hear that? - GoFuckYourself.com

iroc409 · 03-20-2003, 07:02 PM

they confirmed that one of the missiles fired today was a scud... ya know, the ones the UN banned a long time ago.

xanx · 03-20-2003, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by iroc409
they confirmed that one of the missiles fired today was a scud... ya know, the ones the UN banned a long time ago.

Stop it, Saddam wouden't lie to the UN

stanton · 03-20-2003, 07:09 PM

well fuck
americans and un are fucking pussies

first they want Iraq to destroy all the weapons...

then they attack....

does it mean that Iraqis now will have to defend with butter knifes?

Sly_RJ · 03-20-2003, 07:10 PM

Hahaha!

Was there ever any doubt?

Within 5 hours of combat the Iraqi army resorted to using weapons they supposedly did not have.

Fuck yeh.

Amputate Your Head · 03-20-2003, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stanton
well fuck
americans and un are fucking pussies

first they want Iraq to destroy all the weapons...

then they attack....

does it mean that Iraqis now will have to defend with butter knifes?

it means there is no defense.... they had their chance. Dyin' time is here.

Tanker · 03-20-2003, 07:11 PM

we wouldnt have attacked them had they destroyed all there Weapons of MAss destruction and long range missles

so therefor the butterknife theory doesnt work

stanton · 03-20-2003, 07:12 PM

ahh common, each shity country must have some defence...

iroc409 · 03-20-2003, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stanton
well fuck
americans and un are fucking pussies

first they want Iraq to destroy all the weapons...

then they attack....

does it mean that Iraqis now will have to defend with butter knifes?

the point is that iraq claimed they had destroyed the aforementioned weapons, and only strengthens the point that iraq is lying to the UN.

the US, England and Kuwait also seem quite convinced that saddam has chemical weapons still, if you've been watching the news.

Tanker · 03-20-2003, 07:13 PM

They have them, and it will be revieled soon

stanton · 03-20-2003, 07:13 PM

Bush would attack anyways...

Amputate Your Head · 03-20-2003, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stanton
ahh common, each shity country must have some defence...

not Iraq... their day is done. The other side of this will see a brand fuckin' new Iraq. Saddam's years of bullshit stalling is over. We're foreclosing on this bitch.

galleryseek · 03-20-2003, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stanton
ahh common, each shity country must have some defence...

yeah if they've earned the right. this is iraq, buddy.

Sly_RJ · 03-20-2003, 07:14 PM

I can't wait until we find those chemical weapons. I will laugh so hard.

Go Iraq!

iroc409 · 03-20-2003, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stanton
ahh common, each shity country must have some defence...

some of the other missiles fired were al-samoud and a "lesser known type", both falling within UN regulations. they can obviously lob those at us. they have defenses. they're not supposed to have scuds (which exceed the UN regulations by about 300km).

SpaceAce · 03-20-2003, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stanton
well fuck
americans and un are fucking pussies

first they want Iraq to destroy all the weapons...

then they attack....

does it mean that Iraqis now will have to defend with butter knifes?

You can't be serious. It isn't like we told them Wednesday to disarm and attacked them Thursday. We told them in <B>1990</B> and attacked them in 2003.

SpaceAce

stanton · 03-20-2003, 07:16 PM

hmmm...then why the fuck Our Saviours Americans do not save us from Evil North Korea and their Nuclear Weapons?!

Amputate Your Head · 03-20-2003, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stanton
hmmm...then why the fuck Our Saviours Americans do not save us from Evil North Korea and their Nuclear Weapons?!

one fucknut at a time...

NK's day is fuckin' coming too...

iroc409 · 03-20-2003, 07:19 PM

just out of curiosity, why would a country like iraq need a missile to "defend itself" that can reach a target 403km away?

heh.. that's like me lobbing missiles at arkansas or something.

FATPad · 03-20-2003, 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stanton
hmmm...then why the fuck Our Saviours Americans do not save us from Evil North Korea and their Nuclear Weapons?!

HAHA

Uh-oh. The old "You can't prove he doesn't have weapons he's not allowed" line isn't working.

Quick! Start with the "You aren't stopping every brutal dictator in the world, so why are you bothering with one of them" line!

stanton · 03-20-2003, 07:22 PM

why would a country like USA, Russia, France, GB, Germany, China, Japan, and etc would need nuclear weapons?

prolly for same reason Iraq got their shity scud missles

Quote:

Originally posted by iroc409
just out of curiosity, why would a country like iraq need a missile to "defend itself" that can reach a target 403km away?

heh.. that's like me lobbing missiles at arkansas or something.

stanton · 03-20-2003, 07:24 PM

And really Funny that the old Bush started all this shit in 1990..then while Clinton was a president it was peace and quiet (untill he got his dick sucked and start "saving" Yugoslavia from their Evil Empirator to save his ass), and then Bush Junior became a president, and all this terrorist bullshit started out of nowhere...and again he brought up the shit with Iraq...want he busy catching Bin Laden in Afghanistan??!!!

FATPad · 03-20-2003, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stanton
And really Funny that the old Bush started all this shit in 1990..then while Clinton was a president it was peace and quiet (untill he got his dick sucked and start "saving" Yugoslavia from their Evil Empirator to save his ass), and then Bush Junior became a president, and all this terrorist bullshit started out of nowhere...and again he brought up the shit with Iraq...want he busy catching Bin Laden in Afghanistan??!!!

What's really funny is you don't know anything.

There were several terrorist attacks against the US during Clinton's watch.

He just didn't do anything about them except start sending out dinner invitations.

Good job though knowing what you're talking about.

galleryseek · 03-20-2003, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stanton
And really Funny that the old Bush started all this shit in 1990..then while Clinton was a president it was peace and quiet (untill he got his dick sucked and start "saving" Yugoslavia from their Evil Empirator to save his ass), and then Bush Junior became a president, and all this terrorist bullshit started out of nowhere...and again he brought up the shit with Iraq...want he busy catching Bin Laden in Afghanistan??!!!

maybe its because the bush family likes to get things done

stanton · 03-20-2003, 07:29 PM

iroc409 · 03-20-2003, 07:29 PM

well, first off, iraq isn't exactly the same. they don't really have to worry as much about heeding off a nuclear attack from china, russia, and so on. having the technology makes a nice stalemate.

even if they did "need" such an item (which i don't really think is required for the defense of their country under the UN demands), they could easily enough defend themselves with something that could fire 95 km. it still gives a good distance. the UN didn't want them lobbing scuds into israel like last time.

i have to dig this up, i heard it some time ago from some news source, but haven't taken the time to dog things up. apparently clinton knew about the whole north korea ordeal, but instead made a lot of effort to silence it and keep it from the american people. apparently he didn't care enough about a small relatively anti-US country having nuclear power.

basically he sucked NK's dick so he wouldn't have to worry about a military conflict.

Sly_RJ · 03-20-2003, 08:16 PM

Where's Mr. Fiction to comment about this? Directfiesta? Dig420?

But of course, the scuds were planted.

03-20-2003, 07:02 PM	#1
iroc409 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: midwest side, yo Posts: 4,728	hear that? they confirmed that one of the missiles fired today was a scud... ya know, the ones the UN banned a long time ago. __________________ <a href="http://www.iroc409.com/"><img src="http://www.iroc409.com/adv/120x60.gif" border=0></a> icq: 1 7 6 4 2 0 9 6 0 Gallery templates for ONLY $25! w00t!

03-20-2003, 07:10 PM	#4
Sly_RJ Live Hard - Die Hard Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Ready to leave... Posts: 17,042	Hahaha! Was there ever any doubt? Within 5 hours of combat the Iraqi army resorted to using weapons they supposedly did not have. Fuck yeh. __________________ PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price! sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144

03-20-2003, 07:11 PM	#6
Tanker Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada Posts: 9,287	we wouldnt have attacked them had they destroyed all there Weapons of MAss destruction and long range missles so therefor the butterknife theory doesnt work __________________ Tanker ICQ 3427575 CCBTools Now featured in the CCBill.com APP STORE

03-20-2003, 07:13 PM	#9
Tanker Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada Posts: 9,287	They have them, and it will be revieled soon __________________ Tanker ICQ 3427575 CCBTools Now featured in the CCBill.com APP STORE

03-20-2003, 07:14 PM	#13
Sly_RJ Live Hard - Die Hard Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Ready to leave... Posts: 17,042	I can't wait until we find those chemical weapons. I will laugh so hard. Go Iraq! __________________ PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price! sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144

03-20-2003, 07:09 PM	#3
stanton So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 2,640	well fuck americans and un are fucking pussies first they want Iraq to destroy all the weapons... then they attack.... does it mean that Iraqis now will have to defend with butter knifes?

03-20-2003, 07:12 PM	#7
stanton So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 2,640	ahh common, each shity country must have some defence...

03-20-2003, 07:16 PM	#16
stanton So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 2,640	hmmm...then why the fuck Our Saviours Americans do not save us from Evil North Korea and their Nuclear Weapons?!

03-20-2003, 07:19 PM	#18
iroc409 Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: midwest side, yo Posts: 4,728	just out of curiosity, why would a country like iraq need a missile to "defend itself" that can reach a target 403km away? heh.. that's like me lobbing missiles at arkansas or something. __________________ <a href="http://www.iroc409.com/"><img src="http://www.iroc409.com/adv/120x60.gif" border=0></a> icq: 1 7 6 4 2 0 9 6 0 Gallery templates for ONLY $25! w00t!

03-20-2003, 07:24 PM	#21
stanton So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 2,640	And really Funny that the old Bush started all this shit in 1990..then while Clinton was a president it was peace and quiet (untill he got his dick sucked and start "saving" Yugoslavia from their Evil Empirator to save his ass), and then Bush Junior became a president, and all this terrorist bullshit started out of nowhere...and again he brought up the shit with Iraq...want he busy catching Bin Laden in Afghanistan??!!!

03-20-2003, 07:29 PM	#24
stanton So Fucking Banned Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 2,640

03-20-2003, 08:16 PM	#26
Sly_RJ Live Hard - Die Hard Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Ready to leave... Posts: 17,042	Where's Mr. Fiction to comment about this? Directfiesta? Dig420? But of course, the scuds were planted. __________________ PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price! sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144