As I warned b4 Republicans are now making the move to sell public land

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • crockett
    in a van by the river
    • May 2003
    • 76818

    #1

    As I warned b4 Republicans are now making the move to sell public land

    https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ement-chaffetz

    This is what Republicans do for the people. They sell off our land for pennies and the tax payer gets shit.. 3.3 million acres of BLM land will be sold.

    This is land that serves a lot of purposes. It's used by hunters, fishermen, campers, hikers and various outdoor uses some is leased for oil /gas drilling. Not to mention these large tracks of land are safe havens for endless amounts of wildlife.

    “Last I checked, hunters and fishermen were taxpayers,” said Amaro, who lives in a New Mexico county where 70,000 acres of federal lands are singled out. In total, his state, which sees $650m in economic activity from hunting and fishing, stands to lose 800,000 acres of BLM land, or more than the state of Rhode Island.

    “That word ‘disposal’ is scary. It’s not ‘disposable’ for an outdoorsman,” he said.



    Republicans just want to gut the entire country so their big business benefactors can save a few tax dollars. We need to take some of them and drop them in the middle of that 800k acres and let them get lost forever..
    In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
  • 2MuchMark
    Mark of 2Much.net
    • Aug 2004
    • 51009

    #2
    Trumpets don't care. They will lose everything before admitting they made a mistake.

    Comment

    • TCLGirls
      Confirmed User
      • Feb 2010
      • 3068

      #3
      Thwe CONS will sell Yosemite to Trump for $1/acre. Then he is going to construct a gaudy golen tower right next to Half Dome.

      Comment

      • Grapesoda
        So Fucking Banned
        • Jul 2003
        • 46234

        #4
        Originally posted by crockett
        https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ement-chaffetz

        This is what Republicans do for the people. They sell off our land for pennies and the tax payer gets shit.. 3.3 million acres of BLM land will be sold.

        This is land that serves a lot of purposes. It's used by hunters, fishermen, campers, hikers and various outdoor uses some is leased for oil /gas drilling. Not to mention these large tracks of land are safe havens for endless amounts of wildlife.

        ?Last I checked, hunters and fishermen were taxpayers,? said Amaro, who lives in a New Mexico county where 70,000 acres of federal lands are singled out. In total, his state, which sees $650m in economic activity from hunting and fishing, stands to lose 800,000 acres of BLM land, or more than the state of Rhode Island.

        ?That word ?disposal? is scary. It?s not ?disposable? for an outdoorsman,? he said.



        Republicans just want to gut the entire country so their big business benefactors can save a few tax dollars. We need to take some of them and drop them in the middle of that 800k acres and let them get lost forever..
        What luck, for governments, that the people are stupid!

        Adolf Hitler

        Comment

        • crockett
          in a van by the river
          • May 2003
          • 76818

          #5
          Originally posted by Grapesoda
          What luck, for governments, that the people are stupid!

          Adolf Hitler
          You live in an affected state.. you will be losing BLM land in your state if this happens..

          The 10 states affected are Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah and Wyoming. Residents can see how much acreage is earmarked for “disposal” in their counties by checking a PDF on Chaffetz’s website.


          btw this fuck head who is pushing this bill has value estimate on the land as $30-50/acre. This guy should be shot.
          https://chaffetz.house.gov/sites/cha...l%20report.pdf
          In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

          Comment

          • onwebcam
            Fake Nick 1.0
            • Oct 2005
            • 27689

            #6
            Originally posted by crockett
            btw this fuck head who is pushing this bill has value estimate on the land as $30-50/acre. This guy should be shot.
            https://chaffetz.house.gov/sites/cha...l%20report.pdf
            There's lots of land in the US worth -$0 most of which is in those states. In fact some of them would pay you to take it.

            In addition, democrats have been handing off national landmarks to the UN for decades which most people in the US aren't aware of..
            PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
            ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

            Comment

            • crockett
              in a van by the river
              • May 2003
              • 76818

              #7
              Originally posted by onwebcam
              There's lots of land in the US worth -$0 most of which is in those states. In fact some of them would pay you to take it.

              In addition, democrats have been handing off national landmarks to the UN for decades which most people in the US aren't aware of..
              Bullshit, not to mention this land brings in revenue for the states & the local communities.
              In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

              Comment

              • onwebcam
                Fake Nick 1.0
                • Oct 2005
                • 27689

                #8
                Originally posted by crockett
                Bullshit, not to mention this land brings in revenue for the states & the local communities.
                https://www.aol.com/article/2010/10/...free/19604666/

                13 Places to Find FREE Land for Homesteading in the US

                Here are some places where you can get land for free.

                You are aware most of the US is "free" land settlements right?

                The federal government can't technically give it away now but they really don't need to be the owners of so much land.. $50 an acre for a bunch or desert and rock sounds good to me. Who knows, someone might be more productive with it. I'm sure the states can buy it themselves.
                PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
                ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.

                Comment

                • Major (Tom)
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Nov 2003
                  • 32492

                  #9
                  Originally posted by crockett
                  https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ement-chaffetz

                  This is what Republicans do for the people. They sell off our land for pennies and the tax payer gets shit.. 3.3 million acres of BLM land will be sold.

                  This is land that serves a lot of purposes. It's used by hunters, fishermen, campers, hikers and various outdoor uses some is leased for oil /gas drilling. Not to mention these large tracks of land are safe havens for endless amounts of wildlife.

                  ?Last I checked, hunters and fishermen were taxpayers,? said Amaro, who lives in a New Mexico county where 70,000 acres of federal lands are singled out. In total, his state, which sees $650m in economic activity from hunting and fishing, stands to lose 800,000 acres of BLM land, or more than the state of Rhode Island.

                  ?That word ?disposal? is scary. It?s not ?disposable? for an outdoorsman,? he said.



                  Republicans just want to gut the entire country so their big business benefactors can save a few tax dollars. We need to take some of them and drop them in the middle of that 800k acres and let them get lost forever..
                  How did black lives matter get 3.3 million acres

                  Comment

                  • INever
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 4028

                    #10
                    Originally posted by crockett
                    You live in an affected state.. you will be losing BLM land in your state if this happens..

                    The 10 states affected are Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah and Wyoming. Residents can see how much acreage is earmarked for ?disposal? in their counties by checking a PDF on Chaffetz?s website.


                    btw this fuck head who is pushing this bill has value estimate on the land as $30-50/acre. This guy should be shot.
                    https://chaffetz.house.gov/sites/cha...l%20report.pdf
                    That report is dated 1997?
                    I love Camdough

                    airvpn

                    Comment

                    • Joshua G
                      dumb libs love censorship
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 8198

                      #11
                      More dumb whining from crockett about the feds correcting their stifling excess ownership of western land. Making up fake news like its gonna hurt people. Dumb liberal lies, spread by the gfy dumb-bot.

                      Comment

                      • Paul Markham
                        Too old to care
                        • Jun 2001
                        • 52942

                        #12
                        Crockett.

                        Why have you suddenly woken up that politicians have been exploiting you for their own gain?

                        But rest easy.

                        U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz says he no longer wants to sell off public lands in Colorado, other states

                        You scared him into doing a U-turn.



                        Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                        PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                        Comment

                        • RacerX
                          Confirmed User
                          • Aug 2001
                          • 41

                          #13
                          Originally posted by crockett
                          https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ement-chaffetz

                          This is what Republicans do for the people. They sell off our land for pennies and the tax payer gets shit.. 3.3 million acres of BLM land will be sold.

                          This is land that serves a lot of purposes. It's used by hunters, fishermen, campers, hikers and various outdoor uses some is leased for oil /gas drilling. Not to mention these large tracks of land are safe havens for endless amounts of wildlife.

                          ?Last I checked, hunters and fishermen were taxpayers,? said Amaro, who lives in a New Mexico county where 70,000 acres of federal lands are singled out. In total, his state, which sees $650m in economic activity from hunting and fishing, stands to lose 800,000 acres of BLM land, or more than the state of Rhode Island.

                          ?That word ?disposal? is scary. It?s not ?disposable? for an outdoorsman,? he said.



                          Republicans just want to gut the entire country so their big business benefactors can save a few tax dollars. We need to take some of them and drop them in the middle of that 800k acres and let them get lost forever..
                          I'm not saying I agree with this sale overall, but I'm curious if you even read this based on how you are presenting it? The report was initiated by the Clinton administration in 1997. Were you up in arms over this back then?

                          "The acreage identified is drawn from a 1997 survey conducted by the Clinton administration, which sought to identify potential offsets to revive the Florida Everglades after decades of pollution from the sugar cane industry.

                          The actual language of the 1997 survey, which did not result in land being sold, prefaced its findings with a caution: ?Please note many lands identified appear to have conflicts which may preclude them from being considered for disposal or exchange.?

                          Comment

                          • nico-t
                            emperor of my world
                            • Aug 2004
                            • 29901

                            #14
                            Yes its alll Trumps fault

                            Let's make 10 Trump threads a day on GFY

                            Where everyone elses mind is on completely different things, the obsessive brainwashed retards cannot shut up about Trump... Pathetic losers

                            Comment

                            • Matt 26z
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Apr 2002
                              • 18481

                              #15
                              BLM was doing massive land grabs under Obama.

                              It has been a long running theory that they are using the resources on this land (or even the land itself) as collateral for the national debt.

                              Comment

                              • Rochard
                                Jägermeister Test Pilot
                                • Dec 2001
                                • 75761

                                #16
                                Originally posted by RacerX
                                I'm not saying I agree with this sale overall, but I'm curious if you even read this based on how you are presenting it? The report was initiated by the Clinton administration in 1997. Were you up in arms over this back then?

                                "The acreage identified is drawn from a 1997 survey conducted by the Clinton administration, which sought to identify potential offsets to revive the Florida Everglades after decades of pollution from the sugar cane industry.

                                The actual language of the 1997 survey, which did not result in land being sold, prefaced its findings with a caution: ?Please note many lands identified appear to have conflicts which may preclude them from being considered for disposal or exchange.?
                                I believe our government has been selling off land for some time now, very quietly. It doesn't matter who is in office. The reality of this is the US government owns A LOT of land, more so out west. Something like 87% of Nevada is owned is owned by the US government. It costs us a ton of money to maintain and patrol that land....
                                Herschel Savage
                                Brooklyn, NY

                                Comment

                                • crockett
                                  in a van by the river
                                  • May 2003
                                  • 76818

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by DukeSkywalker
                                  How did black lives matter get 3.3 million acres
                                  Bureau of Land Management
                                  In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                  Comment

                                  • crockett
                                    in a van by the river
                                    • May 2003
                                    • 76818

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by RacerX
                                    I'm not saying I agree with this sale overall, but I'm curious if you even read this based on how you are presenting it? The report was initiated by the Clinton administration in 1997. Were you up in arms over this back then?

                                    "The acreage identified is drawn from a 1997 survey conducted by the Clinton administration, which sought to identify potential offsets to revive the Florida Everglades after decades of pollution from the sugar cane industry.

                                    The actual language of the 1997 survey, which did not result in land being sold, prefaced its findings with a caution: ?Please note many lands identified appear to have conflicts which may preclude them from being considered for disposal or exchange.?
                                    Yes, I did read it and the Clinton admin was hounded over it and and they decided it was not worth selling the land to pay for the everglades clean up. Obviously it wasn't sold..
                                    In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                    Comment

                                    • crockett
                                      in a van by the river
                                      • May 2003
                                      • 76818

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                      Crockett.

                                      Why have you suddenly woken up that politicians have been exploiting you for their own gain?

                                      But rest easy.

                                      U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz says he no longer wants to sell off public lands in Colorado, other states

                                      You scared him into doing a U-turn.
                                      I've been posting about this since Republicans 1st started making the grumbles of selling BLM/National Park lands. I think my 1st post on this matter was over a year ago, maybe even 2 years (I forget how long this has been going on TBH).. When ever it first came to light they were trying to do it. I was laughed at by GFY right wingers claiming they'd never do that.. Now they are trying to do it..

                                      Don't try to "invent" facts to make yourself sound like you know what you are talking about..


                                      I've also made many posts about Republicans trying to end net neutrality those posts go back several years.. Now they finally have the power to do it and are once again stepping up pace to try it.


                                      BTW just because he says he wont do it, doesn't mean he wont try it again when they think no one is looking. We've seen the same strategy play out time and time again with net neutrality. The people of this country have spoken out on that issue many times and stopped Republicans plans each time. Each time Republican ignore the people's voice and repackage it and try to push it again. This was not the 1st attempt of Republicans to push this agenda of selling the land.. They will try again. They don't care what the people say, this is why I'm anti-Republican but don't make the mistake of thinking that because I'm anti-Republican that I'm 100% pro-Democrat..
                                      In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                      Comment

                                      • Linkster
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Feb 2003
                                        • 3216

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                        Crockett.


                                        You scared him into doing a U-turn.
                                        Actually the voters in those states scared him when they told the congressmen that they wanted their public land for hunting, fishing camping etc... in huge majorities. People with guns tend to get their way
                                        Porn Links Crak for your bank account - Get Addicted
                                        FREE LIVE CAM SHOWS

                                        Comment

                                        • crockett
                                          in a van by the river
                                          • May 2003
                                          • 76818

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Linkster
                                          Actually the voters in those states scared him when they told the congressmen that they wanted their public land for hunting, fishing camping etc... in huge majorities. People with guns tend to get their way
                                          It seems the Republicans didn't think if there are no public lands to be hunted on, perhaps hunters will have to start targeting them..
                                          In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                          Comment

                                          • JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                            Trump!
                                            • Feb 2011
                                            • 6442

                                            #22
                                            lol at the term "public land"...aka cripples, gimps and losers

                                            Comment

                                            • Joshua G
                                              dumb libs love censorship
                                              • Jul 2008
                                              • 8198

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Linkster
                                              Actually the voters in those states scared him when they told the congressmen that they wanted their public land for hunting, fishing camping etc... in huge majorities. People with guns tend to get their way
                                              yeah right...you say you're not a liberal.

                                              you're a clown.

                                              Comment

                                              • JohnnyClips - BANNED FOR LIFE
                                                Trump!
                                                • Feb 2011
                                                • 6442

                                                #24
                                                Trump isn't going to win the nomination, Trump isnt going to be president, blach blah blah

                                                Comment

                                                Working...