Charleston attack is assassination not hate crime

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brassmonkey
    Pay It Forward
    • Sep 2005
    • 77396

    #16
    Originally posted by TCLGirls
    You can ask yourself that question...since every race is considered a protected class...and thus any killing that targets any race is a hate crime.
    TRUMP 2026 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
    DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

    Comment

    • dyna mo
      just a fucking jerk
      • Dec 2008
      • 68184

      #17
      There is no such thing as protected classes.

      Comment

      • blackmonsters
        Making PHP work
        • Nov 2002
        • 20960

        #18
        Originally posted by Grapesoda
        an assignation is a targeted murder for political or monetary reason, usually by by a paid third party ...

        A hate crime is a traditional criminal offense like murder, arson, invasion of privacy or vandalism with an added element of bias towards a federally protected class of people.

        sense made

        BTW how does it feel to be federally protected like an endangered animal or plant?
        The FBI should make sure you have no access to guns.

        That's what's up.

        Free Open Source Live Aggregated Cams Script (FOSLACS)

        Comment

        • blackmonsters
          Making PHP work
          • Nov 2002
          • 20960

          #19
          Originally posted by TCLGirls
          You can ask yourself that question...since every race is considered a protected class...and thus any killing that targets any race is a hate crime.
          Free Open Source Live Aggregated Cams Script (FOSLACS)

          Comment

          • Captain Kawaii
            So Fucking Banned
            • Oct 2007
            • 6748

            #20
            Originally posted by tonyparra
            ‪#‎Fact1‬. Reverend/South Carolina Senator Clementa Pinckney (Killed) was the leading activist and community leader pushing and demanding that cops in Charleston South Carolina be forced to wear body cameras after the shooting of Walter Scott IN THE SAME CITY

            ‪#‎Fact2‬. The shooter was "GIVEN" a gun days after the shooting of Walter Scott

            ‪#‎Fact3‬. The shooter's first request when walking in the church was, "where the minister, I want to meet the minister"

            ‪#‎Fact4‬. The shooter lived 110 miles away from that church, if it was a "HATE CRIME" against black people, then why didn't he just shoot up any other black church, you can't randomly pick a church 110 miles away from your residence

            #‎Fact5‬ He didn't attempt to kill everyone in the church but reloaded his gun 5 times, what person that commits a "HATE CRIME" spares people lives, if you hate all black people why not kill them all and he was actually heard saying "I want witnesses"
            When I saw Pinckney on the list that's the first thing I thought of. "HIT." Kid was coached thats for sure. On his own he sounds a mess. I hope they are looking at his family and associates.
            I know the area well. Family has been there and in the region for more than 300 years.
            Its become a weird mix of NRA, AB, Mexican gangs, Ultra-left and black people caught in the middle. I feel bad for the innocents.

            Comment

            • DBS.US
              Geo Cities
              • Aug 2003
              • 11843

              #21
              I'm going to wait for the Youtube videos. They allay come up with the true government connection.
              Have an unused domain? Make a Free Chaturbate White Label site and be making money tonight

              Comment

              • SekobA
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Oct 2008
                • 12173

                #22
                It doesnt matters he couldn't control himself n ppl are dead

                Comment

                • directfiesta
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 30135

                  #23
                  Originally posted by tonyparra
                  ‪#‎Fact1‬. Reverend/South Carolina Senator Clementa Pinckney (Killed) was the leading activist and community leader pushing and demanding that cops in Charleston South Carolina be forced to wear body cameras after the shooting of Walter Scott IN THE SAME CITY

                  ‪#‎Fact2‬. The shooter was "GIVEN" a gun days after the shooting of Walter Scott

                  ‪#‎Fact3‬. The shooter's first request when walking in the church was, "where the minister, I want to meet the minister"

                  ‪#‎Fact4‬. The shooter lived 110 miles away from that church, if it was a "HATE CRIME" against black people, then why didn't he just shoot up any other black church, you can't randomly pick a church 110 miles away from your residence

                  #‎Fact5‬ He didn't attempt to kill everyone in the church but reloaded his gun 5 times, what person that commits a "HATE CRIME" spares people lives, if you hate all black people why not kill them all and he was actually heard saying "I want witnesses"
                  #Fact6. Putting Fact# in front of a sentence does not make it truthful or factual ...
                  I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                  But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                  Comment

                  • Grapesoda
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 46238

                    #24
                    Originally posted by TCLGirls
                    You can ask yourself that question...since every race is considered a protected class...and thus any killing that targets any race is a hate crime.
                    do your home work.... not true at all... some subclass of race are federally protected... like homosexuals, and white women so your safe, but on whole white people are not federally protected...

                    in fact aren't all discrimination lawsuits against while people? so would white people be federally non protected or federally targeted?

                    either way not my concern.... I had no idea about this anyway until I looked up due to brassmonters question

                    Comment

                    • Rochard
                      Jägermeister Test Pilot
                      • Dec 2001
                      • 75733

                      #25
                      It was a hate crime. He wanted to kill blacks. He wanted to bring back segragation and was worried that blacks were taking over.

                      This was a hate crime.
                      Herschel Savage
                      Brooklyn, NY

                      Comment

                      • SuckOnThis
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Oct 2003
                        • 6844

                        #26
                        Originally posted by tonyparra
                        ‪#‎Fact1‬. Reverend/South Carolina Senator Clementa Pinckney (Killed) was the leading activist and community leader pushing and demanding that cops in Charleston South Carolina be forced to wear body cameras after the shooting of Walter Scott IN THE SAME CITY

                        ‪#‎Fact2‬. The shooter was "GIVEN" a gun days after the shooting of Walter Scott

                        ‪#‎Fact3‬. The shooter's first request when walking in the church was, "where the minister, I want to meet the minister"

                        ‪#‎Fact4‬. The shooter lived 110 miles away from that church, if it was a "HATE CRIME" against black people, then why didn't he just shoot up any other black church, you can't randomly pick a church 110 miles away from your residence

                        #‎Fact5‬ He didn't attempt to kill everyone in the church but reloaded his gun 5 times, what person that commits a "HATE CRIME" spares people lives, if you hate all black people why not kill them all and he was actually heard saying "I want witnesses"

                        I really hope your therapist is monitoring the idiotic shit you post.

                        Comment

                        • Rochard
                          Jägermeister Test Pilot
                          • Dec 2001
                          • 75733

                          #27
                          It was a hate crime. He wanted to kill blacks. He wanted to bring back segragation and was worried that blacks were taking over.

                          This was a hate crime.
                          Herschel Savage
                          Brooklyn, NY

                          Comment

                          • TCLGirls
                            Confirmed User
                            • Feb 2010
                            • 3068

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Grapesoda
                            do your home work.... not true at all... some subclass of race is federally protected... like homosexuals, and white women so your safe, but on whole white people are not federally protected...

                            Wrong. All race fall under a protected class...not just "some subclass of race":

                            "Federal protected classes now include race, color, national origin, religion, sex (or gender), age (over 40), and disability. State law (HEPA) further protects ancestry, marital status, sexual orientation, as well as arrest and court record (in most cases)."


                            Protected Class Law & Legal Definition



                            Originally posted by Grapesoda
                            in fact aren't all discrimination lawsuits against while people? so would white people be federally non protected or federally targeted?
                            Wrong again...white plaintiffs have won cases where they have been victims of racial discrimination:

                            "McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co., 427 U.S. 273, 96 S.Ct. 2574 (1976). Two White employees and one Black employee were charged with stealing property from their employer. The two White employees were fired while the Black employee was retained. In the first big reverse discrimination case, the Court decided that Title VII is not limited to discrimination against minority persons, but includes discriminatory actions against majority persons as well."


                            "Reverse" Cases


                            Originally posted by Grapesoda
                            either way not my concern.... I had no idea about this anyway until I looked up due to brassmonters question

                            Where did you "look it up"? A simple Google search would have resulted int he links I just posted above.

                            Comment

                            • dyna mo
                              just a fucking jerk
                              • Dec 2008
                              • 68184

                              #29
                              Originally posted by TCLGirls
                              i stand corrected.

                              Comment

                              • TCLGirls
                                Confirmed User
                                • Feb 2010
                                • 3068

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Grapesoda
                                in fact aren't all discrimination lawsuits against while people? so would white people be federally non protected or federally targeted?

                                Another case where a white person successfully claimed he was a victim of racial discrimination. So your premise is entirely false.


                                White Employee Wins Racial-Discrimination Lawsuit

                                "White supervisor fired for racial email has valid discrimination case over unequal discipline. A white supervisor received and then forwarded to others in the company a racial email titled ?Why There Are No Black NASCAR Drivers.? It contained a series of derogatory stereotypes of Blacks. The supervisor was fired for violating the company?s anti-harassment and improper-computer-use policies. He sued under Title VII, claiming that the discharge was racially discriminatory. The court agreed that he had a valid case because, in the same time frame, several Black employees had been using company email to circulate ?How to Dance Like a White Guy!? It contained a series of derogatory terms and stereotyped characterizations of white men. However, these employees only received short-term suspensions for violation of the harassment and computer policies. There was an appearance of racial disparity in the issuing of discipline for virtually the same infraction. Smith v. Lockheed-Martin Corp. (11th Cir., 2011)."


                                White Employee Wins Racial-Discrimination Lawsuit - DiversityInc

                                Comment

                                Working...