22 threads on the front page by johnnyclips

[Socks]

[Matyko]

Lol, I just wanted to make this mention somewhere...
Getting phucking annoying

[BIGTYMER]

Dudes got some form of turrets..

[Sednub997]

He's on fire lately.No Brass is in his shadow.

[j3rkules]

He wants to beat Brassmonkey...

[adultmobile]

GFY guys could put in place a "create new threads per day" limitation of like 2 or 3 a day, but then we would have more fake nicks.

[SilentKnight]

This is what happens when...not realizing the banality of your desperate, attention-whoring existence...you mistakenly think that it'd be a crime not to share the minutia that randomly pops into your head.

[jimmycooper]

Further evidence this site has gone to shit.

[dyna mo]

That's means there are 28 front page threads he hasn't started!

[slapass]

He also seems to be as nuts as wehateporn. The place is a bit sad lately.

[PornDiscounts-V]

Worthless trash

[$money$]

cnn wants it spots back

[newB]

He's just another Troll wannabe, like WHP and Crucifiso. They confuse being annoying with trolling. To their way of thinking, if you post any sort of response at all then they have succeeded, so best just to ignore them.

Though, I am curious if that is why there are so many misspelled words or use of the wrong homonym. If you correct them, do they interpret that response as a successful troll? Probably. Sad, really, to need attention so badly that you have to provoke strangers to interact with you online.

TheKing/Pathfinder, DVTimes, Brassmonkey, etc. are all the same, taking any sort of response to their useless posts as personal validation.

[SilentKnight]

Pot, meet kettle

Simpleton response...weak comeback.

But you're excused. I know your braincell is already overtaxed with other meaningless threads to create.

Carry on.

[SBJ]

Further evidence this site has gone to shit.

is evidence really needed at this stage?