Reduce Dick Size by 1 Inch for SEO Purposes

[ManPuppy]

Google to Reward Facts Over Fans

How would this even be applicable to sites that rely on creative writing or personal experience? Not to mention, opinion or sarcasm?

Between this proposal and the porn blog fiasco last week, I have to wonder if Google is getting Alzheimers.

[ITraffic]

just fill up sites with content and "facts" pulled from the database they are using ... profit.

[Freedom6995]

Not happening any time soon...

[CurrentlySober]

Yep, kinda like a did a few years ago. I was promoting extreeme sites but filled the site (many pages) with articles AGAINST these sites. The Engines saw it that I was against it and ranked me VERY high.

The punter hitting the site didnt see that side of it, and was just promoted joining the sites in question.

Lots of facts fooled google.

[~Ray]

Yep, kinda like a did a few years ago. I was promoting extreeme sites but filled the site (many pages) with articles AGAINST these sites. The Engines saw it that I was against it and ranked me VERY high.

The punter hitting the site didnt see that side of it, and was just promoted joining the sites in question.

Lots of facts fooled google.

that's pretty interesting. did the anti-extreme type buy any memberships?

[CurrentlySober]

that's pretty interesting. did the anti-extreme type buy any memberships?

Yes. This was a '1st draught' version of the idea based on UK sites
The new UK laws that are being brought in by the government, look to restrict your rights as law abiding adults to view this type of Adult entertainment.
When it took off, I multiplied the idea a ramped it up to a much bigger site (diff URL) without the UK centric angle.

The second version had lots of separate pages and 50 x the content, but the 'in your face' promo of the sites was the same.

It was getting first page results for extreme sex, banned sex, etc... For a while the example I showed was number 1 in google for 'extreme sex uk' and 'uk extreme sex' etc

Same principle though, just more actual negative content, but FACTUAL content none the less. MANY MANY SALES

[Black All Through]

This has been in the talks since 2007, not going to happen!

[~Ray]

Yes. This was a '1st draught' version of the idea based on UK sites
The new UK laws that are being brought in by the government, look to restrict your rights as law abiding adults to view this type of Adult entertainment.
When it took off, I multiplied the idea a ramped it up to a much bigger site (diff URL) without the UK centric angle.

The second version had lots of separate pages and 50 x the content, but the 'in your face' promo of the sites was the same.

It was getting first page results for extreme sex, banned sex, etc... For a while the example I showed was number 1 in google for 'extreme sex uk' and 'uk extreme sex' etc

Same principle though, just more actual negative content, but FACTUAL content none the less. MANY MANY SALES

nice. thank you for sharting.. err I mean sharing

[Barry-xlovecam]

Makes sense for fact based media or opinion sites notwithstanding the "propaganda bombs" to come. A preponderance of the same snippit of "fact" might indicate truth but "truth" has often been manufactured.

Rest assured, your porn site is neither fact nor truth driven. So, this change would make little difference in your algorithmic results.