How legal is content like this?

**blackmonsters** · 04-03-2015, 02:44 PM

The bar staff might beat you once they catch you filming.
The dude in the BG cheating on his wife might kill you.

Find a movie set, why be stupid.

.

**blackmonsters** · 04-03-2015, 02:47 PM

Sometimes people think they've figured out something new but they've only figured out something stupid that people stopped doing a long time ago because it was stupid.

**420** · 04-03-2015, 02:50 PM

Originally posted by blackmonsters

The bar staff might beat you once they catch you filming.
The dude in the BG cheating on his wife might kill you.

Find a movie set, why be stupid.

.

I think divvy might lack the fundage for a rental and extras.

Originally posted by blackmonsters

Sometimes people think they've figured out something new but they've only figured out something stupid that people stopped doing a long time ago because it was stupid.

What's old is new again. This is also true in fashion.

**blackmonsters** · 04-03-2015, 02:55 PM

Originally posted by 420

I think divvy might lack the fundage for a rental and extras.

Oh yeah, but how much fundage does he have for dental implants?

**420** · 04-03-2015, 02:57 PM

Originally posted by blackmonsters

Oh yeah, but how much fundage does he have for dental implants?

I would guess zero. He's from UK where they don't even have dentists.

**Barry-xlovecam** · 04-03-2015, 03:01 PM

For the record, after the cam model 'incident' exposing herself on cam in a public library, I amended our XloveCam model rules to explicitly prohibit such behavior, for both legal and ethical reasons:

8.0

2 : The broadcast is must be conducted in a secure and private location where no childen, minor person or person not verified to be broadcasting on XloveCam is visable on cam – no exceptions.
3 : Broadcasting from a public place is forbidden.

Termination and forfeiture of all money due is the contractual penalty.

We are not going to get sued or criminally charged for being negligent or acquiescing to a criminal or tortious act.

**sicone** · 04-03-2015, 03:10 PM

My GFY law degree has taken the weekend off for the holiday, so it might be best to ask your own lawyer.

**Acepimp** · 04-03-2015, 09:52 PM

At the very least, you would need to blur out everyone else's face. But the consensus here is that this is a dumb idea. I have to agree.

**L-Pink** · 04-03-2015, 09:57 PM

Nobody contacted you to shoot anything

**Spunky** · 04-03-2015, 09:57 PM

Are you a gambling man? no risk,no reward

**Jim_Gunn** · 04-03-2015, 10:35 PM

I've done many shoots in my career in practical locations like bars, night clubs, strip clubs, restaurants and most recently a liquor store at a client's request. Of course, I did the right thing by asking permission to shoot when it was closed for business or to shoot in a private area and paying the proprietor for the privilege as well as hiring a few extras who signed releases to be in the background to look like it was open for the public. You're nuts if you think you can just waltz in somewhere in public and film a business and random people without their permission.

**LizardKing** · 04-03-2015, 10:41 PM

love that shit!

**tommy730** · 04-03-2015, 11:04 PM

Is it illegal to not wear panties? Technically she's not exposed, that's an upskirt between two people. The legalities could be questionable/subject to interpretation imo

**RJHere** · 04-04-2015, 12:29 AM

Originally posted by Jim_Gunn

who signed releases to be in the background

I bet that this kicker doesn't

**Markul** · 04-04-2015, 12:48 AM

Originally posted by L-Pink

Nobody contacted you to shoot anything

How legal is content like this?

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment