Anonymous - libtard agenda spreding scum

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mineistaken
    See signature :)
    • Apr 2007
    • 29656

    #1

    Rant Anonymous - libtard agenda spreding scum

    Wow, I just visited https://twitter.com/YourAnonNews for the first time and was chocked - I was not expecting main theme of their tweets/retweets to be anti white racism and libtard agenda spreading.
    Somehow I imagined anonymous were about something else.
  • arock10
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2006
    • 6217

    #2
    Uuuuu mad
    Sup

    Comment

    • Quine
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2013
      • 308

      #3
      -I can't quantify my hatred of the State. Preferences are ordinal.

      -The absolute ruler may be a Nero, but he is sometimes Titus or Marcus Aurelius; the people is often Nero, and never Marcus Aurelius.

      Comment

      • BIGTYMER
        Junior Achiever
        • Nov 2004
        • 17066

        #4
        That account has a new owner as of a few months ago.

        Comment

        • crockett
          in a van by the river
          • May 2003
          • 76818

          #5
          Originally posted by mineistaken
          Wow, I just visited https://twitter.com/YourAnonNews for the first time and was chocked - I was not expecting main theme of their tweets/retweets to be anti white racism and libtard agenda spreading.
          Somehow I imagined anonymous were about something else.
          I love the fact that libtards have the power to make people like you so mad. It's highly amusing.
          In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

          Comment

          • mineistaken
            See signature :)
            • Apr 2007
            • 29656

            #6
            Originally posted by crockett
            I love the fact that libtards have the power to make people like you so mad. It's highly amusing.
            But it should make everybody mad.
            For example - that account is mad that CNN did not put "BLACK MAN" in the title and instead just put "MAN".
            Why would anyone want race to be mentioned? Only those who are racists and race mongers insist on that. To other normal people race is not relevant in an instance like that.
            Any normal person should not like it.

            Not to mention the delusions about "media is owned by white supremacists".
            Seriously?
            Even the biggest libtard would go as far as "media is neutral" when in reality most of the media is pretty much anti white.

            Not to mention all the pro "refugee" posts, like 10 out of 20 post are about that. Ok this one can be chalked to being "humane" or whatever, but the 2 points above are just ridiculous.

            Comment

            • mineistaken
              See signature :)
              • Apr 2007
              • 29656

              #7
              Originally posted by BIGTYMER
              That account has a new owner as of a few months ago.
              That may explain things. Although I did not read previous tweets so can not compare, but these new tweets/retweet are ridiculous.

              Comment

              • Coup
                🚨 PBBC International 🚨
                • Apr 2010
                • 9931

                #8
                Chocked!

                Comment

                • Coup
                  🚨 PBBC International 🚨
                  • Apr 2010
                  • 9931

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Quine
                  this is me IRL

                  Comment

                  Working...