told you already yesterday in another thread that you can be HAPPY that they have published these figures. because NO ONE believed that trump will win because of that and the voters who would have prevented him have simply stayed at home therefore. Believe me, THAT will DEFINITELY not happen again in the 2018 election. I assume that you can count with 65% to 75% voter turnout.
98.1% and you people ate it up and believed it :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Joshua G 02-20-2017 04:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy (Post 21561502)
i told you already yesterday in another thread that you can be HAPPY that they have published these figures. because NO ONE believed that trump will win because of that and the voters who would have prevented him have simply stayed at home therefore. Believe me, THAT will DEFINITELY not happen again in the 2018 election. I assume that you can count with 65% to 75% voter turnout.
so all kinds of people stayed home, & they wont again huh?

do you think perhaps you are simply wishful thinking. there is the possibility that what you are seeing is nothing more than hilary voters, simply being loud. Why would a good voter stay home & not vote for the first woman president? with trump threatening her rights?

i would suggest you get real & recognize everyone that wanted to vote, did vote. & there were plenty of trump votes that didnt bother because their state is so blue...

i guess you are also clueless that all the important senate races are in the midwest in 2018. hardly a good place for liberal PC to make a comeback.

:)

thommy 02-21-2017 12:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua G (Post 21562006)
so all kinds of people stayed home, & they wont again huh?
you can be sure that they will not - and they would not if there wouldnīt have been this numbers around what made everyone sure that trump will not win.

IF this 70% would be afraid that trump will not win - they would have gone, or not?

Quote:
do you think perhaps you are simply wishful thinking. there is the possibility that what you are seeing is nothing more than hilary voters, simply being loud. Why would a good voter stay home & not vote for the first woman president? with trump threatening her rights?
again because THEY THOUGHT she will win anyway....

Quote:
i would suggest you get real & recognize everyone that wanted to vote, did vote. & there were plenty of trump votes that didnt bother because their state is so blue...
what you mean "plenty of voters" ???? more than 40% did NOT vote and from your "plenty" the majority voted for hillary.
do you really think that this over 40% would stay at home when they wanted trump to win and hear everywhere that he have no chance?
you are a dreamer.

Quote:
i guess you are also clueless that all the important senate races are in the midwest in 2018. hardly a good place for liberal PC to make a comeback.
if they only get more than before it is enough - because republicans will see than that they do not have a chance in the next president elections and they will help the democrats on any distrust vote to kick him out.

there are A LOT of republicans what disagree with him so donīt be too sure that they will back him up.

starling 02-21-2017 01:31 AM
I'd say calling people racists and bigots, calling people who agree with trumps policies reactionary goon voters, rioting, calling people ignorant and stupid, supporting illegal immigration, calling all Americans illegal immigrants and many other things are what lost the democrats the vote. Why would people support you when you call them idiots? Want to boost immigration? Boost industry. Then you will be needing immigrants to fill the job surplus.

Tasty1 02-21-2017 06:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20784744)
Then he said... "When we heard Donald Trump say 'Make America White Again' that was all we needed to know"

Megyn Kelly almost jumped out of her seat in disbelief and quickly informed this low information idiot that "NO" Donald Trump has NEVER said that!

But folks...that is what a lot of these ignorant protestors think. It's astounding.
Almost elections in Holland. A new party, against racism, but more against the Dutch culture (Black Pete, everybody is racist etcetra) was on TV. The leader a black woman, always angry at the white and always playing victim also said Trump was racist. When they asked on TV how she knew, she said she had seen an interview of Trump with 'moving' pictures when he made racist talk.... 10 minutes later the show showed a fact check and found out it was fake and confronted her in the show with it... she didn't know what to say. Trump must have said something racist she repeated...

Tasty1 02-21-2017 06:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy (Post 21562678)
you can be sure that they will not - and they would not if there wouldnīt have been this numbers around what made everyone sure that trump will not win.

IF this 70% would be afraid that trump will not win - they would have gone, or not?



again because THEY THOUGHT she will win anyway....



what you mean "plenty of voters" ???? more than 40% did NOT vote and from your "plenty" the majority voted for hillary.
do you really think that this over 40% would stay at home when they wanted trump to win and hear everywhere that he have no chance?
you are a dreamer.



if they only get more than before it is enough - because republicans will see than that they do not have a chance in the next president elections and they will help the democrats on any distrust vote to kick him out.

there are A LOT of republicans what disagree with him so donīt be too sure that they will back him up.
yes, that is one way to explain she lost. They do the same in Holland. There was a referendum about Ukrain. You need at least x% of the population to vote to make it legit. Some of the pro-Ukrain parties didn't do much campaigning, other received, illegaly, money from George Soros (and than saying the Anti Ukrain party got money from Russia what was ridicilous, but they must have something to cover their loss. Some of the Pro Ukrain parties where aiming that not enough people would vote and the referendum wouldn't be legit. And when they lost they started whining that IF everybody would have voted to Pro-Ukrain side would have won. If this, If that, If so. they would have won. Yes, and when the earth wouldn't be round we would fall off. I heard that whining too many times to take it serious anymore.

JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE 02-21-2017 07:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy (Post 21562678)
you can be sure that they will not - and they would not if there wouldnīt have been this numbers around what made everyone sure that trump will not win.

IF this 70% would be afraid that trump will not win - they would have gone, or not?



again because THEY THOUGHT she will win anyway....



what you mean "plenty of voters" ???? more than 40% did NOT vote and from your "plenty" the majority voted for hillary.
do you really think that this over 40% would stay at home when they wanted trump to win and hear everywhere that he have no chance?
you are a dreamer.



if they only get more than before it is enough - because republicans will see than that they do not have a chance in the next president elections and they will help the democrats on any distrust vote to kick him out.

there are A LOT of republicans what disagree with him so donīt be too sure that they will back him up.
The Trump rally sizes were all you needed to know, especially in the swing states

Hillary would give a rally in Florida and 200 people would show up. The media would not accurately report this but some people would. Tim Kaine gave a speech and like 7 people showed up. Trump had rockstar type numbers. 20,000 30,000 50,000 people...and the media would not report this but some honest people would

We all knew who was going to win


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:23 AM.
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123