GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Decentralization: Get ready for the Revolution (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1156148)

jscott 12-08-2014 02:48 PM

Dell Official Site - The Power To Do More | Dell
Computer Parts, Laptops, Electronics, and More - Newegg.com
Fiverr: The marketplace for creative & professional services
reddit: the front page of the internet
Viabox | The Global Leader in Package Forwarding
www.namecheap.com
www.verotel.com
www.internetbs.net
.. and 1000's more....

these companies went through the trouble of accepting bitcoin as a form of payment.

What dumbass's.

aka123 12-08-2014 03:05 PM

Calling me dumbass doesn't make bitcoin any better or worse. I have said why bitcoin sucks. You have just been trying to prove that how "acceptable" it is. Business is business, if enough folks use bitcoin, why wouldn't some company accept it? They do take all the other suckers money too. But it doesn't make bitcoin any better.

jscott 12-08-2014 03:40 PM

I never called you a dumbass dude, re-read what I said and you'll see.

aka123 12-08-2014 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jscott (Post 20316425)
I never called you a dumbass dude, re-read what I said and you'll see.

My sincerely apologies. I would bowl deeply, but my head could hit the monitor.

dyna mo 12-08-2014 03:53 PM

argue against crypto currencies all you want but it's a losing battle.

analog transactions are a thing of the past, it's only a matter of time for digital currencies to match up with digital transactions

slapass 12-08-2014 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123 (Post 20313450)
If I am wrong, tell me why I am wrong. But you can't, as the core idea in bitcoin is being deflatory; so the ponzi sceme is built in it, being essential part of it.

It is safe to Paypal to take part of it as officially bitcoin is currency, unofficial one, and it really doesn't promise anything.

So who is getting rich? That is why it is not a Ponzi scheme. It is/was in a bubble. That is what you are describing. Not a Ponzi scheme.

clickity click 12-08-2014 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123 (Post 20316396)
Calling me dumbass doesn't make bitcoin any better or worse. I have said why bitcoin sucks. You have just been trying to prove that how "acceptable" it is. Business is business, if enough folks use bitcoin, why wouldn't some company accept it? They do take all the other suckers money too. But it doesn't make bitcoin any better.

I think people expect too much from Bitcoin too soon. I think of it as a 5/10/20 year experiment.


I was going to go into far more detail but a comment from Satoshi Nakamoto would fit well here:

Quote:

If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.

aka123 12-08-2014 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slapass (Post 20316440)
So who is getting rich? That is why it is not a Ponzi scheme. It is/was in a bubble. That is what you are describing. Not a Ponzi scheme.

The founders/ early miners and whoever who was in early are getting rich. But yes, it is not ponzi, it is more like pyramid scheme. Although there is not that much difference.

aka123 12-08-2014 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20316435)
argue against crypto currencies all you want but it's a losing battle.

analog transactions are a thing of the past, it's only a matter of time for digital currencies to match up with digital transactions

I have commented just about bitcoin, but I wouldn't be very optimistic regarding similar moneys as well. And what the fuck is analog transaction vs digital? Are we talking about TVs?

Most of the today's currencies are already digital in terms of money volyme and transactions. Well, maybe not in USA, as it lives in stone age regarding that, but in more developed countries. For example in my country most payments are digital, cash is something like 10 % or less. And good if anyone even knows about checks.

aka123 12-08-2014 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickity click (Post 20316442)
I think people expect too much from Bitcoin too soon. I think of it as a 5/10/20 year experiment.

I was going to go into far more detail but a comment from Satoshi Nakamoto would fit well here:

Sounds swell, especially with the Satoshi guy's quote.

dyna mo 12-08-2014 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123 (Post 20316471)
I have commented just about bitcoin, but I wouldn't be very optimistic regarding similar moneys as well. And what the fuck is analog transaction vs digital? Are we talking about TVs?

Most of the today's currencies are already digital in terms of money volyme and transactions. Well, maybe not in USA, as it lives in stone age regarding that, but in more developed countries. For example in my country most payments are digital, cash is something like 10 % or less. And good if anyone even knows about checks.



analog currencY:https://www.google.com/search?q=anal...alog+currency+

umm, no USA isn't in the stone age re: digital transactions. please try and keep this a reasonable discussion. the dollar is currently the benchmarck worldwide currency.

Certainly you can't think that the country that backs that currency operates in the stone age re: currency. I suspect you merely assumed that since credit cards here are not chipped yet.

aka123 12-08-2014 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20316478)
analog currencY:https://www.google.com/search?q=anal...alog+currency+

umm, no USA isn't in the stone age re: digital transactions. please try and keep this a reasonable discussion. the dollar is currently the benchmarck worldwide currency.

Certainly you can't think that the country that backs that currency operates in the stone age re: currency. I suspect you merely assumed that since credit cards here are not chipped yet.

What US dollar being some benchmark has to do with US stone age payment systems and habits?

Backs currency? I use euros, USD doesn't back a shit regarding it, neither did the currency before that. You must confuse euro area to some old colony, that actually would more likely use GBP tied currency than USD.

dyna mo 12-08-2014 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123 (Post 20316483)
What US dollar being some benchmark has to do with US stone age payment systems and habits?

Backs currency? I use euros, USD doesn't back a shit regarding it, neither did the currency before that. You must confuse euro area to some old colony, that actually would more likely use GBP tied currency than USD.

I'm not confused about jack shit :1orglaugh You're the one claiming the USA is in the stone age because the credit cards are not chipped.

and you know what I meant by backed, the dollar is state supported official legal tender that is used worldwide for calculating prices and trading such commodities as oil.

no one in USA gives a fuck about your euros. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

aka123 12-08-2014 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20316491)
I'm not confused about jack shit :1orglaugh You're the one claiming the USA is in the stone age because the credit cards are not chipped.

and you know what I meant by backed, the dollar is state supported official legal tender that is used worldwide for calculating prices and trading such commodities as oil.

no one in USA gives a fuck about your euros. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I said that in stone age regarding.. you know regarding something. I am not native English speaker, but I suppose it means regarding something.

Good that you don't give a shit about euro, as we don't give a shit about USD. This actually applies to pretty much every country (they don't give shit about each other). The difference is that people usually get that. Using USD for oil price, etc. is not that big deal. Just like using English is not that big deal to England (or maybe I am wrong). Well.. lets give couple hoorays for England.. Hooray! Hooray!, Hooray! You too, as you use English too.

dyna mo 12-08-2014 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123 (Post 20316502)
I said that in stone age regarding.. you know regarding something. I am not native English speaker, but I suppose it means regarding something.

Good that you don't give a shit about euro, as we don't give a shit about USD. This actually applies to pretty much every country (they don't give shit about each other). The difference is that people usually get that. Using USD for oil price, etc. is not that big deal. Just like using English is not that big deal to England (or maybe I am wrong). Well.. lets give couple hoorays for England.. Hooray! Hooray!, Hooray! You too, as you use English too.

exactly right. so while it prolly won't be bitcoin, we both agree digital currencies have their place in the future. I doubt they will replace hard cash entirely.

AmeliaG 12-08-2014 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aka123 (Post 20316366)
Pretty much all nations are concerned about the export and currencies impact to it. Not just China. For example Germany has greatly benefited from euro, as euro is much lower in value than would Germany's own mark be. If country has meaningful amount of export, it will not go after just currency's strength, as that would be "death toll" for its export industry.

About bitcoin, you couldn't buy shit with witcoin for example 10 years ago. Maybe the sea shells are just ouf of fashion, but who knows. :)

Bitcoin's characteristics are the difference, the main difference, and also how accepted it is. Its main characteristic (deflatory) is the one that every other currency pretty much tries to avoid. :) It's kinda funny that Bitcoin fans keep it as its best quality, but it is in fact the worst. LOL.

Like most economic levers, it is a teeter totter system. When a currency grows too strong, exports drop. The drop in exports decreases demand for the currency. Decreased demands weakens the currency. As the value of the currency drops, exports increase.

It is generally a cyclical system, not something which always goes in one direction.

I assume, when you talk about deflation, you mean the limit on the number of Bitcoin which will be mined, is that correct? What economic problems do you see stemming from Bitcoin gaining in value over time?

You are right that sea shells are out of fashion. A currency must be currently accepted to function as currency. You can't buy something for two bits in America any more, but that doesn't mean it wasn't currency in the Old West. The fact that I doubt my local restuarants would be pleased to take a gold doubloon does not mean it was not once currency, but it is out of fashion, so it is not currency now.

Currency is not some absolute thing. It is a currently accepted instrument, which is mutually agreed to represent a certain value.

Dead 12-08-2014 08:11 PM

If i have never posted these words out loud,......I love your mind,....always have had a huge respect for you and the words you type on this ill forgotten board. Strong is understated.

aka123 12-09-2014 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 20316722)
Like most economic levers, it is a teeter totter system. When a currency grows too strong, exports drop. The drop in exports decreases demand for the currency. Decreased demands weakens the currency. As the value of the currency drops, exports increase.

It is generally a cyclical system, not something which always goes in one direction.

I assume, when you talk about deflation, you mean the limit on the number of Bitcoin which will be mined, is that correct? What economic problems do you see stemming from Bitcoin gaining in value over time?

First of all, currencies are not just some thing that fluctuates as it wills, it is more or less controlled and central banks are the keyplayers in this. It's fucking bad for economy if things fluctuate, thus preventive actions are used. Also about that cyclical thing, there are so much more things than pure demand those affects to currencies values. Just like with stock prices it is not just about pure demand, as price can change significantly with new information, even when demand is the same. Of course the demand for certain price range is not same, but demand for certain amount of stocks is.

But you are right, it's not some thing that just goes to some direction, as the goal is to keep it more or less stable at some level.

Yes, the main problem in Bitcoin is that its number doesn't increase with economy growth or demand. And it's not just about bitcoin, it's bad for any currency for being deflatory. You read about the quote from ECB? The simplified problem in deflation is that people don't use the money to pay things (what is money's main function), instead they wait it to grow value, just like huge number of Bitcoin owners do.

PR_Glen 12-11-2014 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jscott (Post 20315978)
I know what my bank charges are. I'm just saying, they really aren't shy to charge their customers for blinking an eye.

ahh you finally figured out your statement? congrats, next step lets see you crack the code of your electric bill!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123