50 votes for Trump !!!
-
-
-
outrageous to claim that's how the party would handle it.
i'm no fan of the RNC, but i find that to be a lot of conjecture. the onus is on the delegate to vote the way of his/her district, not to toe the RNC line. that panel is assuming 100s of delegates would flip flop after getting strongarmed by the party leaders at pledge time.Comment
-
Don't quote one line of my post and evade answering the questions posed with rhetoric.
When I visited the UK, France, The Netherlands, Greece, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Canada the customs officer didn't require I pass some religious test to be granted a visa. Did you ever consider there might be reciprocation? Maybe, you don't travel or see what the USA looks like to the rest of the world or even give a shit.
The McCarran-Walter Act, 1952 makes no stipulation for temporary or permanent exclusion of visa applicants by religious ''class''.
American History Documents IICode:barry@[]:~/Documents/path$ html2text american_history_documents_ii.html |grep --color=always -in "religious\|faith\|worship"|more [COLOR="YellowGreen"]123[/COLOR]:(D) an alien crewman serving in good [COLOR="Red"]faith[/COLOR] as such in any capacity required for [COLOR="YellowGreen"]232[/COLOR]:carrying on the vocation of minister of a [COLOR="Red"]relig[/COLOR] [COLOR="Red"]ious[/COLOR] denomination, and whose [COLOR="YellowGreen"]233[/COLOR]:services are needed by such [COLOR="Red"]religious[/COLOR] denom ination having a bona fide [COLOR="YellowGreen"]237[/COLOR]:of the United States Government abroad, and who has perf ormed [COLOR="Red"]faithful[/COLOR] service [COLOR="YellowGreen"]979[/COLOR]:officer that such application is made in good [COLOR="Red"]f aith[/COLOR] and has a substantial barry@deathstar8:~/Documents/meme-urls$
U.S. Immigration Legislation: 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act (McCarran-Walter Act)
Spare me the bullshit pleaseeeee ...Comment
-
I agree. The problem isn't Muslims, the problem is terrorists.
Timothy McVeigh was a US Vet and killed nearly two hundred people. Does this mean we should not allow US Vets back into the United States? What about that guy who shot up that school? Should we start denying Christians permission to enter the country because they might shoot up schools? About the teenagers in at the Columbine shooting - should we stop allowing teenagers into the country?Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NYComment
-
If Trump has no shot of beating Hillary then Democrats should vote for him in Open Primaries.
Everyone..from MSNBC to Fox News to our own resident Braintrust of **********+Crockett is completely freaked out because they know Trump is real and they know Trump can win.
Enjoy the show. It's just getting started.Comment
-
Democrats aren't afraid of him.
I would LOVE to see Trump make it all the way to the end, just for the entertainment value alone -- but it's not going to happen. Do you understand that intelligent people are in no way threatened by a blowhard demagogue who spews fear baiting, non-factual nonsense? He's a fucking joke, and anyone who likes him is also a joke.
Comment
-
LOL, you know intelligent people?
If he wasn't a threat, Obama , Hillary and Bernie wouldn't bring him up. I learned this when I asked the COO of Coca Cola why they never bashed Pepsi. The answer made sense, why acknowledge number 2?
So yes, democrats are afraid of him, they don't know how to attack a candidate that when every time they do, his numbers get better!Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
Let me repeat this again since you might not have caught it the first time:
MSNBC (you know the VERY liberal news channel) reported yesterday that the majority of Trump's supporters are MODERATES.
By the way, the tone of your posts make YOU sound like someone who is a "blowhard demagogue spewing fear baiting, non-factual nonsense."
Just saying, your posts (as usual) have a very bitter and angry tone to them. Calm down and discuss things a bit. No need to get all personal with people about it.
And by the way...nobody ever said that normal people are threatened by Trump in any way at all. Why would they be?
The folks who are threatened by Trump are the big campaign donors who own all of the other candidates, the DNC and the RNC, and the media who are bought and paid for.-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.ComComment
-
Umm hello..yes he certainly did give them a bit of a jab in the ribs. He didn't outright say he would run, but he sure as hell insinuated it and used that as a threat..
https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump...389951165725:0
"A new poll indicates that 68% of my supporters would vote for me if I departed the GOP & ran"In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.Comment
-
Why people insist on deflecting from the actual thread topic shows a lack of focus.
Having said that, here is the reality.
Labor force is at it's lowest in 38 years counting people of age to be in the labor force.
The govt.'s own statistics (they changed the way they do the unemployment rate a few years ago to stop counting people who give up on finding jobs):
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
The govt. is cooking the books on the unemployment rate by changing how they count it.
If they were counting it the way they always did from the beginning...the rate is double or more what they are claiming. There are over 93 MILLION people unemployed. That's not a good thing.
But again, this isn't a thread about the unemployment rate. It's about media bias.-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.ComComment
-
Comment
-
I'm a libertarian and I posted the U6 unemployment rate was 9.9 % which is correct, if you had half a brain, you would know that's correct.
Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization
Such a moron!Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
Under Obama, in his first term with a democrat controlled congress generated 1.3 million jobs
Under Obama , in his second term with a Republican controlled congress generated 7 million jobs.
That's a 8.3 million total. You think this is good?
The population when Obama took office in the US was 306.8 million people
Right now it's 322 million
so that's 15.2 million more people and only 8.2 million new jobs, where most of the growth has been in the service sector.
Remember that Obama started in the middle of a recession! Which means he started in a vacuum of jobs needed!
How can anyone think this is a good thing?
But it does show who is better for jobs in the US, the Republicans!Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
Of those 15.2 Million more people, each of them is between 1 day and 7 years old and hopefully, do not have jobs yet.
But regardless, the job creation rate could have been even higher if republicans worked with Obama instead of got in his way. Here's just a sample of what they did: Senate Republicans block Democrats' jobs bill | ReutersComment
Comment