I spoke with an attorney regarding this, there is a legal agreement that submitters have to comply with. Also, posting is not your regular TGP--enter a URL and you get listed. No... it actually entails entering your actual gallery code.

Not yet, we're still fleshing out the submitter concerns to this project.

on a separate topic...

Another rule: NO AUTOSUBMITTERS. Thanks to the earlier poster who isolated this problem.

huh?

My point was, what is up what that $0.25 incentive?
How much galleries do I need to submit per month... then on that number, how many will he publish on his TGP... X $0.25 = what? $10 per month (for 40 listings which is very high)!?

So the question was... will someone really submit there because of the $0.25 incentive?

I didnt say the the pre-qualified traffic wasnt a good idea...

There's extra effort needed because the way the galleries are to be submitted to the system. Plus, focus is on QUALITY gallery providers.

As allready explained, you can make MUCH more then$10 because you can still advertise your site and his traffic should convert much better then regular traffic.

nevermind, no offense

Rich he said up in the thread that it is for "legal" reasons.

didn't notice that, thanks

After reading through your comments and also looking at my notes, its a very high possibility that REALLY GOOD [based on CTR ratio, reliability, and user reviews] gallery providers will get their payouts increased from .25 per gallery to as high as $1 per gallery. System income increases as the quality of the content increases so you should share in this as well.

Still gathering info, please post all your concerns. Be as negative as you want just provide reasons and factual examples.

This might be the next Microsoft, I want stock options instead of the $0.25

Thanks to Paul for the ICQ: Another rule --- No Free Hosts.

Isn't every surfer on the net "Pre Qualified"...I mean doesn't everyone have to pay for internet access??..so therefore they have some method of paying, (if they want to) ???

Based on your definition of prequalified the the: .cn leecherz off the movie forums that suck up GBs of movies every day and don't click on banners/text are prequalified

Not really a promising market segment.

$10 a gallery and you've got yourself a deal

It seems like a good ideia, but it's also true that 0.25 will only atract newbies with poor galleries looking to make $5 for a hot dog. I want the CC traffic and the detailed stats, not your money.

Hell, if it hits the right areas and produces the right behavior in the user, why the hell not? :2 cents:

Good feedback. You also get marketing feedback based on the system's logs and AI engine. This should help you generate more money with your galleries at least with the system's traffic. Plus maybe pay you more if your materials does exceptionally well for the system.

Although the prime target are experienced gallery producers with a track record of producing galleries that appeal to users, I'm also interested in new guys to the game who may have an "amateur" style that surfers may dig. This is valuable, in providing diversity to the system I'm piecing together.

That's fine, and if you set a minimum payment of $50 you will never have to pay most of the noobs :P

Actually, I plan to pay on all amounts due, even if its just $.25 Having cash roll over may create accounting issues.

do you currently have any traffic behind this avs(s)/paysite(s)? sorry if it's been answered, i'm heading out and only scanned the thread...

I am VERY interested, please contact me on ICQ

Yep but not aggregated within an unified system. I posted this thread to gauge interest/issues that need to be addressed in building such a unified system.

Ok :)
1000s of rules and we didn't start anything :)

Awesome so now you'll pay people to redirect your traffic to incest toplists. Fantastic news!

Gsharp - Please msg me on ICQ 168719446,
Thanks.

why not use the 10000000 sponsors hosted gallerys
thats floating around and make the $$$ yourself ?

I think it sounds like an excellent idea, and I am particularily interested in the data that we as submitters can attain... However, this part about the payment being for "Legal Reasons".. What exactly are the legal ramifications? I'm interested to see the contract that I'd be signing... What are you really "buying" for the $0.25 and even $1.00 per gallery?

Easy to post on 21site

Hmm... would good sponsor hosted galleries qualify?

G sharp hit me up on icq please.

135982156

I don't think he's expecting these galleries submtited to be exclusive to his site... I know many people have thought about doing the same thing, though there are a lot of factors to consider.

1 Positive - You get high-quality galleries because you get instant daily submitters...

1 Negative - You'll have to weed out a lot of constant shit build up from people trying to get a quick 25 cents....

Cheers,
Matt

Legal protections to cover my ass re 1) your right to use your content 2) my right to link to your content

Interesting Idea G-Sharp, keep us posted as to what is next. :thumbsup

Sounds very interesting.

Sounds like a good idea... icq me when you're ready.. I'll submit on a regular schedule.. clean galleries always.

I´m interested, I have 4 paysites and I shoot the content myself, so my gallerys would be for these 4 sites with exclusive content.

I have a fifth site coming next month, really exclusive fetish/niche stuff in that one!

Hit me up when you get things going!

:thumbsup

That's what a ban list is for.

Asking for proof of content ownership would scare many of these type of dudez off ... :)

I'm willing to submit Asian galleries to you with my own exclusive content.

This is a good idea IF

sponsor is relatively new and using relatively fresh exclusive content

However, the bulk of sponsor hosted galleries out there have done heavy rotations through TGPs and other marketing channels already.

Not quite. But interesting, possibly expensive idea. I have a cheaper version. What I actually meant by "scrubbed" is that the database scrubs leechez/unproductive users on a continuing basis.

Another concern this raises is how to find relatively "green" traffic --ie., first or second time porn buyers that are relatively fresh to the game instead of jaded leacherz that won't pay anything EVER.

Using scrub traffic may not be discriminating enough.