STFU NEWS: The AshleyMadison Data Dump
Collapse
X
-

FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com -
I think this is a great idea!Comment
-
-
I saw that and it makes no sense. They were against AM allegedly screwing people with this $19.95 thing. So they release everyones info. I think it was just the excuse they used. I had also read their database was like a kid in school wrote it. I think they cared less about being bullet proof like most companies until after the fact. Now chances are they are done. So was going for the cheapest programming worth in the end?I honestly think the way AshleyMadison conducted it's business contributed to the hacker's motives. To say AM is shady is an accurate description. The data removal fee which is ridiculous in itself because they essentially held people's private info for ransom, probably drew the ire of the hacker group more when the hackers discovered all those data that was supposedly should have been deleted was still on the AM servers. What motives did AM have to keep storing data that people already paid $19.95 to have AM remove them. It should have been a simple delete and it would have saved AM tons of database/hard drive space to removed the said data. Yet they kept them for reasons unknown while collecting $19.95 from the member. It's just one of the things that is mind boggling and shady for them to do. It definitely didn't help their cause because once the hackers saw this, along with whatever else they were already peeved off at AM about, the "deleted data" still being stored by AM made the hackers even more determined to release the info to put AM in a more shady light in having to explain why they still had the data on their servers. And to this day, AM has not addressed why that data is still on their server.Comment
-
I agree with Tony. What the hackers did was release everyone's data, which makes no sense if they were doing it due to concerns about people's data. Had they deleted data, or only released executive emails then that claim would make more sense. The way this played out, it seems like a thin excuse for what they did. Keep in mind, I'm not condoning the data removal fees, I'm just not convinced they were the real reason for the hack.Comment
-
Public perception of online dating has been going sour for the last several years, possibly with the exception of the more known sites that take their advertising to prime time television (think eHarmony).
Fake profiles and imprisonment of offenders making headline news have contributed to this lack of trust and the Ashley Madison events have made things considerably worse. The online dating industry is going to have to roll with this and clean up their image.Comment
-
Chris, how would you suggest they start to do that? Cleaning up the image of online dating seems like a great goal, but I'm not sure television ads would be the answer. Any concrete ideas on steps dating sites could take to clean up their image, or differentiate themselves from this Ashley Madison mess?Comment
-
I think the whole "adult dating" or "porn dating" style of site needs an overhaul. A more respectable and serious image needs to emerge. Does anyone still believe that there are X amount 18 to 20 year old hotties standing by and waiting to hear from you in the area of your IP? The sites need to adapt a more serious approach.Comment
-
Great find Richard! If true it seems people are angry that AM data has been compromised, but are also angry at the steps AM has tried to take in response to curtail the spread of that data. I agree it's a big stretch of what DMCA is intended to be used for, but if people agree this is private data that shouldn't be public, is their overreaching use of DMCA as a way to get it removed from some sites actually a bad thing?anyone see this?
Ashley Madison Is Sending Out Bogus DMCA Takedown NoticesComment
-
You just ruined the morning of several GFY readers... ;)
On a more serious note, I know people who have found dates through sites like alt.com, POF, and AshleyMadison. Those same people tried those sites because eharmony and okcupid had failed them. I also know gay sites like adam4adam are wildly successful at generating real dates with 'local hotties' if you are interested in finding a man. So, I'd agree some of the claims made are overstated, but I wouldn't say these sites are all completely ineffective. I'd also suggest their inability to protect user data is a different (and bigger problem) than the fact that many seem to overstate their success rate for new users.Comment
-
I never said they were ineffective. I'm sure they are quite effective, but the fallout here won't make them more so. The advertising material and site tours will have to illustrate how the user can trust them with their personal info.Comment
-
I agree gay adult dating is more likely to yield results, but isn't it also more likely to service clients who are particularly concerned about the possibility of data insecurity? Meaning, isn't some married dad on the down low now much less likely to enter their info on a gay dating site because of the AM breach news than a straight single guy looking to get laid with no worry whether somebody finds out he has a dating profile on a hookup site?Comment
-
to answer your question, seems more like an ill-advised PR move than anything else.Great find Richard! If true it seems people are angry that AM data has been compromised, but are also angry at the steps AM has tried to take in response to curtail the spread of that data. I agree it's a big stretch of what DMCA is intended to be used for, but if people agree this is private data that shouldn't be public, is their overreaching use of DMCA as a way to get it removed from some sites actually a bad thing?
I thought there was some serious legal ramifications for issuing DMCA notices that are not valid?Comment




Comment