You mean to tell me there was barely any women on AshleyMadison.com ?!?!

[Biggy]

That's according to Gizmodo / BusinessInsider who crunched the #s.

I'm in total shock.

I'm a stats junkie so here are the #s they crunched:

-Only 1,492 of the women in the database had ever checked their messages on the site. That's compared with more than 20 million men.

-Only 2,409 of the women had ever used the site's chat function, versus more than 11 million men.

-Only 9,700 women had ever responded to a message from another person on the site, versus almost 6 million men.


Read more: Ashley Madison almost no women - Business Insider

I knew it was bad, but I didn't realize it was this bad (if true). And these guys wanted to go IPO... crazy.

[Opt!musPr!me]

How many hook ups? 0

[Biggy]

How many hook ups? 0

It'd be a great place for trannies and gay guys to pick up dudes.

[AdultKing]

Ashley Madison, where men are real men and so are most of the women.

[Jel]

isn't it like women buying beauty products, wrinkle cream, and all that other shit they buy? They know it's most likely a complete waste of time, but maybe, just maybe...?

[420]

1 woman for every 13.5k men just sounds bad. I mean they were cheaters so they could be with more than one guy at time.

[dyna mo]

It's what makes the Josh duggans of the world even funnier.

[JFK]

That's according to Gizmodo / BusinessInsider who crunched the #s.

I'm in total shock.

I'm a stats junkie so here are the #s they crunched:



I knew it was bad, but I didn't realize it was this bad (if true). And these guys wanted to go IPO... crazy.

Ashley Madison almost no women - Business Insider same story here ! Sounds like a scam ! Big time !

[AdultKing]

Ashley Madison netted $3,533,012 in paid deletion fees in 24 months according to analysis of the data being carried out in a private IT Security LinkedIn group I am on.

[L-Pink]

Ashley Madison netted $3,533,012 in paid deletion fees in 24 months according to analysis of the data being carried out in a private IT Security LinkedIn group I am on.

Howe many fraud charges does that break down to?

[AdultKing]

Howe many fraud charges does that break down to?

Well they did replace some fields in the database with the string ''<paid_delete>''

But your geolocation data, city, state, date of birth, weight, height your smoking and drinking habits, your gender, your ethnic background, your sexual preferences were all left in tact.

[Jesse Sharpton]

No fucking wonder I never got any pussy off that site
Is adult friend finder for real or same bullshit?

[1215]

Ashley MANison.

So what, maybe 1% of dudes actually had an affair. The other 99% were talking to bots or men.

[1215]

No fucking wonder I never got any pussy off that site
Is adult friend finder for real or same bullshit?

I've seen the inside of AFF and it looks like the piggish rejected backup dancers of a 2 Live Crew concert.

If you really want some pussy, then 1) change your hair, and 2) use a mainstream site like match or pof.

My friends do very well on those two sites and none of the girls had a dick.

[Biggy]

Ashley MANison.

So what, maybe 1% of dudes actually had an affair. The other 99% were talking to bots or men.

1% lololol.

Try .000001% - 1% is 1 out of 100, that would be 75 standard deviations in front of the pack. I haven't done the calculation but you're talking hundredths and thousandths of 1 percent just on the gender composition let alone actually hooking up.

I feel bad for the 2 guys who committed suicide for having their information leaked - poor guys never stood a chance.

[Best-In-BC]

Straight up bull shit, 1 in 25 fathers are not the father for a reason, more female promo bullshit.

[pinkeyedjim]

I don't get how more women replied to messages than checked messages.

[Idigmygirls]

I don't get how more women replied to messages than checked messages.

could be internal accounts used to bait the guys. Just some kind of auto-reply, or reply through an admin without using a web interface to check their messages.

This stat suggests to me there might have been even more bogus activity than the raw numbers show.

[Bryan G]

Shocking!!!!!

[1215]

1% lololol.

Try .000001% - 1% is 1 out of 100, that would be 75 standard deviations in front of the pack. I haven't done the calculation but you're talking hundredths and thousandths of 1 percent just on the gender composition let alone actually hooking up.

I feel bad for the 2 guys who committed suicide for having their information leaked - poor guys never stood a chance.

Those must have been the only 2 who ever met a real woman on the site.

That's just crazy though. You can get by in life after divorce. If they had kids, they just took their kids father away. That's more selfish than anything.

[plaster]

Another loss for the 1000 sluts worldwide using AM.

[takethebluepill]

I've seen the inside of AFF and it looks like the piggish rejected backup dancers of a 2 Live Crew concert.
.[/B]

They are called average women. (No, not all women look like porn stars). And they are real.

[Phoenix]

This is not surprising at all. Women mostly do not need hook up sites. They can just have a couple drinks for courage and then take whatever cock is buying them the next one.

[fitzmulti]

Ashley Madison, where men are real men and so are BARELY ANY of the women.

There, I fixed it for you...

[SpicyM]

Lol...

I have read somewhere that the registration could be done without email verification, so basically anyone could register a fake email addy.. and therefore fake profile ..and then pay for a deletion of that profile?? :D seems like a bad joke..

[aka123]

Lol...

I have read somewhere that the registration could be done without email verification, so basically anyone could register a fake email addy.. and therefore fake profile ..and then pay for a deletion of that profile?? :D seems like a bad joke..

I don't know is it good assumption that everyone will or should make an fake profile if possible.

But sure, it makes this even more funnier: you, the Prince of Merryland with huge wealth and gigantic penis posting messages to Ms Happytits, cute blond teacher from Midwest, always ready to do naughty.

[pr0phet]

I don't believe these numbers. If there are men with money, hookers are not far behind. I'd question the accuracy of their data breakdown and perhaps their technique in coming to these conclusions.

[aka123]

I don't believe these numbers. If there are men with money, hookers are not far behind. I'd question the accuracy of their data breakdown and perhaps their technique in coming to these conclusions.

Oh yeah? Like in that Japanese dating site that had 1 woman?

[Paul Markham]

During my time shooting in the UK I advertised for amateur models. A lot of the girls who applied were married, they were easier to seduce than the unmarried ones. Many were more into getting fucked than getting shot. It was all a bit of a thrill for them.

So I'm sure on dating sites there are married women, just not on a site like Ashley Madison.

I don't believe these numbers. If there are men with money, hookers are not far behind. I'd question the accuracy of their data breakdown and perhaps their technique in coming to these conclusions.

That accounts for the women there. LOL

[jimmycastor]

whenever i suceeded to have sex with one of those females one of those dating networks it ended with a
venereal disease, so i guess the girls i managed to date were some kind of nymphomaniacs wich tried out 6500 guys before me
that explains it now

[Roald]

And these guys wanted to go IPO... crazy.

That's probably the most crazy thing about this all.

[bns666]

[PaperstreetWinston]

Ashley Madison, where men are real men and so are most of the women.

[RazorSharpe]

Howe many fraud charges does that break down to?

How much were they charging for a deletion? I heard it was circa $19. If that is right, you're looking at approximately 84K users paying for a deletion every year. That's kinda hard to believe.

[_Richard_]

1% lololol.

Try .000001% - 1% is 1 out of 100, that would be 75 standard deviations in front of the pack. I haven't done the calculation but you're talking hundredths and thousandths of 1 percent just on the gender composition let alone actually hooking up.

I feel bad for the 2 guys who committed suicide for having their information leaked - poor guys never stood a chance.

ahhh that's brutal

[Oracle Porn]

-Only 1,492 of the women in the database had ever checked their messages
-Only 9,700 women had ever responded to a message

how can a bigger number of women reply to a message then the number that actually checked their messages?

[nico-t]

i never heard of that site until this hacking news, now every time is see the name i think it's a pornstar name before realizing it's that site again.

What's up with that name, it doesn't make any sense?

[ravo]

I don't get how more women replied to messages than checked messages.

how can a bigger number of women reply to a message then the number that actually checked their messages?

From the article: "(This number was greater than the number of women who checked messages because it's possible to answer messages in bulk when you first visit the site, without ever opening your inbox.)"

[DigitalPimpNetwork]

This is crazy, I would feel so sick if I were one of the users...

[RazorSharpe]

i never heard of that site until this hacking news, now every time is see the name i think it's a pornstar name before realizing it's that site again.

What's up with that name, it doesn't make any sense?

In the same way that Google and Yahoo and Bing don't make sense as names. They did a great job branding the name and I like that it's not your generic "adultererhookup.com" or "bangamarriedman.com"

I'm actually surprised that this is the first you're hearing about this site.

[NewNick]

That's probably the most crazy thing about this all.

Not really - there are several that have already done it !

[aka123]

i never heard of that site until this hacking news, now every time is see the name i think it's a pornstar name before realizing it's that site again.

What's up with that name, it doesn't make any sense?

The name makes very much sense, especially now. The name sounds like a service for chicks. And at least in here it was very much advertised like it is a service for women. It wasn't said, but the impression was like that.

Men of course think that there are women as it is a service for women. It is a fucking clever, though twisted marketing if you ask me. Service for women that is actually just a rip off for men. LOL.

I got new business idea: "Night club for beautiful, young and horny women. Here you can party and discuss about men and share the latest gossips. Finally; club for women."

Guess; would it end up as a sausage fest or not?

[nico-t]

The name makes very much sense, especially now. The name sounds like a service for chicks. And at least in here it was very much advertised like it is a service for women. It wasn't said, but the impression was like that.

Men of course think that there are women as it is a service for women. It is a fucking clever, though twisted marketing if you ask me. Service for women that is actually just a rip off for men. LOL.

I got new business idea: "Night club for beautiful, young and horny women. Here you can party and discuss about men and share the latest gossips. Finally; club for women."

Guess; would it end up as a sausage fest or not?

If you'd leave this out: "discuss about men and share the latest gossips", yes. Otherwise no man would go there.

[CaptainHowdy]

So Ashley Madison was a sausage party ...

[aka123]

If you'd leave this out: "discuss about men and share the latest gossips", yes. Otherwise no man would go there.

Without that it is just a club for beautiful, young and horny women. Not very believable. Though maybe I am just underestimating men, or overestimating, depends how you look it.

Besides, it reveals their intent; you know, they are interested about men, not lesbians.

[Biggy]

Almost all these adult dating sites are free, unless you want to talk to a chick, then you must pay.

But then, your talking the amount of women on these sites is hundredths or thousandths of one percent, and they likely clicked an advertising that said there were many women right in their zip code.

So if there's so few women on the site, then why are men signing up to pay to talk, and who exactly are they talking to? And what, exactly, are they paying for?

[ianmoone332000]

Spunk gargling bonanza haha Do they have any claims about how many horny women are on the site?. Massive lawsuit coming to finish them off if so

[mopek1]

I knew it was bad, but I didn't realize it was this bad (if true).

I'm not sure I believ those numbers.

Of course every adult oriented dating site is going to have many more men than women join, but to have LESS than 10,000 active women?

I don't buy it.

I know women who have used the site personally and have many friends who are social workers who tell me stories of the many women they see who use AM.

That's just my experience, of what people reveal, in a smaller city, ... in Canada.

I just don't buy it.

[Biggy]

I'm not sure I believ those numbers.

Of course every adult oriented dating site is going to have many more men than women join, but to have LESS than 10,000 active women?

I don't buy it.

I know women who have used the site personally and have many friends who are social workers who tell me stories of the many women they see who use AM.

That's just my experience, of what people reveal, in a smaller city, ... in Canada.

I just don't buy it.

This article is making the rounds. In at least one article, they reached out to the company for comment, and chose not to comment.

[C H R I S]

I think the larger question is if this is the nail on their coffin.

The media blitz has brought more traffic to their sites, but mostly bounces from what I've heard.

If the ratio is widely publicized will this be the end for AM or is there always another mark ready to sign up?

I have several friends that work there, so I hope they survive.