Only 50% Of Scientists Blame Mankind for Climate Change In New Study - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

wehateporn

Promoting Debate on GFY

Join Date: Apr 2007

Posts: 27176
Share

Post
#1

Only 50% Of Scientists Blame Mankind for Climate Change In New Study

11-21-2014, 05:17 PM

Rather than claiming 97 percent of scientists believe in man-made global warming, hopefully now some media outlets will revise that number closer to 50 percent.

Contrary to the repeated insistence of both climate alarmists and the media, scientists do not all agree on the standard climate alarmism talking points. A Purdue University scholar, surveying scientists in the agricultural sector including climatologists, found surprising disagreement on humanity?s role in climate change. These findings, though contrary to popular narrative on climate change, are unsurprising to anyone familiar with the prevalence of dissent in the scientific community.

Continued Only 50% Of Scientists Blame Mankind for Climate Change In New Study

Sexy Girls Teasing
Tags: None
2MuchMark

Mark of 2Much.net

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 50969
Share

Post
#2

11-21-2014, 09:54 PM
Comment
Blingbaby

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2006

Posts: 1079
Share

Post
#3

11-21-2014, 10:04 PM

Too bad the world has always been full of ignorant egomaniacs with a "Mongols? What mongols?" attitude and the rest of us pay the price.
Comment
suesheboy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 5211
Share

Post
#4

11-22-2014, 03:17 AM

Glad they consulted the farmers. No better way to get quality scientific analysis of world wide data.

Let's through every other major study I have seen and throw it to the wind and now say about half of all scientists question global warming.

The consequence of scientist being wrong about man made carbon, and that it is not that much of a factor and we are spending some money making the air freer of other pollutants as well is minimal.

The consequence of doing nothing and increasing acidification alone is planet changing - forget about weather changing. Not even talking about areal solids and heavy metals.

The only losers in cleaning up the environment are those that make money getting it dirty and can't figure out how to profit from making it better.

Adult Web Site Domain Names For Sale
Adult Sex Toy Domain Names For Sale
Tantric Delights, Sex Toys Blog, Tantric Sex Toys
Comment
wehateporn

Promoting Debate on GFY

Join Date: Apr 2007

Posts: 27176
Share

Post
#5

11-22-2014, 03:44 AM

There's no harm in cleaning things up, just look closer at the proposed taxes, that's what this is really about, a scam and one that will be incredibly hard to reverse. This isn't about cleaning up the world at all, it's about more money, power and control for the Elite

Originally posted by suesheboy

Glad they consulted the farmers. No better way to get quality scientific analysis of world wide data.

Let's through every other major study I have seen and throw it to the wind and now say about half of all scientists question global warming.

The consequence of scientist being wrong about man made carbon, and that it is not that much of a factor and we are spending some money making the air freer of other pollutants as well is minimal.

The consequence of doing nothing and increasing acidification alone is planet changing - forget about weather changing. Not even talking about areal solids and heavy metals.

The only losers in cleaning up the environment are those that make money getting it dirty and can't figure out how to profit from making it better.

Sexy Girls Teasing
Comment
Barry-xlovecam

It's 42

Join Date: Jun 2010

Posts: 18083
Share

Post
#6

11-22-2014, 03:57 AM

Interesting finding published by the University of Wisconsin I read the other day:

Each year, the planet balances its budget. The carbon dioxide absorbed by plants in the spring and summer as they convert solar energy into food is released back to the atmosphere in autumn and winter. Levels of the greenhouse gas fall, only to rise again.

But the budget has gotten bigger. Over the last five decades, the magnitude of this rise and fall has grown nearly 50 percent in the Northern Hemisphere, as the amount of the greenhouse gas taken in and released has increased. Now, new research shows that humans and their crops have a lot to do with it, highlighting the profound impact people have on the Earth’s atmosphere. ...

Crops play a major role in the annual CO2 cycle increase

High yield crops, corn in particular, act like a co2 sponge, then after the crop is harvested, the co2 is no longer sucked up -- the carbon-footprint gets larger. Nothing wrong in reducing the carbon emmissions of the world but this being the 'end of the world' is a bit much.
Comment
aka123

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2014

Posts: 4450
Share

Post
#7

11-22-2014, 04:25 AM

"While 90 percent of scientists and climatologists surveyed thought the climate was changing, only about 50.4 percent contended that humans were the primary cause of these changes. - See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/sean-long/2014/11/20/only-50-scientists-blame-mankind-climate-change-new-study#sthash.T5kMMTX8.dpuf"

Wrong question. Wrong conclusions. Wrong title.

The real question is that "What is humans impact to climate." Especially as most of the predicted changes are bound to happen in the future. And you guys get stuck in the starting line arguing all kinds of shit based on the first step.
Comment
bronco67

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2006

Posts: 29032
Share

Post
#8

11-22-2014, 04:32 AM

I always get my news from right slanted, bigoted fear mongering news rag websites.

Why is anyone entertaining anything written on that site? Go to the home page and look at some of the headlines. It's for kooks like the OP -- and old people who hate where their country is going.

Why is it a conservative idea to not believe what is happening with the climate? What is it about that issue that makes you turn your brain off?
Comment
Joshua G

dumb libs love censorship

Join Date: Jul 2008

Posts: 8198
Share

Post
#9

11-22-2014, 05:11 AM

whatever dorks. as long as the human population grows on the exponential curve, there will be consequences to all planetary resources & habitats in a variety of ways, climate change being just 1 of numerous issues.

but as i never hear the shrill voices of climate change ever propose any curbs to making babies, i cannot take their solutions seriously. there is no tech solution to exponential population growths impact on the planet.
Comment
wehateporn

Promoting Debate on GFY

Join Date: Apr 2007

Posts: 27176
Share

Post
#10

11-22-2014, 05:30 AM

Population reduction is happening covertly, this man is one of the key controllers of the UN, he's currently got the WHO pushing a number of mass vaccination programs around the world, these vaccines are designed to reduce/harm fertility

Originally posted by Joshua G

whatever dorks. as long as the human population grows on the exponential curve, there will be consequences to all planetary resources & habitats in a variety of ways, climate change being just 1 of numerous issues.

but as i never hear the shrill voices of climate change ever propose any curbs to making babies, i cannot take their solutions seriously. there is no tech solution to exponential population growths impact on the planet.

Sexy Girls Teasing
Comment
MaDalton

I am Amazing Content!

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 39861
Share

Post
#11

11-22-2014, 10:11 AM

EPA Barred From Getting Advice From Scientists | IFLScience

'nuff said

AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com
Comment
2MuchMark

Mark of 2Much.net

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 50969
Share

Post
#12

11-22-2014, 10:18 AM

Originally posted by wehateporn

Rather than claiming 97 percent of scientists believe in man-made global warming, hopefully now some media outlets will revise that number closer to 50 percent.

So then, do nothing?

Originally posted by wehateporn

There's no harm in cleaning things up, just look closer at the proposed taxes, that's what this is really about, a scam and one that will be incredibly hard to reverse. This isn't about cleaning up the world at all, it's about more money, power and control for the Elite

So then, do nothing?

Originally posted by Joshua G

whatever dorks. as long as the human population grows on the exponential curve, there will be consequences to all planetary resources & habitats in a variety of ways, climate change being just 1 of numerous issues.

but as i never hear the shrill voices of climate change ever propose any curbs to making babies, i cannot take their solutions seriously. there is no tech solution to exponential population growths impact on the planet.

So then, do nothing?

Originally posted by MaDalton

EPA Barred From Getting Advice From Scientists | IFLScience

'nuff said

No. Fucking. Way. No way no way no way... is this true? Holy shit... if this is really true, the US is clearly fucked. "Make Science Illegal". Wow. Just fucking wow...
Comment
aka123

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2014

Posts: 4450
Share

Post
#13

11-22-2014, 10:24 AM

Originally posted by MaDalton

EPA Barred From Getting Advice From Scientists | IFLScience

'nuff said

"More insidiously, research scientists are barred under the act from advising on any topic that might ?directly or indirectly involve review and evaluation of their own work?. In other words, the only people barred from advising the EPA on a particular chemical are those who have actually studied its toxicity or effect on the environment."

In other words: ban those who have the best information regarding the subject.
Comment
Paz

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2012

Posts: 457
Share

Post
#14

11-22-2014, 11:15 AM

For as long as I can remember now I've been hearing the warmest, the coldest, there wettest and the dryest.... weather since.. and I know something's up.

I'm also a postgraduate scientist and can tell you statistical "proof" is an elusive goal. For many scientists there's not quite enough proof that the current weather patterns are man made and not part of a natural cycle.

Weather patterns are too complex to model scientifically and we'll all be either treading water or drinking our own piss before the scientists shout "eureka"

Too many politicians and counties have a short-term view of the world or have other priorities eg growth and I'm really pessimistic about our prospects.
Comment
Robbie

Leaner, Meaner, Faster

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 20960
Share

Post
#15

11-22-2014, 11:15 AM

So...all the alarmists in here are arguing all over the place without addressing whether or not the media has made up the "97% of all scientists" number.

Where does that number come from?

It just seems shady to me. Especially when many scientists have already said the computer generated models from 2000 that predicted man made climate change were based on data that no longer holds. G.I.G.O. (garbage in, garbage out)

Can someone please provide a link that isn't a conservative or liberal slanted site that has an actual poll of all the scientists in the world and how many believe that mankind has the power to destroy the world through a gas that we exhale everytime we breath?

-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Comment

Previous 1 2 3 template Next

Working...