I guess that's why most armies in the world can't match the U.S.. If the U.S. Was involved a couple of cruise missiles would wipe that base off the map in no time at all.
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Couldn't the US bomb it and say they thought it was a rebel base? After all, Putin is not supposed to have military bases in Ukraine. So it would be a little kick in the groin to Putin
2crockett: I don't know how stupid and brainwashed you should be to ever think about a theoretical possibility of missile attack against Russia. I think your parents were alcoholics and/or junkies, because normal people can not give birth to such an imbecile who don't even understand what nuclear weapon is. A single missile from that video above is enough to completely wipe out Maryland, Vermont and Rhode Island at once. Telling to you as a Russian LT who knows a bit about the nuclear power. Fuckin' 1300 "Hiroshimas" in one single "Satan" missile. You must be a real crazy man, who don't want to live.
2crockett: I don't know how stupid and brainwashed you should be to ever think about a theoretical possibility of missile attack against Russia. I think your parents were alcoholics and/or junkies, because normal people can not give birth to such an imbecile who don't even understand what nuclear weapon is. A single missile from that video above is enough to completely wipe out Maryland, Vermont and Rhode Island at once. Telling to you as a Russian LT who knows a bit about the nuclear power. Fuckin' 1300 "Hiroshimas" in one single "Satan" missile. You must be a real crazy man, who don't want to live.
Russians must cringe every time they see you posting as a spokesperson for pro-Russian propaganda.
Stooping so low as to attacking someone's parents on GFY, especially in such a sophomoric manner - does nothing but qualify you for a Douche of the Year award.
I suspect more than a few of us would applaud if your pathetic, obnoxious and childish ass was banned for this.
its his "style" and it makes you wonder: what kind of troubles in his life/ mind he has/ had that he uses it ?........
Originally posted by SilentKnight
Stooping so low as to attacking someone's parents on GFY, especially in such a sophomoric manner - does nothing but qualify you for a Douche of the Year award.
I suspect more than a few of us would applaud if your pathetic, obnoxious and childish ass was banned for this.
Stooping so low as to attacking someone's parents on GFY, especially in such a sophomoric manner - does nothing but qualify you for a Douche of the Year award.
Are you surprised? The stupid mofo has suggested to attack our military units with "a couple of cruise missiles". What should I do after that? Kiss his ass?
Ok, it was to harsh and wrong to say that about his parents. I apologize for that. But not for anything else. Don't expect me to be kind to a person who suggests to kill my compatriots.
Are you surprised? The stupid mofo has suggested to attack our military units with "a couple of cruise missiles". What should I do after that? Kiss his ass?
but thank you that we finally don't have to argue anymore whether it is your military in the Ukraine or not
but thank you that we finally don't have to argue anymore whether it is your military in the Ukraine or not
Has it been a secret to anybody since the summer of 2014? For real? If so, there is a book about it, which is publicly available in Russia: Putin. The war - sorry no translation, use Google translate.
P.S. The only strange thing there is that CIA was unable to provide any serious evidence (detailed satellite pictures, drone videos etc). It looks the US government spends the taxpayer's money for nothing.
Are you surprised? The stupid mofo has suggested to attack our military units with "a couple of cruise missiles". What should I do after that? Kiss his ass?
Ok, it was to harsh and wrong to say that about his parents. I apologize for that. But not for anything else. Don't expect me to be kind to a person who suggests to kill my compatriots.
No you stupid commie mouthpiece, I said, if the U.S. Was involved that base would not exisit, simply because we have the capability to take something like that out with zero problems..
Btw you never did answer in the other topic, why you commies can't manage to keep the water outside of your submarines? Why is it Russian submarines always end up sinking?
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Btw you never did answer in the other topic, why you commies can't manage to keep the water outside of your submarines? Why is it Russian submarines always end up sinking?
First of all, I'm not a commie, you dumb Nazi fuck. As about the "Kursk" submarine, so it was destroyed by the US torpedo.
Рutin had no balls to pay back accordingly. As I've told it many times, he is a thief and a coward, but not a national leader. Hope the situation will change very soon because the mofo is old and nobody lives forever even with a 86% approval rating...
It's really amusing watching Russian propaganda at work...
It's not Russian. The unofficial versions of the "Kursk" catastrophe are totally forbidden in federal media and real facts are top secret. All the alternative information was gathered by Western journalists (mostly French). The movie I posted above is banned on all TV channels, controlled by Russian government (one more reason to consider it as a truth). So you have missed the target again
woj, let's switch on the simple logic. You are a coder, so you should understand me. The official Putin's version says the "Kursk" has been destroyed by an internal explosion of its own torpedo during the tests. Ok, if that's true why all letters written by the crew to their wives and sons were censored? Only personal information (the farewell and last wishes) were delivered to their families. Everything else related to the catastrophe was removed. Why Putin did that if there was just a confirmation of the official version? The simple logic says it clear: the official version is a fake.
My dear Natasha and son Sasha!!!
If you've got this letter, then I'm dead. I love you both very much.
Natasha forgive me for everything.
Son be a man.
Kissing you.
in Russia official version is always fake, so no surprise there...
How does that prove in any way that US torpedo destroyed that sub? What evidence is there to support that conclusion? What would US achieve by that attack?
who knows what really happened? maybe 2 Russian subs were supposed to train by shooting "blank" torpedos at each other, but someone was too drunk and accidentally fired a "live" one? but really, the official version makes perfect sense, it's not like accidents like this are uncommon over there..
First of all, I'm not a commie, you dumb Nazi fuck. As about the "Kursk" submarine, so it was destroyed by the US torpedo.
Рutin had no balls to pay back accordingly. As I've told it many times, he is a thief and a coward, but not a national leader. Hope the situation will change very soon because the mofo is old and nobody lives forever even with a 86% approval rating...
So what you are saying, is that USA subs are better than Russian subs, because we supposedly sunk yours and no one can even prove it.
Also, since you have said many times, that any attack by the U.S. On Russians would resualt in a nuclear attack from Russia.. Why has Putin not shot his nuclear missiles at us if we sunk your battleship?
Now tell me about those Russian space shuttles powered by bird poop.
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
So what you are saying, is that USA subs are better than Russian subs, because we supposedly sunk yours and no one can even prove it.
So if some junkie stubs an MMA champion with a knife in the back, he is "better"? Man, you have to visit a brain doctor. I'm very serious now.
Originally posted by woj
in Russia official version is always fake, so no surprise there...
Like anywhere else. Don't be so naive about that. Every government lies, and yours lies not even a bit less than mine.
Originally posted by woj
How does that prove in any way that US torpedo destroyed that sub?
There are many of them. Google is your friend.
Originally posted by woj
What evidence is there to support that conclusion? What would US achieve by that attack?
The test has failed and those torpedos were not sold to China. Don't you know that? I believe you have to read more, if you are really interested to know the truth.
Lol. A cold war on a porn forum...Who'd had thought?
As always, the truth lies in the middle. The U.S provoked the situation in Ukraine...overthrowing a democratically-elected government, replacing it with a government that has neo-nazi elements,etc.
Putin may be a power-hungry SOB, but he's actually a far better leader than Obama. He's a nationalist trying to make his country relevant again. Obama is an Obamist...he serves himself.
Turning into "wehateporn"? That hole doesn't prove anything... I'm not even convinced a torpedo hit would create perfect round hole like that...
More typical torpedo hit probably looks like this:
and how does this prove in any way that US was involved? I mean, not even "prove", but how does it even suggest that US could be involved... besides the usual: "something bad happened, lets blame the US"...
Even if that indeed is a torpedo hit, it's just as likely that another Russian submarine shot this one by mistake... which would explain why the Russian government would want to hide it...
Turning into "wehateporn"? That hole doesn't prove anything... I'm not even convinced a torpedo hit would create perfect round hole like that...
More typical torpedo hit probably looks like this:
and how does this prove in any way that US was involved? I mean, not even "prove", but how does it even suggest that US could be involved... besides the usual: "something bad happened, lets blame the US"...
Even if that indeed is a torpedo hit, it's just as likely that another Russian submarine shot this one by mistake... which would explain why the Russian government would want to hide it...
Yea, I think the drunk Russian sailors shooting at each other with live torpedoes sounds more reliable than the U.S. doing it. After all weren't they supposedly doing just that as they were running practice drills with real torpedoes wernt they? Shit they probably shot themselves...
Or it could be that as typical, bad command decisions and shitty up keep of their equipment were to blame, which seems to be very common in the Russian military. I mean really since WW2 Russians have lost 8 nuclear subs.. They obviously are not very good with what ever it is they are doing..
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
This was an unofficial report... Which pretty much falls in line with typical Russian military fucks ups and some of their other sub sinking.. Ie bad command, bad training and bad maintenance.. The crew wasn't even trained how to use the torpedoes on the Kursk and were using a training manual for completely different torpedoes..
Vice-Admiral Valery Ryazantsev differed with the government's official conclusion. He cited inadequate training, poor maintenance, and incomplete inspections that caused the crew to mishandle the weapon.[31] During the examination of the wrecked sub, investigators recovered a partially burned copy of the safety instructions for loading HTP torpedoes, but the instructions were for a significantly different type of torpedo and failed to include essential steps for testing an air valve. The 7th Division, 1st Submarine Flotilla never inspected Kurskha 's crew's qualifications and readiness to fire HTP torpedoes.[25] The Kurskha 's crew had no prior experience with and hadn't been trained in handling or firing HTP powered torpedoes. Due to their inexperience and lack of training, compounded by incomplete inspections and oversight, and because the Kurskha 's crew followed faulty instructions when loading the practice torpedo, Ryazantsev believes they set off a chain of events that led to the explosion.[2]:35[32]
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Putin is smart. Obama is dumb. Putin is strong. Obama is weak. Putin is playing multiple chess matches with his eyes blindfolded, Obama is playing checkers. The second Obama has a lot on his plate (scandal, terrorist attack etc), Putin will grab more land to get his land bridge to Crimea and the world will say "hey man, stop that" as he replies "stop what? i don't know what you are talking about" and that will basically be the end of it because we live in a world run by pacifist pussies who think lunatics will simply go away if you give them hugs and poetry.
. Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.
No matter what BS you quote, it will never excuse Russia denying help from other countries to save the trapped Kursk crew members and ultimately, letting them die as they beat out morse code on the hull for days and days and days.
. Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.
No matter what BS you quote, it will never excuse Russia denying help from other countries to save the trapped Kursk crew members and ultimately, letting them die as they beat out morse code on the hull for days and days and days.
Russia denying? Maybe it was Putin? Don't confuse Putin with Russia. I also can't forgive the mother fucker for that, but to be honest... there were no "days and days". The crew has died much faster because of fire on the board.
Russia denying? Maybe it was Putin? Don't confuse Putin with Russia. I also can't forgive the mother fucker for that, but to be honest... there were no "days and days". The crew has died much faster because of fire on the board.
Russia denying? Maybe it was Putin? Don't confuse Putin with Russia. I also can't forgive the mother fucker for that, but to be honest... there were no "days and days". The crew has died much faster because of fire on the board.
Where have you been the last 15 years? Putin owns Russia along with his rich cronies.. There i no replacing your king.. Putin is to Russia what Castro was to Cuba or lil kim jon ill is to North Korea. He is your beloved dictator. His exit from Russian leadership will come only by his death or mass revolution.
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
woj, those images are banned in Russian federal media (only a couple of them has leaked out):
Any questions?
Torpedo hole in my ass, and no.. this isn't some gay metaphor.
Think about it. Torpedo doesn't punch through sub's hull. And if it explodes as it is designed to do, there is no round hole, there is explosion hole. Dud torpedoes bounce of from ship's or sub's hull, there is plenty of evidence from that, those don't make round holes. Either the torpedoes explode on the contact or nada.
I don't know what seamole's hole is that, but it isn't impact hole from torpedo. Maybe it is a hole made to lift the sub up from the bottom, I don't know.
Torpedo hole in my ass, and no.. this isn't some gay metaphor.
Think about it. Torpedo doesn't punch through sub's hull. And if it explodes as it is designed to do, there is no round hole, there is explosion hole. Dud torpedoes bounce of from ship's or sub's hull, there is plenty of evidence from that, those don't make round holes. Either the torpedoes explode on the contact or nada.
I don't know what seamole's hole is that, but it isn't impact hole from torpedo. Maybe it is a hole made to lift the sub up from the bottom, I don't know.
Added to this, if for instance the US had some special torpedo which penetrated the ship before exploding.. Why is none of the interior framework damaged from a blast in that area? If you notice there is zero damage inside the hull from an explosion which could of originated at that hole..
It's most likely some sort of hatch hole or a hole made for lifting the sub out of the water.
When they first started showing that hole back when the kursk was first raised calling it a torpedo hole, I literately laughed my ass off, because it was so absurd.
Hell modern day anti surface ship torpedoes don't even make contact with the ship's hull.. They are designed to blow up underneath the ship in order to break the ship in half from the water pressure. I'd suspect anti sub torpedoes would work the same and never actually hit the hull.
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Hell modern day anti surface ship torpedoes don't even make contact with the ship's hull.. They are designed to blow up underneath the ship in order to break the ship in half from the water pressure. I'd suspect anti sub torpedoes would work the same and never actually hit the hull.
This ship thing was the case already in WWII and probably in WWI too. It was magnetic detonation under the hull. However the case is different regarding subs as much smaller damage is enough to destroy the sub and the water pressure is much higher down the deep where the subs are. Though there might be magnetic detonation to increase the chance of hit. Or maybe you are right, I don't know, but there is not that much need for it regarding subs. Very succesful anti-sub weapons in WWII were direct contact hedgehogs (hit the top part of the sub).
Comment