You love the cock! :1orglaugh

About terrorism:
Now, stop lying and backpeddling you cowardly piece of shit.

Oh, and answer the fucking question: Why do you think american civilians dying is something to laugh about?

The CIA is but one of many intelligence gathering agencies and not even the most important of the intelligence gathering agencies and total agreement too interpretations of intel among the agencies is rare if ever. Educate yourself dumb fuck, then speak.

Listen up you stupid motherfucker...put your words in some one elses mouth not mine.

You know you want a stiff cock in your mouth!

ADMIT IT!

Just a troll, nothing more. Not of import.

So you won't even stand behind your own words and refuse to answer the most obvious questions. Sad little coward.

The words that you are trying to put in my mouth are your words and not mine. Read your own fucking posts, dumb motherfucker.

You are turning into Joe Sixpack, a fucking troll, but then again you may have always been a troll...I never paid that much attention.

You laugh about the possibility of innocent american civilians dying.
You say terrorism is the reason for attacking Iraq. You fail to stand behind your words for even half half an hour.
You doubt the reliability of the CIA, your only arguments being "it's just an opinion" and "there are other agencies which frequently disagree with them".

You are getting boring troll, and a dumb fuck troll at that.

fiddy!

Oh, I forgot:
When your argumentation is failing and you are being exposed for the cowardly little fuck that you are, you fail to be a man and face it but turn into a whiny little bitch instead.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by theking


Reasons for war.

#1. Iraq was defeated on the field of battle and signed certain terms. Iraq has been in violation of those terms since they signed the terms in '91. The USA has demanded that those terms be complied with and that Iraq remain a defeated country.

#2. Iraq attempted to assasinate a former American President.

#3. Iraq has fired upon, almost daily, for almost 11 years, USA military forces.

#4. Iraq is believed to have, or are acquiring, or are attempting to acquire WMD's. The USA will not allow that.

#5. Iraq has, on multiple occassions called for Americans, to be killed where ever they are found. Thus they are a sworn enemy of the USA.

#6. Iraq is a strategic piece of real estate for future military operations against our enemies in the region, which number in the 100's of millions.

#7. Iraq is a strategic piece of real estate for its oil fields and for the surrounding oil fields, for as the worlds oil supplies dwindle the USA will be in a position to control the dwindling oil supplies for its use and the use of its European allies.

#8. A take over of Iraq sends a very powerful signal to the other countries in that area of the world that if they don't get their act together they will be next.

Any one of the reasons above is a reason for war.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by theking


Proof of WMD's

During the first round of inspections after after the first gulf war, Iraq admitted that they had x number of tons/liters etc. of different types of chemical and different types of biological materials on hand as well as x number of chemical rockets/artillary rounds. The first round of inspections over saw the destruction of much of this material and weapons, but they were not allowed to finish the job. Iraq has now said that they took it upon themselves to destroy the remaining weapons and materials since 1998. They do not have the documentation to prove this and said that they destroyed the documentation when they destroyed the materials and weapons. Even if it were true that they destroyed the documentation of the destruction of the materials and weapons there would still be the physical evidence of the destruction of the these materials and weapons, which they have failed to present evidence of. There would also be those scientists and engineers etc. that would have been involved in the destruction of these materials and Iraq has failed to present these people that would have been involved in the destruction of the materials and weapons. Bottom line is they had chemical and biological materials and weapons, admitted that they had them, the first round of inpsections oversaw the destruction of much of the materials and weapons, but they were kicked out before the remaining materials and weapons were destroyed, and Iraq has yet to present one iota of proof that they in fact took it upon themselves to destroy the remaining chemical and biological materials and weapons, thus without proof that they did in fact destroy them (which is their burden as imposed in the last UN resolution) we the US and anyone with an ounce of brains must assume that they still have them, and may have even produced more of them since 1998.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by theking


Some reasons why we may not be presenting clear cut proof to the UN, our "allies" and the world public.

I of course do not know what crystal clear proof may or may not exist such as photographs, but I do know that if we have black and white proof and presented that proof (even in secret to "allies") that information would have a good chance of being leaked and what are now targets would be dispersed and hidden so the opportunity to take them out will have been lost and as a result they could be used against our forces.

It has been reported that our CIA and military have outlined more than 700 targets to be hit, many of which are suspected, if not factually known to store chemical, biological materials or weapons. If we began to present this target list to the UN or to the world public or even to some of our "allies" those targets would not exist when it came time to attack them as they would have been cleaned of whatever they may now contain.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by theking


We are not going it alone.

The President does not act in a vacuum and cannot act without the backing of the American people, which he has, the backing of congress, which he has (they gave him the thumbs up on Iraq several months ago), the backing of his cabinet, which he has, the backing of the justice department and the courts (the President cannot violate the constitution or the law), which he has, and at this point in time he has the backing of the UN Security Counsel (15-0). Nine countries at this point in time are committing troops, twenty-five other countries are offering other types of support. There will be more come on board before all is said and done. If I remember correctly there were only 38 countries that either committed troops and/or other types of support in the first gulf war. At this point in time we have the committment of 34 countries and counting.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read it, learn it, know it and your attempt to put your words in my mouth will never work with me, troll.

Dumb fuck...I like your unconditional surrender. Maybe you are not so dumb after all.