If Iraq has WMD, shouldn't they be using them right about now? - GoFuckYourself.com

BRISK · 03-21-2003, 11:56 AM

I'm not saying I think they do or don't have weapons of mass destruction, but if they did have them, then wouldn't they be using them right now?

Simon-interaid · 03-21-2003, 11:57 AM

I totally agree.

I guess they did not have them after all ?

PersianKitty · 03-21-2003, 11:57 AM

I think Saddam is in some way incapacitated and his troops are left clueless.

foreverjason · 03-21-2003, 11:58 AM

Its all how you look at it.

Saddam knows hes going to lose. But it would be a victory if the US was never justified in the war. If he started using WMD then the US would of been right all along.

However, if Saddam has weapons and doesnt use them but they find them later, lol its over.

directfiesta · 03-21-2003, 11:58 AM

they don't even have planes in the air,....

Their anti-aerial defense sustem dates from 1974, with no radar on them ....

WMD????

directfiesta · 03-21-2003, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by foreverjason
Its all how you look at it.

Saddam knows hes going to lose. But it would be a victory if the US was never justified in the war. If he started using WMD then the US would of been right all along.

However, if Saddam has weapons and doesnt use them but they find them later, lol its over.

So your scenario : the US is right one way or the other ....

Hehe ...

PersianKitty · 03-21-2003, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Simon-interaid
I totally agree.

I guess they did not have them after all ?

They sure had a SCUD or two sitting around.

angeleyes · 03-21-2003, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Simon-interaid
I totally agree.

I guess they did not have them after all ?

If they start using them, then several of the countries that remained nuetral or sided against the US would be going in after them too. (Part of the reason "some" did not side with the US is because we did not have enough proof). If they start firing that crap off--that's proof.

... but on the flipside they denied having scuds. This entire situation is confusing.

seven · 03-21-2003, 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PersianKitty
I think Saddam is in some way incapacitated and his troops are left clueless.

Think he'd have left a plan to take place automatically in case he was incapacitated

PersianKitty · 03-21-2003, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by angeleyes

If they start using them, then several of the countries that remained nuetral or sided against the US would be going in after them too. (Part of the reason "some" did not side with the US is because we did not have enough proof). If they start firing that crap off--that's proof.

I honestly don't think Saddam gives a rat's ass in hell who comes after him or who sides with who. He's proved time and time again that he's a crass heartless SOB.

LiveDose · 03-21-2003, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

So your scenario : the US is right one way or the other ....

Hehe ...

And your is: the US is wrong one way or the other ....

Hehe

gregtx · 03-21-2003, 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by angeleyes

If they start using them, then several of the countries that remained nuetral or sided against the US would be going in after them too. (Part of the reason "some" did not side with the US is because we did not have enough proof). If they start firing that crap off--that's proof.

... but on the flipside they denied having scuds. This entire situation is confusing.

I agree...

if they were to launch a biological weapon.. all fence riding countries would also engage...

CosmicKitten · 03-21-2003, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PersianKitty

I honestly don't think Saddam gives a rat's ass in hell who comes after him or who sides with who. He's proved time and time again that he's a crass heartless SOB.

Gotta admit he has a hella huge set of balls.

Either that or blatant stupidity to challenge the USA.

May the rest of the losers around the globe take note.

Mojo Rizin · 03-21-2003, 12:06 PM

With so little resistance I honestly think Saddam is either injured or some of his top commanders are dead..

I honestly think he knows this is the end so he is baiting troops in and when the time is right he takes out as many people as possible including himself.

directfiesta · 03-21-2003, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by LiveDose

And your is: the US is wrong one way or the other ....

Hehe

No, I didn't write the scenario ( see who wrote what I quoted ).

If the US finds WMD and Chemical, then they will be exonarated of the role of vilain...

If not, they are the vilain....

CDSmith · 03-21-2003, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta
If the US finds WMD and Chemical, then they will be exonarated of the role of vilain...If not, they are the vilain[/IMG]

I'm sure that's what you'll be chirping no matter what happens, right dude?

Dude, I pray you get a clue.

No matter what happens or what they find, Saddam is out. Gone. Toast. That alone will have been worth everything to the world. Try pasting the title of villain where it belongs for once. Dude.

galleryseek · 03-21-2003, 12:21 PM

THE VILLAINS!!! stop using that gay word, only those moronic assholes in iraq use it.

ronaldo · 03-21-2003, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

No, I didn't write the scenario ( see who wrote what I quoted ).

If the US finds WMD and Chemical, then they will be exonarated of the role of vilain...

If not, they are the vilain....

Would you agree that if they do find WMD that the US was justified?

traffictrader · 03-21-2003, 12:23 PM

directfiesta omg that hilarious! great picture!

Nickatilynx · 03-21-2003, 12:30 PM

If no WMDs are found (UN inspectors found none ) it was unnecessary.
If saddam was incapacitated it was unnecessary.
If a more exhaustive exploration of economic and diplomatic measures could have sucedded it was unecessary.

I think it was unnecessary.

""""I honestly don't think Saddam gives a rat's ass in hell who comes after him or who sides with who. He's proved time and
time again that he's a crass heartless SOB.":""

Agreed.

But apparently Bush didn't care either.And thats the problem

Gemini · 03-21-2003, 12:45 PM

He might have the WMD's hidden and ready to be blown up by remote, or already did it... and then sacrifices himself in hopes of an Islamic uprising like no other. Althought I hardly think he believes that virgin story for martyrs. lol (He *is* 65 and not long for the planet, with one proven nutcase son and one that is borderline)

OR he could hope to squeak thru and explain away the WMD's as 'looky what part of the World we are in,,, they ALL have them!" How many times has he skated thru before?!

Rochard · 03-21-2003, 12:53 PM

It's just like Nukes - We have them, but we can't use them. In this case, if Iraq uses them he'll be the villian. If he doesn't use them and we find them later, he'll still be the villian.

If Iraq has already launched scuds it pretty much proves he was full of shit.

All of this is pointless - There are a dozen or so reasons to go in and take him out. The US has been patrolling the no fly zones which is imposed by the UN, yet they continue to fire at us. If it was up to me the first time Iraq opened up on our planes I would have invaded them.

That's enough of a reason to take him out.

directfiesta · 03-21-2003, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ronaldo

Would you agree that if they do find WMD that the US was justified?

read post above: it is clear....

sexyclicks · 03-21-2003, 12:55 PM

do you guys really believe americans will not "find" WMD?

mule · 03-21-2003, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by RocHard
In this case, if Iraq uses them he'll be the villian.

So since when has being the villain ever bothered Saddam?

directfiesta · 03-21-2003, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexyclicks
do you guys really believe americans will not "find" WMD?

Hum... Ambigious ...

Are you saying you are sure they have some ?

or

Are you saying the US will plant some ???

Personally, I think it is possible but as times go by, this possibility diminishes:

Come on, the regime is dead, they don't care for their population no more than for the invasion troops, so why wouldn't they use them....

FlyingIguana · 03-21-2003, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

No, I didn't write the scenario ( see who wrote what I quoted ).

If the US finds WMD and Chemical, then they will be exonarated of the role of vilain...

If not, they are the vilain....

saddam should have followed the cease fire agreement

directfiesta · 03-21-2003, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FlyingIguana

saddam should have followed the cease fire agreement

Saddam should have gone in exile, like a lot of Dictator's or Head of States did in the past.

But this guy is something else ....

Still no reason ....

BRISK · 03-21-2003, 01:15 PM

Saddam should have taken as much money as he could get and bought an island in the Caribbean and filled it with hot girls and retire there. Thats what I would have done.

All I want is money, fuck the fame, I'm a simple man.

Lizzie · 03-21-2003, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexyclicks
do you guys really believe americans will not "find" WMD?

Of course they will "Find" WMD.
It's going to be a cake walk to find them. The inspectors couldn't find any but the US will.
LOL

Snake Doctor · 03-21-2003, 01:51 PM

If Saddam uses WMD, then yeah, this is all justified.

If, after the war is over and the smoke clears, we suddenly "find" a bunch of WMD that the inspectors missed, I think that's a little fishy.

And for the record, I'm not a Saddam fan, the issue isn't whether or not we think Saddam is a good guy, the issue is whether or not the U.S. has to right to invade another country and install a new government without being attacked or provoked first.
This is setting a REALLY BAD precedent

directfiesta · 03-21-2003, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lenny2

And for the record, I'm not a Saddam fan, the issue isn't whether or not we think Saddam is a good guy, the issue is whether or not the U.S. has to right to invade another country and install a new government without being attacked or provoked first.
This is setting a REALLY BAD precedent

For the record, I think nobody is a Saddam fan .... But it is hard here to get people to make the difference: if you are againt the war, you are for Saddam....

Probably comes from the new US thematic:

" If you are not with us, you are against us "

- George W. Bush.

iroc409 · 03-21-2003, 01:58 PM

fucking shit people, it's already confirmed he lied to the US and UN by using scuds in this conflict.

proof enough he was not willing to disarm peacefully.

do we really need to find WMD's? he's proven he's a liar, a sneaky bastard, and likes to kill his own people. listen to the iraqis that have come here.

PersianKitty · 03-21-2003, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by iroc409
fucking shit people, it's already confirmed he lied to the US and UN by using scuds in this conflict.

proof enough he was not willing to disarm peacefully.

do we really need to find WMD's? he's proven he's a liar, a sneaky bastard, and likes to kill his own people. listen to the iraqis that have come here.

I just hope if there are weapons of mass destruction to be used by Saddam, they are found before his regime uses them. They don't care how many of their own countrymen they'd kill in the process.

directfiesta · 03-21-2003, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by iroc409
fucking shit people, it's already confirmed

Rumors, no proof.

Could be true , maybe not. Til the " smoke" settles, nobody will know.

Houdini · 03-21-2003, 02:04 PM

As soon as this "war" is over, we'll find more weapons in one day than the inspectors found in years.

machineg · 03-21-2003, 02:06 PM

just a though .. if the US doesnt know where these so called " weapons or mass destruction " are .. is it really a good idea to go blasting shit up like mad .. what if they nail the bunker where these weapons are .. Im no ammunitions expert but my though is a bomb dropped on a shitload of bombs could cause a big fucking problem .

I dont think they even have any .
but we will never know .
Even if he doesnt . we'll be told they found them .
NO way the US will NOT find them .. they get some from somewhere to cover its ass if there arent any .

either way .. bombs away

The Truth Hurts · 03-21-2003, 02:07 PM

If we don't find WMD, we'll get "We told ya so".
If we do, we'll get "You planted them".

eroswebmaster · 03-21-2003, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

For the record, I think nobody is a Saddam fan .... But it is hard here to get people to make the difference: if you are againt the war, you are for Saddam....

Probably comes from the new US thematic:

" If you are not with us, you are against us "

- George W. Bush.

Well I look at it this way.

If I were at a bar with my buddy (George W. Bush) and he was mouthing off to the big asshole (Saddam Hussein) on the other side of the bar about how he was going to kick his ass I'd tell him to cool it either publicly or privately.

However once the shit hit the fan, I'd shut the fuck up and make sure my boy's back was covered.

This is EXACTLY how I would hancle a real life situation with a good buddy of mine.

People during times of aggression look for weaknesses, and during the Vietnam war that weakness was our homefront, not our war front.

Anytime there is a lack of support on an issue, asshole's always seize the opportunity to exploit that, it also in their demented little minds validates them and whatever issues brought them to this point.

You can be against the war and still support the troops, but for now while the scuffle is on, just shut the fuck up and make sure our boys' backs are covered.

JeremySF · 03-21-2003, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

For the record, I think nobody is a Saddam fan .... But it is hard here to get people to make the difference: if you are againt the war, you are for Saddam....

Speak for yourself. I'm a huge Saddam fan. If it wasn't for that suave, debonair dictator, I'd have nothing to talk about. Saddam is a genocidal whisky drinking, mistress banging, viagra popping all original

eroswebmaster · 03-21-2003, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by iroc409
fucking shit people, it's already confirmed he lied to the US and UN by using scuds in this conflict.

He also stated he would NOT light his oil wells on fire...oh well.

cluck · 03-21-2003, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by directfiesta

For the record, I think nobody is a Saddam fan .... But it is hard here to get people to make the difference: if you are againt the war, you are for Saddam....

Probably comes from the new US thematic:

" If you are not with us, you are against us "

- George W. Bush.

So much for being able to have your own political opinions in the USA

If there aren't any we'll just plant them there I'm sure. Uncle Sam can't be proved wrong, he'll just make it look like he's right.

So they're supposed to be protecting us. They *may* have WMD's and they *may* sell them to terrorists. Isn't this just what's going on with North Korea? Oh right, we know they actually have them therefore we won't fuck with them and we'll just let them go about their business.

Why would we fuck with a country when we know they have WMD's?

JeremySF · 03-21-2003, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BRISK
I'm not saying I think they do or don't have weapons of mass destruction, but if they did have them, then wouldn't they be using them right now?

Well, so far they have been firing missiles they allegedly do not have. That Al Abbas missile they fired has a range of 558 miles.

But, if Saddam does use WMDs or chemical agents, the entire world oppinion will shift. Saddam is a master of PR so I don't think he'll be that stupid. He's blinded by his ego and makes irrational decisions, but he's not stupid.

directfiesta · 03-21-2003, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cluck

So much for being able to have your own political opinions in the USA

If there aren't any we'll just plant them there I'm sure. Uncle Sam can't be proved wrong, he'll just make it look like he's right.

So they're supposed to be protecting us. They *may* have WMD's and they *may* sell them to terrorists. Isn't this just what's going on with North Korea? Oh right, we know they actually have them therefore we won't fuck with them and we'll just let them go about their business.

Why would we fuck with a country when we know they have WMD's?

Didn't try to kill my daddy

and

I need OIL

Nickatilynx · 03-21-2003, 02:14 PM

Quote:

However once the shit hit the fan, I'd shut the fuck up and make sure my boy's back was covered

I agree 100%

Good point.

When the dust settles I'd tear him a new one though

eroswebmaster · 03-21-2003, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cluck

So much for being able to have your own political opinions in the USA

I'll just cut and paste this and post it here:

Well I look at it this way.

If I were at a bar with my buddy (George W. Bush) and he was mouthing off to the big asshole (Saddam Hussein) on the other side of the bar about how he was going to kick his ass I'd tell him to cool it either publicly or privately.

However once the shit hit the fan, I'd shut the fuck up and make sure my boy's back was covered.

This is EXACTLY how I would hancle a real life situation with a good buddy of mine.

People during times of aggression look for weaknesses, and during the Vietnam war that weakness was our homefront, not our war front.

Anytime there is a lack of support on an issue, asshole's always seize the opportunity to exploit that, it also in their demented little minds validates them and whatever issues brought them to this point.

You can be against the war and still support the troops, but for now while the scuffle is on, just shut the fuck up and make sure our boys' backs are covered.

Sly_RJ · 03-21-2003, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JeremySF

But, if Saddam does use WMDs or chemical agents, the entire world oppinion will shift.

I don't think so. Read the post above by cluck. I have a feeling that mentality is quite common.

eroswebmaster · 03-21-2003, 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nickatilynx

I agree 100%

Good point.

When the dust settles I'd tear him a new one though

LOL no kidding.

I remember a situation just like the one I described.
My best friend back in High School, Tim, we were at a party and Joe and Mike these two little shit heads he was always trying to impress were there.

They always slammed Tim every chance they got, and this happened real often.

Anyway they started on Tim and I figured my boy needed his back covered so I walk over there and I'm all up in their face and they say something and Tim starts laughing along with THEM!

So what did I do? I walked over to Tim and popped him one right in the jaw.

No fucking kidding...LOL

Tim and I are still friends going on 20 years

In fact he spoke at my mother's funeral 2 weeks ago.

cluck · 03-21-2003, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by eroswebmaster

I'll just cut and paste this and post it here:

Well I look at it this way.

If I were at a bar with my buddy (George W. Bush) and he was mouthing off to the big asshole (Saddam Hussein) on the other side of the bar about how he was going to kick his ass I'd tell him to cool it either publicly or privately.

However once the shit hit the fan, I'd shut the fuck up and make sure my boy's back was covered.

This is EXACTLY how I would hancle a real life situation with a good buddy of mine.

People during times of aggression look for weaknesses, and during the Vietnam war that weakness was our homefront, not our war front.

Anytime there is a lack of support on an issue, asshole's always seize the opportunity to exploit that, it also in their demented little minds validates them and whatever issues brought them to this point.

You can be against the war and still support the troops, but for now while the scuffle is on, just shut the fuck up and make sure our boys' backs are covered.

See if my buddy got himself into a fight in the bar I wouldn't jump in(unless it was purely for fun). If you start a fight you should be able to finish it.

As far as the soldiers they're just doing their job. I don't want anything to happen to them. I hope they're successful in doing what they do, they're obviously some of the most honorable people around. When I protest war, I tell W not to put our boys in that position. They didn't deserve to be thrown in there, nor do most of them have an idea what's really going on behind the scenes. Takes a fuck of alotta balls to do the job of cleaning up what the government starts.

eroswebmaster · 03-21-2003, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cluck

See if my buddy got himself into a fight in the bar I wouldn't jump in(unless it was purely for fun). If you start a fight you should be able to finish it.

Naw man you missed my point entirely.

My boy would have to finish what he started, I'd just have his back...that means physically if someone else were to jump in, and just morally by him knowing I was there.

I sure as hell wouldn't be standing behind him when he's about to get his ass kicked saying shit like..."I'm just so against this bar fight." "You have no reason to be in this bar fight." Creating anymore confusion than there already is and almost ensuring his getting his ass kicked.

If you would handle it anyother way...then I doubt you have too many friends.

03-21-2003, 11:56 AM	#1
BRISK Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 12,240	If Iraq has WMD, shouldn't they be using them right about now? I'm not saying I think they do or don't have weapons of mass destruction, but if they did have them, then wouldn't they be using them right now? __________________ I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

03-21-2003, 11:57 AM	#3
PersianKitty Meow Media Inc. Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: In the valley of the sun, cactus, tacos, tequila, and nod Posts: 7,785	I think Saddam is in some way incapacitated and his troops are left clueless. __________________ Wondering what webmaster programs PK uses? Check them out here!

03-21-2003, 11:58 AM	#5
directfiesta Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Montreal, Quebec Posts: 29,680	they don't even have planes in the air,.... Their anti-aerial defense sustem dates from 1974, with no radar on them .... WMD???? __________________ I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT ! But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

03-21-2003, 12:23 PM	#19
traffictrader Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: ICQ# 93507395 Posts: 1,331	directfiesta omg that hilarious! great picture! __________________

03-21-2003, 12:30 PM	#20
Nickatilynx Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: International Gypsy Posts: 819	If no WMDs are found (UN inspectors found none ) it was unnecessary. If saddam was incapacitated it was unnecessary. If a more exhaustive exploration of economic and diplomatic measures could have sucedded it was unecessary. I think it was unnecessary. """"I honestly don't think Saddam gives a rat's ass in hell who comes after him or who sides with who. He's proved time and time again that he's a crass heartless SOB.":"" Agreed. But apparently Bush didn't care either.And thats the problem __________________ Skype - Nickatilynx Last edited by Nickatilynx; 03-21-2003 at 12:32 PM..

03-21-2003, 11:57 AM	#2
Simon-interaid Confirmed User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Vancouver Posts: 814	I totally agree. I guess they did not have them after all ?

03-21-2003, 11:58 AM	#4
foreverjason Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,452	Its all how you look at it. Saddam knows hes going to lose. But it would be a victory if the US was never justified in the war. If he started using WMD then the US would of been right all along. However, if Saddam has weapons and doesnt use them but they find them later, lol its over.

03-21-2003, 12:06 PM	#14
Mojo Rizin Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Chandler, AZ Posts: 1,089	With so little resistance I honestly think Saddam is either injured or some of his top commanders are dead.. I honestly think he knows this is the end so he is baiting troops in and when the time is right he takes out as many people as possible including himself.

03-21-2003, 12:21 PM	#17
galleryseek Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 8,234	THE VILLAINS!!! stop using that gay word, only those moronic assholes in iraq use it.

03-21-2003, 12:45 PM	#21
Gemini Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: o-HI-o Posts: 7,183	He might have the WMD's hidden and ready to be blown up by remote, or already did it... and then sacrifices himself in hopes of an Islamic uprising like no other. Althought I hardly think he believes that virgin story for martyrs. lol (He is 65 and not long for the planet, with one proven nutcase son and one that is borderline) OR he could hope to squeak thru and explain away the WMD's as 'looky what part of the World we are in,,, they ALL have them!" How many times has he skated thru before?! __________________ <center><a target="_blank" href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac"><img border="0" src="http://216.130.172.224/gfy/gsig.gif" width="490" height="100"></a><br><a href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac" target="_blank"><b><font face="Arial"><font color="#FF99FF"> Buy me away from Slavedriver Smokey!<br>It's May Sig Sweeps!<font></b></center>

03-21-2003, 12:53 PM	#22
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 74,049	It's just like Nukes - We have them, but we can't use them. In this case, if Iraq uses them he'll be the villian. If he doesn't use them and we find them later, he'll still be the villian. If Iraq has already launched scuds it pretty much proves he was full of shit. All of this is pointless - There are a dozen or so reasons to go in and take him out. The US has been patrolling the no fly zones which is imposed by the UN, yet they continue to fire at us. If it was up to me the first time Iraq opened up on our planes I would have invaded them. That's enough of a reason to take him out. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

03-21-2003, 12:55 PM	#24
sexyclicks Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: c9media.com Posts: 3,240	do you guys really believe americans will not "find" WMD?

03-21-2003, 01:15 PM	#29
BRISK Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 12,240	Saddam should have taken as much money as he could get and bought an island in the Caribbean and filled it with hot girls and retire there. Thats what I would have done. All I want is money, fuck the fame, I'm a simple man. __________________ I post on GFY so that when people ask me what I do, I can tell them that I work with the mentally retarded.

03-21-2003, 01:51 PM	#31
Snake Doctor I'm Lenny2 Bitch Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: On top of my soapbox Posts: 13,449	If Saddam uses WMD, then yeah, this is all justified. If, after the war is over and the smoke clears, we suddenly "find" a bunch of WMD that the inspectors missed, I think that's a little fishy. And for the record, I'm not a Saddam fan, the issue isn't whether or not we think Saddam is a good guy, the issue is whether or not the U.S. has to right to invade another country and install a new government without being attacked or provoked first. This is setting a REALLY BAD precedent __________________ sig too big

03-21-2003, 01:58 PM	#33
iroc409 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: midwest side, yo Posts: 4,728	fucking shit people, it's already confirmed he lied to the US and UN by using scuds in this conflict. proof enough he was not willing to disarm peacefully. do we really need to find WMD's? he's proven he's a liar, a sneaky bastard, and likes to kill his own people. listen to the iraqis that have come here. __________________ <a href="http://www.iroc409.com/"><img src="http://www.iroc409.com/adv/120x60.gif" border=0></a> icq: 1 7 6 4 2 0 9 6 0 Gallery templates for ONLY $25! w00t!

03-21-2003, 02:04 PM	#36
Houdini Confirmed User Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: SoCal Posts: 1,651	As soon as this "war" is over, we'll find more weapons in one day than the inspectors found in years.

03-21-2003, 02:06 PM	#37
machineg Confirmed User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 1,090	just a though .. if the US doesnt know where these so called " weapons or mass destruction " are .. is it really a good idea to go blasting shit up like mad .. what if they nail the bunker where these weapons are .. Im no ammunitions expert but my though is a bomb dropped on a shitload of bombs could cause a big fucking problem . I dont think they even have any . but we will never know . Even if he doesnt . we'll be told they found them . NO way the US will NOT find them .. they get some from somewhere to cover its ass if there arent any . either way .. bombs away __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.

03-21-2003, 02:07 PM	#38
The Truth Hurts Zph7YXfjMhg Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: In Your Skull Posts: 15,306	If we don't find WMD, we'll get "We told ya so". If we do, we'll get "You planted them".