Why age checks on porn sites will do more harm than good

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DVTimes
    xxx
    • Jun 2003
    • 31658

    #1

    Business Why age checks on porn sites will do more harm than good

    Earlier this year, the Authority for Television on Demand demanded that UK porn websites be forced to check all users are over 18 in an attempt to stop children accessing adult material. To give their clarion call added panic, they claimed that one in 20 visitors to porn sites are aged under 18.

    [LINK]
    XXX
  • VIXEN ESCORTS
    Confirmed User
    • Oct 2003
    • 1103

    #2
    Is this your sister DVT ?

    Comment

    • bronco67
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Dec 2006
      • 29032

      #3
      People who mandate age checks probably love that porn sites are hurt by it.

      it's probably the whole point of it in the first place.

      Comment

      • slapass
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Nov 2002
        • 14625

        #4
        They don't do more harm then good. This is a dumb argument. Anyone would agree that allowing underage children to access hardcore porn is not good for them. How can you even think of taking the other side accept on the freedom of speech argument?

        Comment

        • Best-In-BC
          Confirmed User
          • Jun 2002
          • 9511

          #5
          Well, I personally been viewing porn since I became a teenager and I have no ill effects, that being said I dont want people under 18 looking at my sites but I really dont think its harmful nor is there any evidence it is. Also, good luck stopping it, its the parents job and its damn near impossible if you dont want your teenager looking at it.
          Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More
          Unparked domains burning a hole in your pocket? 5 Simple Ways to Make Easy $$$ from Unused Domains

          Comment

          • BlackCrayon
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Jun 2003
            • 19634

            #6
            Originally posted by slapass
            They don't do more harm then good. This is a dumb argument. Anyone would agree that allowing underage children to access hardcore porn is not good for them. How can you even think of taking the other side accept on the freedom of speech argument?
            it all seems pointless unless its a global thing. as a parent i intend to do all i can to keep my kids from watching porn online. i am not going to fool myself into thinking that someone else is going to do it for me.
            you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

            Comment

            • tony286
              lurker
              • Aug 2002
              • 57021

              #7
              I dont know, you get rid of the spontaneous buyer but on the other hand if they use credit cards for id. You got traffic that are all pre qualified buyers.

              Comment

              • L-Pink
                working on my tan
                • Mar 2005
                • 39151

                #8
                Originally posted by slapass
                They don't do more harm then good. This is a dumb argument. Anyone would agree that allowing underage children to access hardcore porn is not good for them. How can you even think of taking the other side accept on the freedom of speech argument?
                Gotta agree.

                Comment

                • MaDalton
                  I am Amazing Content!
                  • Feb 2004
                  • 39861

                  #9
                  we had this discussion in Germany like 12-13 years ago, nothing anyone says I haven't heard already.

                  i wish there was no hardcore porn without age check anywhere on the internet
                  AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
                  Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
                  Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
                  Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

                  Comment

                  • Tubevideditor
                    Confirmed User
                    • Sep 2013
                    • 352

                    #10
                    I still find it odd how at 16 you can have sex and marry, have kids, but you're not allowed to view a pic of a naked women if she has her legs spread.

                    Comment

                    • shoot twice
                      Confirmed User
                      • Sep 2014
                      • 517

                      #11
                      If it's about business then it depends on what side of the fence you make your money on.

                      If you're in production you want the age checks. Because they'll ultimately be a problem for the tube sites. Not to mention that pirate porn forums will come under more government scrutiny.


                      But tube site owners and other distributors of free porn will hate the age checks.

                      Now if we're talking about ethics.
                      Then porn is like smokes, booze, drugs or guns and it should be kept out of the hands of children.
                      "A slightly exposed shoulder emerging from a long silk nightgown packs more sex than two bodies naked in bed." - Bette Davis

                      I'm a shooter and I do business in private and I only take CASH.
                      PS I'm impossible to troll.

                      Comment

                      • VSKevin
                        Confirmed User
                        • Apr 2013
                        • 885

                        #12
                        Originally posted by shoot twice
                        If it's about business then it depends on what side of the fence you make your money on.

                        If you're in production you want the age checks. Because they'll ultimately be a problem for the tube sites. Not to mention that pirate porn forums will come under more government scrutiny.


                        But tube site owners and other distributors of free porn will hate the age checks.

                        Now if we're talking about ethics.
                        Then porn is like smokes, booze, drugs or guns and it should be kept out of the hands of children.
                        Kevin Saeko

                        Skype: kevin.saeko
                        Email: kevin[at]flirt4free[dot]com


                        Comment

                        • sarah_teamcmp
                          Registered User
                          • Mar 2012
                          • 29

                          #13
                          This is a great point.

                          Originally posted by Tubevideditor
                          I still find it odd how at 16 you can have sex and marry, have kids, but you're not allowed to view a pic of a naked women if she has her legs spread.

                          Comment

                          Working...