Darwinism lacks explanation for new discovered life that has not evolved for >2 Billion years

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 6
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 template Next
  • dyna mo
    just a fucking jerk
    • Dec 2008
    • 68184
    #1

    Darwinism lacks explanation for new discovered life that has not evolved for >2 Billion years

    An international team of scientists has discovered the greatest absence of evolution ever reported — a type of deep-sea microorganism that appears not to have evolved over more than 2 billion years.


    “It seems astounding that life has not evolved for more than 2 billion years — nearly half the history of the Earth,” J. William Schopf, a professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, and the study’s lead author, said in a statement.

    “Given that evolution is a fact, this lack of evolution needs to be explained.”


    Scientists discover organism that hasn't evolved in more than 2 billion years | UCLA
    Tags: None
    • michael.kickass
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Mar 2009
      • 11039
      #2
      Just quotin'

      "Research actually provides further support for Darwin,..."
      NICERATIOS - $30 PPS - 50% Rev Share - 5% WM Referral - High Converting Sites!
      Any questions about your NICERATIOS account? Vanessa will take care of you: [email protected]

      Looking to expand your business in general, maybe sell your sites? Contact me:
      [email protected]

        Comment

        • dyna mo
          just a fucking jerk
          • Dec 2008
          • 68184
          #3
          Originally posted by michael.kickass
          Just quotin'

          "Research actually provides further support for Darwin,..."
          just re-quoting the study's lead scientist's comment I included in my OP

          “Given that evolution is a fact, this lack of evolution needs to be explained.”

            Comment

            • Harmon
              ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ)
              • Mar 2004
              • 20012
              #4
              Originally posted by michael.kickass
              Just quotin'

              "Research actually provides further support for Darwin,..."
              It's at the top of the article

              Amazing how people read into shit and forget the bullet points.

              Ama-ZING!
              [email protected]

                Comment

                • Bladewire
                  StraightBro
                  • Aug 2003
                  • 56228
                  #5
                  From your link:


                  ?The rule of biology is not to evolve unless the physical or biological environment changes, which is consistent with Darwin,? said Schopf, who also is director of UCLA?s Center for the Study of Evolution and the Origin of Life. The environment in which these microorganisms live has remained essentially unchanged for 3 billion years, he said.

                  ?These microorganisms are well-adapted to their simple, very stable physical and biological environment,? he said. ?If they were in an environment that did not change but they nevertheless evolved, that would have shown that our understanding of Darwinian evolution was seriously flawed.?


                  Skype: CallTomNow

                    Comment

                    • 420
                      cuck
                      • Mar 2003
                      • 11571
                      #6
                      When one organism "evolves" into another the original isn't wiped out. If the newly adapted organism doesn't consume all the resources, they'd both have a chance for survival. I don't believe evolution always happens out of necessity.
                      <!--BEGIN SIMUTRONICS PLAY BUTTON CODE -->
                      <p align="center">

                      <a href="http://buddy.play.net/dr?TMOREAU1">

                      <img src="drplay.gif" width="128" height="64" alt="Play DragonRealms!"></a></p>

                      <!--END SIMUTRONICS PLAY BUTTON CODE -->

                        Comment

                        • MaDalton
                          I am Amazing Content!
                          • Feb 2004
                          • 39861
                          #7
                          Originally posted by Squirtit
                          From your link:


                          ?The rule of biology is not to evolve unless the physical or biological environment changes, which is consistent with Darwin,? said Schopf, who also is director of UCLA?s Center for the Study of Evolution and the Origin of Life. The environment in which these microorganisms live has remained essentially unchanged for 3 billion years, he said.

                          ?These microorganisms are well-adapted to their simple, very stable physical and biological environment,? he said. ?If they were in an environment that did not change but they nevertheless evolved, that would have shown that our understanding of Darwinian evolution was seriously flawed.?
                          ^^^^^this
                          AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                          Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                          Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                          Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                            Comment

                            • crockett
                              in a van by the river
                              • May 2003
                              • 76818
                              #8
                              Originally posted by dyna mo
                              just re-quoting the study's lead scientist's comment I included in my OP

                              “Given that evolution is a fact, this lack of evolution needs to be explained.”

                              To further quote...

                              “The rule of biology is not to evolve unless the physical or biological environment changes, which is consistent with Darwin,” said Schopf, who also is director of UCLA’s Center for the Study of Evolution and the Origin of Life. The environment in which these microorganisms live has remained essentially unchanged for 3 billion years, he said.

                              “These microorganisms are well-adapted to their simple, very stable physical and biological environment,” he said. “If they were in an environment that did not change but they nevertheless evolved, that would have shown that our understanding of Darwinian evolution was seriously flawed.”

                              ie their environment didn't change, so there was no stimulus to inspire any need to evolve.
                              In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                Comment

                                • ottopottomouse
                                  She is ugly, bad luck.
                                  • Jan 2010
                                  • 13177
                                  #9
                                  Once you evolve to being perfect for your environment and the environment isn't subject to any changes there is no need to continue to mutate.
                                  ↑ see post ↑
                                  13101

                                    Comment

                                    • dyna mo
                                      just a fucking jerk
                                      • Dec 2008
                                      • 68184
                                      #10
                                      lolz, it appears y'all are not familiar with the socratic method of creating dialogue around critical thinking.

                                      the simple fact is that this discovery allowed further proofing of the theory. FYI, it's still a fucking theory and consequently, this discovery allowed further discussion amongst the intelligent.


                                      y'all are all too busy playing gotcha. have fun with that!

                                        Comment

                                        • MaDalton
                                          I am Amazing Content!
                                          • Feb 2004
                                          • 39861
                                          #11
                                          god does not approve this thread
                                          AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                                          Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                                          Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                                          Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                                            Comment

                                            • dyna mo
                                              just a fucking jerk
                                              • Dec 2008
                                              • 68184
                                              #12
                                              Originally posted by Harmon
                                              It's at the top of the article

                                              Amazing how people read into shit and forget the bullet points.

                                              Ama-ZING!
                                              Originally posted by Squirtit
                                              From your link:


                                              ?The rule of biology is not to evolve unless the physical or biological environment changes, which is consistent with Darwin,? said Schopf, who also is director of UCLA?s Center for the Study of Evolution and the Origin of Life. The environment in which these microorganisms live has remained essentially unchanged for 3 billion years, he said.

                                              ?These microorganisms are well-adapted to their simple, very stable physical and biological environment,? he said. ?If they were in an environment that did not change but they nevertheless evolved, that would have shown that our understanding of Darwinian evolution was seriously flawed.?
                                              Originally posted by MaDalton
                                              ^^^^^this
                                              Originally posted by crockett
                                              To further quote...

                                              ?The rule of biology is not to evolve unless the physical or biological environment changes, which is consistent with Darwin,? said Schopf, who also is director of UCLA?s Center for the Study of Evolution and the Origin of Life. The environment in which these microorganisms live has remained essentially unchanged for 3 billion years, he said.

                                              ?These microorganisms are well-adapted to their simple, very stable physical and biological environment,? he said. ?If they were in an environment that did not change but they nevertheless evolved, that would have shown that our understanding of Darwinian evolution was seriously flawed.?

                                              ie their environment didn't change, so there was no stimulus to inspire any need to evolve.



                                              it's as if y'all think I stopped reading the article on this right after the quote I used.

                                              the fact is (from the article)::::::::::::
                                              Charles Darwin?s writings on evolution focused much more on species that had changed over time than on those that hadn?t. So how do scientists explain a species living for so long without evolving?

                                              can you brainiacs see the difference here?

                                                Comment

                                                • aka123
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Jul 2014
                                                  • 4450
                                                  #13
                                                  Originally posted by dyna mo
                                                  An international team of scientists has discovered the greatest absence of evolution ever reported ? a type of deep-sea microorganism that appears not to have evolved over more than 2 billion years.


                                                  ?It seems astounding that life has not evolved for more than 2 billion years ? nearly half the history of the Earth,? J. William Schopf, a professor at the University of California at Los Angeles, and the study?s lead author, said in a statement.

                                                  ?Given that evolution is a fact, this lack of evolution needs to be explained.?


                                                  Scientists discover organism that hasn't evolved in more than 2 billion years | UCLA
                                                  So, how this contradicts with evolution?

                                                    Comment

                                                    • dyna mo
                                                      just a fucking jerk
                                                      • Dec 2008
                                                      • 68184
                                                      #14
                                                      Darwinism explains evolution, it does not directly explain the lack of evolution.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • 420
                                                          cuck
                                                          • Mar 2003
                                                          • 11571
                                                          #15
                                                          Originally posted by aka123
                                                          So, how this contradicts with evolution?
                                                          It doesn't contradict evolution or god. God created everything and then it started changing for mostly unknown reasons.
                                                          <!--BEGIN SIMUTRONICS PLAY BUTTON CODE -->
                                                          <p align="center">

                                                          <a href="http://buddy.play.net/dr?TMOREAU1">

                                                          <img src="drplay.gif" width="128" height="64" alt="Play DragonRealms!"></a></p>

                                                          <!--END SIMUTRONICS PLAY BUTTON CODE -->

                                                            Comment

                                                            Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 template Next
                                                            Working...