-
That's pretty much spot on ... -
Is there anyone left who doesn't already know this to be true?Comment
-
thanks pretty much sums up why i haven't watched any of theseComment
-
Comment
-
And wars have always been to the benefit of the 90%. DUHHHH
Wars are started by rulers, with 100s to millions of ordinary people supporting them. The problem is sometimes they're inevitable. Because one tribe thinks killing the other tribe will take them to heaven. Or one tribe thinks if they steal the other tribes land, it will bring benefits. Which it often does.
The problem then is do we allow ISIS or Russia, or China to take what we have or go to war?
Yes Bush invaded Iraq for his own gain, and some pals. The American people went to war and voted him back in. Obama has to do more to fight ISIS, but not support terrorists (freedom fighters).
Did the War of Independence bring anything to Americans. Did the War in Korea bring more to the South Koreans?
He needs to stick to making films, politics is out of his scope,Comment
-
Comment
-
Who funded the Americans in the War of Independence, Civil War, Afghan war, supplied Nazis Steel, Israel, The Armada was funded by Spain's pillaging of the South Americans.
The difficulty is in looking at this as there's only one guilty party, or that there's an alternative.
Wars are about money or defense against others. The notion that it's all about a small elite is so wrong, it's a wonder it is taken seriously.
Sutherland is spouting this from a country created by wars and in a State taken from others by war.
Bottom line is we need the oil. So is it better in the hands of our friends or enemies?
Take oil out of the equation and there's no need or money to fight. And there's no need to convince anyone, access to oil benefits 100% of us.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment