What would be speculated and whispered if races were in opposite order?
Obama would have had a speech already.
-
What would be speculated and whispered if races were in opposite order?
Obama would have had a speech already. -
No racist until brassmonkey says so. -
Comment
-
This was a pissed off black man who thought he was discriminated against so he started killing white people he was pissed at.
"On the same Twitter account that posted video of the shooting, Flanigan also made it clear that he was angry at the reporter and the photographer.
He said that he had filed a report with the United States Equal Opportunity Commission.
Jeffrey A. Marks, WDBJ-TV's general manager, confirmed that Flanigan had filed that EEOC complaint."Comment
-
^ He also banked from his older station in Florida (settlement).
Nice thing they got going on - do not fire us even if we are slacking, otherwise pay settlement for "discrimination".Comment
-
Correct, it was a blatant hate crime.
White people are pussies and the more we ignore this woe is me cause I'm black shit the more its going to happen. Wise up white people, the time is now.Comment
-
TRUMP 2026 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.comComment
-
Thanks, that photo alone tells a lot. Let me guess: he banged your mom because she is white?
Comment
-
Is there any indication the guy was a racist? I mean other than the hopeful conjecture of gfy racists?
According to a foxnews article I read earlier he was a big fan of porn and sex toys lolComment
-
What is the point? Is the guy a racist or not? It's not a hate crime if he did for reasons unrelated to hate. So is there any proof that he did this out of racial hatred?Comment
-
Point is pretty simple: whenever it is white perp and black victim people imply or guess hate/racism.
Whenever it is black perp and white victim people do not imply the same thing. It is just a crime then.
Double standard thinking by people who can not thing critically. Libtards, guilters, anti whiters and such.
Just look at zimmy or ferguson case - there was NOTHING related to racism, but libtards taunted "racisss whitey" mantra all over. In zimmy case - they even had to make hispanic zimmy to be white, so tha they could taunt racism.
Fucking disgrace how any time something bad happens to black dude and the perp is white - first thought in libtards/guilters little brains is "this could have been racism".
Any time races are opposite - they do not think that for a second.
If I have to explain this to you - you are one of the little brain guys as well.Comment
-
Yes, like it panned out in Ferguson (0.00% racial motivation) and Zimmerman (funny how anti whiters in tv station redacted that 911 call to make it sound racist)
Assuming racism JUST BECAUSE perp is white and victim is black (typical behavior of guilters, libtards and, of course, blacks themselves) is the sign of imbecility.
This is fact on fact^^^
I see that you advocate that
Speaks volumes about your intelligence level...Comment
-
Keep going until my cup runs over with your tears. So.. Very.. ThirstyYes, like it panned out in Ferguson (0.00% racial motivation) and Zimmerman (funny how anti whiters in tv station redacted that 911 call to make it sound racist)
Assuming racism JUST BECAUSE perp is white and victim is black (typical behavior of guilters, libtards and, of course, blacks themselves) is the sign of imbecility.
I see that you advocate that
Speaks volumes about your intelligence level...
Comment
-
Comment
-
Idiot strikes again with 100% irrelevant remark. Nobody is speaking about government.
According to your and BM logic: you can make a hate crime, but if you shoot yourself afterwards, that ceases to be hate crime
Moron, I have no interest in calling this a hate crime.
I am not like those idiots who call hate crime JUST BECAUSE PERP IS OF ONE COLOR AND VICTIM OF ANOTHER. Only imbeciles do so, only imbeciles reason like that.
The point of this thread was not to call it a hate crime, but merely poke fun of imbeciles who would do that if the races were opposite.Comment
-
Comment
-
Idiot strikes again with 100% irrelevant remark. Nobody is speaking about government.
According to your and BM logic: you can make a hate crime, but if you shoot yourself afterwards, that ceases to be hate crime
Moron, I have no interest in calling this a hate crime.
I am not like those idiots who call hate crime JUST BECAUSE PERP IS OF ONE COLOR AND VICTIM OF ANOTHER. Only imbeciles do so, only imbeciles reason like that.
The point of this thread was not to call it a hate crime, but merely poke fun of imbeciles who would do that if the races were opposite.
MMM Delicious!Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Who said this incident was not a hate crime? I said the killer cannot be charged with a hate crime. Those are two different things.Comment
-
Because we are not talking whether one or another crime is hate crime or not.
We are talking about the perception. Laughing at how some morons assume hate crime JUST BECAUSE perp and victim are of the same race.
So I am laughing at how there were no perception of hate crime in this case and how it would have been if the races were opposite.Comment
-
I brought up charging because "hate crime" is a legal term. You said it is not "acknowledged" that this was a hate crime. The only body that can officially and unanimously acknowledge a hate crime is the government. And the government does not charge dead people with crimes.
If you want to general public to acknowledge this as a hate crime good luck with that, because the general public never agrees 100% on anything.Comment
-
Again, why are you laughing that there is no perception of a hate crime here? No one is stopping you from perceiving a hate crime exists. If there really is no perception of a hate crime, that means YOU ALSO do not perceive a hate crime exists...so then you are just laughing at your own perception. Strange.Comment
-
Ok, imagine situation. Dude starts shouting racial slurs and shoots people of opposite race. Then shoots himself.
We (most of us) would acknowledge that this was a hate crime. You, on the other hand, would come in and say - hey, wait, perp is dead, government did not charge him, so we can not acknowledge.
We agree to disagree on this.Comment
-
Man, you are stupid....
I will not repeat myself as this was already answered.
Ok, maybe I will repeat once again to point out your misunderstanding.
You say: "laughing that there is no perception of a hate crime here"
Wrong. I am not laughing that there is no perception HERE.
Forget THIS case completely.
I am laughing that WHEN there is white perp black victim there are lots of hate crime assumptions, while same people do not assume the same thing if races are opposite. I am laughing at their double standard reasoning. Get it? This case was merely the chance to remind those double standards. Do not go into THIS case wondering if there was a hate crime or not because that is 100% irrelevant. Case was just a chance to bring the general topic up.
I hope I wont have to repeat that for the fifth time!Comment
Comment